Search

Bava Batra 90

Want to dedicate learning? Get started here:

podcast placeholder

0:00
0:00




Summary

Today’s daf is sponsored by Judith Shapiro in loving memory of her mother, Deera Tychman, z”l, on her 11th yahrzeit. “She would have been very proud of her daughter, of her 4 grandchildren, and of her 8 great-grandchildren.”

What size measuring cups are not permitted for one to use as they can be used to trick the buyer? Shmuel ruled that one cannot change a particular size by increasing it by more than a sixth. The Gemara grapples to understand the reason for this ruling and offers three different suggestions, all of which are rejected. Ultimately, Rav Chisda explains that Shmuel derived this law from a verse in Yechezkel 45:12.

Rav Papa enlarged a measurement size by more than a sixth – how could he have done this in light of Shmuel’s ruling?

A braita rules that one cannot save up a lot of produce to sell later in the season, thus causing a shortage in the market and a rise in prices. But this applies only to one who purchases it for resale. One who grows the crops is permitted to store them.

Another braita distinguishes between storing produce that is an essential item that everyone buys and one that is not. If it is not essential, then one can store it and the aforementioned issue is no longer relevant as people who can’t afford it can manage without it.

A third braita rules that one cannot export oil, wine, and flour from Israel as these items are essential, and exporting them will cause a shortage in Israel and a rise in prices.

Today’s daily daf tools:

Bava Batra 90

וְעוּכְלָא. וְכַמָּה הִיא עוּכְלָא? אֶחָד מֵחֲמִשָּׁה בִּרְבִיעַ. וּבְמִדַּת הַלַּח הוּא עוֹשֶׂה הִין, וַחֲצִי הִין, וּשְׁלִישִׁית הַהִין, וּרְבִיעִית הַהִין, וְלוֹג, וַחֲצִי לוֹג, וּרְבִיעִית, וּשְׁמִינִית, וְאֶחָד מִשְּׁמוֹנָה בִּשְׁמִינִית – וְזֶהוּ קוּרְטוֹב.

and an ukla. And how much is an ukla? It is one-fifth of a quarter of a kav. And in the case of liquid measures, one may prepare a hin, which is twelve log; and a half-hin, or six log; and a thirdhin, or four log; and a quarter-hin, three log; and a log; and a halflog; and a quarterlog; and an eighth-log; and an eighth of an eighth-log, and this, the last mentioned, is a kortov.

וְלֶעְבֵּיד נָמֵי קַבַּיִים! אָתֵי לְאִיחַלּוֹפֵי בְּתַרְקַב. אַלְמָא טָעוּ אִינָשֵׁי תִּילְתָּא – אִי הָכִי, קַב נָמֵי לָא לֶיעְבֵּיד; דְּאָתֵי לְאִיחַלּוֹפֵי בַּחֲצִי תַּרְקַב! אֶלָּא קַבַּיִים הַיְינוּ טַעְמָא דְּלָא עָבֵיד – דְּאָתֵי לְאִיחַלּוֹפֵי בַּחֲצִי תַּרְקַב.

The Gemara asks: And let one also prepare a measure equal to two kav. The Gemara answers that this measure is not used, lest people come to mistake it for a tarkav, which is three kav. The Gemara observes: Apparently, people err by one-third of a measure. If that is so, one should also not prepare a measure equal to a kav, as people may come to mistake it for a half-tarkav, which is equal to one and one-half kav. Rather, this is the reason that one may not prepare a two-kav measure: That people might come to mistake it for a half-tarkav, which is equal to one and one-half kav.

אַלְמָא טָעֵי אִינִישׁ רִיבְעָא – אִי הָכִי, חֲצִי תּוֹמֶן וְעוּכְלָא לָא לֶיעְבֵּיד! אָמַר רַב פָּפָּא: מִדּוֹת קְטַנּוֹת בְּקִיאִי בְּהוּ אִינָשֵׁי.

The Gemara again suggests: Apparently, people err by one-quarter of a measure. If that is so, one should also not prepare measures of a half-tomen, which is one-sixteenth of a kav, and an ukla, which is one-twentieth of a kav. Since they differ by only one-fifth, there is a concern that people might mistake one measure for the other. Rav Pappa said: People are well-versed in small measures and can distinguish between them.

שְׁלִישִׁית הַהִין, רְבִיעִית הַהִין – לָא לֶיעְבֵּיד! כֵּיוָן דַּהֲווֹ בַּמִּקְדָּשׁ, לָא גְּזַרוּ בְּהוּ רַבָּנַן. בַּמִּקְדָּשׁ נָמֵי לִיגְזוֹר! כֹּהֲנִים זְרִיזִין הֵן.

The Gemara continues: If people err by one-quarter of a measure, then since one may prepare a measure equal to four log, one-third of a hin, let one not prepare a measure equal to three log, one-quarter of a hin. The Gemara answers: Since these measures were used in the Temple, the Sages did not decree that they not be used. The Gemara asks: In the Temple as well, let the Sages decree that they should not be used, in case the two measures are mistaken for each other. The Gemara answers: The priests who serve in the Temple are vigilant and would not commit this error.

אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: אֵין מוֹסִיפִין עַל הַמִּדּוֹת יוֹתֵר מִשְּׁתוּת, וְלֹא עַל הַמַּטְבֵּעַ יָתֵר מִשְּׁתוּת, וְהַמִּשְׂתַּכֵּר אַל יִשְׁתַּכֵּר יוֹתֵר מִשְּׁתוּת. אֵין מוֹסִיפִין עַל הַמִּדּוֹת יוֹתֵר מִשְּׁתוּת – מַאי טַעְמָא? אִילֵּימָא מִשּׁוּם אַפְקוֹעֵי תַּרְעָא, שְׁתוּת נָמֵי לָא!

§ Shmuel says: If the residents of a certain place want to change the standard of their measures and augment them by a certain fraction, they may not increase the measures by more than one-sixth, and they may not increase the value of a coin by more than one-sixth of its previous value. And one who profits from his sales may not profit by more than one-sixth. The Gemara analyzes these statements. When Shmuel said: They may not increase the measures by more than one-sixth, what is the reason for this? If we say it is because doing so causes market prices to rise, the same concern should apply to raising the prices by one-sixth, and therefore this should also not be allowed.

אֶלָּא מִשּׁוּם אוֹנָאָה – דְּלָא לֶיהֱוֵי בִּיטּוּל מִקָּח? וְהָאָמַר רָבָא: כׇּל דָּבָר שֶׁבְּמִדָּה וְשֶׁבְּמִשְׁקָל וְשֶׁבְּמִנְיָן – אֲפִילּוּ פָּחוֹת מִכְּדֵי אוֹנָאָה חוֹזֵר!

Rather, you will say that the prohibition is due to concern for exploitation; and they may increase the measures only by up to one-sixth, so that there will not be nullification of the transaction, as the transaction is nullified only when the disparity is more than one-sixth of the value of the item. The Gemara raises an objection: But doesn’t Rava say: With regard to any item that is otherwise subject to the halakhot of exploitation, and it is sold by measure, or by weight, or by number, even if the disparity was less than the measure of exploitation in the transaction, the transaction is reversed. A disparity of one-sixth between the value of an item and its price constitutes exploitation only in cases where there is room for error in assessing the value of an item. In a case where the details of the item are easily quantifiable, any deviation from the designated quantity results in a nullification of the transaction.

אֶלָּא דְּלָא לֶיהֱוֵי פְּסֵידָא לְתַגָּרָא.

Rather, the prohibition is so that there will not be a loss suffered by the merchant, who might not realize that a new standard was issued, and sell in accordance with the old standard. Since a merchant usually enjoys a profit of one-sixth of the value of an item, if the standard is not increased by more than this amount he will not suffer a loss, as at worst he will forfeit his profit margin.

פְּסֵידָא הוּא דְּלָא לֶיהֱוֵי לֵיהּ – רַוְוחָא לָא בָּעֵי?! זְבַן וְזַבֵּין – תַּגָּרָא אִיקְּרִי?!

This Gemara notes: This explanation is also difficult, since even if the aim is to ensure that there will not be a loss for the merchant, does he not need to earn a profit? There is a well-known adage in this regard: If you buy and sell without making any profit, will you be called a merchant? A merchant must profit from his sales; therefore, if this decree was instituted for the protection of merchants, the Sages should have ensured that they earn a profit.

אֶלָּא אָמַר רַב חִסְדָּא: שְׁמוּאֵל קְרָא אַשְׁכַּח וּדְרַשׁ – ״וְהַשֶּׁקֶל – עֶשְׂרִים גֵּרָה; עֶשְׂרִים שְׁקָלִים, חֲמִשָּׁה וְעֶשְׂרִים שְׁקָלִים, עֲשָׂרָה וַחֲמִשָּׁה שֶׁקֶל – הַמָּנֶה יִהְיֶה לָכֶם״.

Rather, Rav Ḥisda said: The prohibition is not based on logical reasoning. Instead, Shmuel found a verse and interpreted it homiletically: “And the shekel shall be twenty gera; twenty shekels, five and twenty shekels, ten, and five shekels, shall be your maneh (Ezekiel 45:12). According to this verse, the combination of all of these numbers, sixty shekels, is equivalent to a maneh.

מָנֶה?! מָאתָן וְאַרְבְּעִין הָווּ! אֶלָּא שְׁמַע מִינַּהּ תְּלָת: שְׁמַע מִינַּהּ מָנֶה שֶׁל קֹדֶשׁ – כָּפוּל הָיָה; וּשְׁמַע מִינַּהּ מוֹסִיפִין עַל הַמִּדּוֹת – וְאֵין מוֹסִיפִין יוֹתֵר מִשְּׁתוּת; וּשְׁמַע מִינַּהּ שְׁתוּתָא – מִלְּבַר.

This is problematic: How can a maneh consist of sixty shekels? Since each biblical shekel is equivalent to four dinars, if a maneh is equal to sixty shekels, a maneh is two hundred and forty dinars. But a maneh is actually equal to twenty-five shekels, which is one hundred dinars. Rather, one can learn from the verse three matters: Learn from it that the sacred maneh was doubled, so that it equaled fifty dinars, not twenty-five. And furthermore, as Ezekiel stated that the maneh will be sixty dinars, not fifty, learn from it that a community may increase measures, but they may not increase them by more than one-sixth. And learn from it that the one-sixth is calculated from the outside, i.e., it is one-sixth of the final sum, which is one-fifth of the previous sum.

רַב פָּפָּא בַּר שְׁמוּאֵל תַּקֵּין כְּיָילָא בַּר תְּלָתָא קְפִיזֵי. אֲמַרוּ לֵיהּ, וְהָא אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: אֵין מוֹסִיפִין עַל הַמִּדּוֹת יוֹתֵר מִשְּׁתוּת! אֲמַר לְהוּ: אֲנָא כְּיָילָא חַדְתָּא תַּקֵּינִי. שַׁדְּרֵיהּ לְפוּמְבְּדִיתָא – וְלָא קַבְּלוּהּ, שַׁדְּרֵיהּ לְפַאפּוּנְיָא – וְקַבְּלוּהּ; וְקָרוּ לֵיהּ: ״רוּז פָּפָּא״.

