Avodah Zarah 55
Share this shiur:
Masechet Avodah Zarah
Masechet Avodah Zarah is sponsored by the Talmud class of Congregation Beth Jacob in Redwood City, CA, in honor of the Hadran staff who make learning possible.
This month’s learning is sponsored by Jonathan Loring in honor of his wife, Leah Ackner and their children Zev and Meira. “From the first day I met my wife in Hebrew class at JTS to watching her show kindness when we volunteered together to help those in need and even when I had to wait 9 years for a first date, my wife has always been an inspiration to me and everyone she meets. Thank you for these 20 years and B’Ezrat Hashem to many more! I love you wifesy.”
This month’s learning is dedicated for a refuah shleima for Pesha Etel bat Sarah
This week’s learning is sponsored by Robert and Paula Cohen in loving memory of Chaim Avraham HaKohen ben Alter Gershon HaKohen.
Want to dedicate learning? Get started here:
Today’s daily daf tools:
Masechet Avodah Zarah
Masechet Avodah Zarah is sponsored by the Talmud class of Congregation Beth Jacob in Redwood City, CA, in honor of the Hadran staff who make learning possible.
This month’s learning is sponsored by Jonathan Loring in honor of his wife, Leah Ackner and their children Zev and Meira. “From the first day I met my wife in Hebrew class at JTS to watching her show kindness when we volunteered together to help those in need and even when I had to wait 9 years for a first date, my wife has always been an inspiration to me and everyone she meets. Thank you for these 20 years and B’Ezrat Hashem to many more! I love you wifesy.”
This month’s learning is dedicated for a refuah shleima for Pesha Etel bat Sarah
This week’s learning is sponsored by Robert and Paula Cohen in loving memory of Chaim Avraham HaKohen ben Alter Gershon HaKohen.
Avodah Zarah 55
״אָסֹף אָסֵף כֹּל מֵעַל פְּנֵי הָאֲדָמָה נְאֻם ה׳, אָסֵף אָדָם וּבְהֵמָה אָסֵף עוֹף הַשָּׁמַיִם וּדְגֵי הַיָּם וְהַמַּכְשֵׁלוֹת אֶת הָרְשָׁעִים [וְגוֹ׳]״, וְכִי מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהָרְשָׁעִים נִכְשָׁלִים בָּהֶן יְאַבְּדֵם מִן הָעוֹלָם? וַהֲלֹא לְאָדָם הֵן עוֹבְדִין, ״וְהִכְרַתִּי אֶת הָאָדָם מֵעַל פְּנֵי הָאֲדָמָה [וְגוֹ׳]״.
“Shall I utterly consume all things from off the face of the earth? says the Lord. Shall I consume man and beast? Shall I consume the fowls of the heavens and the fish of the sea, and the stumbling blocks of the wicked, and shall I cut off man from off the face of the earth? says the Lord” (Zephaniah 1:2–3). Should God remove objects of idol worship from the world due to the fact that the wicked stumble because of them? If so, He would have to destroy all of humanity as well, as do not idol worshippers also worship people? This is expressed in the continuation of the verse: “And shall I cut off man from off the face of the earth? says the Lord.”
שָׁאַל אַגְרִיפַּס שַׂר צָבָא אֶת רַבָּן גַּמְלִיאֵל: כְּתִיב בְּתוֹרַתְכֶם: ״כִּי ה׳ אֱלֹהֶיךָ אֵשׁ אֹכְלָה הוּא אֵל קַנָּא״, כְּלוּם מִתְקַנֵּא אֶלָּא חָכָם בְּחָכָם, וְגִבּוֹר בְּגִבּוֹר, וְעָשִׁיר בְּעָשִׁיר?
§ Agrippas the general asked Rabban Gamliel: It is written in your Torah with regard to idol worship: “For the Lord your God is a devouring fire, a jealous God” (Deuteronomy 4:24). Doesn’t jealousy arise only in the following cases: A wise man might be jealous of another wise man, and a mighty man might be jealous of another mighty man, and a rich man might be jealous of another rich man? If so, why is God jealous of objects of idol worship, which are not gods?
אָמַר לוֹ: אֶמְשׁוֹל לְךָ מָשָׁל, לְמָה הַדָּבָר דּוֹמֶה? לְאָדָם שֶׁנָּשָׂא אִשָּׁה עַל אִשְׁתּוֹ, חֲשׁוּבָה מִמֶּנָּה — אֵין מִתְקַנְּאָה בָּהּ, פְּחוּתָה מִמֶּנָּה — מִתְקַנְּאָה בָּהּ.
Rabban Gamliel said to Agrippas: I will relate a parable to you. To what is this matter comparable? It can be compared to a person who married a second wife in addition to his first wife. If the second wife is more distinguished than the first wife, the first wife is not jealous of her, and she does not feel anger toward her husband. But if the second wife is less distinguished than the first wife, she is jealous of her.
אֲמַר לֵיהּ זוּנִין לְרַבִּי עֲקִיבָא: לִבִּי וְלִבָּךְ יָדַע דַּעֲבוֹדָה זָרָה לֵית בַּהּ מְשָׁשָׁא, וְהָא קָחָזֵינַן גַּבְרֵי דְּאָזְלִי כִּי מְתַבְּרִי וְאָתוּ כִּי מְצַמְּדִי! מַאי טַעְמָא?
Zunin said to Rabbi Akiva: Both my heart and your heart know that there is no substance to idol worship. Nevertheless, don’t we see people who go with broken limbs to worship idols and come back when they are whole? What is the reason for this?
