The woman’s ketubah can function as a lien, fundamentally, on the man’s property. In the case under discussion, of a woman who is betrothed/married twice, do the terms of the second ketubah supplement or replace the terms of the first one? When it comes to regular (non-ketubah) documents, R. Nachman says the second replaces the first. But is that the case for ketubah? Also, a new mishnah: the defamer. Specifically, the implications of defamation for converts – namely, in the case of a husband bringing a suit against his wife (or betrothed). Likewise, for one who doesn’t have a living father – as the defamation is an offense against him.
Click here for the Talking Talmud podcast on Ketubot 44.
To listen: Click the link above. Or subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Or join the Talking Talmud WhatsApp group, and receive the link as soon as it goes up.
Please like our Facebook page and join our conversation there: <a href=”https://www.facebook.com/Talking-Talmud-113324056898191/” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener
