Kiddushin 33
״מִפְּנֵי שֵׂיבָה תָּקוּם וְהָדַרְתָּ, תָּקוּם וְהָדַרְתָּ פְּנֵי זָקֵן״ וּמִדְּלָא כְּתַב הָכִי, שְׁמַע מִינַּהּ חַד הוּא.
Before the hoary head of an elder you shall stand and revere; you shall stand and revere the face of an elder. From the fact that the Merciful One did not write this and thereby divide the two concepts, learn from it that “elder” and “hoary head” are together referring to one type of person.
אָמַר מָר: יָכוֹל יְהַדְּרֶנּוּ בְּמָמוֹן? תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר: ״תָּקוּם וְהָדַרְתָּ״ – מָה קִימָה שֶׁאֵין בָּהּ חֶסְרוֹן כִּיס – אַף הִידּוּר שֶׁאֵין בּוֹ חֶסְרוֹן כִּיס. וְקִימָה לֵית בַּהּ חֶסְרוֹן כִּיס? מִי לָא עָסְקִינַן דְּקָא נָקֵיב מַרְגָּנִיתָא, אַדְּהָכִי וְהָכִי קָאֵים מִקַּמֵּיהּ וּבָטֵיל מִמְּלַאכְתּוֹ!
The Master said previously in the baraita: One might have thought that he should revere him through money, i.e., he is required to give him money in his honor; therefore, the verse states: “You shall stand and you shall revere” (Leviticus 19:32). Just as standing includes no monetary loss, so too, reverence is referring to an action that includes no monetary loss. The Gemara asks: And does standing include no monetary loss at all? Are we not dealing with a case where he was piercing pearls, a highly remunerative task, and in the meantime he must stand for the elder and thereby neglect his work, which causes him a loss?
אֶלָּא: אַקֵּישׁ קִימָה לְהִידּוּר. מָה הִידּוּר שֶׁאֵין בּוֹ בִּיטּוּל – אַף קִימָה שֶׁאֵין בָּהּ בִּיטּוּל. וְאַקֵּישׁ נָמֵי הִידּוּר לְקִימָה, מָה קִימָה שֶׁאֵין בָּהּ חֶסְרוֹן כִּיס – אַף הִידּוּר שֶׁאֵין בּוֹ חֶסְרוֹן כִּיס. מִכָּאן אָמְרוּ: אֵין בַּעֲלֵי אוּמָּנִיּוֹת רַשָּׁאִין לַעֲמוֹד מִפְּנֵי תַּלְמִידֵי חֲכָמִים בְּשָׁעָה שֶׁעוֹסְקִין בִּמְלַאכְתָּם.
Rather, the verse juxtaposes standing to reverence: Just as reverence does not include neglect of work, so too, standing does not include neglect of work; therefore, one who is engaged in work is not obligated to stand before an elder. And the verse also juxtaposes reverence to standing: Just as standing includes no monetary loss, as standing applies only when it does not entail neglect of work, as explained previously, so too, reverence is referring to an action that includes no monetary loss. From here the Sages stated: Craftsmen are not permitted to stand before Torah scholars when they are engaged in their work.
וְלָא? וְהָתְנַן: כׇּל בַּעֲלֵי אוּמָּנִיּוֹת עוֹמְדִים מִפְּנֵיהֶם, וְשׁוֹאֲלִים בִּשְׁלוֹמָם, וְאוֹמְרִים לָהֶם: אַחֵינוּ אַנְשֵׁי מָקוֹם פְּלוֹנִי בּוֹאֲכֶם לְשָׁלוֹם! אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: מִפְּנֵיהֶם עוֹמְדִים, מִפְּנֵי תַּלְמִידֵי חֲכָמִים אֵין עוֹמְדִים.
The Gemara asks: And are craftsmen not required to stand before Torah scholars? But didn’t we learn in a mishna (Bikkurim 3:3): When farmers bring their first fruits to Jerusalem, all craftsmen stand before them, and greet them, and say to them: Our brothers from such and such a place, welcome! Since craftsmen would stand even for those engaged in a mitzva, all the more so should they stand for Torah scholars. Rabbi Yoḥanan says: There is no difficulty here, as indeed they stood before those bringing first fruits, and yet they would not stand before Torah scholars.
אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹסֵי בַּר אָבִין: בּוֹא וּרְאֵה כַּמָּה חֲבִיבָה מִצְוָה בִּשְׁעָתָהּ, שֶׁהֲרֵי מִפְּנֵיהֶם עוֹמְדִים, מִפְּנֵי תַּלְמִידֵי חֲכָמִים אֵין עוֹמְדִים. וְדִלְמָא שָׁאנֵי הָתָם, דְּאִם כֵּן, אַתָּה מַכְשִׁילָן לֶעָתִיד לָבֹא.
Based on this Rabbi Yosei bar Avin says: Come and see how beloved is a mitzva performed in its proper time, as the craftsmen stood before those who were fulfilling a mitzva, whereas they did not stand before Torah scholars. The Gemara responds: This does not prove that the same applies to all mitzvot performed in their proper times, as perhaps it is different there, with regard to the bringing of the first fruits; for if so, i.e., if one does not treat those who bring first fruits with such honor, they will not want to come at all, and you will cause them to stumble and sin in the future. Consequently, the Sages instituted that those bringing first fruits should be treated with special honor. This reasoning does not apply to people performing other mitzvot.
אָמַר מָר: יָכוֹל יַעֲמוֹד מִפָּנָיו מִבֵּית הַכִּסֵּא וּמִבֵּית הַמֶּרְחָץ. וְלָא? וְהָא רַבִּי חִיָּיא הֲוָה יָתֵיב בֵּי מַסְחוּתָא וְחָלֵיף וְאָזֵיל רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בַּר רַבִּי, וְלָא קָם מִקַּמֵּיהּ וְאִיקְּפַד, וַאֲתָא אֲמַר לֵיהּ לַאֲבוּהּ: שְׁנֵי חוּמָּשִׁים שָׁנִיתִי לוֹ בְּסֵפֶר תְּהִלִּים, וְלֹא עָמַד מִפָּנַי!
The Master said previously: One might have thought that one should also stand before an Elder in the lavatory or in the bathhouse; therefore, the verse said: “You shall stand and you shall revere,” which indicates that the mitzva of standing applies only in a place where there is reverence. The Gemara asks: And does one not show honor in a lavatory? But Rabbi Ḥiyya was sitting in a bathhouse and Rabbi Shimon bar Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi passed by, and he did not stand before him. And Rabbi Shimon bar Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi became angry and went and said to his father, Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi: I taught Rabbi Ḥiyya two of the five parts of the book of Psalms, and yet he did not stand before me. This indicates that a display of honor is appropriate even in a bathhouse.
וְתוּ: בַּר קַפָּרָא, וְאָמְרִי לַהּ רַבִּי שְׁמוּאֵל בַּר רַבִּי יוֹסֵי, הֲוָה יָתֵיב בֵּי מַסְחוּתָא. עָל וְאָזֵיל רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בַּר רַבִּי וְלָא קָם מִקַּמֵּיהּ, וְאִיקְּפַד, וַאֲתָא אֲמַר לֵיהּ לַאֲבוּהּ: שְׁנֵי שְׁלִישֵׁי שְׁלִישׁ שָׁנִיתִי לוֹ בְּתוֹרַת כֹּהֲנִים – וְלֹא עָמַד מִפָּנַי! וְאָמַר לוֹ: שֶׁמָּא בָּהֶן יוֹשֵׁב וּמְהַרְהֵר.
And furthermore, bar Kappara, and some say it was Rabbi Shmuel bar Rabbi Yosei, was sitting in a bathhouse. Rabbi Shimon bar Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi entered and passed by, and he did not stand before him. Rabbi Shimon became angry and went and said to his father: I taught him two of the nine parts of Torat Kohanim, the halakhic midrash on Leviticus, and yet he did not stand before me. And Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi said to Rabbi Shimon: Perhaps he was sitting and contemplating what you taught him and did not see you come in.
טַעְמָא דְּבָהֶן יוֹשֵׁב וּמְהַרְהֵר, הָא לָאו הָכִי לָא!
The Gemara explains the proof: The fact that the reason he might have been exempt was that he was sitting and pondering the lessons indicates that if that were not so, Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi would not have justified such behavior. One must stand before a Sage even in a bathhouse.
לָא קַשְׁיָא: הָא בְּבָתֵּי גַּוָּאֵי, הָא בְּבָתֵּי בָּרָאֵי.
The Gemara answers that this is not difficult: This halakha, that one is not required to stand in a bathhouse, applies to the inner rooms, where everyone is naked; standing in a place of this kind certainly does not bestow honor. That halakha, that one is obligated to stand in a bathhouse, applies to the outer rooms, where people are still dressed. Standing is a sign of respect in these rooms.
הָכִי נָמֵי מִסְתַּבְּרָא, דְּאָמַר רַבָּה בַּר בַּר חָנָה אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: בְּכׇל מָקוֹם מוּתָּר לְהַרְהֵר חוּץ מִבֵּית הַמֶּרְחָץ וּמִבֵּית הַכִּסֵּא. דִּילְמָא לְאוּנְסֵיהּ שָׁאנֵי.
The Gemara comments: So too, it is reasonable that this is the correct explanation, as Rabba bar bar Ḥana says that Rabbi Yoḥanan says: One is permitted to contemplate matters of Torah everywhere, except for the bathhouse and the lavatory. Since Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi suggested that the student might have been sitting and pondering his studies, it can be assumed that the episode occurred in a location where only some of the halakhot governing one’s behavior in a bathhouse apply, i.e., the outer rooms. The Gemara rejects this proof: Perhaps one whose studies are beyond his control is different; it is possible he was so absorbed in Torah study that he forgot that he was in a place where it is prohibited to think about sacred matters.
יָכוֹל יַעֲצִים עֵינָיו כְּמִי שֶׁלֹּא רָאָהוּ. אַטּוּ בְּרַשִּׁיעֵי עָסְקִינַן?
It is taught in the same baraita: One might have thought that one may close his eyes like one who does not see the elder; therefore, the verse states: “Before the hoary head you shall stand, and you shall revere the face of an elder, and you shall fear your God” (Leviticus 19:32). The Gemara expresses surprise at this statement: Is that to say that we are dealing with wicked people who would intentionally act this way to avoid fulfilling a mitzva?
אֶלָּא: יָכוֹל יַעֲצִים עֵינָיו מִקַּמֵּי דְּלִימְטְיֵהּ זְמַן חִיּוּבָא, דְּכִי מְטָא זְמַן חִיּוּבָא הָא לָא חָזֵי לֵיהּ דְּקָאֵים מִקַּמֵּיהּ, תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר: ״תָּקוּם וְיָרֵאתָ״.
Rather, this means: One might have thought that one may close his eyes before the obligation to stand arrives, i.e., when the elder is still far off. This would mean that when the obligation does arrive he will not see him, such that he would be required to stand before him. In this manner he thinks that he can avoid the obligation altogether. Therefore the verse states: “You shall stand…and you shall fear,” i.e., one should fear He who knows the secrets of one’s heart.
תָּנָא: אֵיזוֹהִי קִימָה שֶׁיֵּשׁ בָּהּ הִידּוּר – הֱוֵי אוֹמֵר זֶה אַרְבַּע אַמּוֹת. אָמַר אַבָּיֵי: לָא אֲמַרַן אֶלָּא בְּרַבּוֹ שֶׁאֵינוֹ מוּבְהָק, אֲבָל בְּרַבּוֹ הַמּוּבְהָק – מְלֹא עֵינָיו.
§ A Sage taught: What is the type of standing that indicates reverence? You must say that this applies when it is clear that one is standing in the elder’s honor, which is within four cubits of him. Abaye said: We said this halakha, that one must stand within four cubits of the elder, only with regard to one who is not his primary teacher; but for his primary teacher he must stand when he is within his range of vision, i.e., as soon as he sees him, even if he is more than four cubits away.
אַבָּיֵי מִכִּי הֲוָה חָזֵי לֵיהּ לְאוּדְנֵיהּ דְּחַמְרָא דְּרַב יוֹסֵף דְּאָתֵי, הֲוָה קָאֵים. אַבָּיֵי הֲוָה רְכִיב חֲמָרָא וְקָא מְסַגֵּי אַגּוּדָּא דִּנְהַר סַגְיָא, יָתֵיב רַב מְשַׁרְשְׁיָא וְרַבָּנַן בְּאִידַּךְ גִּיסָא וְלָא קָמוּ מִקַּמֵּיהּ. אֲמַר לְהוּ: וְלָאו רַב מוּבְהָק אֲנָא? אֲמַרוּ לֵיהּ: לָאו אַדַּעְתִּין.