אָמַר לוֹ: אֶמְשׁוֹל לְךָ מָשָׁל, לְמָה הַדָּבָר דּוֹמֶה? לְאָדָם נֶאֱמָן שֶׁהָיָה בָּעִיר, וְכׇל בְּנֵי עִירוֹ הָיוּ מַפְקִידִין אֶצְלוֹ שֶׁלֹּא בְּעֵדִים, וּבָא אָדָם אֶחָד וְהִפְקִיד לוֹ בְּעֵדִים. פַּעַם אֶחָד שָׁכַח וְהִפְקִיד אֶצְלוֹ שֶׁלֹּא בְּעֵדִים, אָמְרָה לוֹ אִשְׁתּוֹ: בּוֹא וְנִכְפְּרֶנּוּ, אָמַר לָהּ: וְכִי מִפְּנֵי שֶׁשּׁוֹטֶה זֶה עָשָׂה שֶׁלֹּא כַּהוֹגֶן אָנוּ נְאַבֵּד אֶת אֱמוּנָתֵינוּ?
Rabbi Akiva said to Zunin: I will relate a parable to you. To what is this matter comparable? It can be compared to a trusted person who was in a certain city, and all the residents of his city would deposit items and money with him, even not in the presence of witnesses. And there was one man who did not trust him, who came and specifically deposited money with him in the presence of witnesses. On one occasion, that person forgot and deposited money with him not in the presence of witnesses. The trusted man’s wife said to him: Come, let us deny that he deposited the money with us, as there are no witnesses. The man said to her: Should we lose our credibility and act deceitfully just because this fool acted improperly and did not require the presence of witnesses?
אַף כָּךְ יִסּוּרִין, בְּשָׁעָה שֶׁמְּשַׁגְּרִין אוֹתָן עַל הָאָדָם, מַשְׁבִּיעִין אוֹתָן: שֶׁלֹּא תֵּלְכוּ אֶלָּא בְּיוֹם פְּלוֹנִי, וְלֹא תֵּצְאוּ אֶלָּא בְּיוֹם פְּלוֹנִי וּבְשָׁעָה פְּלוֹנִית, וְעַל יְדֵי פְּלוֹנִי וְעַל יְדֵי סַם פְּלוֹנִי. כֵּיוָן שֶׁהִגִּיעַ זְמַנָּן לָצֵאת, הָלַךְ זֶה לְבֵית עֲבוֹדָה זָרָה, אָמְרוּ יִסּוּרִין: דִּין הוּא שֶׁלֹּא נֵצֵא, וְחוֹזְרִין וְאוֹמְרִים: וְכִי מִפְּנֵי שֶׁשּׁוֹטֶה זֶה עוֹשֶׂה שֶׁלֹּא כַּהוֹגֶן אָנוּ נְאַבֵּד שְׁבוּעָתֵנוּ?
So too, with regard to different forms of suffering, at the time when they are sent to afflict the person, an oath is administered to them as follows: Take an oath that you shall not go and afflict the person except on such and such a day. And you shall not leave him except on such and such a day, at such and such an hour, by means of so-and-so, a specific doctor, and by means of such and such a medicine. When the time came for the suffering to leave him, this sick man went to a temple of idol worship. The forms of suffering said: By right we should not leave him. But then they say: Should we lose the fulfillment of our oath just because this fool is acting improperly?
וְהַיְינוּ דְּאָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: מַאי דִּכְתִיב ״וׇחֳלָיִם רָעִים וְנֶאֱמָנִים״? רָעִים בִּשְׁלִיחוּתָן, וְנֶאֱמָנִים בִּשְׁבוּעָתָן.
And this is consistent with that which Rabbi Yoḥanan says: What is the meaning of that which is written: “Then the Lord will make your plagues wonderful, and the plagues of your seed, even great plagues and faithful, and evil and faithful sicknesses” (Deuteronomy 28:59)? The term “evil” does not mean that the agent of sickness is in itself evil. Rather, this is referring to its mission, which is to cause harm. The term “and faithful sicknesses” indicates that the illnesses are faithful to their oath and adhere to the times designated for the affliction.
אֲמַר לֵיהּ רָבָא בַּר רַב יִצְחָק לְרַב יְהוּדָה: הָאִיכָּא בֵּית עֲבוֹדָה זָרָה בְּאַתְרִין, דְּכִי מִצְטְרִיךְ עָלְמָא לְמִטְרָא, מִתְחֲזֵי לְהוּ בְּחֶלְמָא וְאָמַר לְהוּ: שַׁחֲטוּ לִי גַּבְרָא וְאַיְיתֵי מִטְרָא — שָׁחֲטוּ לַהּ גַּבְרָא וְאָתֵי מִטְרָא!
Rava bar Rav Yitzḥak said to Rav Yehuda: Isn’t there a temple of idol worship in our locale, where, when the world is in need of rain, the idol appears to them in a dream, and it says to them: Slaughter a man as an offering to me, and I will bring rain. They then slaughter a man for it, and the rain comes.
אֲמַר לֵיהּ: הַשְׁתָּא (אִי הֲוַי) [אִיכּוֹ] שָׁכֵיבְנָא, לָא אֲמַרִי לְכוּ הָא מִלְּתָא, דְּאָמַר רַב: מַאי דִּכְתִיב ״אֲשֶׁר חָלַק ה׳ אֱלֹהֶיךָ אֹתָם לְכֹל הָעַמִּים״? מְלַמֵּד שֶׁהֶחְלִיקָן בִּדְבָרִים, כְּדֵי לְטוֹרְדָן מִן הָעוֹלָם.
