Search

Beitzah 29

Want to dedicate learning? Get started here:

English
עברית
podcast placeholder

0:00
0:00




podcast placeholder

0:00
0:00




Summary

Today’s daf is sponsored by Hannah Hashkes in memory of her mother-in-law Chaya Sarah (Sally) bat Genya and Mordechai Rubin on her birthday, Simchat Torah outside of Israel. “She was active in supporting women’s Torah learning throughout her life.” 

Can one go to a store and ask for a utensil full of food if the utensil is a measuring utensil? Rabbi Yehuda and the rabbis disagree – Shmuel and Rava bring two different explanations of their debate. Either way, their approach is the opposite of the Mishnah in Beitzah 28 where Rabbi Yehuda is more lenient, as here it is clear that Rabbi Yehuda is stricter. How does the Gemara resolve that contradiction? Abba Shaul ben Butnit would do all his measuring before Yom Tov. The Mishna tries to prove from here that he was strict but two other opinions are brought to show that he either did this on every day of Chol Hamoed as well or on all days for other reasons – to prevent any sort of stealing from his buyers. Can one measure flour for making bread in order to ensure the proper amount is removed to give to the kohen? Rav and Shmuel debate. A difficulty is raised against Shmuel as he quoted a braita saying it is permitted, however, he forbids it. How is this issue resolved? Can one sift flour a second time on Yom Tov, as there is no more removing the bad from the good, one is just trying to make the flour more refined? There are differing opinions about this and whether or not it can be done normally or with some sort of change. What if something external fell into the flour – can it be removed with a sifter or by hand? Which is better? According to the Mishna, one can ask a store owner for items by number, just not by weight or, according to Rabbi Shimon ben Elazar not by mentioning money. What types of things can one not carry on Yom Tov and in what amount/manner does it appear as one does on a weekday? From where is one allowed/not allowed to take straw/wood for kindling on Yom Tov?

Today’s daily daf tools:

Beitzah 29

דִּבְסוּרָא אָמְרִי: תַּרְטָא וּפַלְגוּ תַּרְטָא. בְּנַרֶשׁ אָמְרִי: חֶלְקָא וּפַלְגוּ חֶלְקָא. בְּפוּמְבְּדִיתָא אָמְרִי: אוּזְיָא וּפַלְגוּ אוּזְיָא. בִּנְהַר פְּקוֹד וּבְמָתָא מַחְסֵיָא אָמְרִי: רִבְעָא וּפַלְגוּ רִבְעָא.

they would say in Sura: Give me that cut of meat called a tarta or half a tarta, without naming a price. In Neresh they would say in reference to those same portions: A part or half a part. In Pumbedita they would say: An uzya or half an uzya. In Nehar Pekod and in Mata Meḥasya they would say: Give me a quarter or half a quarter, thereby establishing the size of the portion without mentioning its price.

מַתְנִי׳ אוֹמֵר אָדָם לַחֲבֵרוֹ: מַלֵּא לִי כְּלִי זֶה, אֲבָל לֹא בְּמִדָּה. רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: אִם הָיָה כְּלִי שֶׁל מִדָּה — לֹא יְמַלְּאֶנּוּ. מַעֲשֶׂה בְּאַבָּא שָׁאוּל בֶּן בָּטְנִית, שֶׁהָיָה מְמַלֵּא מִדּוֹתָיו מֵעֶרֶב יוֹם טוֹב וְנוֹתְנָן לַלָּקוֹחוֹת בְּיוֹם טוֹב.

MISHNA: One person may say to another on a Festival: Fill this vessel for me, and I will return its contents or reimburse you after the Festival, but he may not ask him to fill the vessel in a particular measure. Rabbi Yehuda says: If it was a measuring utensil, he may not fill it. There was an incident involving Abba Shaul ben Botnit, a Sage who was also a grocer, who would fill his measures on the eve of a Festival and give them to his customers on the Festival. In this way he would know exactly how much he had given each person, without conducting any measurements on the Festival itself.

אַבָּא שָׁאוּל אוֹמֵר: אַף בַּמּוֹעֵד עוֹשֶׂה כֵּן, מִפְּנֵי בֵּרוּרֵי הַמִּדּוֹת. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים: אַף בַּחוֹל עוֹשֶׂה כֵּן, מִפְּנֵי מִצּוּי הַמִּדּוֹת.

Abba Shaul, a Sage distinct from Abba Shaul ben Botnit, says: He would do this even on the intermediate days of a Festival because of the clarity of the measures, i.e., in order to clarify precisely how much must be given to each customer, since the measurement is more precise once the foam of the liquid being measured has subsided. And the Rabbis say: Even on a weekday it is proper to do so, because of the draining of the measures. This method allows all the liquid to drain fully out of the seller’s measuring utensil so that the amount is exact.

גְּמָ׳ מַאי ״אֲבָל לֹא בְּמִדָּה״? אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: אֲבָל לֹא בִּכְלִי הַמְיוּחָד לְמִדָּה. אֲבָל כְּלִי הָעוֹמֵד לְמִדָּה — יְמַלְּאֶנּוּ. וַאֲתָא רַבִּי יְהוּדָה לְמֵימַר אֲפִילּוּ כְּלִי הָעוֹמֵד לְמִדָּה לֹא יְמַלְּאֶנּוּ.

GEMARA: The Gemara asks: What is the meaning of the phrase: But not in a measure? Rav Yehuda said that Shmuel said: But not with a vessel designated for measuring; however, in the case of a vessel that can be used for measuring but has yet to be used for this purpose, he may fill it. According to this, Rabbi Yehuda comes to disagree and say that he may not fill even a vessel that can be used for measuring.

אַלְמָא גַּבֵּי שִׂמְחַת יוֹם טוֹב רַבִּי יְהוּדָה לְחוּמְרָא וְרַבָּנַן לְקוּלָּא? וְהָא אִפְּכָא שָׁמְעִינַן לְהוּ! דִּתְנַן, רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: שׁוֹקֵל אָדָם בָּשָׂר כְּנֶגֶד הַכְּלִי וּכְנֶגֶד הַקּוֹפִיץ, וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים: אֵין מַשְׁגִּיחִין בְּכַף מֹאזְנַיִם כׇּל עִיקָּר. אַלְמָא רַבִּי יְהוּדָה לְקוּלָּא וְרַבָּנַן לְחוּמְרָא. קַשְׁיָא דְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה אַדְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה, קַשְׁיָא דְּרַבָּנַן אַדְּרַבָּנַן!

The Gemara asks: Apparently, Rabbi Yehuda is stringent with regard to the joy of the Festival in that he prohibits the use of any sort of measuring utensil, while the Rabbis are lenient. But didn’t we hear them state the opposite, as we learned in an earlier mishna (28a) that Rabbi Yehuda says: A person selling meat on a Festival may weigh the meat against a vessel or against a cleaver, and the Rabbis say: One may not look at the pans of a balance scale at all? Apparently, here, the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda is lenient, while the opinion of the Rabbis is stringent. Therefore, there is a contradiction between the one statement of Rabbi Yehuda and the other statement of Rabbi Yehuda, as well as a contradiction between the one statement of the Rabbis and the other statement of the Rabbis.

דְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה אַדְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה לָא קַשְׁיָא: הָתָם בְּשֶׁאֵינוֹ עוֹמֵד לְמִדָּה, הָכָא בְּעוֹמֵד לְמִדָּה.

