Where did the priests sleep? What if they had a seminal emission? When did they wake up and what did they do upon waking up? From where is it derived that they guarded in three different places? What did the places where they guarded from look like?
This week’s learning is sponsored for the merit and safety of Haymanut (Emuna) Kasau, who was 9 years old when she disappeared from her home in Tzfat two years ago, on the 16th of Adar, 5784 (February 25, 2024), and whose whereabouts remain unknown.
This week’s learning is dedicated of the safety of our nation, the soldiers and citizens of Israel, and for the liberation of the Iranian people. May we soon see the realization of “ליהודים היתה אורה ושמחה וששון ויקר”.
Want to dedicate learning? Get started here:
English
עברית
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
Today’s daily daf tools:
This week’s learning is sponsored for the merit and safety of Haymanut (Emuna) Kasau, who was 9 years old when she disappeared from her home in Tzfat two years ago, on the 16th of Adar, 5784 (February 25, 2024), and whose whereabouts remain unknown.
This week’s learning is dedicated of the safety of our nation, the soldiers and citizens of Israel, and for the liberation of the Iranian people. May we soon see the realization of “ליהודים היתה אורה ושמחה וששון ויקר”.
Tamid 26
בִּמְסִיבָּה הַהוֹלֶכֶת לוֹ תַּחַת הַבִּירָה. וְנֵרוֹת דּוֹלְקִין מִכָּאן וּמִכָּאן. עַד שֶׁהוּא מַגִּיעַ לְבֵית הַטְּבִילָה. וּמְדוּרָה הָיְתָה שָׁם. וּבֵית הַכִּסֵּא שֶׁל כָּבוֹד. זֶה הָיָה כְּבוֹדוֹ: מְצָאוֹ נָעוּל – יוֹדֵעַ שֶׁיֵּשׁ שָׁם אָדָם. פָּתוּחַ – בְּיָדוּעַ שֶׁאֵין שָׁם אָדָם.
through the circuitous passage that extended beneath the Temple, as he could not pass through the Temple courtyard, due to his impurity. And there were lamps burning on this side and on that side of the passage. He would walk through the passage until he reached the Chamber of Immersion. And there was a fire burning there to warm the priests after they had immersed, and also a bathroom of honor, so that the priests could urinate before immersion. This was the manifestation of its honor: If one found the door closed, he would know that there was a person there, and he would wait for him to exit before entering. If one found the door open, it was known that there was no person there, and he could enter. In this manner, the one using it was afforded privacy.
יָרַד, וְטָבַל, עָלָה וְנִסְתַּפֵּג, וְנִתְחַמֵּם כְּנֶגֶד הַמְּדוּרָה. בָּא, וְיָשַׁב לוֹ אֵצֶל אֶחָיו הַכֹּהֲנִים, עַד שֶׁהָיוּ שְׁעָרִים נִפְתָּחִים, יוֹצֵא וְהוֹלֵךְ לוֹ.
After the priest descended and immersed in the ritual bath, he ascended and dried himself with a towel, and warmed himself opposite the fire. He then came back to the Chamber of the Hearth and sat with his brethren the priests until dawn, when the gates of the Temple courtyard would be opened. He would then leave the Temple and go on his way. Since the purification process of one who immerses is not complete until sunset, by rabbinic law he could not remain in the Temple during the daytime.
מִי שֶׁהוּא רוֹצֶה לִתְרוֹם אֶת הַמִּזְבֵּחַ, מַשְׁכִּים וְטוֹבֵל עַד שֶׁלֹּא יָבֹא הַמְמוּנֶּה. וְכִי בְּאֵיזֶה שָׁעָה בָּא הַמְמוּנֶּה? לֹא כׇּל הָעִתִּים שָׁווֹת, פְּעָמִים שֶׁהוּא בָּא מִקְּרוֹת הַגֶּבֶר, אוֹ סָמוּךְ לוֹ מִלְּפָנָיו אוֹ מֵאַחֲרָיו.
The mishna describes the commencement of the daily service in the Temple: Among the members of the priestly family who are to serve in the Temple that day, whoever wants to remove the ashes from the altar rises early and immerses himself in a ritual bath, as required of anyone who enters the Temple courtyard. He must immerse before the appointed priest arrives, as the appointed priest oversees the lottery that determines which priests perform the various rites of the Temple service, and the first of those lotteries determines who will be charged with the removal of the ashes. And at what time does the appointed priest arrive? The times of his arrival are not all the same. There are times that he comes at the call of the rooster [hagever], or he might come at an adjacent time, either before the call of the rooster or after it.
הַמְמוּנֶּה בָּא, וְדָפַק עֲלֵיהֶן, וְהֵן פָּתְחוּ לוֹ, אָמַר לָהֶן: מִי שֶׁטָּבַל – יָבֹא וְיָפִיס, הֵפִיסוּ, מִי שֶׁזָּכָה – זָכָה בּוֹ.
The appointed priest arrived at the Chamber of the Hearth, where the priests of the patrilineal family were assembled, and he knocked on the gate to alert them to open the gate for him. And when they opened the gate for him, he said to them: Whoever immersed in the ritual bath may come and participate in the lottery. They then conducted the lottery, and whoever won that lottery won the privilege to perform the rite of the removal of the ashes.
גְּמָ׳ מְנָא הָנֵי מִילֵּי? אָמַר אַבָּיֵי: אָמַר קְרָא ״וְהַחֹנִים לִפְנֵי הַמִּשְׁכָּן קֵדְמָה לִפְנֵי אֹהֶל מוֹעֵד מִזְרָחָה מֹשֶׁה וְאַהֲרֹן וּבָנָיו שֹׁמְרִים מִשְׁמֶרֶת הַמִּקְדָּשׁ לְמִשְׁמֶרֶת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל״.
GEMARA: The mishna teaches that the priests would keep watch in three locations in the Temple. The Gemara asks: From where are these matters derived? Abaye said that they are derived from a verse, as the verse states: “And those that were to camp before the Tabernacle eastward, before the Tent of Meeting toward the sunrise, were Moses and Aaron and his sons, keeping the watch of the Sanctuary, for the watch of the children of Israel, and the non-priest who came near was to be put to death” (Numbers 3:38).
אָמְרִי: אִין, שִׁימּוּר בְּעָלְמָא אַשְׁכְּחַן דְּבָעֵי, כֹּהֲנִים וּלְוִיִּם שִׁימּוּר. מִיהוּ מַתְנִיתִין קָתָנֵי: בִּשְׁלֹשָׁה מְקוֹמוֹת הַכֹּהֲנִים שׁוֹמְרִים בְּבֵית הַמִּקְדָּשׁ, וְהַלְוִיִּם בְּעֶשְׂרִים וְאֶחָד מָקוֹם, וְאִילּוּ קְרָא, כֹּהֲנִים וּלְוִיִּם בַּהֲדֵי הֲדָדֵי כְּתִיב!
The Sages say in response: Yes, we have found in this verse that in general the Torah requires a watch to be kept. Furthermore, the verse indicates that it is the priests and Levites who are required to perform the watch, as it states the precedent of Moses, who was a Levite, and Aaron, who was a priest. But the mishna (Middot 1:1) teaches: The priests would keep watch in three places in the Temple courtyard…and the Levites in twenty-one places. According to the mishna, the priests and Levites kept watch in different locations, whereas in the verse the priests and the Levites are written together, indicating that they kept watch in the same places.
אָמְרִי, הָכִי קָאָמַר: ״וְהַחֹנִים לִפְנֵי הַמִּשְׁכָּן קֵדְמָה לִפְנֵי אֹהֶל מוֹעֵד מִזְרָחָה מֹשֶׁה וַהֲדַר אַהֲרֹן וּבָנָיו שֹׁמְרֵי מִשְׁמֶרֶת הַמִּקְדָּשׁ״. אַהֲרֹן – בְּחַד מָקוֹם, וּבָנָיו – בִּשְׁנֵי מְקוֹמוֹת.
The Sages say that this is what the verse is saying: “And those that were to camp before the Tabernacle eastward, before the Tent of Meeting toward the sunrise, were Moses,” indicating that the Levites keep watch. And then the verse states with regard to the separate watch kept by the priests: “Aaron and his sons, keeping the watch of the Sanctuary.” Furthermore, the verse indicates that Aaron keeps watch in one place, and his sons keep watch in two other places, from which it is derived that the priests keep watch in three different places.
מִמַּאי? מִדִּכְתִיב ״וְהַחֹנִים״, וּכְתִיב ״שֹׁמְרִים״. ״חוֹנִים״ לְחוֹד, וְ״שׁוֹמְרִים״ לְחוֹד.
The Gemara asks: From where is it derived that the verse should be interpreted in this manner? This is derived from the fact that it is written: “And those that were to camp…were Moses,” and it is written separately: “Aaron and his sons, keeping the watch.” This indicates that those who were to camp and thereby keep watch are discrete, and those keeping the watch are discrete, i.e., they perform different watches in separate places.
אֵימָא כּוּלְּהוּ בְּחַד מָקוֹם לְחוֹדֵיהּ! לָא סָלְקָא דַּעְתָּךְ: מָה מֹשֶׁה – בְּחַד מָקוֹם לְחוֹדֵיהּ, אַף אַהֲרֹן וּבָנָיו – בְּחַד מָקוֹם לְחוֹדֵיהּ.
The Gemara objects: One can say that all of the priests keep watch in one place that is discrete from the watches of the Levites, but not in three separate places. The Gemara explains: That possibility should not enter your mind, as the verse juxtaposes the watches of Moses and Aaron. This indicates that just as Moses keeps watch in one place discretely, so too, Aaron and his sons each keep watch in one place discretely, and they do not keep watch together.
רַב אָשֵׁי אָמַר, מִסֵּיפֵיהּ דִּקְרָא: ״שֹׁמְרִים מִשְׁמֶרֶת … לְמִשְׁמֶרֶת״.
Rav Ashi said that the halakha that the priests keep watch in three places is derived from the end of the verse, which states: “Moses and Aaron and his sons, keeping [shomerim] the watch [mishmeret] of the Sanctuary, for the watch [lemishmeret] of the children of Israel.” The verse uses three terms from the root shin, mem, reish, which means to watch, indicating that there should be three separate watches.
בֵּית אַבְטִינָס וּבֵית הַנִּיצוֹץ. אִיבַּעְיָא לְהוּ: עֲלִיּוֹת מַמָּשׁ הֲווֹ, אוֹ דִלְמָא דַּהֲווֹ גְּבִיהִי מִגְבָּהּ כַּעֲלִיּוֹת?
§ The mishna teaches that the Chamber of Avtinas and the Chamber of the Spark were upper stories. Concerning this, a dilemma was raised before the Sages: Were these halls actual upper stories? Or perhaps they were merely very tall, built upon pillars, and therefore were like upper stories.