Rav Yehuda said to Rava bar Rav Yitzḥak: Now, were I dead I would not have been able to tell you the explanation of this matter. It is therefore good that you reminded me of this matter while I am alive. The explanation is as Rav says: What is the meaning of that which is written: “And lest you lift up your eyes to the heavens, and when you see the sun and the moon and the stars, even all the host of heavens, you are drawn away and worship them, and serve them, which the Lord your God has allotted [ḥalak] to all the nations under the whole heaven” (Deuteronomy 4:19). The verse teaches that God allowed the nations to be misled [sheheḥelikan] by matters that seemingly indicate that idol worship is effective in order to expel the nations from the world due to their decision to engage in idol worship.
וְהַיְינוּ דְּאָמַר רֵישׁ לָקִישׁ: מַאי דִּכְתִיב ״אִם לַלֵּצִים הוּא יָלִיץ וְלַעֲנָוִים יִתֶּן חֵן״? בָּא לִטַּמֵּא — פּוֹתְחִין לוֹ, בָּא לִטָּהֵר — מְסַיְּיעִין אוֹתוֹ.
And this is consistent with that which Reish Lakish says: What is the meaning of that which is written: “If it concerns the scornful, He scorns them, but to the humble He gives grace” (Proverbs 3:34)? One who comes in order to become impure, i.e., to sin, they, in Heaven, provide him with an opening to do so, and he is not prevented from sinning. If one comes in order to become purified, not only is he allowed to do so, but they, in Heaven, assist him.
מַתְנִי׳ לוֹקְחִין גַּת בְּעוּטָה מִן הַנׇּכְרִי, אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁהוּא נוֹטֵל בְּיָדוֹ וְנוֹתֵן לַתַּפּוּחַ, וְאֵינוֹ עוֹשֶׂה יֵין נֶסֶךְ עַד שֶׁיֵּרֵד לַבּוֹר. יָרַד לַבּוֹר — מַה שֶּׁבַּבּוֹר אָסוּר, וְהַשְּׁאָר מוּתָּר.
MISHNA: One may purchase from a gentile a winepress in which the grapes have been trodden on, despite the fact that the gentile takes grapes in his hand from the winepress and places them on the pile that remains to be trodden on. And the gentile’s touch does not render the juice of the grapes into wine used for a libation in idol worship, which is forbidden, until it descends into the collection vat, because until then it does not have the status of wine. Once the wine descended into the collection vat, that which is in the vat is prohibited, and the rest, which did not yet descend into the vat, is permitted.
דּוֹרְכִין עִם הַנׇּכְרִי בַּגַּת,
One may tread on grapes together with the gentile in the winepress,
אֲבָל לֹא בּוֹצְרִין עִמּוֹ. יִשְׂרָאֵל שֶׁהוּא עוֹשֶׂה בְּטוּמְאָה — לֹא דּוֹרְכִין וְלֹא בּוֹצְרִין עִמּוֹ, אֲבָל מוֹלִיכִין עִמּוֹ חָבִיּוֹת לַגַּת, וּמְבִיאִין עִמּוֹ מִן הַגַּת.
but one may not harvest grapes with him. After the harvest the grapes are brought to the winepress, which is ritually impure. This would render the grapes impure, and it is prohibited to render produce of Eretz Yisrael impure. In the case of a Jew who produces his wine in a state of ritual impurity, one may not tread on grapes nor harvest them with him, as it is prohibited to assist transgressors. But once he has produced his wine, one may take the barrels to the winepress with him, as the wine is already impure. And one may also bring the barrels from the winepress together with him.
נַחְתּוֹם שֶׁהוּא עוֹשֶׂה בְּטוּמְאָה — לֹא לָשִׁין וְלֹא עוֹרְכִין עִמּוֹ, אֲבָל מוֹלִיכִין עִמּוֹ פַּת לְפַלְטֵר.
Similarly, in the case of a baker who makes his bread in a state of ritual impurity, one may not knead or arrange the dough in the shape of bread together with him, so as not to assist in a transgression. But one may take the bread with him to the bread merchant [lapalter].
גְּמָ׳ אָמַר רַב הוּנָא: יַיִן, כֵּיוָן שֶׁהִתְחִיל לְהִמָּשֵׁךְ, עוֹשֶׂה יֵין נֶסֶךְ. תְּנַן: לוֹקְחִים גַּת בְּעוּטָה מִן הַנׇּכְרִי, וְאַף עַל פִּי שֶׁנָּטַל בְּיָדוֹ וְנָתַן לַתַּפּוּחַ! אָמַר רַב הוּנָא: בְּגַת פְּקוּקָה וּמְלֵאָה.
GEMARA: Rav Huna says: With regard to wine, once it begins to flow toward the exit from the winepress it can become wine used for a libation in idol worship if touched by a gentile. The Gemara asks: But we learned in the mishna: One may purchase from a gentile a winepress in which the grapes have been trodden on, despite the fact that the gentile took grapes in his hand and placed them on the pile of grapes that remained to be trodden on? Presumably the wine began to flow once the grapes were pressed, and yet the mishna states that the wine is not forbidden. Rav Huna said: The mishna is referring to a winepress that is stoppered and full, and therefore the wine does not flow.
תָּא שְׁמַע, וְאֵינוֹ עוֹשֶׂה יֵין נֶסֶךְ עַד שֶׁיֵּרֵד לַבּוֹר! הָכָא נָמֵי בְּגַת פְּקוּקָה וּמְלֵאָה.
