he case of illicit relationships and the penalty that would need to be paid – which did not align with the view of R. Nechuniyah ben HaKaneh. He draws the connection to a shabbat violation that comes together with a monetary penalty, and how the perpetrator is only obligated on one punishment (and how Abaye and Rava understand his approach). Also, what happens if a zar decides to eat terumah (a karet violation), and stole it from a kohen – shouldn’t he be exempt from paying for terumah because of the more extreme punishment. But what if you could get the terumah back? What if the terumah was liquid terumah??
Click here for the Talking Talmud podcast on Ketubot 30.
To listen: Click the link above. Or subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Or join the Talking Talmud WhatsApp group, and receive the link as soon as it goes up.
Please like our Facebook page and join our conversation there: <a href="https://www.facebook.com/Talking-Talmud-113324056898191/" target="_blank" rel="noopener
