Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Skip to content

Today's Daf Yomi

September 24, 2015 | 讬状讗 讘转砖专讬 转砖注状讜

  • This month's learning is sponsored by Ron and Shira Krebs to commemorate the 73rd yahrzeit of Shira's grandfather (Yitzchak Leib Ben David Ber HaCohen v'Malka), the 1st yahrzeit of Shira's father (Gershon Pinya Ben Yitzchak Leib HaCohen v'Menucha Sara), and the bar mitzvah of their son Eytan who will be making a siyum on Mishna Shas this month.

  • This month's learning is sponsored for the refuah shleima of Naama bat Yael Esther.

Nazir 33

讗讘讬讬 讗诪专 讻讙讜谉 讚讗诪专 讗讬 谞诪讬 诇讗讜 驻诇讜谞讬 讛讜讗 讗讬 讛讜讬 谞讝讬专 讜诪讗讬 诇讗 谞转拽讬讬诪讜 讚讘专讬讜 诇讗 谞转拽讬讬诪讜 讚讘专讬讜 讛专讗砖讜谞讬诐 讗诇讗 讚讘专讬讜 讗讞专讜谞讬诐

Abaye said: One must correct his understanding of the mishna, so that it deals with a situation where in addition to his first statement he said: Even if it is not so-and-so, I shall be a nazirite. And what is the meaning of the phrase: Whose statement was not fulfilled? It means: His first statement was not fulfilled, as it was not that person; rather, he is a nazirite because his last statement was fulfilled.

讛专转讬注 诇讗讞讜专讬讜 讗讬谞讜 谞讝讬专 讻讜壮 讟注诪讗 诪砖讜诐 讚讛专转讬注 诇讗讞讜专讬讜 讛讗 讗转讬 诇拽诪谉 讛讜讬 谞讝讬专 诪谞讬

搂 The mishna taught that if the individual walking toward them turned back, so that his identity remained unknown, not one of them is a nazirite. The Gemara clarifies: The reason is only because he turned back, from which it may be inferred that if that person comes before us and is identified, the one who said he would be a nazirite if it is so-and-so is considered to be a nazirite. The Gemara inquires: In accordance with whose opinion is this halakha?
This amud has no Gemara text, as in the classic Vilna layout it is entirely filled with the commentary of Tosafot.

  • This month's learning is sponsored by Ron and Shira Krebs to commemorate the 73rd yahrzeit of Shira's grandfather (Yitzchak Leib Ben David Ber HaCohen v'Malka), the 1st yahrzeit of Shira's father (Gershon Pinya Ben Yitzchak Leib HaCohen v'Menucha Sara), and the bar mitzvah of their son Eytan who will be making a siyum on Mishna Shas this month.

  • This month's learning is sponsored for the refuah shleima of Naama bat Yael Esther.

Want to explore more about the Daf?

See insights from our partners, contributors and community of women learners

Sorry, there aren't any posts in this category yet. We're adding more soon!

Nazir 33

The William Davidson Talmud | Powered by Sefaria

Nazir 33

讗讘讬讬 讗诪专 讻讙讜谉 讚讗诪专 讗讬 谞诪讬 诇讗讜 驻诇讜谞讬 讛讜讗 讗讬 讛讜讬 谞讝讬专 讜诪讗讬 诇讗 谞转拽讬讬诪讜 讚讘专讬讜 诇讗 谞转拽讬讬诪讜 讚讘专讬讜 讛专讗砖讜谞讬诐 讗诇讗 讚讘专讬讜 讗讞专讜谞讬诐

Abaye said: One must correct his understanding of the mishna, so that it deals with a situation where in addition to his first statement he said: Even if it is not so-and-so, I shall be a nazirite. And what is the meaning of the phrase: Whose statement was not fulfilled? It means: His first statement was not fulfilled, as it was not that person; rather, he is a nazirite because his last statement was fulfilled.

讛专转讬注 诇讗讞讜专讬讜 讗讬谞讜 谞讝讬专 讻讜壮 讟注诪讗 诪砖讜诐 讚讛专转讬注 诇讗讞讜专讬讜 讛讗 讗转讬 诇拽诪谉 讛讜讬 谞讝讬专 诪谞讬

搂 The mishna taught that if the individual walking toward them turned back, so that his identity remained unknown, not one of them is a nazirite. The Gemara clarifies: The reason is only because he turned back, from which it may be inferred that if that person comes before us and is identified, the one who said he would be a nazirite if it is so-and-so is considered to be a nazirite. The Gemara inquires: In accordance with whose opinion is this halakha?
This amud has no Gemara text, as in the classic Vilna layout it is entirely filled with the commentary of Tosafot.

Scroll To Top