The Gemara suggests: Come and hear a proof from the mishna: And the gentile’s touch does not render the grape juice wine used for a libation in idol worship until it descends into the collection vat. This indicates that even if the wine flows it does not become wine used for a libation before it descends into the vat. The Gemara answers: Here, too, the mishna is referring to a winepress that is stoppered and full, and the wine does not flow.
תָּא שְׁמַע: יָרַד לַבּוֹר — מָה שֶׁבַּבּוֹר אָסוּר, וְהַשְּׁאָר מוּתָּר. אָמַר רַב הוּנָא: לָא קַשְׁיָא — כָּאן בְּמִשְׁנָה רִאשׁוֹנָה, כָּאן בְּמִשְׁנָה אַחֲרוֹנָה.
The Gemara suggests: Come and hear a proof from the mishna: Once the wine descended into the collection vat, that which is in the vat is prohibited, and the rest that did not yet descend into the vat is permitted, even though it already began to flow. Rav Huna said: This is not difficult. Here, in the mishna, the halakha is stated in accordance with the initial version of the mishna. There, in my ruling, the halakha is stated in accordance with the ultimate version of the mishna.
דְּתַנְיָא: בָּרִאשׁוֹנָה הָיוּ אוֹמְרִים בד״ד — אֵין בּוֹצְרִין עִם הַנׇּכְרִי בַּגַּת, שֶׁאָסוּר לִגְרוֹם טוּמְאָה לְחוּלִּין שֶׁבְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל, וְאֵין דּוֹרְכִין עִם יִשְׂרָאֵל שֶׁעוֹשֶׂה פֵּירוֹתָיו בְּטוּמְאָה, שֶׁאָסוּר לְסַיֵּיעַ יְדֵי עוֹבְרֵי עֲבֵירָה, אֲבָל דּוֹרְכִים עִם הַנׇּכְרִי בַּגַּת, וְלָא חָיְישִׁינַן לִדְרַב הוּנָא.
This is as it is taught in a baraita: Initially, the Sages would say the following halakhot whose mnemonic is bet, dalet, dalet, which stands for harvesting [botzrin], treading [dorkhin], and treading [dorkhin]: One may not harvest grapes with a gentile in order to bring them to the winepress, as this would render the grapes ritually impure and it is prohibited to impart impurity to the non-sacred produce that is in Eretz Yisrael. And one may not tread on grapes together with a Jew who produces wine from his fruit in a state of ritual impurity, as it is prohibited to assist transgressors. But one may tread on grapes in the winepress together with the gentile. The Gemara comments: And we are not concerned about the ruling of Rav Huna that from the time that it flows the wine is rendered wine used for a libation.
וְחָזְרוּ לוֹמַר דב״ב — אֵין דּוֹרְכִין עִם הַנׇּכְרִי בַּגַּת, מִשּׁוּם דְּרַב הוּנָא.
The baraita continues: But the Sages later revised this halakha and said the following halakhot whose mnemonic is dalet, beit, dalet, which stands for treading [dorkhin], harvesting [botzrin], and treading [dorkhin]: One may not tread on grapes in the winepress together with the gentile. The Gemara comments: This is due to the ruling of Rav Huna that from the time that it flows the wine can be rendered wine used for a libation. The gentile usually touches the flowing wine while treading on the grapes, rendering the wine forbidden. Therefore, if a Jew receives payment for treading on the grapes with the gentile, he is profiting from an item from which deriving benefit is prohibited.
Today’s daily daf tools:
Delve Deeper
Broaden your understanding of the topics on this daf with classes and podcasts from top women Talmud scholars.
New to Talmud?
Check out our resources designed to help you navigate a page of Talmud – and study at the pace, level and style that fits you.
The Hadran Women’s Tapestry
Meet the diverse women learning Gemara at Hadran and hear their stories.
With Rabbanit Dr. Naomi Cohen in the Women’s Talmud class, over 30 years ago. It was a “known” class and it was accepted, because of who taught. Since then I have also studied with Avigail Gross-Gelman and Dr. Gabriel Hazut for about a year). Years ago, in a shiur in my shul, I did know about Persians doing 3 things with their clothes on. They opened the shiur to woman after that!
Haifa, Israel
I started last year after completing the Pesach Sugiyot class. Masechet Yoma might seem like a difficult set of topics, but for me made Yom Kippur and the Beit HaMikdash come alive. Liturgy I’d always had trouble connecting with took on new meaning as I gained a sense of real people moving through specific spaces in particular ways. It was the perfect introduction; I am so grateful for Hadran!
Minnesota, United States
I learned Mishnayot more than twenty years ago and started with Gemara much later in life. Although I never managed to learn Daf Yomi consistently, I am learning since some years Gemara in depth and with much joy. Since last year I am studying at the International Halakha Scholars Program at the WIHL. I often listen to Rabbanit Farbers Gemara shiurim to understand better a specific sugyiah. I am grateful for the help and inspiration!
Berlin, Germany
I was exposed to Talmud in high school, but I was truly inspired after my daughter and I decided to attend the Women’s Siyum Shas in 2020. We knew that this was a historic moment. We were blown away, overcome with emotion at the euphoria of the revolution. Right then, I knew I would continue. My commitment deepened with the every-morning Virtual Beit Midrash on Zoom with R. Michelle.
Zichron Yaakov, Israel
After all the hype on the 2020 siyum I became inspired by a friend to begin learning as the new cycle began.with no background in studying Talmud it was a bit daunting in the beginning. my husband began at the same time so we decided to study on shabbat together. The reaction from my 3 daughters has been fantastic. They are very proud. It’s been a great challenge for my brain which is so healthy!
Modi’in, Israel
A few years back, after reading Ilana Kurshan’s book, “If All The Seas Were Ink,” I began pondering the crazy, outlandish idea of beginning the Daf Yomi cycle. Beginning in December, 2019, a month before the previous cycle ended, I “auditioned” 30 different podcasts in 30 days, and ultimately chose to take the plunge with Hadran and Rabbanit Michelle. Such joy!
HUNTINGTON, United States
I never thought I’d be able to do Daf Yomi till I saw the video of Hadran’s Siyum HaShas. Now, 2 years later, I’m about to participate in Siyum Seder Mo’ed with my Hadran community. It has been an incredible privilege to learn with Rabbanit Michelle and to get to know so many caring, talented and knowledgeable women. I look forward with great anticipation and excitement to learning Seder Nashim.
Karmiel, Israel
In early 2020, I began the process of a stem cell transplant. The required extreme isolation forced me to leave work and normal life but gave me time to delve into Jewish text study. I did not feel isolated. I began Daf Yomi at the start of this cycle, with family members joining me online from my hospital room. I’ve used my newly granted time to to engage, grow and connect through this learning.
Worcester, United States
Berlin, Germany
I began my journey two years ago at the beginning of this cycle of the daf yomi. It has been an incredible, challenging experience and has given me a new perspective of Torah Sh’baal Peh and the role it plays in our lives
Efrat, Israel
I started at the beginning of this cycle. No 1 reason, but here’s 5.
In 2019 I read about the upcoming siyum hashas.
There was a sermon at shul about how anyone can learn Talmud.
Talmud references come up when I am studying. I wanted to know more.
Yentl was on telly. Not a great movie but it’s about studying Talmud.
I went to the Hadran website: A new cycle is starting. I’m gonna do this
Cambridge, United Kingdom
I started the daf at the beginning of this cycle in January 2020. My husband, my children, grandchildren and siblings have been very supportive. As someone who learned and taught Tanach and mefarshim for many years, it has been an amazing adventure to complete the six sedarim of Mishnah, and now to study Talmud on a daily basis along with Rabbanit Michelle and the wonderful women of Hadran.
Jerusalem, Israel
I started learning Daf Yomi in January 2020 after watching my grandfather, Mayer Penstein z”l, finish shas with the previous cycle. My grandfather made learning so much fun was so proud that his grandchildren wanted to join him. I was also inspired by Ilana Kurshan’s book, If All the Seas Were Ink. Two years in, I can say that it has enriched my life in so many ways.
New York, United States
I decided to learn one masechet, Brachot, but quickly fell in love and never stopped! It has been great, everyone is always asking how it’s going and chering me on, and my students are always making sure I did the day’s daf.
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Blacksburg, United States
Los Angeles, United States
I was moved to tears by the Hadran Siyyum HaShas. I have learned Torah all my life, but never connected to learning Gemara on a regular basis until then. Seeing the sheer joy Talmud Torah at the siyyum, I felt compelled to be part of it, and I haven’t missed a day!
It’s not always easy, but it is so worthwhile, and it has strengthened my love of learning. It is part of my life now.
Beit Shemesh, Israel
When I began the previous cycle, I promised myself that if I stuck with it, I would reward myself with a trip to Israel. Little did I know that the trip would involve attending the first ever women’s siyum and being inspired by so many learners. I am now over 2 years into my second cycle and being part of this large, diverse, fascinating learning family has enhanced my learning exponentially.
Minnesota, United States
Ive been learning Gmara since 5th grade and always loved it. Have always wanted to do Daf Yomi and now with Michelle Farber’s online classes it made it much easier to do! Really enjoying the experience thank you!!
Neve Daniel, Israel
It happened without intent (so am I yotzei?!) – I watched the women’s siyum live and was so moved by it that the next morning, I tuned in to Rabbanit Michelle’s shiur, and here I am, still learning every day, over 2 years later. Some days it all goes over my head, but others I grasp onto an idea or a story, and I ‘get it’ and that’s the best feeling in the world. So proud to be a Hadran learner.
Zichron Yaakov, Israel
Avodah Zarah 55
״אָסֹף אָסֵף כֹּל מֵעַל פְּנֵי הָאֲדָמָה נְאֻם ה׳, אָסֵף אָדָם וּבְהֵמָה אָסֵף עוֹף הַשָּׁמַיִם וּדְגֵי הַיָּם וְהַמַּכְשֵׁלוֹת אֶת הָרְשָׁעִים [וְגוֹ׳]״, וְכִי מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהָרְשָׁעִים נִכְשָׁלִים בָּהֶן יְאַבְּדֵם מִן הָעוֹלָם? וַהֲלֹא לְאָדָם הֵן עוֹבְדִין, ״וְהִכְרַתִּי אֶת הָאָדָם מֵעַל פְּנֵי הָאֲדָמָה [וְגוֹ׳]״.
“Shall I utterly consume all things from off the face of the earth? says the Lord. Shall I consume man and beast? Shall I consume the fowls of the heavens and the fish of the sea, and the stumbling blocks of the wicked, and shall I cut off man from off the face of the earth? says the Lord” (Zephaniah 1:2–3). Should God remove objects of idol worship from the world due to the fact that the wicked stumble because of them? If so, He would have to destroy all of humanity as well, as do not idol worshippers also worship people? This is expressed in the continuation of the verse: “And shall I cut off man from off the face of the earth? says the Lord.”