The Gemara answers: With regard to the contradiction between the one teaching of Rabbi Yehuda and the other teaching of Rabbi Yehuda, this is not difficult. There, where he is lenient, he is dealing with a vessel that cannot be used for measuring on a regular basis at all, whereas here, he is referring to a vessel that can be used for measuring, and therefore he is stringent even if the vessel has not yet actually been used in this capacity.

דְּרַבָּנַן אַדְּרַבָּנַן נָמֵי לָא קַשְׁיָא: הָתָם קָא עָבֵיד כִּדְעָבְדִין בְּחוֹל, הָכָא לָא קָא עָבֵיד כִּדְעָבְדִין בְּחוֹל.

With regard to the contradiction between the one statement of the Rabbis and the other statement of the Rabbis, it is also not difficult. There, he is acting in a weekday manner, and consequently they prohibit the weighing, whereas here, he is not acting in a weekday manner, as the vessel is not a measuring utensil, and consequently they permit him to use it. This completes the Gemara’s discussion of Shmuel’s explanation of the mishna.

רָבָא אָמַר: מַאי ״אֲבָל לֹא בְּמִדָּה״ — שֶׁלֹּא יִזְכּוֹר לוֹ שֵׁם מִדָּה, אֲבָל כְּלִי הַמְיוּחָד לְמִדָּה — יְמַלְּאֶנּוּ. וַאֲתָא רַבִּי יְהוּדָה לְמֵימַר: כְּלִי הַמְיוּחָד לְמִדָּה — לֹא יְמַלְּאֶנּוּ.

The Gemara offers a second explanation of the mishna. Rava said: What is the meaning of the phrase: But not by measure? It means that he may not mention to him the name of the measure. For example, he may not say: Fill for me one kav, or two kav. However, he may fill a vessel even if it is designated for measuring. And Rabbi Yehuda comes to say: He may not fill a vessel designated for measuring, even if he does not stipulate a particular measure.

אַלְמָא גַּבֵּי שִׂמְחַת יוֹם טוֹב רַבִּי יְהוּדָה לְחוּמְרָא וְרַבָּנַן לְקוּלָּא? וְהָא אִפְּכָא שָׁמְעִינַן לְהוּ! דִּתְנַן, רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: שׁוֹקֵל אָדָם בָּשָׂר כְּנֶגֶד הַכְּלִי וּכְנֶגֶד הַקּוֹפִיץ, וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים: אֵין מַשְׁגִּיחִין בְּכַף מֹאזְנַיִם כׇּל עִיקָּר. אַלְמָא רַבִּי יְהוּדָה לְקוּלָּא וְרַבָּנַן לְחוּמְרָא. קַשְׁיָא דְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה אַדְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה, קַשְׁיָא דְּרַבָּנַן אַדְּרַבָּנַן!

The Gemara asks: Apparently, with regard to the joy of the Festival, Rabbi Yehuda is stringent, and the Rabbis are lenient. But didn’t we hear them state the opposite, as we learned in an earlier mishna (28a) that Rabbi Yehuda says: A person may weigh meat against a vessel or against a cleaver, and the Rabbis prohibit this and say: One may not look at the pans of a balance scale at all? Apparently, Rabbi Yehuda is lenient, while the Rabbis are stringent. Therefore, there is a contradiction between one statement of Rabbi Yehuda and the other statement of Rabbi Yehuda, and there is also a contradiction between one statement of the Rabbis and the other statement of the Rabbis.

דְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה אַדְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה לָא קַשְׁיָא: הָתָם בְּשֶׁאֵינוֹ מְיוּחָד לְמִדָּה, הָכָא מְיוּחָד לְמִדָּה. דְּרַבָּנַן אַדְּרַבָּנַן נָמֵי לָא קַשְׁיָא: הָתָם קָא עָבֵיד כִּדְעָבְדִין בְּחוֹל, הָכָא לָא קָעָבֵיד כִּדְעָבְדִין בְּחוֹל, דְּעָבְדִי אִינָשֵׁי דִּמְקָרְבִי חַמְרָא בְּמָנָא דְכִילָא וְשָׁתוּ.

The Gemara answers: With regard to the contradiction between one teaching of Rabbi Yehuda and the other teaching of Rabbi Yehuda, this is not difficult. There, with regard to weighing meat against a vessel, he is dealing with a vessel that is not designated for measuring, and therefore he is lenient, whereas here, he is referring to a vessel that is designated for measuring, with regard to which he is stringent. With regard to the contradiction between one statement of the Rabbis and the other statement of the Rabbis, this is also not difficult. There, he is acting in a weekday manner, and consequently they prohibit the weighing, whereas here, he is not acting in a weekday manner, as people are accustomed to offer their friends wine in a measuring utensil and drink. Since the use of such a vessel is not exclusive to commercial transactions, the Rabbis permitted it here as well.

מַעֲשֶׂה בְּאַבָּא שָׁאוּל בֶּן בָּטְנִית. תָּנָא: אַף בַּמּוֹעֵד עוֹשֶׂה כֵּן מִפְּנֵי בִּטּוּל בֵּית הַמִּדְרָשׁ.

§ The mishna recounted an incident involving Abba Shaul ben Botnit, a Sage who was also a grocer, who would fill his measures on the eve of a Festival and give them to his customers on the Festival. A tanna taught in a baraita: He would do this even on the intermediate days of a Festival, in order to prevent dereliction of Torah study in the study hall. Since he wanted to spend most of his day in the study hall and not have to interrupt his study to carry out measurements, he would measure for his customers at night, when it was not a time of study.

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: הוּא כָּנַס שְׁלֹשׁ מֵאוֹת גַּרְבֵי יַיִן מִבֵּרוּרֵי הַמִּדּוֹת, וַחֲבֵרָיו כָּנְסוּ שְׁלֹשׁ מֵאוֹת גַּרְבֵי שֶׁמֶן מִמִּצּוּי הַמִּדּוֹת, וֶהֱבִיאוּם לִפְנֵי הַגִּזְבָּרִים לִירוּשָׁלַיִם.

The Sages taught in a baraita: Abba Shaul ben Botnit collected three hundred earthenware jugs of wine, to which he thought he was not entitled due to the clarity of the measures, as he thought that he had unfairly profited from the foam at the top of the liquid he measured. And his colleagues, similarly God-fearing grocers, collected three hundred earthenware jugs of oil, which they thought were not rightly theirs due to the draining of the measures; they were concerned that because they had measured for their customers using their own vessels, they might not have drained the entire measure from their containers into the customers’ vessels. And they brought these jugs of wine and oil to Jerusalem before the Temple treasurers, as they did not want to benefit from possibly stolen goods.

אָמְרוּ לָהֶם: אִי אַתֶּם זְקוּקִים לְכָךְ. אָמְרוּ לָהֶם: אַף אָנוּ אֵין רְצוֹנֵנוּ בְּכָךְ.

The treasurers said to them: You need not do this, as all buyers take into account the foam and what is left in the sellers’ vessels and pay with this in mind. They said to them: Just like the buyers give up their claim to it, we too do not wish to benefit from this, even if strictly speaking it is not considered stolen property.

אָמְרוּ לָהֶם: הוֹאִיל וְהֶחְמַרְתֶּם עַל עַצְמְכֶם — עֲשׂוּ מֵהֶם צׇרְכֵי רַבִּים. דְּתַנְיָא: גָּזַל וְאֵינוֹ יוֹדֵעַ מִמִּי גָּזַל — יַעֲשֶׂה בָּהֶם צׇרְכֵי רַבִּים. מַאי נִינְהוּ? אָמַר רַב חִסְדָּא: בּוֹרוֹת, שִׁיחִין וּמְעָרוֹת.

The treasurers said to them: Since you are so stringent with yourselves, use the wine and oil for communal needs. As it is taught in a baraita: If one stole and does not know from whom he stole, he should use the stolen items for communal needs, thereby repaying all of the Jewish people. The Gemara asks: What are communal needs? Rav Ḥisda said: He should finance the digging of cisterns, ditches, and caves, for storing water for travelers.

אַדְבְּרֵיהּ רַב חִסְדָּא לְרַבָּנָא עוּקְבָא, וּדְרַשׁ: לֹא יִמְדּוֹד אָדָם שְׂעוֹרִים וְיִתֵּן לִפְנֵי בְּהֶמְתּוֹ בְּיוֹם טוֹב, אֲבָל קוֹדֵר הוּא קַב אוֹ קַבִּים וְנוֹתֵן לִפְנֵי בְּהֶמְתּוֹ, וְאֵינוֹ חוֹשֵׁשׁ. וְהַנַּחְתּוֹם מוֹדֵד תַּבְלִין וְנוֹתֵן לְתוֹךְ קְדֵרָתוֹ, כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא יַקְדִּיחַ תַּבְשִׁילוֹ.

§ Rav Ḥisda authorized Rabbana Ukva to give a public lecture, and he taught the following: A person may not measure barley and place it before his animal on a Festival, but he may cut out [koder] a hole in the pile of grain by means of a vessel of one kav or two kav, and place the barley before his animal, and he need not be concerned about the measuring this entails, as he does not transgress the prohibition against using a measuring utensil if he is not particular about measuring precisely. And a baker may measure spices and put them in his pot, so as not to spoil his dish, since if he puts in too much he will ruin the food.

אָמַר רַב יִרְמְיָה בַּר אַבָּא אָמַר רַב: מוֹדֶדֶת אִשָּׁה קֶמַח בְּיוֹם טוֹב וְנוֹתֶנֶת לְתוֹךְ עִיסָּתָהּ כְּדֵי שֶׁתִּטּוֹל חַלָּה בְּעַיִן יָפָה. וּשְׁמוּאֵל אָמַר: אָסוּר. וְהָא תָּנָא דְּבֵי שְׁמוּאֵל, מוּתָּר!

Rav Yirmeya bar Abba said that Rav said: A woman may measure flour on a Festival and put it into her dough in order to separate ḥalla generously, because if she knows the exact amount of dough she can separate the proper amount of ḥalla. And Shmuel said: It is prohibited, as she can estimate the amount that must be set aside as ḥalla. The Gemara asks: But didn’t a Sage of the school of Shmuel teach a baraita stating that this is permitted?

אָמַר אַבָּיֵי: הַשְׁתָּא דְּאָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל אָסוּר, וְתָנָא דְּבֵי שְׁמוּאֵל מוּתָּר,

Abaye said: Now that it is known that Shmuel said it is prohibited and a Sage of the school of Shmuel taught a baraita that it is permitted,

שְׁמוּאֵל — הֲלָכָה לְמַעֲשֶׂה אֲתָא לְאַשְׁמוֹעִינַן.

it is reasonable to conclude that Shmuel came to teach us the practical halakha. Knowing that a baraita permits the practice, Shmuel found it necessary to state that the halakha is otherwise.

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: אֵין שׁוֹנִין קֶמַח בְּיוֹם טוֹב. מִשּׁוּם רַבִּי פַּפְּיָיס וְרַבִּי יְהוּדָה בֶּן בְּתִירָא אָמְרוּ: שׁוֹנִין. וְשָׁוִין שֶׁאִם נָפַל לְתוֹכָן צְרוֹר אוֹ קֵיסָם, שֶׁשּׁוֹנִין.

§ The Sages taught in a baraita: One may not sift flour a second time on a Festival, as this involves unnecessary extra effort. They said in the name of Rabbi Papeyyas and Rabbi Yehuda ben Beteira: One may sift flour a second time. However, they all agree that if a pebble or a wood chip fell into the flour after it had been sifted the previous day, one may sift it a second time in order to remove the items.

תָּנֵי תַּנָּא קַמֵּיהּ דְּרָבִינָא: אֵין שׁוֹנִין קֶמַח בְּיוֹם טוֹב, אֲבָל נָפַל צְרוֹר אוֹ קֵיסָם — בּוֹרֵר בְּיָדוֹ. אֲמַר לֵיהּ: כׇּל שֶׁכֵּן דְּאָסוּר, דְּהָוֵה לֵיהּ כְּבוֹרֵר.

A tanna taught the following baraita before Ravina: One may not sift flour a second time on a Festival, but if a pebble or a wood chip fell into the flour after the first sifting, he may remove it with his hand. Ravina said to him: All the more so is the latter procedure prohibited, as it is similar to the prohibited labor of selecting. It is therefore preferable to sift the flour with a sieve, and the unwanted items will thereby be removed.

דָּרֵשׁ רָבָא בַּר רַב הוּנָא זוּטֵי אַפִּתְחָא דִנְהַרְדְּעָא: שׁוֹנִין קֶמַח בְּיוֹם טוֹב. אֲמַר לְהוּ רַב נַחְמָן: פּוּקוּ וֶאֱמַרוּ לֵיהּ לְאַבָּא: שְׁקִילָא טֵיבוּתָךְ וְשַׁדְיָ[א] אַחִזְרֵי, פּוֹק חֲזִי כַּמָּה מַהוֹלָתָא הַדְרָן בִּנְהַרְדְּעָא.

Rava bar Rav Huna the Short taught at the entrance to Neharde’a: One may sift flour a second time on a Festival. Rav Naḥman said to the students standing before him: Go out and say to Abba, i.e., to Rava bar Rav Huna, as Rava is a shortened form of Rav Abba: Your good has been removed and cast upon thorns, meaning that your teachings are not needed. Go out and see how many sieves circulate in Neharde’a, as all the women already know that this is permitted.

דְּבֵיתְהוּ דְּרַב יוֹסֵף נָהֲלָא קִמְחָא אַגַּבָּא דְּמַהוֹלְתָּא. אֲמַר לַהּ: חֲזַי, דַּאֲנָא רִפְתָּא מְעַלַּיְתָא בָּעֵינָא. דְּבֵיתְהוּ דְּרַב אָשֵׁי נָהֲלָא קִמְחָא אַגַּבָּא דְּפָתוּרָא. אָמַר רַב אָשֵׁי: הָא דִּידַן, בְּרַתֵּיה דְּרָמֵי בַּר חָמָא, וְרָמֵי בַּר חָמָא מָרָא דְעוֹבָדָא הֲוָה, וְאִי לָאו דַּחֲזַאי מִבֵּי נָשָׁא לָא הֲוָה עָבְדָא.

The Gemara relates that Rav Yosef’s wife was once sifting flour in an unusual manner on the reverse side of a sieve. He said to her: Look, I want good-quality bread, hinting that she need not invert the sieve but may sift the flour in her regular fashion. The Gemara likewise relates that Rav Ashi’s wife was once sifting flour onto a table, rather than into a bowl in the usual manner. Rav Ashi said: This one of ours, my wife, is the daughter of Rami bar Ḥama, and Rami bar Ḥama is a master of good deeds who is meticulous in his performance of mitzvot. Had my wife not observed this practice in her father’s house, she would not have acted in this manner. Therefore, one can learn the halakha in practice from her actions.

מַתְנִי׳ הוֹלֵךְ אָדָם אֵצֶל חֶנְוָנִי הָרָגִיל אֶצְלוֹ וְאוֹמֵר לוֹ: תֵּן לִי בֵּיצִים וֶאֱגוֹזִים בְּמִנְיָן, שֶׁכֵּן דֶּרֶךְ בַּעַל הַבַּיִת לִהְיוֹת מוֹנֶה בְּתוֹךְ בֵּיתוֹ.