תָּא שְׁמַע, דִּתְנַן: שֶׁבַּצָּפוֹן שַׁעַר הַנִּיצוֹץ כְּמִין אַכְסַדְרָא הָיָה, וַעֲלִיָּיה בְּנוּיָה עַל גַּבָּהּ, שֶׁהַכֹּהֲנִים שׁוֹמְרִים מִלְמַעְלָה, וְהַלְוִיִּם מִלְּמַטָּה. וּפֶתַח הָיָה לוֹ לַחוֹל.
The Gemara explains: Come and hear a resolution, as we learned in a mishna that discusses the seven gates to the Temple courtyard (Middot 1:5): There were three gates that were in the north, and the first of these was the Gate of the Spark. It was like a portico [akhsadra], and there was an upper story built atop it, where the honor guard stood, with the priests watching from above, in the upper story; and the Levites would keep watch from below. And the hall had an entrance toward the non-sacred area of the Temple Mount. This mishna indicates that the Chamber of the Spark was an actual upper story.
מְנָא הָנֵי מִילֵּי? דְּתָנוּ רַבָּנַן: ״וְיִלָּווּ עָלֶיךָ וִישָׁרְתוּךָ״ – בַּעֲבוֹדָתְךָ הַכָּתוּב מְדַבֵּר.
The Gemara asks: From where are these matters, that the priests and Levites kept watch on different stories, derived? This is derived from a verse, as the Sages taught in a baraita: The verse states that God said to Aaron: “And your brethren also, the tribe of Levi, the tribe of your father, you shall bring near with you, that they may accompany you and serve you” (Numbers 18:2). The verse is speaking of the Levites accompanying Aaron in your, i.e., Aaron’s, service of keeping watch in the Temple, which is the only service performed by both priests and Levites. Since the verse speaks of the watch of the Levites only as an accompaniment to the watch of the priests, the Levites do not keep watch from above like the priests, but only from below.
אַתָּה אוֹמֵר בַּעֲבוֹדָתְךָ הַכָּתוּב מְדַבֵּר, אוֹ אֵינוֹ אֶלָּא בַּעֲבוֹדָתָם! כְּשֶׁהוּא אוֹמֵר ״וְנִלְווּ עָלֶיךָ וְשָׁמְרוּ לְכׇל כֵּלָיו וּלְכֹל עֲבֹדָתוֹ״ – הֲרֵי בַּעֲבוֹדָתָם אָמוּר. הָא מָה אֲנִי מְקַיֵּים ״וְיִלָּווּ עָלֶיךָ וִישָׁרְתוּךָ״ – בַּעֲבוֹדָתְךָ הַכָּתוּב מְדַבֵּר. הָא כֵּיצַד? כֹּהֲנִים שׁוֹמְרִים מִלְמַעְלָה, וּלְוִיִּם מִלְּמַטָּה.
The baraita asks: Do you say that the verse speaks of the Levites’ accompanying the priests in your service, of the priests keeping watch, or is it only stating that the Levites should accompany the priests through their own service of bearing the sacred vessels? The baraita explains that when the verse states: “And they shall accompany you, and they shall keep the watch of the Tent of Meeting” (Numbers 18:4), this is referring to keeping watch of all the Temple’s vessels and all its service, and consequently their own service of bearing the sacred vessels is already stated. How, then, do I realize the meaning of the previous verse: “That they may accompany you and serve you” (Numbers 18:2)? The verse is speaking of the Levites accompanying the priests in your service, of the priests keeping watch in the Temple. How so? The priests keep watch from above, and the Levites accompany them from below.
בֵּית הַמּוֹקֵד כִּיפָּה, וּבַיִת גָּדוֹל הָיָה.
§ With regard to the third place in which the priests would keep watch, the mishna states: In the Chamber of the Hearth the ceiling was round like a cupola, and it was a large hall.
וְחַד שׁוֹמֵר הוּא דַּהֲוָה בְּבֵית הַמּוֹקֵד? וּרְמִינְהִי: שְׁנֵי שְׁעָרִים הָיוּ בְּבֵית הַמּוֹקֵד, אֶחָד פָּתוּחַ לַחֵיל, וְאֶחָד פָּתוּחַ לָעֲזָרָה. אָמַר רַבִּי יְהוּדָה: בָּזֶה שֶׁנִּכְנָסִין לָעֲזָרָה – פִּשְׁפָּשׁ קָטָן הָיָה לוֹ, שֶׁבּוֹ נִכְנָסִין לִבְלוֹשׁ הָעֲזָרָה! אָמַר אַבָּיֵי: כֵּיוָן דְּגַבֵּי הֲדָדֵי הֲווֹ קָיְימִי – סַגִּי לְהוּ בְּחַד שׁוֹמֵר, דָּוֵי לְהָכָא וְדָוֵי לְהָכָא.
The Gemara asks: But was there only one watchman in the Chamber of the Hearth? And the Gemara raises a contradiction from a mishna (Middot 1:7): The Chamber of the Hearth had two gates; one, on the north side, was open to the rampart, and one, on the south side, was open to the courtyard. Rabbi Yehuda said: This gate that was open to the courtyard had a small wicket in the door of the gate, through which the priests would enter in order to examine the courtyard and ensure that everything was in order. The Chamber of the Hearth had two gates, and therefore there should have been two watchmen there. Abaye said: Since the two gates stood next to each other, i.e., directly opposite one another, it was sufficient for them to be watched by one watchman, who could look here and look there.
מוּקָּף רוֹבְדִין שֶׁל אֶבֶן. רוֹבְדִין מַאי נִיהוּ? גִּזְרָתָא דְאִצְטְבָתָא דְּסָלְקִי בְּהוּ לְאִצְטְבָתָא. וּמִי הֲווֹ מִיפַּלְגִי אֲבָנִים? וְהָכְתִיב: ״וְהַבַּיִת בְּהִבָּנוֹתוֹ אֶבֶן שְׁלֵמָה וְגוֹ׳״!