The Gemara relates: Rav Pappa bar Shmuel instituted a new measure of three kefiza, which is equal to three log. The Sages said to him: But doesn’t Shmuel say that one may not increase the measures by more than one-sixth? You have added one-third, as there already exists a measure of a half-kav, which is the equivalent of two log. Rav Pappa bar Shmuel said to them: I instituted a new measure. He sent the measure to Pumbedita, and they did not accept it; he sent it to the city of Paphunya, and they accepted it and called it the measure of Pappa.

(סִימָן: אוֹצְרֵי פֵירוֹת, אֵין אוֹצְרִין, וְאֵין מוֹצִיאִין, וְאֵין מִשְׂתַּכְּרִין פַּעֲמַיִם בְּבֵיצִים, מַתְרִיעִין, וְלֹא מוֹצִיאִין.)

§ The Gemara provides a mnemonic for the ensuing discussions: Hoarders of produce; one may not hoard; and one may not export; and one may not earn a profit; twice from the sale of eggs; they sound the alarm; and one may not leave.

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: אוֹצְרֵי פֵירוֹת, וּמַלְוֵי בְּרִבִּית, וּמַקְטִינֵי אֵיפָה, וּמַפְקִיעֵי שְׁעָרִים – עֲלֵיהֶן הַכָּתוּב אוֹמֵר: ״לֵאמֹר מָתַי יַעֲבֹר הַחֹדֶשׁ וְנַשְׁבִּירָה שֶּׁבֶר, וְהַשַּׁבָּת וְנִפְתְּחָה בָּר, לְהַקְטִין אֵיפָה וּלְהַגְדִּיל שֶׁקֶל, וּלְעַוֵּת מֹאזְנֵי מִרְמָה״. וּכְתִיב: ״נִשְׁבַּע ה׳ בִּגְאוֹן יַעֲקֹב, אִם אֶשְׁכַּח לָנֶצַח כׇּל מַעֲשֵׂיהֶם״.

The Sages taught: Hoarders of produce, who drive up prices by causing a shortage of available goods, and usurers, and those sellers who falsely reduce their measures, and those who raise market prices by selling for more than the accepted price, about them the verse states: “You that would swallow the needy and destroy the poor of the land, saying: When will the new moon be gone, that we may sell produce? And the Shabbat, that we may set forth grain? Making the measure small, and the shekel great, and falsifying the balances of deceit” (Amos 8:4–5). And it is written: “The Lord has sworn by the pride of Jacob: Surely I will never forget any of their works” (Amos 8:7).

אוֹצְרֵי פֵירוֹת – כְּגוֹן מַאן? אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: כְּגוֹן שַׁבְּתַי אַצָּר פֵּירוֹת.

The Gemara asks: Hoarders of produce, such as whom? Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Such as Shabbtai, the hoarder of produce, who would buy and hoard large amounts of produce and later sell it at a high price.

אֲבוּהּ דִּשְׁמוּאֵל מְזַבֵּין לְהוּ לְפֵירֵי בְּתַרְעָא חָרְפָא, כְּתַרְעָא חָרְפָא. שְׁמוּאֵל בְּרֵיהּ, מַשְׁהֵי לְפֵירֵי, וּמְזַבֵּין לְהוּ בְּתַרְעָא אַפְלָא – כְּתַרְעָא חָרְפָא. שְׁלַחוּ מִתָּם: טָבָא דְּאַבָּא מִדִּבְרָא. מַאי טַעְמָא? תַּרְעָא דְּרָוַוח – רָוַוח.

The Gemara relates: Shmuel’s father would sell produce during the period of the early market price, when produce is cheap, for the early market price. His son Shmuel acted differently, and would keep the produce and sell it during the period of the late market price, when produce is expensive, for the early market price. They sent a message from there, Eretz Yisrael: The practice of the father is better than that of the son. What is the reason for this? A market price that has been eased and starts out low will remain eased, with little increase over the course of the year. Therefore, one who makes produce available at the beginning of the season, like Shmuel’s father, aids people during the entire year. By contrast, a market price that starts out high, because people are not making their produce available at the market, is not easily lowered.

אָמַר רַב: עוֹשֶׂה אָדָם אֶת קַבּוֹ אוֹצָר. תַּנְיָא נָמֵי הָכִי: אֵין אוֹצְרִין פֵּירוֹת – דְּבָרִים שֶׁיֵּשׁ בָּהֶן חַיֵּי נֶפֶשׁ, כְּגוֹן: יֵינוֹת, שְׁמָנִין וּסְלָתוֹת. אֲבָל תְּבָלִין, כַּמּוֹן וּפִלְפְּלִין – מוּתָּר. בַּמֶּה דְּבָרִים אֲמוּרִים – בְּלוֹקֵחַ מִן הַשּׁוּק, אֲבָל בְּמַכְנִיס מִשֶּׁלּוֹ – מוּתָּר.

Rav says: A person may turn his own kav into a storeroom, i.e., he may hoard the produce of his own field and sell it only at a later stage, without violating the prohibition of hoarding produce. This is also taught in a baraita: One may not hoard produce of items that contain an element of basic sustenance, such as wines, oils, and flours, but in the case of spices, such as cumin and pepper, it is permitted. In what case is this statement said? It is with regard to one who buys that produce from the market to resell later; but with regard to one who brings in produce from his own field, it is permitted for any type of produce.

וּמוּתָּר לָאָדָם לֶאֱצוֹר פֵּירוֹת בְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל שָׁלֹשׁ שָׁנִים – עֶרֶב שְׁבִיעִית, וּשְׁבִיעִית, וּמוֹצָאֵי שְׁבִיעִית.

The baraita continues: And it is permitted for a person to hoard produce in Eretz Yisrael for these three years: The year preceding the Sabbatical Year, the Sabbatical Year, and the year that follows the Sabbatical Year, because the land lies fallow during the seventh year, the Sabbatical Year, and the produce of the sixth year must last through these three years, until near the end of the eighth year.