MISHNA: A person may go on a Festival to a grocer from whom he is accustomed to buy and say to him: Give me eggs and nuts of such-and-such a number, as it is the manner of a homeowner to count this way in his own house. Counting eggs or nuts is not considered a commercial activity, as people regularly mention the number of eggs and nuts that they need.

גְּמָ׳ תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: הוֹלֵךְ אָדָם אֵצֶל רוֹעֶה הָרָגִיל אֶצְלוֹ וְאוֹמֵר לוֹ: תֵּן לִי גְּדִי אֶחָד אוֹ טָלֶה אֶחָד. אֵצֶל טַבָּח הָרָגִיל אֶצְלוֹ וְאוֹמֵר לוֹ: תֵּן לִי כַּף אַחַת אוֹ יָרֵךְ אַחַת. אֵצֶל פַּטָּם הָרָגִיל אֶצְלוֹ וְאוֹמֵר לוֹ: תֵּן לִי תּוֹר אֶחָד אוֹ גּוֹזָל אֶחָד. אֵצֶל נַחְתּוֹם הָרָגִיל אֶצְלוֹ וְאוֹמֵר לוֹ: תֵּן לִי כִּכָּר אֶחָד אוֹ גְּלוּסְקָא אַחַת.

GEMARA: The Sages taught in the Tosefta: A person may go on a Festival to a shepherd with whom he is accustomed to deal and say to him: Give me one kid, or one lamb. Similarly, one may go on a Festival to a butcher from whom he is accustomed to buy and say to him: Give me one foreleg of an animal, or one thigh. Likewise, one may approach one who deals in fattened fowl from whom he is accustomed to buy and say to him: Give me one dove or one pigeon. He may also visit a baker from whom he is accustomed to buy and say to him: Give me one loaf or one cake [geluska].

וְאֵצֶל חֶנְוָנִי הָרָגִיל אֶצְלוֹ וְאוֹמֵר לוֹ: תֵּן לִי עֶשְׂרִים בֵּיצִים, אוֹ חֲמִשִּׁים אֱגוֹזִים, עֲשָׂרָה אֲפַרְסְקִין, וַחֲמִשָּׁה רִמּוֹנִים וְאֶתְרוֹג אֶחָד. וּבִלְבַד שֶׁלֹּא יַזְכִּיר לוֹ סְכוּם מִדָּה. רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן אֶלְעָזָר אוֹמֵר: וּבִלְבַד שֶׁלֹּא יַזְכִּיר לוֹ סְכוּם מִקָּח.

And one may go on a Festival to a grocer from whom he is accustomed to buy and say to him: Give me twenty eggs, or fifty nuts, or ten peaches, or five pomegranates, or one etrog, provided that he does not mention any measure. In other words, he must not specify a unit of measurement, e.g., a kav; rather, he must state a number, which is not the usual manner of making a purchase. Rabbi Shimon ben Elazar says: This is permitted, provided that he does not mention the amount of the purchase, meaning that he must not mention the sum of money that he is spending, but rather he must take what he needs and after the Festival they will calculate how much he owes.



הֲדַרַן עֲלָךְ אֵין צָדִין

הַמֵּבִיא כַּדֵּי יַיִן מִמָּקוֹם לְמָקוֹם — לֹא יְבִיאֵם בְּסַל וּבְקוּפָּה, אֲבָל מֵבִיא הוּא עַל כְּתֵפוֹ אוֹ לְפָנָיו. וְכֵן הַמּוֹלִיךְ אֶת הַתֶּבֶן — לֹא יַפְשִׁיל אֶת הַקּוּפָּה לַאֲחוֹרָיו, אֲבָל מְבִיאָהּ הוּא בְּיָדוֹ. וּמַתְחִילִין

MISHNA: One who brings wine jugs from one place to another place may not bring a large number of them in a basket or in a tub in the usual weekday manner on a Festival, as this is disrespectful of the Festival; but he may bring one or two barrels on his shoulder or carry them in front of himself. Similarly, one who brings straw for kindling or for feeding animals may not place the tub behind him while carrying it, as this is the usual weekday manner; but he may transport it in front of him in his hand, in an unusual fashion. And one may begin taking straw for kindling

Today’s daily daf tools:

Delve Deeper

Broaden your understanding of the topics on this daf with classes and podcasts from top women Talmud scholars.

For the Beyond the Daf shiurim offered in Hebrew, see here.

New to Talmud?

Check out our resources designed to help you navigate a page of Talmud – and study at the pace, level and style that fits you. 

The Hadran Women’s Tapestry

Meet the diverse women learning Gemara at Hadran and hear their stories. 

I started Daf during the pandemic. I listened to a number of podcasts by various Rebbeim until one day, I discovered Rabbanit Farbers podcast. Subsequently I joined the Hadran family in Eruvin. Not the easiest place to begin, Rabbanit Farber made it all understandable and fun. The online live group has bonded together and have really become a supportive, encouraging family.

Leah Goldford
Leah Goldford

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

I had no formal learning in Talmud until I began my studies in the Joint Program where in 1976 I was one of the few, if not the only, woman talmud major. It was superior training for law school and enabled me to approach my legal studies with a foundation . In 2018, I began daf yomi listening to Rabbanit MIchelle’s pod cast and my daily talmud studies are one of the highlights of my life.

Krivosha_Terri_Bio
Terri Krivosha

Minneapolis, United States

Since I started in January of 2020, Daf Yomi has changed my life. It connects me to Jews all over the world, especially learned women. It makes cooking, gardening, and folding laundry into acts of Torah study. Daf Yomi enables me to participate in a conversation with and about our heritage that has been going on for more than 2000 years.

Shira Eliaser
Shira Eliaser

Skokie, IL, United States

About a year into learning more about Judaism on a path to potential conversion, I saw an article about the upcoming Siyum HaShas in January of 2020. My curiosity was piqued and I immediately started investigating what learning the Daf actually meant. Daily learning? Just what I wanted. Seven and a half years? I love a challenge! So I dove in head first and I’ve enjoyed every moment!!
Nickie Matthews
Nickie Matthews

Blacksburg, United States

Jill Shames
Jill Shames

Jerusalem, Israel

Years ago, I attended the local Siyum HaShas with my high school class. It was inspiring! Through that cycle and the next one, I studied masekhtot on my own and then did “daf yomi practice.” The amazing Hadran Siyum HaShas event firmed my resolve to “really do” Daf Yomi this time. It has become a family goal. We’ve supported each other through challenges, and now we’re at the Siyum of Seder Moed!

Elisheva Brauner
Elisheva Brauner

Jerusalem, Israel

I saw an elderly man at the shul kiddush in early March 2020, celebrating the siyyum of masechet brachot which he had been learning with a young yeshiva student. I thought, if he can do it, I can do it! I began to learn masechet Shabbat the next day, Making up masechet brachot myself, which I had missed. I haven’t missed a day since, thanks to the ease of listening to Hadran’s podcast!
Judith Shapiro
Judith Shapiro

Minnesota, United States

In early January of 2020, I learned about Siyyum HaShas and Daf Yomi via Tablet Magazine’s brief daily podcast about the Daf. I found it compelling and fascinating. Soon I discovered Hadran; since then I have learned the Daf daily with Rabbanit Michelle Cohen Farber. The Daf has permeated my every hour, and has transformed and magnified my place within the Jewish Universe.