§ The mishna teaches that the Chamber of the Hearth was surrounded by rows of stone that protruded from the walls and that served as benches. The Gemara asks: What are these rows of stone? They are rows of chiseled stones by which the priests ascend to another row of stone, where they could lie down. The Gemara asks: And would they split the stones in the process of building the Temple? But isn’t it written: “For the Temple, when it was being built, was built of whole stone made ready at the quarry; and there was neither hammer nor ax nor any tool of iron heard in the Temple, while it was being built” (I Kings 6:7)?
אָמַר אַבָּיֵי: דִּמְתַקְּנִי וּמַיְיתִי מֵעִיקָּרָא אַבְנֵי זוּטְרָתָא וְאַבְנֵי רַבְרְבָתָא, כְּדִכְתִיב: ״אַבְנֵי עֶשֶׂר אַמּוֹת וְאַבְנֵי שְׁמֹנֶה אַמּוֹת״.
Abaye said: It was prohibited to use iron implements to cut the stones only inside the Temple area. In this case it was permitted to have chiseled stones, as the builders prepared the stones in another location. And the builders initially brought small stones and large stones with which to build the Temple, as it is written: “And the foundation was of costly stones, even great stones, stones of ten cubits, and stones of eight cubits” (I Kings 7:10). Accordingly, the larger stones were used for the lower tier, while the smaller stones were for the higher tier, forming protruding benches upon which the priests could sleep.
זִקְנֵי בֵּית אָב יְשֵׁנִים שָׁם. וְאַמַּאי? לְעַיְּילִי מִטּוֹת! אָמַר אַבָּיֵי: לָאו אוֹרַח אַרְעָא לְעַיּוֹלֵי מִטּוֹת לְבֵית הַמִּקְדָּשׁ.
The mishna teaches that the elders of the patrilineal family that would serve in the Temple the following day would sleep there, on the rows of stone. The Gemara asks: But why did the priests sleep on the stones? Let them bring beds into the Chamber of the Hearth. Abaye said: It is not proper conduct to bring beds into the Temple.
פִּרְחֵי כְהוּנָּה, אִישׁ כְּסוּתוֹ בָּאָרֶץ. אַמַּאי הָתָם קָרֵי לְהוּ ״רוֹבִים״, הָכָא קָרֵי לְהוּ
The mishna further teaches that with regard to the young men of the priesthood, each of them would sleep with his garment on the ground. The Gemara asks: Why is it that there, in the earlier mishna, the tanna calls them young [rovim] priests, whereas here, the tanna calls them
Follow 
Today’s daily daf tools:
Delve Deeper
Broaden your understanding of the topics on this daf with classes and podcasts from top women Talmud scholars.
Yevamot 93: The Existence of the Things That Do Not Yet Exist
06.08.2022 | ט׳ בסיון תשפ״ב
Pesachim 105: Shabbat Arrives When It Does, Like It or Not
03.06.2021 | כ״ב באדר תשפ״א
New to Talmud?
Check out our resources designed to help you navigate a page of Talmud – and study at the pace, level and style that fits you.
The Hadran Women’s Tapestry
Meet the diverse women learning Gemara at Hadran and hear their stories.
I started learning Daf in Jan 2020 with Brachot b/c I had never seen the Jewish people united around something so positive, and I wanted to be a part of it. Also, I wanted to broaden my background in Torah Shebal Peh- Maayanot gave me a great gemara education, but I knew that I could hold a conversation in most parts of tanach but almost no TSB. I’m so thankful for Daf and have gained immensely.
Meira Shapiro
NJ, United States
I attended the Siyum so that I could tell my granddaughter that I had been there. Then I decided to listen on Spotify and after the siyum of Brachot, Covid and zoom began. It gave structure to my day. I learn with people from all over the world who are now my friends – yet most of us have never met. I can’t imagine life without it. Thank you Rabbanit Michelle.
Emma Rinberg
Raanana, Israel
Attending the Siyyum in Jerusalem 26 months ago inspired me to become part of this community of learners. So many aspects of Jewish life have been illuminated by what we have learned in Seder Moed. My day is not complete without daf Yomi. I am so grateful to Rabbanit Michelle and the Hadran Community.
Nancy Kolodny
Newton, United States
In early January of 2020, I learned about Siyyum HaShas and Daf Yomi via Tablet Magazine’s brief daily podcast about the Daf. I found it compelling and fascinating. Soon I discovered Hadran; since then I have learned the Daf daily with Rabbanit Michelle Cohen Farber. The Daf has permeated my every hour, and has transformed and magnified my place within the Jewish Universe.
Lisa Berkelhammer
San Francisco, CA , United States
What a great experience to learn with Rabbanit Michelle Farber. I began with this cycle in January 2020 and have been comforted by the consistency and energy of this process throughout the isolation period of Covid. Week by week, I feel like I am exploring a treasure chest with sparkling gems and puzzling antiquities. The hunt is exhilarating.
Marian Frankston
Pennsylvania, United States
I LOVE learning the Daf. I started with Shabbat. I join the morning Zoom with Reb Michelle and it totally grounds my day. When Corona hit us in Israel, I decided that I would use the Daf to keep myself sane, especially during the days when we could not venture out more than 300 m from our home. Now my husband and I have so much new material to talk about! It really is the best part of my day!
Batsheva Pava
Hashmonaim, Israel
Robin Zeiger
Tel Aviv, Israel
I heard about the syium in January 2020 & I was excited to start learning then the pandemic started. Learning Daf became something to focus on but also something stressful. As the world changed around me & my family I had to adjust my expectations for myself & the world. Daf Yomi & the Hadran podcast has been something I look forward to every day. It gives me a moment of centering & Judaism daily.