שָׁאַל אַגְרִיפַּס שַׂר צָבָא אֶת רַבָּן גַּמְלִיאֵל: כְּתִיב בְּתוֹרַתְכֶם: ״כִּי ה׳ אֱלֹהֶיךָ אֵשׁ אֹכְלָה הוּא אֵל קַנָּא״, כְּלוּם מִתְקַנֵּא אֶלָּא חָכָם בְּחָכָם, וְגִבּוֹר בְּגִבּוֹר, וְעָשִׁיר בְּעָשִׁיר?
§ Agrippas the general asked Rabban Gamliel: It is written in your Torah with regard to idol worship: “For the Lord your God is a devouring fire, a jealous God” (Deuteronomy 4:24). Doesn’t jealousy arise only in the following cases: A wise man might be jealous of another wise man, and a mighty man might be jealous of another mighty man, and a rich man might be jealous of another rich man? If so, why is God jealous of objects of idol worship, which are not gods?
אָמַר לוֹ: אֶמְשׁוֹל לְךָ מָשָׁל, לְמָה הַדָּבָר דּוֹמֶה? לְאָדָם שֶׁנָּשָׂא אִשָּׁה עַל אִשְׁתּוֹ, חֲשׁוּבָה מִמֶּנָּה — אֵין מִתְקַנְּאָה בָּהּ, פְּחוּתָה מִמֶּנָּה — מִתְקַנְּאָה בָּהּ.
Rabban Gamliel said to Agrippas: I will relate a parable to you. To what is this matter comparable? It can be compared to a person who married a second wife in addition to his first wife. If the second wife is more distinguished than the first wife, the first wife is not jealous of her, and she does not feel anger toward her husband. But if the second wife is less distinguished than the first wife, she is jealous of her.
אֲמַר לֵיהּ זוּנִין לְרַבִּי עֲקִיבָא: לִבִּי וְלִבָּךְ יָדַע דַּעֲבוֹדָה זָרָה לֵית בַּהּ מְשָׁשָׁא, וְהָא קָחָזֵינַן גַּבְרֵי דְּאָזְלִי כִּי מְתַבְּרִי וְאָתוּ כִּי מְצַמְּדִי! מַאי טַעְמָא?
Zunin said to Rabbi Akiva: Both my heart and your heart know that there is no substance to idol worship. Nevertheless, don’t we see people who go with broken limbs to worship idols and come back when they are whole? What is the reason for this?
אָמַר לוֹ: אֶמְשׁוֹל לְךָ מָשָׁל, לְמָה הַדָּבָר דּוֹמֶה? לְאָדָם נֶאֱמָן שֶׁהָיָה בָּעִיר, וְכׇל בְּנֵי עִירוֹ הָיוּ מַפְקִידִין אֶצְלוֹ שֶׁלֹּא בְּעֵדִים, וּבָא אָדָם אֶחָד וְהִפְקִיד לוֹ בְּעֵדִים. פַּעַם אֶחָד שָׁכַח וְהִפְקִיד אֶצְלוֹ שֶׁלֹּא בְּעֵדִים, אָמְרָה לוֹ אִשְׁתּוֹ: בּוֹא וְנִכְפְּרֶנּוּ, אָמַר לָהּ: וְכִי מִפְּנֵי שֶׁשּׁוֹטֶה זֶה עָשָׂה שֶׁלֹּא כַּהוֹגֶן אָנוּ נְאַבֵּד אֶת אֱמוּנָתֵינוּ?
Rabbi Akiva said to Zunin: I will relate a parable to you. To what is this matter comparable? It can be compared to a trusted person who was in a certain city, and all the residents of his city would deposit items and money with him, even not in the presence of witnesses. And there was one man who did not trust him, who came and specifically deposited money with him in the presence of witnesses. On one occasion, that person forgot and deposited money with him not in the presence of witnesses. The trusted man’s wife said to him: Come, let us deny that he deposited the money with us, as there are no witnesses. The man said to her: Should we lose our credibility and act deceitfully just because this fool acted improperly and did not require the presence of witnesses?
אַף כָּךְ יִסּוּרִין, בְּשָׁעָה שֶׁמְּשַׁגְּרִין אוֹתָן עַל הָאָדָם, מַשְׁבִּיעִין אוֹתָן: שֶׁלֹּא תֵּלְכוּ אֶלָּא בְּיוֹם פְּלוֹנִי, וְלֹא תֵּצְאוּ אֶלָּא בְּיוֹם פְּלוֹנִי וּבְשָׁעָה פְּלוֹנִית, וְעַל יְדֵי פְּלוֹנִי וְעַל יְדֵי סַם פְּלוֹנִי. כֵּיוָן שֶׁהִגִּיעַ זְמַנָּן לָצֵאת, הָלַךְ זֶה לְבֵית עֲבוֹדָה זָרָה, אָמְרוּ יִסּוּרִין: דִּין הוּא שֶׁלֹּא נֵצֵא, וְחוֹזְרִין וְאוֹמְרִים: וְכִי מִפְּנֵי שֶׁשּׁוֹטֶה זֶה עוֹשֶׂה שֶׁלֹּא כַּהוֹגֶן אָנוּ נְאַבֵּד שְׁבוּעָתֵנוּ?
So too, with regard to different forms of suffering, at the time when they are sent to afflict the person, an oath is administered to them as follows: Take an oath that you shall not go and afflict the person except on such and such a day. And you shall not leave him except on such and such a day, at such and such an hour, by means of so-and-so, a specific doctor, and by means of such and such a medicine. When the time came for the suffering to leave him, this sick man went to a temple of idol worship. The forms of suffering said: By right we should not leave him. But then they say: Should we lose the fulfillment of our oath just because this fool is acting improperly?