וּבִשְׁנֵי בַצּוֹרֶת – אֲפִילּוּ קַב חָרוּבִין לֹא יֶאֱצוֹר, מִפְּנֵי שֶׁמַּכְנִיס מְאֵרָה בַּשְּׁעָרִים. אֲמַר לֵיהּ רַבִּי יוֹסֵי בְּרַבִּי חֲנִינָא לְפוּגָא שַׁמָּעֵיהּ: פּוּק אֱצַר לִי פֵּירֵי שָׁלֹשׁ שָׁנִים – עֶרֶב שְׁבִיעִית, וּשְׁבִיעִית, וּמוֹצָאֵי שְׁבִיעִית.

And in years of drought one may not hoard even a kav of carobs, because he thereby brings a curse on market prices, as everyone is fearful of selling and even a small fluctuation in supply can cause a significant rise in prices. Rabbi Yosei, son of Rabbi Ḥanina, who was living in Eretz Yisrael, said to his servant Fuga: Go and hoard produce for me for the coming three years: The year preceding the Sabbatical Year, the Sabbatical Year, and the year that follows the Sabbatical Year.

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: אֵין מוֹצִיאִין פֵּירוֹת מֵאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל – דְּבָרִים שֶׁיֵּשׁ בָּהֶן חַיֵּי נֶפֶשׁ, כְּגוֹן: יֵינוֹת, שְׁמָנִים וּסְלָתוֹת. רַבִּי יְהוּדָה בֶּן בְּתֵירָא מַתִּיר בַּיַּיִן, מִפְּנֵי שֶׁמְּמַעֵט אֶת הַתִּיפְלָה. וּכְשֵׁם שֶׁאֵין מוֹצִיאִין מֵאֶרֶץ לְחוּץ לָאָרֶץ, כָּךְ אֵין מוֹצִיאִין מֵאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל לְסוּרְיָא. וְרַבִּי מַתִּיר

§ The Sages taught: One may not export produce from Eretz Yisrael if it consists of items that contain an element of basic sustenance, such as wines, oils, and flours, because this causes them to become more expensive in Eretz Yisrael. Rabbi Yehuda ben Beteira permits export in the case of wine, because this lessens licentiousness in Eretz Yisrael. And just as one may not export these types of produce from Eretz Yisrael to outside of Eretz Yisrael, so too one may not export them from Eretz Yisrael to Syria, as Syria is not considered part of Eretz Yisrael in this context. And Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi permits the export of produce

Today’s daily daf tools:

Delve Deeper

Broaden your understanding of the topics on this daf with classes and podcasts from top women Talmud scholars.

For the Beyond the Daf shiurim offered in Hebrew, see here.

New to Talmud?

Check out our resources designed to help you navigate a page of Talmud – and study at the pace, level and style that fits you. 

The Hadran Women’s Tapestry

Meet the diverse women learning Gemara at Hadran and hear their stories. 

I was inspired to start learning after attending the 2020 siyum in Binyanei Hauma. It has been a great experience for me. It’s amazing to see the origins of stories I’ve heard and rituals I’ve participated in my whole life. Even when I don’t understand the daf itself, I believe that the commitment to learning every day is valuable and has multiple benefits. And there will be another daf tomorrow!

Khaya Eisenberg
Khaya Eisenberg

Jerusalem, Israel

Retirement and Covid converged to provide me with the opportunity to commit to daily Talmud study in October 2020. I dove into the middle of Eruvin and continued to navigate Seder Moed, with Rabannit Michelle as my guide. I have developed more confidence in my learning as I completed each masechet and look forward to completing the Daf Yomi cycle so that I can begin again!

Rhona Fink
Rhona Fink

San Diego, United States

My curiosity was peaked after seeing posts about the end of the last cycle. I am always looking for opportunities to increase my Jewish literacy & I am someone that is drawn to habit and consistency. Dinnertime includes a “Guess what I learned on the daf” segment for my husband and 18 year old twins. I also love the feelings of connection with my colleagues who are also learning.

Diana Bloom
Diana Bloom

Tampa, United States

See video

Susan Fisher
Susan Fisher

Raanana, Israel

I started last year after completing the Pesach Sugiyot class. Masechet Yoma might seem like a difficult set of topics, but for me made Yom Kippur and the Beit HaMikdash come alive. Liturgy I’d always had trouble connecting with took on new meaning as I gained a sense of real people moving through specific spaces in particular ways. It was the perfect introduction; I am so grateful for Hadran!

Debbie Engelen-Eigles
Debbie Engelen-Eigles

Minnesota, United States

Hadran entered my life after the last Siyum Hashaas, January 2020. I was inspired and challenged simultaneously, having never thought of learning Gemara. With my family’s encouragement, I googled “daf yomi for women”. A perfecr fit!
I especially enjoy when Rabbanit Michelle connects the daf to contemporary issues to share at the shabbat table e.g: looking at the Kohen during duchaning. Toda rabba

Marsha Wasserman
Marsha Wasserman

Jerusalem, Israel

I heard the new Daf Yomi cycle was starting and I was curious, so I searched online for a women’s class and was pleasently surprised to find Rabanit Michelle’s great class reviews in many online articles. It has been a splendid journey. It is a way to fill my days with Torah, learning so many amazing things I have never heard before during my Tanach learning at High School. Thanks so much .

Martha Tarazi
Martha Tarazi

Panama, Panama

I started learning on January 5, 2020. When I complete the 7+ year cycle I will be 70 years old. I had been intimidated by those who said that I needed to study Talmud in a traditional way with a chevruta, but I decided the learning was more important to me than the method. Thankful for Daf Yomi for Women helping me catch up when I fall behind, and also being able to celebrate with each Siyum!