Lisa Berkelhammer
Lisa Berkelhammer

San Francisco, CA , United States

I began learning with Rabbanit Michelle’s wonderful Talmud Skills class on Pesachim, which really enriched my Pesach seder, and I have been learning Daf Yomi off and on over the past year. Because I’m relatively new at this, there is a “chiddush” for me every time I learn, and the knowledge and insights of the group members add so much to my experience. I feel very lucky to be a part of this.

Julie-Landau-Photo
Julie Landau

Karmiel, Israel

I started last year after completing the Pesach Sugiyot class. Masechet Yoma might seem like a difficult set of topics, but for me made Yom Kippur and the Beit HaMikdash come alive. Liturgy I’d always had trouble connecting with took on new meaning as I gained a sense of real people moving through specific spaces in particular ways. It was the perfect introduction; I am so grateful for Hadran!

Debbie Engelen-Eigles
Debbie Engelen-Eigles

Minnesota, United States

In early January of 2020, I learned about Siyyum HaShas and Daf Yomi via Tablet Magazine’s brief daily podcast about the Daf. I found it compelling and fascinating. Soon I discovered Hadran; since then I have learned the Daf daily with Rabbanit Michelle Cohen Farber. The Daf has permeated my every hour, and has transformed and magnified my place within the Jewish Universe.

Lisa Berkelhammer
Lisa Berkelhammer

San Francisco, CA , United States

See video

Susan Fisher
Susan Fisher

Raanana, Israel

It happened without intent (so am I yotzei?!) – I watched the women’s siyum live and was so moved by it that the next morning, I tuned in to Rabbanit Michelle’s shiur, and here I am, still learning every day, over 2 years later. Some days it all goes over my head, but others I grasp onto an idea or a story, and I ‘get it’ and that’s the best feeling in the world. So proud to be a Hadran learner.

Jeanne Yael Klempner
Jeanne Yael Klempner

Zichron Yaakov, Israel

Ive been learning Gmara since 5th grade and always loved it. Have always wanted to do Daf Yomi and now with Michelle Farber’s online classes it made it much easier to do! Really enjoying the experience thank you!!

Lisa Lawrence
Lisa Lawrence

Neve Daniel, Israel

In my Shana bet at Migdal Oz I attended the Hadran siyum hash”as. Witnessing so many women so passionate about their Torah learning and connection to God, I knew I had to begin with the coming cycle. My wedding (June 24) was two weeks before the siyum of mesechet yoma so I went a little ahead and was able to make a speech and siyum at my kiseh kallah on my wedding day!

Sharona Guggenheim Plumb
Sharona Guggenheim Plumb

Givat Shmuel, Israel

I was exposed to Talmud in high school, but I was truly inspired after my daughter and I decided to attend the Women’s Siyum Shas in 2020. We knew that this was a historic moment. We were blown away, overcome with emotion at the euphoria of the revolution. Right then, I knew I would continue. My commitment deepened with the every-morning Virtual Beit Midrash on Zoom with R. Michelle.

Adina Hagege
Adina Hagege

Zichron Yaakov, Israel

After being so inspired by the siyum shas two years ago, I began tentatively learning daf yomi, like Rabbanut Michelle kept saying – taking one daf at a time. I’m still taking it one daf at a time, one masechet at a time, but I’m loving it and am still so inspired by Rabbanit Michelle and the Hadran community, and yes – I am proud to be finishing Seder Mo’ed.

Caroline Graham-Ofstein
Caroline Graham-Ofstein

Bet Shemesh, Israel

I started learning Talmud with R’ Haramati in Yeshivah of Flatbush. But after a respite of 60 years, Rabbanit Michelle lit my fire – after attending the last three world siyumim in Miami Beach, Meadowlands and Boca Raton, and now that I’m retired, I decided – “I can do this!” It has been an incredible journey so far, and I look forward to learning Daf everyday – Mazal Tov to everyone!

Roslyn Jaffe
Roslyn Jaffe

Florida, United States

I began daf yomi in January 2020 with Brachot. I had made aliya 6 months before, and one of my post-aliya goals was to complete a full cycle. As a life-long Tanach teacher, I wanted to swim from one side of the Yam shel Torah to the other. Daf yomi was also my sanity through COVID. It was the way to marking the progression of time, and feel that I could grow and accomplish while time stopped.

Leah Herzog
Leah Herzog

Givat Zev, Israel

I started learning Daf Yomi inspired by תָּפַסְתָּ מְרוּבֶּה לֹא תָּפַסְתָּ, תָּפַסְתָּ מוּעָט תָּפַסְתָּ. I thought I’d start the first page, and then see. I was swept up into the enthusiasm of the Hadran Siyum, and from there the momentum kept building. Rabbanit Michelle’s shiur gives me an anchor, a connection to an incredible virtual community, and an energy to face whatever the day brings.

Medinah Korn
Medinah Korn

בית שמש, Israel

Beitzah 29

דִּבְסוּרָא אָמְרִי: תַּרְטָא וּפַלְגוּ תַּרְטָא. בְּנַרֶשׁ אָמְרִי: חֶלְקָא וּפַלְגוּ חֶלְקָא. בְּפוּמְבְּדִיתָא אָמְרִי: אוּזְיָא וּפַלְגוּ אוּזְיָא. בִּנְהַר פְּקוֹד וּבְמָתָא מַחְסֵיָא אָמְרִי: רִבְעָא וּפַלְגוּ רִבְעָא.

they would say in Sura: Give me that cut of meat called a tarta or half a tarta, without naming a price. In Neresh they would say in reference to those same portions: A part or half a part. In Pumbedita they would say: An uzya or half an uzya. In Nehar Pekod and in Mata Meḥasya they would say: Give me a quarter or half a quarter, thereby establishing the size of the portion without mentioning its price.

מַתְנִי׳ אוֹמֵר אָדָם לַחֲבֵרוֹ: מַלֵּא לִי כְּלִי זֶה, אֲבָל לֹא בְּמִדָּה. רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: אִם הָיָה כְּלִי שֶׁל מִדָּה — לֹא יְמַלְּאֶנּוּ. מַעֲשֶׂה בְּאַבָּא שָׁאוּל בֶּן בָּטְנִית, שֶׁהָיָה מְמַלֵּא מִדּוֹתָיו מֵעֶרֶב יוֹם טוֹב וְנוֹתְנָן לַלָּקוֹחוֹת בְּיוֹם טוֹב.

MISHNA: One person may say to another on a Festival: Fill this vessel for me, and I will return its contents or reimburse you after the Festival, but he may not ask him to fill the vessel in a particular measure. Rabbi Yehuda says: If it was a measuring utensil, he may not fill it. There was an incident involving Abba Shaul ben Botnit, a Sage who was also a grocer, who would fill his measures on the eve of a Festival and give them to his customers on the Festival. In this way he would know exactly how much he had given each person, without conducting any measurements on the Festival itself.

אַבָּא שָׁאוּל אוֹמֵר: אַף בַּמּוֹעֵד עוֹשֶׂה כֵּן, מִפְּנֵי בֵּרוּרֵי הַמִּדּוֹת. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים: אַף בַּחוֹל עוֹשֶׂה כֵּן, מִפְּנֵי מִצּוּי הַמִּדּוֹת.

Abba Shaul, a Sage distinct from Abba Shaul ben Botnit, says: He would do this even on the intermediate days of a Festival because of the clarity of the measures, i.e., in order to clarify precisely how much must be given to each customer, since the measurement is more precise once the foam of the liquid being measured has subsided. And the Rabbis say: Even on a weekday it is proper to do so, because of the draining of the measures. This method allows all the liquid to drain fully out of the seller’s measuring utensil so that the amount is exact.

גְּמָ׳ מַאי ״אֲבָל לֹא בְּמִדָּה״? אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: אֲבָל לֹא בִּכְלִי הַמְיוּחָד לְמִדָּה. אֲבָל כְּלִי הָעוֹמֵד לְמִדָּה — יְמַלְּאֶנּוּ. וַאֲתָא רַבִּי יְהוּדָה לְמֵימַר אֲפִילּוּ כְּלִי הָעוֹמֵד לְמִדָּה לֹא יְמַלְּאֶנּוּ.

GEMARA: The Gemara asks: What is the meaning of the phrase: But not in a measure? Rav Yehuda said that Shmuel said: But not with a vessel designated for measuring; however, in the case of a vessel that can be used for measuring but has yet to be used for this purpose, he may fill it. According to this, Rabbi Yehuda comes to disagree and say that he may not fill even a vessel that can be used for measuring.

אַלְמָא גַּבֵּי שִׂמְחַת יוֹם טוֹב רַבִּי יְהוּדָה לְחוּמְרָא וְרַבָּנַן לְקוּלָּא? וְהָא אִפְּכָא שָׁמְעִינַן לְהוּ! דִּתְנַן, רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: שׁוֹקֵל אָדָם בָּשָׂר כְּנֶגֶד הַכְּלִי וּכְנֶגֶד הַקּוֹפִיץ, וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים: אֵין מַשְׁגִּיחִין בְּכַף מֹאזְנַיִם כׇּל עִיקָּר. אַלְמָא רַבִּי יְהוּדָה לְקוּלָּא וְרַבָּנַן לְחוּמְרָא. קַשְׁיָא דְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה אַדְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה, קַשְׁיָא דְּרַבָּנַן אַדְּרַבָּנַן!

The Gemara asks: Apparently, Rabbi Yehuda is stringent with regard to the joy of the Festival in that he prohibits the use of any sort of measuring utensil, while the Rabbis are lenient. But didn’t we hear them state the opposite, as we learned in an earlier mishna (28a) that Rabbi Yehuda says: A person selling meat on a Festival may weigh the meat against a vessel or against a cleaver, and the Rabbis say: One may not look at the pans of a balance scale at all? Apparently, here, the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda is lenient, while the opinion of the Rabbis is stringent. Therefore, there is a contradiction between the one statement of Rabbi Yehuda and the other statement of Rabbi Yehuda, as well as a contradiction between the one statement of the Rabbis and the other statement of the Rabbis.

דְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה אַדְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה לָא קַשְׁיָא: הָתָם בְּשֶׁאֵינוֹ עוֹמֵד לְמִדָּה, הָכָא בְּעוֹמֵד לְמִדָּה.

The Gemara answers: With regard to the contradiction between the one teaching of Rabbi Yehuda and the other teaching of Rabbi Yehuda, this is not difficult. There, where he is lenient, he is dealing with a vessel that cannot be used for measuring on a regular basis at all, whereas here, he is referring to a vessel that can be used for measuring, and therefore he is stringent even if the vessel has not yet actually been used in this capacity.

דְּרַבָּנַן אַדְּרַבָּנַן נָמֵי לָא קַשְׁיָא: הָתָם קָא עָבֵיד כִּדְעָבְדִין בְּחוֹל, הָכָא לָא קָא עָבֵיד כִּדְעָבְדִין בְּחוֹל.

With regard to the contradiction between the one statement of the Rabbis and the other statement of the Rabbis, it is also not difficult. There, he is acting in a weekday manner, and consequently they prohibit the weighing, whereas here, he is not acting in a weekday manner, as the vessel is not a measuring utensil, and consequently they permit him to use it. This completes the Gemara’s discussion of Shmuel’s explanation of the mishna.

רָבָא אָמַר: מַאי ״אֲבָל לֹא בְּמִדָּה״ — שֶׁלֹּא יִזְכּוֹר לוֹ שֵׁם מִדָּה, אֲבָל כְּלִי הַמְיוּחָד לְמִדָּה — יְמַלְּאֶנּוּ. וַאֲתָא רַבִּי יְהוּדָה לְמֵימַר: כְּלִי הַמְיוּחָד לְמִדָּה — לֹא יְמַלְּאֶנּוּ.

The Gemara offers a second explanation of the mishna. Rava said: What is the meaning of the phrase: But not by measure? It means that he may not mention to him the name of the measure. For example, he may not say: Fill for me one kav, or two kav. However, he may fill a vessel even if it is designated for measuring. And Rabbi Yehuda comes to say: He may not fill a vessel designated for measuring, even if he does not stipulate a particular measure.

אַלְמָא גַּבֵּי שִׂמְחַת יוֹם טוֹב רַבִּי יְהוּדָה לְחוּמְרָא וְרַבָּנַן לְקוּלָּא? וְהָא אִפְּכָא שָׁמְעִינַן לְהוּ! דִּתְנַן, רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: שׁוֹקֵל אָדָם בָּשָׂר כְּנֶגֶד הַכְּלִי וּכְנֶגֶד הַקּוֹפִיץ, וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים: אֵין מַשְׁגִּיחִין בְּכַף מֹאזְנַיִם כׇּל עִיקָּר. אַלְמָא רַבִּי יְהוּדָה לְקוּלָּא וְרַבָּנַן לְחוּמְרָא. קַשְׁיָא דְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה אַדְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה, קַשְׁיָא דְּרַבָּנַן אַדְּרַבָּנַן!

The Gemara asks: Apparently, with regard to the joy of the Festival, Rabbi Yehuda is stringent, and the Rabbis are lenient. But didn’t we hear them state the opposite, as we learned in an earlier mishna (28a) that Rabbi Yehuda says: A person may weigh meat against a vessel or against a cleaver, and the Rabbis prohibit this and say: One may not look at the pans of a balance scale at all? Apparently, Rabbi Yehuda is lenient, while the Rabbis are stringent. Therefore, there is a contradiction between one statement of Rabbi Yehuda and the other statement of Rabbi Yehuda, and there is also a contradiction between one statement of the Rabbis and the other statement of the Rabbis.

דְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה אַדְּרַבִּי יְהוּדָה לָא קַשְׁיָא: הָתָם בְּשֶׁאֵינוֹ מְיוּחָד לְמִדָּה, הָכָא מְיוּחָד לְמִדָּה. דְּרַבָּנַן אַדְּרַבָּנַן נָמֵי לָא קַשְׁיָא: הָתָם קָא עָבֵיד כִּדְעָבְדִין בְּחוֹל, הָכָא לָא קָעָבֵיד כִּדְעָבְדִין בְּחוֹל, דְּעָבְדִי אִינָשֵׁי דִּמְקָרְבִי חַמְרָא בְּמָנָא דְכִילָא וְשָׁתוּ.

The Gemara answers: With regard to the contradiction between one teaching of Rabbi Yehuda and the other teaching of Rabbi Yehuda, this is not difficult. There, with regard to weighing meat against a vessel, he is dealing with a vessel that is not designated for measuring, and therefore he is lenient, whereas here, he is referring to a vessel that is designated for measuring, with regard to which he is stringent. With regard to the contradiction between one statement of the Rabbis and the other statement of the Rabbis, this is also not difficult. There, he is acting in a weekday manner, and consequently they prohibit the weighing, whereas here, he is not acting in a weekday manner, as people are accustomed to offer their friends wine in a measuring utensil and drink. Since the use of such a vessel is not exclusive to commercial transactions, the Rabbis permitted it here as well.

