3 mishnayot! The case of a man who eats in his father-in-law’s home in Yehudah, specifically, after betrothal, and with no witnesses that the betrothed couple was not along together… the husband-to-be can no longer make a claim against the wife’s virginity. With the location being key. Also, how the kehunah has impact on the ketubah value. Also, when a husband brings a complaint against his wife’s virginity, and she maintains that she was raped after the betrothal – which he doesn’t accept. The mishnah presents two strong opinions, and the Gemara tackles the question via examples elsewhere in Halakhah. || Talmud Principles on This Daf: minhag hamakom, bari ve-shema, migo.
To listen: Click the link above. Or subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Or join the Talking Talmud WhatsApp group, and receive the link as soon as it goes up.
Please like our Facebook page and join our conversation there: <a href=”https://www.facebook.com/Talking-Talmud-113324056898191/” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener