Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Skip to content

Today's Daf Yomi

February 25, 2023 | 讚壮 讘讗讚专 转砖驻状讙

  • This month's learning聽is sponsored by Leah Goldford in loving memory of聽her grandmothers, Tzipporah bat Yechezkiel, Rivka Yoda Bat聽Dovide Tzvi, Bracha Bayla bat Beryl, her father-in-law, Chaim Gershon ben Tzvi Aryeh, her mother, Devorah Rivkah bat Tuvia Hacohen, her cousins, Avrum Baer ben Mordechai, and Sharon bat Yaakov.

  • Masechet Nazir is sponsored by the family of Rabbi Howard Alpert, HaRav Tzvi Lipa ben Hillel, in honor of his first yahrzeit.

Nazir 33 – Shabbat February 25

This is the daf for Shabbat. For Friday鈥檚 daf please click here.

Today鈥檚 daf is sponsored in honor of a big yom huledet sameach to Safta Abby Flamholz on her half-century birthday! From Sigal, Zach & Nitzan.

Beit Hillel鈥檚 language in the Mishna is difficult as he says 鈥淭he one whose words do not come to be is a nazir.鈥 Shouldn鈥檛 it be the opposite? Rav Yehuda suggests changing the language to read 鈥淭he one whose words come true.鈥 Abaye leaves the original language and suggests that Beit Hillel is referring to a case where one switched one鈥檚 original statement and added to it that even if the opposite is true, they will still become a nazir. The Mishna is then teaching that we follow the end of the person鈥檚 statement. If the person they were betting on turned around, the tanna kama rules that none of them become a nazir. The Gemara infers that if we identify who it is, the one whose statement came true is a nazir. According to whose opinion is this?

讗讘讬讬 讗诪专 讻讙讜谉 讚讗诪专 讗讬 谞诪讬 诇讗讜 驻诇讜谞讬 讛讜讗 讗讬 讛讜讬 谞讝讬专 讜诪讗讬 诇讗 谞转拽讬讬诪讜 讚讘专讬讜 诇讗 谞转拽讬讬诪讜 讚讘专讬讜 讛专讗砖讜谞讬诐 讗诇讗 讚讘专讬讜 讗讞专讜谞讬诐:


Abaye said: One must correct his understanding of the mishna, so that it deals with a situation where in addition to his first statement he said: Even if it is not so-and-so, I shall be a nazirite. And what is the meaning of the phrase: Whose statement was not fulfilled? It means: His first statement was not fulfilled, as it was not that person; rather, he is a nazirite because his last statement was fulfilled.


讛专转讬注 诇讗讞讜专讬讜 讗讬谞讜 谞讝讬专 讻讜壮: 讟注诪讗 诪砖讜诐 讚讛专转讬注 诇讗讞讜专讬讜 讛讗 讗转讬 诇拽诪谉 讛讜讬 谞讝讬专 诪谞讬


搂 The mishna taught that if the individual walking toward them turned back, so that his identity remained unknown, not one of them is a nazirite. The Gemara clarifies: The reason is only because he turned back, from which it may be inferred that if that person comes before us and is identified, the one who said he would be a nazirite if it is so-and-so is considered to be a nazirite. The Gemara inquires: In accordance with whose opinion is this halakha?
This amud has no Gemara text, as in the classic Vilna layout it is entirely filled with the commentary of Tosafot.

  • This month's learning聽is sponsored by Leah Goldford in loving memory of聽her grandmothers, Tzipporah bat Yechezkiel, Rivka Yoda Bat聽Dovide Tzvi, Bracha Bayla bat Beryl, her father-in-law, Chaim Gershon ben Tzvi Aryeh, her mother, Devorah Rivkah bat Tuvia Hacohen, her cousins, Avrum Baer ben Mordechai, and Sharon bat Yaakov.

  • Masechet Nazir is sponsored by the family of Rabbi Howard Alpert, HaRav Tzvi Lipa ben Hillel, in honor of his first yahrzeit.

Want to explore more about the Daf?

See insights from our partners, contributors and community of women learners

learn daf yomi one week at a time with tamara spitz

Nazir: 30-36 – Daf Yomi One Week at a Time

This week we will learn the concept of 鈥渢he taste of forbidden food is prohibited鈥 and how it relates to...
talking talmud_square

Nazir 33: A Page with No Gemara?!

First, a mishnah - a brainteaser of 6 people who take conditional vows of nezirut, depending on determinable unknowns. The...

Nazir 33 – Shabbat February 25

The William Davidson Talmud | Powered by Sefaria

Nazir 33 – Shabbat February 25

讗讘讬讬 讗诪专 讻讙讜谉 讚讗诪专 讗讬 谞诪讬 诇讗讜 驻诇讜谞讬 讛讜讗 讗讬 讛讜讬 谞讝讬专 讜诪讗讬 诇讗 谞转拽讬讬诪讜 讚讘专讬讜 诇讗 谞转拽讬讬诪讜 讚讘专讬讜 讛专讗砖讜谞讬诐 讗诇讗 讚讘专讬讜 讗讞专讜谞讬诐:


Abaye said: One must correct his understanding of the mishna, so that it deals with a situation where in addition to his first statement he said: Even if it is not so-and-so, I shall be a nazirite. And what is the meaning of the phrase: Whose statement was not fulfilled? It means: His first statement was not fulfilled, as it was not that person; rather, he is a nazirite because his last statement was fulfilled.


讛专转讬注 诇讗讞讜专讬讜 讗讬谞讜 谞讝讬专 讻讜壮: 讟注诪讗 诪砖讜诐 讚讛专转讬注 诇讗讞讜专讬讜 讛讗 讗转讬 诇拽诪谉 讛讜讬 谞讝讬专 诪谞讬


搂 The mishna taught that if the individual walking toward them turned back, so that his identity remained unknown, not one of them is a nazirite. The Gemara clarifies: The reason is only because he turned back, from which it may be inferred that if that person comes before us and is identified, the one who said he would be a nazirite if it is so-and-so is considered to be a nazirite. The Gemara inquires: In accordance with whose opinion is this halakha?
This amud has no Gemara text, as in the classic Vilna layout it is entirely filled with the commentary of Tosafot.

Scroll To Top