מַעֲשֶׂה בְּאַבָּא שָׁאוּל בֶּן בָּטְנִית. תָּנָא: אַף בַּמּוֹעֵד עוֹשֶׂה כֵּן מִפְּנֵי בִּטּוּל בֵּית הַמִּדְרָשׁ.

§ The mishna recounted an incident involving Abba Shaul ben Botnit, a Sage who was also a grocer, who would fill his measures on the eve of a Festival and give them to his customers on the Festival. A tanna taught in a baraita: He would do this even on the intermediate days of a Festival, in order to prevent dereliction of Torah study in the study hall. Since he wanted to spend most of his day in the study hall and not have to interrupt his study to carry out measurements, he would measure for his customers at night, when it was not a time of study.

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: הוּא כָּנַס שְׁלֹשׁ מֵאוֹת גַּרְבֵי יַיִן מִבֵּרוּרֵי הַמִּדּוֹת, וַחֲבֵרָיו כָּנְסוּ שְׁלֹשׁ מֵאוֹת גַּרְבֵי שֶׁמֶן מִמִּצּוּי הַמִּדּוֹת, וֶהֱבִיאוּם לִפְנֵי הַגִּזְבָּרִים לִירוּשָׁלַיִם.

The Sages taught in a baraita: Abba Shaul ben Botnit collected three hundred earthenware jugs of wine, to which he thought he was not entitled due to the clarity of the measures, as he thought that he had unfairly profited from the foam at the top of the liquid he measured. And his colleagues, similarly God-fearing grocers, collected three hundred earthenware jugs of oil, which they thought were not rightly theirs due to the draining of the measures; they were concerned that because they had measured for their customers using their own vessels, they might not have drained the entire measure from their containers into the customers’ vessels. And they brought these jugs of wine and oil to Jerusalem before the Temple treasurers, as they did not want to benefit from possibly stolen goods.

אָמְרוּ לָהֶם: אִי אַתֶּם זְקוּקִים לְכָךְ. אָמְרוּ לָהֶם: אַף אָנוּ אֵין רְצוֹנֵנוּ בְּכָךְ.

The treasurers said to them: You need not do this, as all buyers take into account the foam and what is left in the sellers’ vessels and pay with this in mind. They said to them: Just like the buyers give up their claim to it, we too do not wish to benefit from this, even if strictly speaking it is not considered stolen property.

אָמְרוּ לָהֶם: הוֹאִיל וְהֶחְמַרְתֶּם עַל עַצְמְכֶם — עֲשׂוּ מֵהֶם צׇרְכֵי רַבִּים. דְּתַנְיָא: גָּזַל וְאֵינוֹ יוֹדֵעַ מִמִּי גָּזַל — יַעֲשֶׂה בָּהֶם צׇרְכֵי רַבִּים. מַאי נִינְהוּ? אָמַר רַב חִסְדָּא: בּוֹרוֹת, שִׁיחִין וּמְעָרוֹת.

The treasurers said to them: Since you are so stringent with yourselves, use the wine and oil for communal needs. As it is taught in a baraita: If one stole and does not know from whom he stole, he should use the stolen items for communal needs, thereby repaying all of the Jewish people. The Gemara asks: What are communal needs? Rav Ḥisda said: He should finance the digging of cisterns, ditches, and caves, for storing water for travelers.

אַדְבְּרֵיהּ רַב חִסְדָּא לְרַבָּנָא עוּקְבָא, וּדְרַשׁ: לֹא יִמְדּוֹד אָדָם שְׂעוֹרִים וְיִתֵּן לִפְנֵי בְּהֶמְתּוֹ בְּיוֹם טוֹב, אֲבָל קוֹדֵר הוּא קַב אוֹ קַבִּים וְנוֹתֵן לִפְנֵי בְּהֶמְתּוֹ, וְאֵינוֹ חוֹשֵׁשׁ. וְהַנַּחְתּוֹם מוֹדֵד תַּבְלִין וְנוֹתֵן לְתוֹךְ קְדֵרָתוֹ, כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא יַקְדִּיחַ תַּבְשִׁילוֹ.

§ Rav Ḥisda authorized Rabbana Ukva to give a public lecture, and he taught the following: A person may not measure barley and place it before his animal on a Festival, but he may cut out [koder] a hole in the pile of grain by means of a vessel of one kav or two kav, and place the barley before his animal, and he need not be concerned about the measuring this entails, as he does not transgress the prohibition against using a measuring utensil if he is not particular about measuring precisely. And a baker may measure spices and put them in his pot, so as not to spoil his dish, since if he puts in too much he will ruin the food.

אָמַר רַב יִרְמְיָה בַּר אַבָּא אָמַר רַב: מוֹדֶדֶת אִשָּׁה קֶמַח בְּיוֹם טוֹב וְנוֹתֶנֶת לְתוֹךְ עִיסָּתָהּ כְּדֵי שֶׁתִּטּוֹל חַלָּה בְּעַיִן יָפָה. וּשְׁמוּאֵל אָמַר: אָסוּר. וְהָא תָּנָא דְּבֵי שְׁמוּאֵל, מוּתָּר!

Rav Yirmeya bar Abba said that Rav said: A woman may measure flour on a Festival and put it into her dough in order to separate ḥalla generously, because if she knows the exact amount of dough she can separate the proper amount of ḥalla. And Shmuel said: It is prohibited, as she can estimate the amount that must be set aside as ḥalla. The Gemara asks: But didn’t a Sage of the school of Shmuel teach a baraita stating that this is permitted?

אָמַר אַבָּיֵי: הַשְׁתָּא דְּאָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל אָסוּר, וְתָנָא דְּבֵי שְׁמוּאֵל מוּתָּר,

Abaye said: Now that it is known that Shmuel said it is prohibited and a Sage of the school of Shmuel taught a baraita that it is permitted,

שְׁמוּאֵל — הֲלָכָה לְמַעֲשֶׂה אֲתָא לְאַשְׁמוֹעִינַן.

it is reasonable to conclude that Shmuel came to teach us the practical halakha. Knowing that a baraita permits the practice, Shmuel found it necessary to state that the halakha is otherwise.

תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: אֵין שׁוֹנִין קֶמַח בְּיוֹם טוֹב. מִשּׁוּם רַבִּי פַּפְּיָיס וְרַבִּי יְהוּדָה בֶּן בְּתִירָא אָמְרוּ: שׁוֹנִין. וְשָׁוִין שֶׁאִם נָפַל לְתוֹכָן צְרוֹר אוֹ קֵיסָם, שֶׁשּׁוֹנִין.

§ The Sages taught in a baraita: One may not sift flour a second time on a Festival, as this involves unnecessary extra effort. They said in the name of Rabbi Papeyyas and Rabbi Yehuda ben Beteira: One may sift flour a second time. However, they all agree that if a pebble or a wood chip fell into the flour after it had been sifted the previous day, one may sift it a second time in order to remove the items.

תָּנֵי תַּנָּא קַמֵּיהּ דְּרָבִינָא: אֵין שׁוֹנִין קֶמַח בְּיוֹם טוֹב, אֲבָל נָפַל צְרוֹר אוֹ קֵיסָם — בּוֹרֵר בְּיָדוֹ. אֲמַר לֵיהּ: כׇּל שֶׁכֵּן דְּאָסוּר, דְּהָוֵה לֵיהּ כְּבוֹרֵר.

A tanna taught the following baraita before Ravina: One may not sift flour a second time on a Festival, but if a pebble or a wood chip fell into the flour after the first sifting, he may remove it with his hand. Ravina said to him: All the more so is the latter procedure prohibited, as it is similar to the prohibited labor of selecting. It is therefore preferable to sift the flour with a sieve, and the unwanted items will thereby be removed.