וְהַיְינוּ דְּאָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: מַאי דִּכְתִיב ״וׇחֳלָיִם רָעִים וְנֶאֱמָנִים״? רָעִים בִּשְׁלִיחוּתָן, וְנֶאֱמָנִים בִּשְׁבוּעָתָן.
And this is consistent with that which Rabbi Yoḥanan says: What is the meaning of that which is written: “Then the Lord will make your plagues wonderful, and the plagues of your seed, even great plagues and faithful, and evil and faithful sicknesses” (Deuteronomy 28:59)? The term “evil” does not mean that the agent of sickness is in itself evil. Rather, this is referring to its mission, which is to cause harm. The term “and faithful sicknesses” indicates that the illnesses are faithful to their oath and adhere to the times designated for the affliction.
אֲמַר לֵיהּ רָבָא בַּר רַב יִצְחָק לְרַב יְהוּדָה: הָאִיכָּא בֵּית עֲבוֹדָה זָרָה בְּאַתְרִין, דְּכִי מִצְטְרִיךְ עָלְמָא לְמִטְרָא, מִתְחֲזֵי לְהוּ בְּחֶלְמָא וְאָמַר לְהוּ: שַׁחֲטוּ לִי גַּבְרָא וְאַיְיתֵי מִטְרָא — שָׁחֲטוּ לַהּ גַּבְרָא וְאָתֵי מִטְרָא!
Rava bar Rav Yitzḥak said to Rav Yehuda: Isn’t there a temple of idol worship in our locale, where, when the world is in need of rain, the idol appears to them in a dream, and it says to them: Slaughter a man as an offering to me, and I will bring rain. They then slaughter a man for it, and the rain comes.
אֲמַר לֵיהּ: הַשְׁתָּא (אִי הֲוַי) [אִיכּוֹ] שָׁכֵיבְנָא, לָא אֲמַרִי לְכוּ הָא מִלְּתָא, דְּאָמַר רַב: מַאי דִּכְתִיב ״אֲשֶׁר חָלַק ה׳ אֱלֹהֶיךָ אֹתָם לְכֹל הָעַמִּים״? מְלַמֵּד שֶׁהֶחְלִיקָן בִּדְבָרִים, כְּדֵי לְטוֹרְדָן מִן הָעוֹלָם.
Rav Yehuda said to Rava bar Rav Yitzḥak: Now, were I dead I would not have been able to tell you the explanation of this matter. It is therefore good that you reminded me of this matter while I am alive. The explanation is as Rav says: What is the meaning of that which is written: “And lest you lift up your eyes to the heavens, and when you see the sun and the moon and the stars, even all the host of heavens, you are drawn away and worship them, and serve them, which the Lord your God has allotted [ḥalak] to all the nations under the whole heaven” (Deuteronomy 4:19). The verse teaches that God allowed the nations to be misled [sheheḥelikan] by matters that seemingly indicate that idol worship is effective in order to expel the nations from the world due to their decision to engage in idol worship.
וְהַיְינוּ דְּאָמַר רֵישׁ לָקִישׁ: מַאי דִּכְתִיב ״אִם לַלֵּצִים הוּא יָלִיץ וְלַעֲנָוִים יִתֶּן חֵן״? בָּא לִטַּמֵּא — פּוֹתְחִין לוֹ, בָּא לִטָּהֵר — מְסַיְּיעִין אוֹתוֹ.
And this is consistent with that which Reish Lakish says: What is the meaning of that which is written: “If it concerns the scornful, He scorns them, but to the humble He gives grace” (Proverbs 3:34)? One who comes in order to become impure, i.e., to sin, they, in Heaven, provide him with an opening to do so, and he is not prevented from sinning. If one comes in order to become purified, not only is he allowed to do so, but they, in Heaven, assist him.
מַתְנִי׳ לוֹקְחִין גַּת בְּעוּטָה מִן הַנׇּכְרִי, אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁהוּא נוֹטֵל בְּיָדוֹ וְנוֹתֵן לַתַּפּוּחַ, וְאֵינוֹ עוֹשֶׂה יֵין נֶסֶךְ עַד שֶׁיֵּרֵד לַבּוֹר. יָרַד לַבּוֹר — מַה שֶּׁבַּבּוֹר אָסוּר, וְהַשְּׁאָר מוּתָּר.
MISHNA: One may purchase from a gentile a winepress in which the grapes have been trodden on, despite the fact that the gentile takes grapes in his hand from the winepress and places them on the pile that remains to be trodden on. And the gentile’s touch does not render the juice of the grapes into wine used for a libation in idol worship, which is forbidden, until it descends into the collection vat, because until then it does not have the status of wine. Once the wine descended into the collection vat, that which is in the vat is prohibited, and the rest, which did not yet descend into the vat, is permitted.
דּוֹרְכִין עִם הַנׇּכְרִי בַּגַּת,
One may tread on grapes together with the gentile in the winepress,
אֲבָל לֹא בּוֹצְרִין עִמּוֹ. יִשְׂרָאֵל שֶׁהוּא עוֹשֶׂה בְּטוּמְאָה — לֹא דּוֹרְכִין וְלֹא בּוֹצְרִין עִמּוֹ, אֲבָל מוֹלִיכִין עִמּוֹ חָבִיּוֹת לַגַּת, וּמְבִיאִין עִמּוֹ מִן הַגַּת.
but one may not harvest grapes with him. After the harvest the grapes are brought to the winepress, which is ritually impure. This would render the grapes impure, and it is prohibited to render produce of Eretz Yisrael impure. In the case of a Jew who produces his wine in a state of ritual impurity, one may not tread on grapes nor harvest them with him, as it is prohibited to assist transgressors. But once he has produced his wine, one may take the barrels to the winepress with him, as the wine is already impure. And one may also bring the barrels from the winepress together with him.