Talia Haykin
Denver, United States
I started learning on January 5, 2020. When I complete the 7+ year cycle I will be 70 years old. I had been intimidated by those who said that I needed to study Talmud in a traditional way with a chevruta, but I decided the learning was more important to me than the method. Thankful for Daf Yomi for Women helping me catch up when I fall behind, and also being able to celebrate with each Siyum!
Pamela Elisheva
Bakersfield, United States
In January 2020, my teaching partner at IDC suggested we do daf yomi. Thanks to her challenge, I started learning daily from Rabbanit Michelle. It’s a joy to be part of the Hadran community. (It’s also a tikkun: in 7th grade, my best friend and I tied for first place in a citywide gemara exam, but we weren’t invited to the celebration because girls weren’t supposed to be learning gemara).
Sara Averick
Jerusalem, Israel
I heard the new Daf Yomi cycle was starting and I was curious, so I searched online for a women’s class and was pleasently surprised to find Rabanit Michelle’s great class reviews in many online articles. It has been a splendid journey. It is a way to fill my days with Torah, learning so many amazing things I have never heard before during my Tanach learning at High School. Thanks so much .
Martha Tarazi
Panama, Panama
“I got my job through the NY Times” was an ad campaign when I was growing up. I can headline “I got my daily Daf shiur and Hadran through the NY Times”. I read the January 4, 2020 feature on Reb. Michelle Farber and Hadran and I have been participating ever since. Thanks NY Times & Hadran!
Deborah Aschheim
New York, United States
I started learning at the beginning of this Daf Yomi cycle because I heard a lot about the previous cycle coming to an end and thought it would be a good thing to start doing. My husband had already bought several of the Koren Talmud Bavli books and they were just sitting on the shelf, not being used, so here was an opportunity to start using them and find out exactly what was in them. Loving it!
Caroline Levison
Borehamwood, United Kingdom
I had never heard of Daf Yomi and after reading the book, The Weight of Ink, I explored more about it. I discovered that it was only 6 months before a whole new cycle started and I was determined to give it a try. I tried to get a friend to join me on the journey but after the first few weeks they all dropped it. I haven’t missed a day of reading and of listening to the podcast.
Anne Rubin
Elkins Park, United States
I read Ilana Kurshan’s “If All the Seas Were Ink” which inspired me. Then the Women’s Siyum in Jerusalem in 2020 convinced me, I knew I had to join! I have loved it- it’s been a constant in my life daily, many of the sugiyot connect to our lives. My family and friends all are so supportive. It’s incredible being part of this community and love how diverse it is! I am so excited to learn more!
Shira Jacobowitz
Jerusalem, Israel
I started learning at the start of this cycle, and quickly fell in love. It has become such an important part of my day, enriching every part of my life.
Naomi Niederhoffer
Toronto, Canada
In my Shana bet at Migdal Oz I attended the Hadran siyum hash”as. Witnessing so many women so passionate about their Torah learning and connection to God, I knew I had to begin with the coming cycle. My wedding (June 24) was two weeks before the siyum of mesechet yoma so I went a little ahead and was able to make a speech and siyum at my kiseh kallah on my wedding day!
Sharona Guggenheim Plumb
Givat Shmuel, Israel
Robin Zeiger
Tel Aviv, Israel
What a great experience to learn with Rabbanit Michelle Farber. I began with this cycle in January 2020 and have been comforted by the consistency and energy of this process throughout the isolation period of Covid. Week by week, I feel like I am exploring a treasure chest with sparkling gems and puzzling antiquities. The hunt is exhilarating.
Marian Frankston
Pennsylvania, United States
I started last year after completing the Pesach Sugiyot class. Masechet Yoma might seem like a difficult set of topics, but for me made Yom Kippur and the Beit HaMikdash come alive. Liturgy I’d always had trouble connecting with took on new meaning as I gained a sense of real people moving through specific spaces in particular ways. It was the perfect introduction; I am so grateful for Hadran!
Debbie Engelen-Eigles
Minnesota, United States
Tamid 26
בִּמְסִיבָּה הַהוֹלֶכֶת לוֹ תַּחַת הַבִּירָה. וְנֵרוֹת דּוֹלְקִין מִכָּאן וּמִכָּאן. עַד שֶׁהוּא מַגִּיעַ לְבֵית הַטְּבִילָה. וּמְדוּרָה הָיְתָה שָׁם. וּבֵית הַכִּסֵּא שֶׁל כָּבוֹד. זֶה הָיָה כְּבוֹדוֹ: מְצָאוֹ נָעוּל – יוֹדֵעַ שֶׁיֵּשׁ שָׁם אָדָם. פָּתוּחַ – בְּיָדוּעַ שֶׁאֵין שָׁם אָדָם.
through the circuitous passage that extended beneath the Temple, as he could not pass through the Temple courtyard, due to his impurity. And there were lamps burning on this side and on that side of the passage. He would walk through the passage until he reached the Chamber of Immersion. And there was a fire burning there to warm the priests after they had immersed, and also a bathroom of honor, so that the priests could urinate before immersion. This was the manifestation of its honor: If one found the door closed, he would know that there was a person there, and he would wait for him to exit before entering. If one found the door open, it was known that there was no person there, and he could enter. In this manner, the one using it was afforded privacy.