Pamela Elisheva
Pamela Elisheva

Bakersfield, United States

I have joined the community of daf yomi learners at the start of this cycle. I have studied in different ways – by reading the page, translating the page, attending a local shiur and listening to Rabbanit Farber’s podcasts, depending on circumstances and where I was at the time. The reactions have been positive throughout – with no exception!

Silke Goldberg
Silke Goldberg

Guildford, United Kingdom

I started my Daf Yomi journey at the beginning of the COVID19 pandemic.

Karena Perry
Karena Perry

Los Angeles, United States

I’ve been studying Talmud since the ’90s, and decided to take on Daf Yomi two years ago. I wanted to attempt the challenge of a day-to-day, very Jewish activity. Some days are so interesting and some days are so boring. But I’m still here.
Sarene Shanus
Sarene Shanus

Mamaroneck, NY, United States

After being so inspired by the siyum shas two years ago, I began tentatively learning daf yomi, like Rabbanut Michelle kept saying – taking one daf at a time. I’m still taking it one daf at a time, one masechet at a time, but I’m loving it and am still so inspired by Rabbanit Michelle and the Hadran community, and yes – I am proud to be finishing Seder Mo’ed.

Caroline Graham-Ofstein
Caroline Graham-Ofstein

Bet Shemesh, Israel

Having never learned Talmud before, I started Daf Yomi in hopes of connecting to the Rabbinic tradition, sharing a daily idea on Instagram (@dafyomiadventures). With Hadran and Sefaria, I slowly gained confidence in my skills and understanding. Now, part of the Pardes Jewish Educators Program, I can’t wait to bring this love of learning with me as I continue to pass it on to my future students.

Hannah-G-pic
Hannah Greenberg

Pennsylvania, United States

A friend mentioned that she was starting Daf Yomi in January 2020. I had heard of it and thought, why not? I decided to try it – go day by day and not think about the seven plus year commitment. Fast forward today, over two years in and I can’t imagine my life without Daf Yomi. It’s part of my morning ritual. If I have a busy day ahead of me I set my alarm to get up early to finish the day’s daf
Debbie Fitzerman
Debbie Fitzerman

Ontario, Canada

I began my journey two years ago at the beginning of this cycle of the daf yomi. It has been an incredible, challenging experience and has given me a new perspective of Torah Sh’baal Peh and the role it plays in our lives

linda kalish-marcus
linda kalish-marcus

Efrat, Israel

I began learning the daf in January 2022. I initially “flew under the radar,” sharing my journey with my husband and a few close friends. I was apprehensive – who, me? Gemara? Now, 2 years in, I feel changed. The rigor of a daily commitment frames my days. The intellectual engagement enhances my knowledge. And the virtual community of learners has become a new family, weaving a glorious tapestry.

Gitta Jaroslawicz-Neufeld
Gitta Jaroslawicz-Neufeld

Far Rockaway, United States

I started learning after the siyum hashas for women and my daily learning has been a constant over the last two years. It grounded me during the chaos of Corona while providing me with a community of fellow learners. The Daf can be challenging but it’s filled with life’s lessons, struggles and hope for a better world. It’s not about the destination but rather about the journey. Thank you Hadran!

Dena Lehrman
Dena Lehrman

אפרת, Israel

I began daf yomi in January 2020 with Brachot. I had made aliya 6 months before, and one of my post-aliya goals was to complete a full cycle. As a life-long Tanach teacher, I wanted to swim from one side of the Yam shel Torah to the other. Daf yomi was also my sanity through COVID. It was the way to marking the progression of time, and feel that I could grow and accomplish while time stopped.

Leah Herzog
Leah Herzog

Givat Zev, Israel

After all the hype on the 2020 siyum I became inspired by a friend to begin learning as the new cycle began.with no background in studying Talmud it was a bit daunting in the beginning. my husband began at the same time so we decided to study on shabbat together. The reaction from my 3 daughters has been fantastic. They are very proud. It’s been a great challenge for my brain which is so healthy!

Stacey Goodstein Ashtamker
Stacey Goodstein Ashtamker

Modi’in, Israel

I started Daf during the pandemic. I listened to a number of podcasts by various Rebbeim until one day, I discovered Rabbanit Farbers podcast. Subsequently I joined the Hadran family in Eruvin. Not the easiest place to begin, Rabbanit Farber made it all understandable and fun. The online live group has bonded together and have really become a supportive, encouraging family.

Leah Goldford
Leah Goldford

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Bava Batra 90

וְעוּכְלָא. וְכַמָּה הִיא עוּכְלָא? אֶחָד מֵחֲמִשָּׁה בִּרְבִיעַ. וּבְמִדַּת הַלַּח הוּא עוֹשֶׂה הִין, וַחֲצִי הִין, וּשְׁלִישִׁית הַהִין, וּרְבִיעִית הַהִין, וְלוֹג, וַחֲצִי לוֹג, וּרְבִיעִית, וּשְׁמִינִית, וְאֶחָד מִשְּׁמוֹנָה בִּשְׁמִינִית – וְזֶהוּ קוּרְטוֹב.

and an ukla. And how much is an ukla? It is one-fifth of a quarter of a kav. And in the case of liquid measures, one may prepare a hin, which is twelve log; and a half-hin, or six log; and a thirdhin, or four log; and a quarter-hin, three log; and a log; and a halflog; and a quarterlog; and an eighth-log; and an eighth of an eighth-log, and this, the last mentioned, is a kortov.

וְלֶעְבֵּיד נָמֵי קַבַּיִים! אָתֵי לְאִיחַלּוֹפֵי בְּתַרְקַב. אַלְמָא טָעוּ אִינָשֵׁי תִּילְתָּא – אִי הָכִי, קַב נָמֵי לָא לֶיעְבֵּיד; דְּאָתֵי לְאִיחַלּוֹפֵי בַּחֲצִי תַּרְקַב! אֶלָּא קַבַּיִים הַיְינוּ טַעְמָא דְּלָא עָבֵיד – דְּאָתֵי לְאִיחַלּוֹפֵי בַּחֲצִי תַּרְקַב.