The Gemara likewise reports that Abaye would stand as soon as he saw the ear of Rav Yosef’s donkey coming toward him. The Gemara relates: Abaye was riding a donkey along the bank of the Sagya River. Rav Mesharshiyya and other rabbis were sitting on the other bank of the river, and they did not stand before him. Abaye said to them: Am I not your primary teacher? You are therefore required to stand before me, despite the fact that I am far away. They said to him: That did not enter our minds, i.e., we did not see you at all.
רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן אֶלְעָזָר אוֹמֵר: מִנַּיִן לְזָקֵן שֶׁלֹּא יַטְרִיחַ – תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר: ״זָקֵן וְיָרֵאתָ״. אָמַר אַבָּיֵי: נָקְטִינַן דְּאִי מַקֵּיף – חָיֵי. אַבָּיֵי מַקֵּיף, רַבִּי זֵירָא מַקֵּיף.
§ It was further stated in the baraita that Rabbi Shimon ben Elazar says: From where is it derived that an elder should not trouble others to honor him? The verse states: “And you shall revere the face of an elder, and you shall fear your God.” Abaye said: We have a tradition that if a Sage circumnavigates an area so that people will not have to stand before him, he will live a long life. The Gemara relates that Abaye would circumnavigate an area, and likewise Rabbi Zeira would circumnavigate an area.
רָבִינָא הֲוָה יָתֵיב קַמֵּיהּ דְּרַבִּי יִרְמְיָה מִדִּיפְתִּי, חֲלַף הָהוּא גַּבְרָא קַמֵּיהּ וְלָא מִיכַּסֵּי רֵישָׁא. אָמַר: כַּמָּה חֲצִיף הָא גַּבְרָא. אֲמַר לֵיהּ: דִּלְמָא מִמָּתָא מַחְסֵיָא נִיהוּ, דְּגִיסִי בַּהּ רַבָּנַן.
The Gemara cites another incident involving honor one demonstrates for his teacher. Once, when Ravina was sitting before Rabbi Yirmeya of Difti, a certain man passed before him and did not cover his head. Ravina said: How rude is this man, who does not show respect by covering his head in honor of a rabbi. Rabbi Yirmeya of Difti said to him: Perhaps he is from the city of Mata Meḥasya, where rabbis are common and the people living there are consequently not as careful to display honor as those in other places.
אִיסִי בֶּן יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: ״מִפְּנֵי שֵׂיבָה תָּקוּם״ – וַאֲפִילּוּ כׇּל שֵׂיבָה בַּמַּשְׁמָע. אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: הֲלָכָה כְּאִיסִי בֶּן יְהוּדָה. רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן הֲוָה קָאֵי מִקַּמֵּי סָבֵי דְאַרְמָאֵי. אָמַר: כַּמָּה הַרְפַּתְקֵי עֲדוֹ עֲלַיְיהוּ דְּהָנֵי. רָבָא מֵיקָם לָא קָאֵי, הִידּוּר עָבֵד לְהוּ.
§ It was stated previously that Isi ben Yehuda says that as the verse states: “Before the hoary head you shall stand,” it indicates that even anyone of hoary head is included, not only a Torah scholar. Rabbi Yoḥanan said: The halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Isi ben Yehuda. The Gemara relates: Rabbi Yoḥanan himself would stand before Aramean, i.e., gentile, elders. He said: How many experiences [harpatkei] have occurred to these individuals. It is appropriate to honor them, due to the wisdom they have garnered from their long lives. Rava would not stand before them, but he displayed reverence to them.
אַבָּיֵי יָהֵיב יְדָא לְסָבֵי. רָבָא מְשַׁדַּר שְׁלוּחֵיהּ. רַב נַחְמָן מְשַׁדַּר גּוֹזָאֵי. אָמַר: אִי לָאו תּוֹרָה כַּמָּה נַחְמָן בַּר אַבָּא אִיכָּא בְּשׁוּקָא?
Abaye would extend a hand to elders so that they could lean on him. Rava would send his agent to help them. Rav Naḥman would send officers [goza’ei], his servants, to assist elders. He said: If not for the Torah, how many people named Naḥman bar Abba would there be in the marketplace? In other words, I am not permitted to treat my Torah study lightly by assisting them myself, as I can perform this mitzva through others.
אָמַר רַבִּי אַיְיבוּ אָמַר רַבִּי יַנַּאי:
Rabbi Aivu says that Rabbi Yannai says:
אֵין תַּלְמִיד חָכָם רַשַּׁאי לַעֲמוֹד מִפְּנֵי רַבּוֹ אֶלָּא שַׁחֲרִית וְעַרְבִית, כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא יִהְיֶה כְּבוֹדוֹ מְרוּבֶּה מִכְּבוֹד שָׁמַיִם. מֵיתִיבִי, רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן אֶלְעָזָר אוֹמֵר: מִנַּיִן לְזָקֵן שֶׁלֹּא יַטְרִיחַ – תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר: ״זָקֵן וְיָרֵאתָ״.
A Torah scholar is permitted to stand before his teacher only once in the morning and once in the evening, so that the teacher’s honor should not be greater than the honor of Heaven, as one recites the Shema, which is tantamount to greeting God, once in the morning and once in the evening. The Gemara raises an objection from an aforementioned opinion. Rabbi Shimon ben Elazar says: From where is it derived that an elder should not trouble others to honor him? The verse states: “An elder, and you shall fear” (Leviticus 19:32). The collocation of these words comes to teach that the elder, too, must fear God.
וְאִי אָמְרַתְּ שַׁחֲרִית וְעַרְבִית בִּלְבַד, אַמַּאי לָא נִיטְרַח? חִיּוּבָא הוּא! אֶלָּא לָאו כּוּלֵּי יוֹמָא! לָא, לְעוֹלָם שַׁחֲרִית וְעַרְבִית בִּלְבַד, וַאֲפִילּוּ הָכִי כַּמָּה דְּאֶפְשָׁר לֵיהּ – לָא נִיטְרַח.
The Gemara explains the objection: And if you say one may stand only in the morning and evening, why does the baraita say an elder should not trouble others? Standing for an elder only twice a day is an obligation for the people, not an imposition. Rather, is it not correct to say that one is obligated to stand before one’s teacher at any point during the day? The Gemara answers: No; actually one is obligated to stand only in the morning and evening, and even so, as much as it is possible for the elder, he should not trouble the people to stand.
אָמַר רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר: כׇּל תַּלְמִיד חָכָם שֶׁאֵין עוֹמֵד מִפְּנֵי רַבּוֹ נִקְרָא רָשָׁע, וְאֵינוֹ מַאֲרִיךְ יָמִים, וְתַלְמוּדוֹ מִשְׁתַּכֵּחַ, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״וְטוֹב לֹא יִהְיֶה לָרָשָׁע וְלֹא יַאֲרִיךְ יָמִים כַּצֵּל אֲשֶׁר אֵינֶנּוּ יָרֵא מִלִּפְנֵי הָאֱלֹהִים״, מוֹרָא זוֹ אֵינִי יוֹדֵעַ מַהוּ – כְּשֶׁהוּא אוֹמֵר ״וְיָרֵאתָ מֵאֱלֹהֶיךָ״ – הֲרֵי מוֹרָא זוֹ קִימָה.
§ Rabbi Elazar said: Any Torah scholar who does not stand before his teacher is called wicked, and he will not live a long life, and his studies will be forgotten, as it is stated: “But it shall not be well for the wicked, neither shall he prolong his days, which are as a shadow, because he does not fear before [millifnei] God” (Ecclesiastes 8:13). This fear mentioned in the verse, I do not know what it is. When the verse states: “And you shall revere the face [penei] of an elder, and you shall fear your God” (Leviticus 19:32), one can deduce that this fear mentioned in the verse is referring to standing. Consequently, this verse teaches with regard to one who does not stand that he is called wicked, he will not live a long life, and his studies will be forgotten, as indicated by the phrase: “It shall not be well.”
וְאֵימָא מוֹרָאַת רִבִּית וּמוֹרָאַת מִשְׁקָלוֹת! רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר: ״פְּנֵי״ ״פְּנֵי״ גָּמַר.
The Gemara asks: But why not say that this is referring to fear of God stated with regard to interest (Leviticus 25:36), or the fear of God stated with regard to weights (Deuteronomy 25:13–16), as the fear of God is mentioned with regard to these prohibitions as well. The Gemara answers: Rabbi Elazar derives this halakha through a verbal analogy of “penei” and “penei,” as explained previously, not from a verbal analogy of the term “fear.”
אִיבַּעְיָא לְהוּ: בְּנוֹ וְהוּא רַבּוֹ, מַהוּ לַעֲמוֹד מִפְּנֵי אָבִיו? תָּא שְׁמַע, דַּאֲמַר לֵיהּ שְׁמוּאֵל לְרַב יְהוּדָה: שִׁינָּנָא, קוּם מִקַּמֵּי אֲבוּךְ. שָׁאנֵי רַב יְחֶזְקֵאל דְּבַעַל מַעֲשִׂים הֲוָה, דַּאֲפִילּוּ מָר שְׁמוּאֵל נָמֵי קָאֵים מִקַּמֵּיהּ.
A dilemma was raised before them: With regard to one who is both a man’s son and his teacher, what is the halakha as to whether that son must stand before his father? The Gemara answers: Come and hear, as Shmuel said to Rav Yehuda: Big-toothed one, stand before your father. Although Rav Yehuda was a great Torah scholar and taught his father, he was still required to stand before him. The Gemara answers: Rav Yeḥezkel, Rav Yehuda’s father, is different, as he was a man of good deeds, and even Mar Shmuel himself would stand before him.
אֶלָּא מַאי קָאָמַר לֵיהּ? הָכִי קָאָמַר לֵיהּ: זִימְנִין דְּאָתֵי מֵאֲחוֹרַי, קוּם אַתְּ מִקַּמֵּיהּ וְלָא תֵּיחוּשׁ לִיקָרָא דִידִי.
The Gemara asks: Rather, what is Shmuel saying to Rav Yehuda? If he is not teaching him that one who is his father’s teacher must stand before his father, why did Shmuel say this to Rav Yehuda? The Gemara answers that this is what Shmuel said to him: Sometimes your father comes from behind me and I do not see him or stand before him. Nevertheless, you should stand before him and do not be concerned about my honor.
אִיבַּעְיָא לְהוּ: בְּנוֹ וְהוּא רַבּוֹ, מַהוּ שֶׁיַּעֲמוֹד אָבִיו מִפָּנָיו? תָּא שְׁמַע דְּאָמַר רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ בֶּן לֵוִי: אֲנִי אֵינִי כְּדַי לַעֲמוֹד מִפְּנֵי בְנִי, אֶלָּא מִשּׁוּם כְּבוֹד בֵּית נָשִׂיא.
Another dilemma was raised before them, with regard to one who is both a man’s son and his teacher, what is the halakha as to whether the father must stand before his son? The Gemara answers: Come and hear, as Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi says: It is not appropriate for me to stand before my son solely due to his greatness in Torah, as I am greater than him. But due to the honor of the household of the Nasi I do stand before him, as his son was a son-in-law of the Nasi.
טַעְמָא דַּאֲנָא רַבֵּיהּ, הָא אִיהוּ רַבַּאי – קָאֵימְנָא מִקַּמֵּיהּ! הָכִי קָאָמַר: אֲנִי אֵינִי כְּדַי לַעֲמוֹד מִפְּנֵי בְנִי וַאֲפִילּוּ הוּא רַבַּאי, דְּהָא אֲנָא אֲבוּהּ, אֶלָּא מִשּׁוּם כְּבוֹד בֵּית נָשִׂיא.
It may be inferred from here that if his son were not in the household of the Nasi he would not stand for him, and the reason was that he could claim: I am his teacher and therefore I am not obligated to stand before him. Accordingly, Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi is indicating that if he were my teacher I would stand before him. The Gemara rejects this proof: This is what Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi is saying: It is not appropriate for me to stand before my son, even if he were my teacher, as I am his father. But due to the honor of the household of the Nasi I do stand before him.
אִיבַּעְיָא לְהוּ: רָכוּב כִּמְהַלֵּךְ דָּמֵי, אוֹ לָא? אָמַר אַבָּיֵי: תָּא שְׁמַע: טָמֵא יוֹשֵׁב תַּחַת הָאִילָן, וְטָהוֹר עוֹמֵד – טָמֵא.
A dilemma was raised before them: If one’s teacher is riding on an animal, is that considered like walking, and therefore one must stand before him, or is he not obligated to stand before him, since he is stationary relative to the animal? Abaye said: Come and hear a resolution from a different issue (Nega’im 13:7): If a leper, who is ritually impure and transfers impurity through a tent, i.e., anyone who enters the location of the leper is rendered impure, is sitting under the branches of a tree, which form a tent over him, and a pure person is standing under that tree, the pure person is rendered impure.
טָמֵא עוֹמֵד תַּחַת הָאִילָן וְטָהוֹר יוֹשֵׁב – טָהוֹר, וְאִם יָשַׁב הַטָּמֵא – הַטָּהוֹר טָמֵא.
If the impure person is standing under the tree and the pure person is sitting there, he remains pure. In this case, as the impure person is not settled there, he does not impart ritual impurity in a tent. But if the impure person sat and established his place there, the pure individual is rendered impure.
וְכֵן בְּאֶבֶן הַמְנוּגַּעַת. וְאָמַר רַב נַחְמָן בַּר כֹּהֵן: זֹאת אוֹמֶרֶת רָכוּב כִּמְהַלֵּךְ דָּמֵי, שְׁמַע מִינַּהּ.
That mishna adds: And the same halakha applies with regard to a stone afflicted with a leprous sore (see Leviticus, chapter 14), which also imparts impurity of a tent. If one carrying a stone of this kind sits under a tree, a pure person standing under the tree is rendered impure, whereas if the person carrying the stone stands, he does not render the other individual impure. And Rav Naḥman bar Kohen says: That is to say that riding is considered like walking, as although the stone is stationary relative to the person, it is considered to be moving. Conclude from it that in all cases riding is like walking.
אִיבַּעְיָא לְהוּ: מַהוּ לַעֲמוֹד מִפְּנֵי סֵפֶר תּוֹרָה? רַבִּי חִלְקִיָּה וְרַבִּי סִימוֹן וְרַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר אָמְרִי: קַל וָחוֹמֶר, מִפְּנֵי לוֹמְדֶיהָ עוֹמְדִים – מִפָּנֶיהָ לֹא כׇּל שֶׁכֵּן?!
A dilemma was raised before them: What is the halakha as to whether one should stand before a Torah scroll? Rabbi Ḥilkiya and Rabbi Simon and Rabbi Elazar say that this dilemma can be resolved by an a fortiori inference: If one stands before those who study the Torah, is it not all the more so true that one should stand before the Torah itself?
רַבִּי אִלְעַי וְרַבִּי יַעֲקֹב בַּר זַבְדִּי הֲווֹ יָתְבִי. חָלֵיף וְאָזֵיל רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בַּר אַבָּא, וְקָמוּ מִקַּמֵּיהּ. אֲמַר לְהוּ: חֲדָא – דְּאַתּוּן חַכִּימֵי וַאֲנָא חָבֵר. וְעוֹד, כְּלוּם תּוֹרָה עוֹמֶדֶת מִפְּנֵי לוֹמְדֶיהָ.
The Gemara relates: Rabbi Elai and Rabbi Ya’akov bar Zavdi were sitting and studying Torah. Rabbi Shimon bar Abba passed before them and they stood before him. Rabbi Shimon bar Abba said to them: You are not obligated to do this, for two reasons. One reason is that you are ordained scholars and I am only an associate, i.e., he had not been ordained. And furthermore, does the Torah stand before those who study it? Since you are engaged in Torah study at the present moment you are not required to stand before a Torah scholar.
סָבַר לַהּ כְּרַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר. דְּאָמַר רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר: אֵין תַּלְמִיד חָכָם רַשַּׁאי לַעֲמוֹד מִפְּנֵי רַבּוֹ בְּשָׁעָה שֶׁעוֹסֵק בַּתּוֹרָה. לָיֵיט עֲלַהּ אַבָּיֵי.
The Gemara comments: Rabbi Shimon bar Abba holds in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Elazar, as Rabbi Elazar says: A Torah scholar may not stand before his teacher when he is studying Torah, because he is engaged in honoring the Torah itself. The Gemara adds: Even so, Abaye cursed anyone who acted in accordance with this ruling, as he would give the appearance of one who disrespected his teacher.
״וְהִבִּיטוּ אַחֲרֵי מֹשֶׁה עַד בֹּאוֹ הָאֹהֱלָה״, רַבִּי אַמֵּי וְרַבִּי יִצְחָק נַפָּחָא. חַד אָמַר לִגְנַאי, וְחַד אָמַר לְשֶׁבַח. מַאן דְּאָמַר לִגְנַאי – כִּדְאִיתָא. מַאן דְּאָמַר לְשֶׁבַח, אָמַר חִזְקִיָּה:
§ The Gemara continues to discuss the mitzva of standing before a Torah scholar. With regard to the verse: “And they looked after Moses until he was gone into the tent” (Exodus 33:8), Rabbi Ami and Rabbi Yitzḥak Nappaḥa disputed its correct interpretation. One said that this is stated unfavorably, and one said that it is meant favorably. The one who said it was stated unfavorably explains the verse as it is interpreted in the midrash. The one who said it was stated favorably interprets the verse in accordance with that which Ḥizkiyya says.
אֲמַר לִי רַבִּי חֲנִינָא בְּרֵיהּ דְּרַבִּי אֲבָהוּ, אָמַר רַבִּי אֲבָהוּ, אָמַר רַבִּי אַבְדִּימִי דְּמִן חֵיפָא: חָכָם עוֹבֵר – עוֹמֵד מִלְּפָנָיו אַרְבַּע אַמּוֹת, וְכֵיוָן שֶׁעָבַר אַרְבַּע אַמּוֹת – יוֹשֵׁב. אַב בֵּית דִּין עוֹבֵר – עוֹמֵד מִלְּפָנָיו מְלֹא עֵינָיו, וְכֵיוָן שֶׁעָבַר אַרְבַּע אַמּוֹת יוֹשֵׁב. נָשִׂיא עוֹבֵר – עוֹמֵד מִלְּפָנָיו מְלֹא עֵינָיו, וְאֵינוֹ יוֹשֵׁב עַד שֶׁיֵּשֵׁב בִּמְקוֹמוֹ, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״וְהִבִּיטוּ אַחֲרֵי מֹשֶׁה עַד בֹּאוֹ הָאֹהֱלָה״.
As Ḥizkiyya says: Rabbi Ḥanina, son of Rabbi Abbahu, said to me that Rabbi Abbahu says that Rabbi Avdimi of Haifa says: If a Torah scholar is passing, one stands before him if he passes within four cubits of him, and once he passes four cubits from him he sits. If the president of the court is passing, one stands before him as soon as he comes within his range of vision. And once he passes four cubits from him, he sits. If the Nasi is passing, one stands before him as soon as he comes within his range of vision, and he does not sit until the Nasi sits in his place, as it is stated: “And they looked after Moses until he was gone into the tent,” and only afterward did they sit. According to this interpretation, the verse is praising the behavior of the Jews.
כׇּל מִצְוַת עֲשֵׂה שֶׁהַזְּמַן גְּרָמָהּ וְכוּ׳. תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: אֵיזוֹהִי מִצְוַת עֲשֵׂה שֶׁהַזְּמַן גְּרָמָהּ – סוּכָּה, וְלוּלָב, שׁוֹפָר, וְצִיצִית,
§ The mishna teaches that women are exempt from all positive, time-bound mitzvot. The Sages taught: What is a positive, time-bound mitzva? Examples include residing in a sukka, and taking the lulav, and blowing the shofar on Rosh HaShana, all of which can be performed only at specific times of the year. And another example is donning ritual fringes, as the mitzva applies only during the daytime due to the verse which states: “Fringes, that you may look upon them” (Numbers 15:39), indicating that the fringes should be seen.