יָרַד, וְטָבַל, עָלָה וְנִסְתַּפֵּג, וְנִתְחַמֵּם כְּנֶגֶד הַמְּדוּרָה. בָּא, וְיָשַׁב לוֹ אֵצֶל אֶחָיו הַכֹּהֲנִים, עַד שֶׁהָיוּ שְׁעָרִים נִפְתָּחִים, יוֹצֵא וְהוֹלֵךְ לוֹ.
After the priest descended and immersed in the ritual bath, he ascended and dried himself with a towel, and warmed himself opposite the fire. He then came back to the Chamber of the Hearth and sat with his brethren the priests until dawn, when the gates of the Temple courtyard would be opened. He would then leave the Temple and go on his way. Since the purification process of one who immerses is not complete until sunset, by rabbinic law he could not remain in the Temple during the daytime.
מִי שֶׁהוּא רוֹצֶה לִתְרוֹם אֶת הַמִּזְבֵּחַ, מַשְׁכִּים וְטוֹבֵל עַד שֶׁלֹּא יָבֹא הַמְמוּנֶּה. וְכִי בְּאֵיזֶה שָׁעָה בָּא הַמְמוּנֶּה? לֹא כׇּל הָעִתִּים שָׁווֹת, פְּעָמִים שֶׁהוּא בָּא מִקְּרוֹת הַגֶּבֶר, אוֹ סָמוּךְ לוֹ מִלְּפָנָיו אוֹ מֵאַחֲרָיו.
The mishna describes the commencement of the daily service in the Temple: Among the members of the priestly family who are to serve in the Temple that day, whoever wants to remove the ashes from the altar rises early and immerses himself in a ritual bath, as required of anyone who enters the Temple courtyard. He must immerse before the appointed priest arrives, as the appointed priest oversees the lottery that determines which priests perform the various rites of the Temple service, and the first of those lotteries determines who will be charged with the removal of the ashes. And at what time does the appointed priest arrive? The times of his arrival are not all the same. There are times that he comes at the call of the rooster [hagever], or he might come at an adjacent time, either before the call of the rooster or after it.
הַמְמוּנֶּה בָּא, וְדָפַק עֲלֵיהֶן, וְהֵן פָּתְחוּ לוֹ, אָמַר לָהֶן: מִי שֶׁטָּבַל – יָבֹא וְיָפִיס, הֵפִיסוּ, מִי שֶׁזָּכָה – זָכָה בּוֹ.
The appointed priest arrived at the Chamber of the Hearth, where the priests of the patrilineal family were assembled, and he knocked on the gate to alert them to open the gate for him. And when they opened the gate for him, he said to them: Whoever immersed in the ritual bath may come and participate in the lottery. They then conducted the lottery, and whoever won that lottery won the privilege to perform the rite of the removal of the ashes.
גְּמָ׳ מְנָא הָנֵי מִילֵּי? אָמַר אַבָּיֵי: אָמַר קְרָא ״וְהַחֹנִים לִפְנֵי הַמִּשְׁכָּן קֵדְמָה לִפְנֵי אֹהֶל מוֹעֵד מִזְרָחָה מֹשֶׁה וְאַהֲרֹן וּבָנָיו שֹׁמְרִים מִשְׁמֶרֶת הַמִּקְדָּשׁ לְמִשְׁמֶרֶת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל״.
GEMARA: The mishna teaches that the priests would keep watch in three locations in the Temple. The Gemara asks: From where are these matters derived? Abaye said that they are derived from a verse, as the verse states: “And those that were to camp before the Tabernacle eastward, before the Tent of Meeting toward the sunrise, were Moses and Aaron and his sons, keeping the watch of the Sanctuary, for the watch of the children of Israel, and the non-priest who came near was to be put to death” (Numbers 3:38).
אָמְרִי: אִין, שִׁימּוּר בְּעָלְמָא אַשְׁכְּחַן דְּבָעֵי, כֹּהֲנִים וּלְוִיִּם שִׁימּוּר. מִיהוּ מַתְנִיתִין קָתָנֵי: בִּשְׁלֹשָׁה מְקוֹמוֹת הַכֹּהֲנִים שׁוֹמְרִים בְּבֵית הַמִּקְדָּשׁ, וְהַלְוִיִּם בְּעֶשְׂרִים וְאֶחָד מָקוֹם, וְאִילּוּ קְרָא, כֹּהֲנִים וּלְוִיִּם בַּהֲדֵי הֲדָדֵי כְּתִיב!
The Sages say in response: Yes, we have found in this verse that in general the Torah requires a watch to be kept. Furthermore, the verse indicates that it is the priests and Levites who are required to perform the watch, as it states the precedent of Moses, who was a Levite, and Aaron, who was a priest. But the mishna (Middot 1:1) teaches: The priests would keep watch in three places in the Temple courtyard…and the Levites in twenty-one places. According to the mishna, the priests and Levites kept watch in different locations, whereas in the verse the priests and the Levites are written together, indicating that they kept watch in the same places.
אָמְרִי, הָכִי קָאָמַר: ״וְהַחֹנִים לִפְנֵי הַמִּשְׁכָּן קֵדְמָה לִפְנֵי אֹהֶל מוֹעֵד מִזְרָחָה מֹשֶׁה וַהֲדַר אַהֲרֹן וּבָנָיו שֹׁמְרֵי מִשְׁמֶרֶת הַמִּקְדָּשׁ״. אַהֲרֹן – בְּחַד מָקוֹם, וּבָנָיו – בִּשְׁנֵי מְקוֹמוֹת.
The Sages say that this is what the verse is saying: “And those that were to camp before the Tabernacle eastward, before the Tent of Meeting toward the sunrise, were Moses,” indicating that the Levites keep watch. And then the verse states with regard to the separate watch kept by the priests: “Aaron and his sons, keeping the watch of the Sanctuary.” Furthermore, the verse indicates that Aaron keeps watch in one place, and his sons keep watch in two other places, from which it is derived that the priests keep watch in three different places.
מִמַּאי? מִדִּכְתִיב ״וְהַחֹנִים״, וּכְתִיב ״שֹׁמְרִים״. ״חוֹנִים״ לְחוֹד, וְ״שׁוֹמְרִים״ לְחוֹד.
The Gemara asks: From where is it derived that the verse should be interpreted in this manner? This is derived from the fact that it is written: “And those that were to camp…were Moses,” and it is written separately: “Aaron and his sons, keeping the watch.” This indicates that those who were to camp and thereby keep watch are discrete, and those keeping the watch are discrete, i.e., they perform different watches in separate places.
אֵימָא כּוּלְּהוּ בְּחַד מָקוֹם לְחוֹדֵיהּ! לָא סָלְקָא דַּעְתָּךְ: מָה מֹשֶׁה – בְּחַד מָקוֹם לְחוֹדֵיהּ, אַף אַהֲרֹן וּבָנָיו – בְּחַד מָקוֹם לְחוֹדֵיהּ.
The Gemara objects: One can say that all of the priests keep watch in one place that is discrete from the watches of the Levites, but not in three separate places. The Gemara explains: That possibility should not enter your mind, as the verse juxtaposes the watches of Moses and Aaron. This indicates that just as Moses keeps watch in one place discretely, so too, Aaron and his sons each keep watch in one place discretely, and they do not keep watch together.
רַב אָשֵׁי אָמַר, מִסֵּיפֵיהּ דִּקְרָא: ״שֹׁמְרִים מִשְׁמֶרֶת … לְמִשְׁמֶרֶת״.
Rav Ashi said that the halakha that the priests keep watch in three places is derived from the end of the verse, which states: “Moses and Aaron and his sons, keeping [shomerim] the watch [mishmeret] of the Sanctuary, for the watch [lemishmeret] of the children of Israel.” The verse uses three terms from the root shin, mem, reish, which means to watch, indicating that there should be three separate watches.
בֵּית אַבְטִינָס וּבֵית הַנִּיצוֹץ. אִיבַּעְיָא לְהוּ: עֲלִיּוֹת מַמָּשׁ הֲווֹ, אוֹ דִלְמָא דַּהֲווֹ גְּבִיהִי מִגְבָּהּ כַּעֲלִיּוֹת?
§ The mishna teaches that the Chamber of Avtinas and the Chamber of the Spark were upper stories. Concerning this, a dilemma was raised before the Sages: Were these halls actual upper stories? Or perhaps they were merely very tall, built upon pillars, and therefore were like upper stories.
תָּא שְׁמַע, דִּתְנַן: שֶׁבַּצָּפוֹן שַׁעַר הַנִּיצוֹץ כְּמִין אַכְסַדְרָא הָיָה, וַעֲלִיָּיה בְּנוּיָה עַל גַּבָּהּ, שֶׁהַכֹּהֲנִים שׁוֹמְרִים מִלְמַעְלָה, וְהַלְוִיִּם מִלְּמַטָּה. וּפֶתַח הָיָה לוֹ לַחוֹל.
The Gemara explains: Come and hear a resolution, as we learned in a mishna that discusses the seven gates to the Temple courtyard (Middot 1:5): There were three gates that were in the north, and the first of these was the Gate of the Spark. It was like a portico [akhsadra], and there was an upper story built atop it, where the honor guard stood, with the priests watching from above, in the upper story; and the Levites would keep watch from below. And the hall had an entrance toward the non-sacred area of the Temple Mount. This mishna indicates that the Chamber of the Spark was an actual upper story.
מְנָא הָנֵי מִילֵּי? דְּתָנוּ רַבָּנַן: ״וְיִלָּווּ עָלֶיךָ וִישָׁרְתוּךָ״ – בַּעֲבוֹדָתְךָ הַכָּתוּב מְדַבֵּר.
The Gemara asks: From where are these matters, that the priests and Levites kept watch on different stories, derived? This is derived from a verse, as the Sages taught in a baraita: The verse states that God said to Aaron: “And your brethren also, the tribe of Levi, the tribe of your father, you shall bring near with you, that they may accompany you and serve you” (Numbers 18:2). The verse is speaking of the Levites accompanying Aaron in your, i.e., Aaron’s, service of keeping watch in the Temple, which is the only service performed by both priests and Levites. Since the verse speaks of the watch of the Levites only as an accompaniment to the watch of the priests, the Levites do not keep watch from above like the priests, but only from below.
אַתָּה אוֹמֵר בַּעֲבוֹדָתְךָ הַכָּתוּב מְדַבֵּר, אוֹ אֵינוֹ אֶלָּא בַּעֲבוֹדָתָם! כְּשֶׁהוּא אוֹמֵר ״וְנִלְווּ עָלֶיךָ וְשָׁמְרוּ לְכׇל כֵּלָיו וּלְכֹל עֲבֹדָתוֹ״ – הֲרֵי בַּעֲבוֹדָתָם אָמוּר. הָא מָה אֲנִי מְקַיֵּים ״וְיִלָּווּ עָלֶיךָ וִישָׁרְתוּךָ״ – בַּעֲבוֹדָתְךָ הַכָּתוּב מְדַבֵּר. הָא כֵּיצַד? כֹּהֲנִים שׁוֹמְרִים מִלְמַעְלָה, וּלְוִיִּם מִלְּמַטָּה.