The Gemara asks: And let one also prepare a measure equal to two kav. The Gemara answers that this measure is not used, lest people come to mistake it for a tarkav, which is three kav. The Gemara observes: Apparently, people err by one-third of a measure. If that is so, one should also not prepare a measure equal to a kav, as people may come to mistake it for a half-tarkav, which is equal to one and one-half kav. Rather, this is the reason that one may not prepare a two-kav measure: That people might come to mistake it for a half-tarkav, which is equal to one and one-half kav.

אַלְמָא טָעֵי אִינִישׁ רִיבְעָא – אִי הָכִי, חֲצִי תּוֹמֶן וְעוּכְלָא לָא לֶיעְבֵּיד! אָמַר רַב פָּפָּא: מִדּוֹת קְטַנּוֹת בְּקִיאִי בְּהוּ אִינָשֵׁי.

The Gemara again suggests: Apparently, people err by one-quarter of a measure. If that is so, one should also not prepare measures of a half-tomen, which is one-sixteenth of a kav, and an ukla, which is one-twentieth of a kav. Since they differ by only one-fifth, there is a concern that people might mistake one measure for the other. Rav Pappa said: People are well-versed in small measures and can distinguish between them.

שְׁלִישִׁית הַהִין, רְבִיעִית הַהִין – לָא לֶיעְבֵּיד! כֵּיוָן דַּהֲווֹ בַּמִּקְדָּשׁ, לָא גְּזַרוּ בְּהוּ רַבָּנַן. בַּמִּקְדָּשׁ נָמֵי לִיגְזוֹר! כֹּהֲנִים זְרִיזִין הֵן.

The Gemara continues: If people err by one-quarter of a measure, then since one may prepare a measure equal to four log, one-third of a hin, let one not prepare a measure equal to three log, one-quarter of a hin. The Gemara answers: Since these measures were used in the Temple, the Sages did not decree that they not be used. The Gemara asks: In the Temple as well, let the Sages decree that they should not be used, in case the two measures are mistaken for each other. The Gemara answers: The priests who serve in the Temple are vigilant and would not commit this error.

אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: אֵין מוֹסִיפִין עַל הַמִּדּוֹת יוֹתֵר מִשְּׁתוּת, וְלֹא עַל הַמַּטְבֵּעַ יָתֵר מִשְּׁתוּת, וְהַמִּשְׂתַּכֵּר אַל יִשְׁתַּכֵּר יוֹתֵר מִשְּׁתוּת. אֵין מוֹסִיפִין עַל הַמִּדּוֹת יוֹתֵר מִשְּׁתוּת – מַאי טַעְמָא? אִילֵּימָא מִשּׁוּם אַפְקוֹעֵי תַּרְעָא, שְׁתוּת נָמֵי לָא!

§ Shmuel says: If the residents of a certain place want to change the standard of their measures and augment them by a certain fraction, they may not increase the measures by more than one-sixth, and they may not increase the value of a coin by more than one-sixth of its previous value. And one who profits from his sales may not profit by more than one-sixth. The Gemara analyzes these statements. When Shmuel said: They may not increase the measures by more than one-sixth, what is the reason for this? If we say it is because doing so causes market prices to rise, the same concern should apply to raising the prices by one-sixth, and therefore this should also not be allowed.

אֶלָּא מִשּׁוּם אוֹנָאָה – דְּלָא לֶיהֱוֵי בִּיטּוּל מִקָּח? וְהָאָמַר רָבָא: כׇּל דָּבָר שֶׁבְּמִדָּה וְשֶׁבְּמִשְׁקָל וְשֶׁבְּמִנְיָן – אֲפִילּוּ פָּחוֹת מִכְּדֵי אוֹנָאָה חוֹזֵר!

Rather, you will say that the prohibition is due to concern for exploitation; and they may increase the measures only by up to one-sixth, so that there will not be nullification of the transaction, as the transaction is nullified only when the disparity is more than one-sixth of the value of the item. The Gemara raises an objection: But doesn’t Rava say: With regard to any item that is otherwise subject to the halakhot of exploitation, and it is sold by measure, or by weight, or by number, even if the disparity was less than the measure of exploitation in the transaction, the transaction is reversed. A disparity of one-sixth between the value of an item and its price constitutes exploitation only in cases where there is room for error in assessing the value of an item. In a case where the details of the item are easily quantifiable, any deviation from the designated quantity results in a nullification of the transaction.

אֶלָּא דְּלָא לֶיהֱוֵי פְּסֵידָא לְתַגָּרָא.

Rather, the prohibition is so that there will not be a loss suffered by the merchant, who might not realize that a new standard was issued, and sell in accordance with the old standard. Since a merchant usually enjoys a profit of one-sixth of the value of an item, if the standard is not increased by more than this amount he will not suffer a loss, as at worst he will forfeit his profit margin.

פְּסֵידָא הוּא דְּלָא לֶיהֱוֵי לֵיהּ – רַוְוחָא לָא בָּעֵי?! זְבַן וְזַבֵּין – תַּגָּרָא אִיקְּרִי?!

This Gemara notes: This explanation is also difficult, since even if the aim is to ensure that there will not be a loss for the merchant, does he not need to earn a profit? There is a well-known adage in this regard: If you buy and sell without making any profit, will you be called a merchant? A merchant must profit from his sales; therefore, if this decree was instituted for the protection of merchants, the Sages should have ensured that they earn a profit.