דָּרֵשׁ רָבָא בַּר רַב הוּנָא זוּטֵי אַפִּתְחָא דִנְהַרְדְּעָא: שׁוֹנִין קֶמַח בְּיוֹם טוֹב. אֲמַר לְהוּ רַב נַחְמָן: פּוּקוּ וֶאֱמַרוּ לֵיהּ לְאַבָּא: שְׁקִילָא טֵיבוּתָךְ וְשַׁדְיָ[א] אַחִזְרֵי, פּוֹק חֲזִי כַּמָּה מַהוֹלָתָא הַדְרָן בִּנְהַרְדְּעָא.

Rava bar Rav Huna the Short taught at the entrance to Neharde’a: One may sift flour a second time on a Festival. Rav Naḥman said to the students standing before him: Go out and say to Abba, i.e., to Rava bar Rav Huna, as Rava is a shortened form of Rav Abba: Your good has been removed and cast upon thorns, meaning that your teachings are not needed. Go out and see how many sieves circulate in Neharde’a, as all the women already know that this is permitted.

דְּבֵיתְהוּ דְּרַב יוֹסֵף נָהֲלָא קִמְחָא אַגַּבָּא דְּמַהוֹלְתָּא. אֲמַר לַהּ: חֲזַי, דַּאֲנָא רִפְתָּא מְעַלַּיְתָא בָּעֵינָא. דְּבֵיתְהוּ דְּרַב אָשֵׁי נָהֲלָא קִמְחָא אַגַּבָּא דְּפָתוּרָא. אָמַר רַב אָשֵׁי: הָא דִּידַן, בְּרַתֵּיה דְּרָמֵי בַּר חָמָא, וְרָמֵי בַּר חָמָא מָרָא דְעוֹבָדָא הֲוָה, וְאִי לָאו דַּחֲזַאי מִבֵּי נָשָׁא לָא הֲוָה עָבְדָא.

The Gemara relates that Rav Yosef’s wife was once sifting flour in an unusual manner on the reverse side of a sieve. He said to her: Look, I want good-quality bread, hinting that she need not invert the sieve but may sift the flour in her regular fashion. The Gemara likewise relates that Rav Ashi’s wife was once sifting flour onto a table, rather than into a bowl in the usual manner. Rav Ashi said: This one of ours, my wife, is the daughter of Rami bar Ḥama, and Rami bar Ḥama is a master of good deeds who is meticulous in his performance of mitzvot. Had my wife not observed this practice in her father’s house, she would not have acted in this manner. Therefore, one can learn the halakha in practice from her actions.

מַתְנִי׳ הוֹלֵךְ אָדָם אֵצֶל חֶנְוָנִי הָרָגִיל אֶצְלוֹ וְאוֹמֵר לוֹ: תֵּן לִי בֵּיצִים וֶאֱגוֹזִים בְּמִנְיָן, שֶׁכֵּן דֶּרֶךְ בַּעַל הַבַּיִת לִהְיוֹת מוֹנֶה בְּתוֹךְ בֵּיתוֹ.

MISHNA: A person may go on a Festival to a grocer from whom he is accustomed to buy and say to him: Give me eggs and nuts of such-and-such a number, as it is the manner of a homeowner to count this way in his own house. Counting eggs or nuts is not considered a commercial activity, as people regularly mention the number of eggs and nuts that they need.

גְּמָ׳ תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: הוֹלֵךְ אָדָם אֵצֶל רוֹעֶה הָרָגִיל אֶצְלוֹ וְאוֹמֵר לוֹ: תֵּן לִי גְּדִי אֶחָד אוֹ טָלֶה אֶחָד. אֵצֶל טַבָּח הָרָגִיל אֶצְלוֹ וְאוֹמֵר לוֹ: תֵּן לִי כַּף אַחַת אוֹ יָרֵךְ אַחַת. אֵצֶל פַּטָּם הָרָגִיל אֶצְלוֹ וְאוֹמֵר לוֹ: תֵּן לִי תּוֹר אֶחָד אוֹ גּוֹזָל אֶחָד. אֵצֶל נַחְתּוֹם הָרָגִיל אֶצְלוֹ וְאוֹמֵר לוֹ: תֵּן לִי כִּכָּר אֶחָד אוֹ גְּלוּסְקָא אַחַת.

GEMARA: The Sages taught in the Tosefta: A person may go on a Festival to a shepherd with whom he is accustomed to deal and say to him: Give me one kid, or one lamb. Similarly, one may go on a Festival to a butcher from whom he is accustomed to buy and say to him: Give me one foreleg of an animal, or one thigh. Likewise, one may approach one who deals in fattened fowl from whom he is accustomed to buy and say to him: Give me one dove or one pigeon. He may also visit a baker from whom he is accustomed to buy and say to him: Give me one loaf or one cake [geluska].

וְאֵצֶל חֶנְוָנִי הָרָגִיל אֶצְלוֹ וְאוֹמֵר לוֹ: תֵּן לִי עֶשְׂרִים בֵּיצִים, אוֹ חֲמִשִּׁים אֱגוֹזִים, עֲשָׂרָה אֲפַרְסְקִין, וַחֲמִשָּׁה רִמּוֹנִים וְאֶתְרוֹג אֶחָד. וּבִלְבַד שֶׁלֹּא יַזְכִּיר לוֹ סְכוּם מִדָּה. רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן אֶלְעָזָר אוֹמֵר: וּבִלְבַד שֶׁלֹּא יַזְכִּיר לוֹ סְכוּם מִקָּח.

And one may go on a Festival to a grocer from whom he is accustomed to buy and say to him: Give me twenty eggs, or fifty nuts, or ten peaches, or five pomegranates, or one etrog, provided that he does not mention any measure. In other words, he must not specify a unit of measurement, e.g., a kav; rather, he must state a number, which is not the usual manner of making a purchase. Rabbi Shimon ben Elazar says: This is permitted, provided that he does not mention the amount of the purchase, meaning that he must not mention the sum of money that he is spending, but rather he must take what he needs and after the Festival they will calculate how much he owes.

הֲדַרַן עֲלָךְ אֵין צָדִין

הַמֵּבִיא כַּדֵּי יַיִן מִמָּקוֹם לְמָקוֹם — לֹא יְבִיאֵם בְּסַל וּבְקוּפָּה, אֲבָל מֵבִיא הוּא עַל כְּתֵפוֹ אוֹ לְפָנָיו. וְכֵן הַמּוֹלִיךְ אֶת הַתֶּבֶן — לֹא יַפְשִׁיל אֶת הַקּוּפָּה לַאֲחוֹרָיו, אֲבָל מְבִיאָהּ הוּא בְּיָדוֹ. וּמַתְחִילִין

MISHNA: One who brings wine jugs from one place to another place may not bring a large number of them in a basket or in a tub in the usual weekday manner on a Festival, as this is disrespectful of the Festival; but he may bring one or two barrels on his shoulder or carry them in front of himself. Similarly, one who brings straw for kindling or for feeding animals may not place the tub behind him while carrying it, as this is the usual weekday manner; but he may transport it in front of him in his hand, in an unusual fashion. And one may begin taking straw for kindling

Want to follow content and continue where you left off?

Create an account today to track your progress, mark what you’ve learned, and follow the shiurim that speak to you.

Clear all items from this list?

This will remove ALL the items in this section. You will lose any progress or history connected to them. This is irreversible.

Cancel
Yes, clear all

Are you sure you want to delete this item?

You will lose any progress or history connected to this item.

Cancel
Yes, delete