נַחְתּוֹם שֶׁהוּא עוֹשֶׂה בְּטוּמְאָה — לֹא לָשִׁין וְלֹא עוֹרְכִין עִמּוֹ, אֲבָל מוֹלִיכִין עִמּוֹ פַּת לְפַלְטֵר.
Similarly, in the case of a baker who makes his bread in a state of ritual impurity, one may not knead or arrange the dough in the shape of bread together with him, so as not to assist in a transgression. But one may take the bread with him to the bread merchant [lapalter].
גְּמָ׳ אָמַר רַב הוּנָא: יַיִן, כֵּיוָן שֶׁהִתְחִיל לְהִמָּשֵׁךְ, עוֹשֶׂה יֵין נֶסֶךְ. תְּנַן: לוֹקְחִים גַּת בְּעוּטָה מִן הַנׇּכְרִי, וְאַף עַל פִּי שֶׁנָּטַל בְּיָדוֹ וְנָתַן לַתַּפּוּחַ! אָמַר רַב הוּנָא: בְּגַת פְּקוּקָה וּמְלֵאָה.
GEMARA: Rav Huna says: With regard to wine, once it begins to flow toward the exit from the winepress it can become wine used for a libation in idol worship if touched by a gentile. The Gemara asks: But we learned in the mishna: One may purchase from a gentile a winepress in which the grapes have been trodden on, despite the fact that the gentile took grapes in his hand and placed them on the pile of grapes that remained to be trodden on? Presumably the wine began to flow once the grapes were pressed, and yet the mishna states that the wine is not forbidden. Rav Huna said: The mishna is referring to a winepress that is stoppered and full, and therefore the wine does not flow.
תָּא שְׁמַע, וְאֵינוֹ עוֹשֶׂה יֵין נֶסֶךְ עַד שֶׁיֵּרֵד לַבּוֹר! הָכָא נָמֵי בְּגַת פְּקוּקָה וּמְלֵאָה.
The Gemara suggests: Come and hear a proof from the mishna: And the gentile’s touch does not render the grape juice wine used for a libation in idol worship until it descends into the collection vat. This indicates that even if the wine flows it does not become wine used for a libation before it descends into the vat. The Gemara answers: Here, too, the mishna is referring to a winepress that is stoppered and full, and the wine does not flow.
תָּא שְׁמַע: יָרַד לַבּוֹר — מָה שֶׁבַּבּוֹר אָסוּר, וְהַשְּׁאָר מוּתָּר. אָמַר רַב הוּנָא: לָא קַשְׁיָא — כָּאן בְּמִשְׁנָה רִאשׁוֹנָה, כָּאן בְּמִשְׁנָה אַחֲרוֹנָה.
The Gemara suggests: Come and hear a proof from the mishna: Once the wine descended into the collection vat, that which is in the vat is prohibited, and the rest that did not yet descend into the vat is permitted, even though it already began to flow. Rav Huna said: This is not difficult. Here, in the mishna, the halakha is stated in accordance with the initial version of the mishna. There, in my ruling, the halakha is stated in accordance with the ultimate version of the mishna.
דְּתַנְיָא: בָּרִאשׁוֹנָה הָיוּ אוֹמְרִים בד״ד — אֵין בּוֹצְרִין עִם הַנׇּכְרִי בַּגַּת, שֶׁאָסוּר לִגְרוֹם טוּמְאָה לְחוּלִּין שֶׁבְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל, וְאֵין דּוֹרְכִין עִם יִשְׂרָאֵל שֶׁעוֹשֶׂה פֵּירוֹתָיו בְּטוּמְאָה, שֶׁאָסוּר לְסַיֵּיעַ יְדֵי עוֹבְרֵי עֲבֵירָה, אֲבָל דּוֹרְכִים עִם הַנׇּכְרִי בַּגַּת, וְלָא חָיְישִׁינַן לִדְרַב הוּנָא.
This is as it is taught in a baraita: Initially, the Sages would say the following halakhot whose mnemonic is bet, dalet, dalet, which stands for harvesting [botzrin], treading [dorkhin], and treading [dorkhin]: One may not harvest grapes with a gentile in order to bring them to the winepress, as this would render the grapes ritually impure and it is prohibited to impart impurity to the non-sacred produce that is in Eretz Yisrael. And one may not tread on grapes together with a Jew who produces wine from his fruit in a state of ritual impurity, as it is prohibited to assist transgressors. But one may tread on grapes in the winepress together with the gentile. The Gemara comments: And we are not concerned about the ruling of Rav Huna that from the time that it flows the wine is rendered wine used for a libation.
וְחָזְרוּ לוֹמַר דב״ב — אֵין דּוֹרְכִין עִם הַנׇּכְרִי בַּגַּת, מִשּׁוּם דְּרַב הוּנָא.
The baraita continues: But the Sages later revised this halakha and said the following halakhot whose mnemonic is dalet, beit, dalet, which stands for treading [dorkhin], harvesting [botzrin], and treading [dorkhin]: One may not tread on grapes in the winepress together with the gentile. The Gemara comments: This is due to the ruling of Rav Huna that from the time that it flows the wine can be rendered wine used for a libation. The gentile usually touches the flowing wine while treading on the grapes, rendering the wine forbidden. Therefore, if a Jew receives payment for treading on the grapes with the gentile, he is profiting from an item from which deriving benefit is prohibited.