אֶלָּא אָמַר רַב חִסְדָּא: שְׁמוּאֵל קְרָא אַשְׁכַּח וּדְרַשׁ – ״וְהַשֶּׁקֶל – עֶשְׂרִים גֵּרָה; עֶשְׂרִים שְׁקָלִים, חֲמִשָּׁה וְעֶשְׂרִים שְׁקָלִים, עֲשָׂרָה וַחֲמִשָּׁה שֶׁקֶל – הַמָּנֶה יִהְיֶה לָכֶם״.

Rather, Rav Ḥisda said: The prohibition is not based on logical reasoning. Instead, Shmuel found a verse and interpreted it homiletically: “And the shekel shall be twenty gera; twenty shekels, five and twenty shekels, ten, and five shekels, shall be your maneh (Ezekiel 45:12). According to this verse, the combination of all of these numbers, sixty shekels, is equivalent to a maneh.

מָנֶה?! מָאתָן וְאַרְבְּעִין הָווּ! אֶלָּא שְׁמַע מִינַּהּ תְּלָת: שְׁמַע מִינַּהּ מָנֶה שֶׁל קֹדֶשׁ – כָּפוּל הָיָה; וּשְׁמַע מִינַּהּ מוֹסִיפִין עַל הַמִּדּוֹת – וְאֵין מוֹסִיפִין יוֹתֵר מִשְּׁתוּת; וּשְׁמַע מִינַּהּ שְׁתוּתָא – מִלְּבַר.

This is problematic: How can a maneh consist of sixty shekels? Since each biblical shekel is equivalent to four dinars, if a maneh is equal to sixty shekels, a maneh is two hundred and forty dinars. But a maneh is actually equal to twenty-five shekels, which is one hundred dinars. Rather, one can learn from the verse three matters: Learn from it that the sacred maneh was doubled, so that it equaled fifty dinars, not twenty-five. And furthermore, as Ezekiel stated that the maneh will be sixty dinars, not fifty, learn from it that a community may increase measures, but they may not increase them by more than one-sixth. And learn from it that the one-sixth is calculated from the outside, i.e., it is one-sixth of the final sum, which is one-fifth of the previous sum.

רַב פָּפָּא בַּר שְׁמוּאֵל תַּקֵּין כְּיָילָא בַּר תְּלָתָא קְפִיזֵי. אֲמַרוּ לֵיהּ, וְהָא אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: אֵין מוֹסִיפִין עַל הַמִּדּוֹת יוֹתֵר מִשְּׁתוּת! אֲמַר לְהוּ: אֲנָא כְּיָילָא חַדְתָּא תַּקֵּינִי. שַׁדְּרֵיהּ לְפוּמְבְּדִיתָא – וְלָא קַבְּלוּהּ, שַׁדְּרֵיהּ לְפַאפּוּנְיָא – וְקַבְּלוּהּ; וְקָרוּ לֵיהּ: ״רוּז פָּפָּא״.

The Gemara relates: Rav Pappa bar Shmuel instituted a new measure of three kefiza, which is equal to three log. The Sages said to him: But doesn’t Shmuel say that one may not increase the measures by more than one-sixth? You have added one-third, as there already exists a measure of a half-kav, which is the equivalent of two log. Rav Pappa bar Shmuel said to them: I instituted a new measure. He sent the measure to Pumbedita, and they did not accept it; he sent it to the city of Paphunya, and they accepted it and called it the measure of Pappa.

(סִימָן: אוֹצְרֵי פֵירוֹת, אֵין אוֹצְרִין, וְאֵין מוֹצִיאִין, וְאֵין מִשְׂתַּכְּרִין פַּעֲמַיִם בְּבֵיצִים, מַתְרִיעִין, וְלֹא מוֹצִיאִין.)

§ The Gemara provides a mnemonic for the ensuing discussions: Hoarders of produce; one may not hoard; and one may not export; and one may not earn a profit; twice from the sale of eggs; they sound the alarm; and one may not leave.

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: אוֹצְרֵי פֵירוֹת, וּמַלְוֵי בְּרִבִּית, וּמַקְטִינֵי אֵיפָה, וּמַפְקִיעֵי שְׁעָרִים – עֲלֵיהֶן הַכָּתוּב אוֹמֵר: ״לֵאמֹר מָתַי יַעֲבֹר הַחֹדֶשׁ וְנַשְׁבִּירָה שֶּׁבֶר, וְהַשַּׁבָּת וְנִפְתְּחָה בָּר, לְהַקְטִין אֵיפָה וּלְהַגְדִּיל שֶׁקֶל, וּלְעַוֵּת מֹאזְנֵי מִרְמָה״. וּכְתִיב: ״נִשְׁבַּע ה׳ בִּגְאוֹן יַעֲקֹב, אִם אֶשְׁכַּח לָנֶצַח כׇּל מַעֲשֵׂיהֶם״.

The Sages taught: Hoarders of produce, who drive up prices by causing a shortage of available goods, and usurers, and those sellers who falsely reduce their measures, and those who raise market prices by selling for more than the accepted price, about them the verse states: “You that would swallow the needy and destroy the poor of the land, saying: When will the new moon be gone, that we may sell produce? And the Shabbat, that we may set forth grain? Making the measure small, and the shekel great, and falsifying the balances of deceit” (Amos 8:4–5). And it is written: “The Lord has sworn by the pride of Jacob: Surely I will never forget any of their works” (Amos 8:7).

אוֹצְרֵי פֵירוֹת – כְּגוֹן מַאן? אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: כְּגוֹן שַׁבְּתַי אַצָּר פֵּירוֹת.

The Gemara asks: Hoarders of produce, such as whom? Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Such as Shabbtai, the hoarder of produce, who would buy and hoard large amounts of produce and later sell it at a high price.