The baraita asks: Do you say that the verse speaks of the Levites’ accompanying the priests in your service, of the priests keeping watch, or is it only stating that the Levites should accompany the priests through their own service of bearing the sacred vessels? The baraita explains that when the verse states: “And they shall accompany you, and they shall keep the watch of the Tent of Meeting” (Numbers 18:4), this is referring to keeping watch of all the Temple’s vessels and all its service, and consequently their own service of bearing the sacred vessels is already stated. How, then, do I realize the meaning of the previous verse: “That they may accompany you and serve you” (Numbers 18:2)? The verse is speaking of the Levites accompanying the priests in your service, of the priests keeping watch in the Temple. How so? The priests keep watch from above, and the Levites accompany them from below.
בֵּית הַמּוֹקֵד כִּיפָּה, וּבַיִת גָּדוֹל הָיָה.
§ With regard to the third place in which the priests would keep watch, the mishna states: In the Chamber of the Hearth the ceiling was round like a cupola, and it was a large hall.
וְחַד שׁוֹמֵר הוּא דַּהֲוָה בְּבֵית הַמּוֹקֵד? וּרְמִינְהִי: שְׁנֵי שְׁעָרִים הָיוּ בְּבֵית הַמּוֹקֵד, אֶחָד פָּתוּחַ לַחֵיל, וְאֶחָד פָּתוּחַ לָעֲזָרָה. אָמַר רַבִּי יְהוּדָה: בָּזֶה שֶׁנִּכְנָסִין לָעֲזָרָה – פִּשְׁפָּשׁ קָטָן הָיָה לוֹ, שֶׁבּוֹ נִכְנָסִין לִבְלוֹשׁ הָעֲזָרָה! אָמַר אַבָּיֵי: כֵּיוָן דְּגַבֵּי הֲדָדֵי הֲווֹ קָיְימִי – סַגִּי לְהוּ בְּחַד שׁוֹמֵר, דָּוֵי לְהָכָא וְדָוֵי לְהָכָא.
The Gemara asks: But was there only one watchman in the Chamber of the Hearth? And the Gemara raises a contradiction from a mishna (Middot 1:7): The Chamber of the Hearth had two gates; one, on the north side, was open to the rampart, and one, on the south side, was open to the courtyard. Rabbi Yehuda said: This gate that was open to the courtyard had a small wicket in the door of the gate, through which the priests would enter in order to examine the courtyard and ensure that everything was in order. The Chamber of the Hearth had two gates, and therefore there should have been two watchmen there. Abaye said: Since the two gates stood next to each other, i.e., directly opposite one another, it was sufficient for them to be watched by one watchman, who could look here and look there.
מוּקָּף רוֹבְדִין שֶׁל אֶבֶן. רוֹבְדִין מַאי נִיהוּ? גִּזְרָתָא דְאִצְטְבָתָא דְּסָלְקִי בְּהוּ לְאִצְטְבָתָא. וּמִי הֲווֹ מִיפַּלְגִי אֲבָנִים? וְהָכְתִיב: ״וְהַבַּיִת בְּהִבָּנוֹתוֹ אֶבֶן שְׁלֵמָה וְגוֹ׳״!
§ The mishna teaches that the Chamber of the Hearth was surrounded by rows of stone that protruded from the walls and that served as benches. The Gemara asks: What are these rows of stone? They are rows of chiseled stones by which the priests ascend to another row of stone, where they could lie down. The Gemara asks: And would they split the stones in the process of building the Temple? But isn’t it written: “For the Temple, when it was being built, was built of whole stone made ready at the quarry; and there was neither hammer nor ax nor any tool of iron heard in the Temple, while it was being built” (I Kings 6:7)?
אָמַר אַבָּיֵי: דִּמְתַקְּנִי וּמַיְיתִי מֵעִיקָּרָא אַבְנֵי זוּטְרָתָא וְאַבְנֵי רַבְרְבָתָא, כְּדִכְתִיב: ״אַבְנֵי עֶשֶׂר אַמּוֹת וְאַבְנֵי שְׁמֹנֶה אַמּוֹת״.
Abaye said: It was prohibited to use iron implements to cut the stones only inside the Temple area. In this case it was permitted to have chiseled stones, as the builders prepared the stones in another location. And the builders initially brought small stones and large stones with which to build the Temple, as it is written: “And the foundation was of costly stones, even great stones, stones of ten cubits, and stones of eight cubits” (I Kings 7:10). Accordingly, the larger stones were used for the lower tier, while the smaller stones were for the higher tier, forming protruding benches upon which the priests could sleep.
זִקְנֵי בֵּית אָב יְשֵׁנִים שָׁם. וְאַמַּאי? לְעַיְּילִי מִטּוֹת! אָמַר אַבָּיֵי: לָאו אוֹרַח אַרְעָא לְעַיּוֹלֵי מִטּוֹת לְבֵית הַמִּקְדָּשׁ.
The mishna teaches that the elders of the patrilineal family that would serve in the Temple the following day would sleep there, on the rows of stone. The Gemara asks: But why did the priests sleep on the stones? Let them bring beds into the Chamber of the Hearth. Abaye said: It is not proper conduct to bring beds into the Temple.
פִּרְחֵי כְהוּנָּה, אִישׁ כְּסוּתוֹ בָּאָרֶץ. אַמַּאי הָתָם קָרֵי לְהוּ ״רוֹבִים״, הָכָא קָרֵי לְהוּ
The mishna further teaches that with regard to the young men of the priesthood, each of them would sleep with his garment on the ground. The Gemara asks: Why is it that there, in the earlier mishna, the tanna calls them young [rovim] priests, whereas here, the tanna calls them
Follow