אֲבוּהּ דִּשְׁמוּאֵל מְזַבֵּין לְהוּ לְפֵירֵי בְּתַרְעָא חָרְפָא, כְּתַרְעָא חָרְפָא. שְׁמוּאֵל בְּרֵיהּ, מַשְׁהֵי לְפֵירֵי, וּמְזַבֵּין לְהוּ בְּתַרְעָא אַפְלָא – כְּתַרְעָא חָרְפָא. שְׁלַחוּ מִתָּם: טָבָא דְּאַבָּא מִדִּבְרָא. מַאי טַעְמָא? תַּרְעָא דְּרָוַוח – רָוַוח.

The Gemara relates: Shmuel’s father would sell produce during the period of the early market price, when produce is cheap, for the early market price. His son Shmuel acted differently, and would keep the produce and sell it during the period of the late market price, when produce is expensive, for the early market price. They sent a message from there, Eretz Yisrael: The practice of the father is better than that of the son. What is the reason for this? A market price that has been eased and starts out low will remain eased, with little increase over the course of the year. Therefore, one who makes produce available at the beginning of the season, like Shmuel’s father, aids people during the entire year. By contrast, a market price that starts out high, because people are not making their produce available at the market, is not easily lowered.

אָמַר רַב: עוֹשֶׂה אָדָם אֶת קַבּוֹ אוֹצָר. תַּנְיָא נָמֵי הָכִי: אֵין אוֹצְרִין פֵּירוֹת – דְּבָרִים שֶׁיֵּשׁ בָּהֶן חַיֵּי נֶפֶשׁ, כְּגוֹן: יֵינוֹת, שְׁמָנִין וּסְלָתוֹת. אֲבָל תְּבָלִין, כַּמּוֹן וּפִלְפְּלִין – מוּתָּר. בַּמֶּה דְּבָרִים אֲמוּרִים – בְּלוֹקֵחַ מִן הַשּׁוּק, אֲבָל בְּמַכְנִיס מִשֶּׁלּוֹ – מוּתָּר.

Rav says: A person may turn his own kav into a storeroom, i.e., he may hoard the produce of his own field and sell it only at a later stage, without violating the prohibition of hoarding produce. This is also taught in a baraita: One may not hoard produce of items that contain an element of basic sustenance, such as wines, oils, and flours, but in the case of spices, such as cumin and pepper, it is permitted. In what case is this statement said? It is with regard to one who buys that produce from the market to resell later; but with regard to one who brings in produce from his own field, it is permitted for any type of produce.

וּמוּתָּר לָאָדָם לֶאֱצוֹר פֵּירוֹת בְּאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל שָׁלֹשׁ שָׁנִים – עֶרֶב שְׁבִיעִית, וּשְׁבִיעִית, וּמוֹצָאֵי שְׁבִיעִית.

The baraita continues: And it is permitted for a person to hoard produce in Eretz Yisrael for these three years: The year preceding the Sabbatical Year, the Sabbatical Year, and the year that follows the Sabbatical Year, because the land lies fallow during the seventh year, the Sabbatical Year, and the produce of the sixth year must last through these three years, until near the end of the eighth year.

וּבִשְׁנֵי בַצּוֹרֶת – אֲפִילּוּ קַב חָרוּבִין לֹא יֶאֱצוֹר, מִפְּנֵי שֶׁמַּכְנִיס מְאֵרָה בַּשְּׁעָרִים. אֲמַר לֵיהּ רַבִּי יוֹסֵי בְּרַבִּי חֲנִינָא לְפוּגָא שַׁמָּעֵיהּ: פּוּק אֱצַר לִי פֵּירֵי שָׁלֹשׁ שָׁנִים – עֶרֶב שְׁבִיעִית, וּשְׁבִיעִית, וּמוֹצָאֵי שְׁבִיעִית.

And in years of drought one may not hoard even a kav of carobs, because he thereby brings a curse on market prices, as everyone is fearful of selling and even a small fluctuation in supply can cause a significant rise in prices. Rabbi Yosei, son of Rabbi Ḥanina, who was living in Eretz Yisrael, said to his servant Fuga: Go and hoard produce for me for the coming three years: The year preceding the Sabbatical Year, the Sabbatical Year, and the year that follows the Sabbatical Year.

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: אֵין מוֹצִיאִין פֵּירוֹת מֵאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל – דְּבָרִים שֶׁיֵּשׁ בָּהֶן חַיֵּי נֶפֶשׁ, כְּגוֹן: יֵינוֹת, שְׁמָנִים וּסְלָתוֹת. רַבִּי יְהוּדָה בֶּן בְּתֵירָא מַתִּיר בַּיַּיִן, מִפְּנֵי שֶׁמְּמַעֵט אֶת הַתִּיפְלָה. וּכְשֵׁם שֶׁאֵין מוֹצִיאִין מֵאֶרֶץ לְחוּץ לָאָרֶץ, כָּךְ אֵין מוֹצִיאִין מֵאֶרֶץ יִשְׂרָאֵל לְסוּרְיָא. וְרַבִּי מַתִּיר

§ The Sages taught: One may not export produce from Eretz Yisrael if it consists of items that contain an element of basic sustenance, such as wines, oils, and flours, because this causes them to become more expensive in Eretz Yisrael. Rabbi Yehuda ben Beteira permits export in the case of wine, because this lessens licentiousness in Eretz Yisrael. And just as one may not export these types of produce from Eretz Yisrael to outside of Eretz Yisrael, so too one may not export them from Eretz Yisrael to Syria, as Syria is not considered part of Eretz Yisrael in this context. And Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi permits the export of produce

Want to follow content and continue where you left off?

Create an account today to track your progress, mark what you’ve learned, and follow the shiurim that speak to you.

Clear all items from this list?

This will remove ALL the items in this section. You will lose any progress or history connected to them. This is irreversible.

Cancel
Yes, clear all

Are you sure you want to delete this item?

You will lose any progress or history connected to this item.

Cancel
Yes, delete