Search

Nazir 60

Want to dedicate learning? Get started here:

English
עברית
podcast placeholder

0:00
0:00




podcast placeholder

0:00
0:00




Summary

This week’s learning is sponsored by Rabbi Lisa Malik and Adi Wyner in loving memory of Aryeh Natanel Kluger z”l, the 12-year-old son of Larry Kluger and Josie Glausiusz Kluger & the twin brother of Rena Amalya Kluger of Modi’in. Aryeh died on Rosh Chodesh Nisan 5783 at Shaare Zedek in Jerusalem due to complications from a brain tumor. In his short life, Aryeh was an award-winning software developer, Lego inventor, and entrepreneur who loved to play piano, read books, eat eclairs, hike, and hang out with his sister, his friends, and his family. Easily identifiable by his bright red hair, beaming smile, & boundless concern for others (expressed even during the last days of his life), Aryeh touched the lives of everyone he encountered. This week, the world feels a little darker without Aryeh; we pray that Aryeh’s light will continue to shine in the hearts of those who loved him. May the neshama of Aryeh Natanel ben Lev v’Nechama Channah have an aliyah & may his memory inspire us to learn, to care, and to be grateful for the blessings in our lives.

If there is a doubt whether a nazir became impure to a dead body and became a leper, one has to shave four times and each time bring various sacrifices and actions. What is done at each stage and what stipulations need to be made? What is the procedure if a nazir was definitely a leper but possibly impure to a dead body? What if the impurity was clear but the leprosy was in doubt? Why can’t one of the shavings count for two issues such as, completion on nezirut and leprosy? Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai spells out all the differences between the different types of shavings, thereby explaining why one can’t count for both.

 

Today’s daily daf tools:

Nazir 60

גְּמָ׳ תָּנָא: בַּמֶּה דְּבָרִים אֲמוּרִים — בִּנְזִירוּת מוּעֶטֶת, אֲבָל בִּנְזִירוּת בַּת שָׁנָה — אוֹכֵל בְּקָדָשִׁים לְאַחַר שְׁתֵּי שָׁנִים,

GEMARA: The Sage taught: In what case is this statement of the mishna said? With regard to a short naziriteship of thirty days. However, with regard to a naziriteship of a year, he partakes of sacrificial food only after two years. He cannot shave until a year has passed, in case he is not a leper; he may shave the second time only a year later, in case he was impure during the first year and this second year was his naziriteship observed in purity. At this stage he may partake of sacrificial meat, for if he was a full-fledged leper he has shaved twice.

וְשׁוֹתֶה יַיִן וּמִיטַּמֵּא לְמֵתִים לְאַחַר אַרְבַּע שָׁנִים.

Yet if the first two shavings were for his leprosy, he has not shaved for his naziriteship at all, and therefore he must observe a third year of naziriteship and shave. He then must observe another year of naziriteship and shave again, as perhaps his third shaving was for impurity and the fourth will be for his naziriteship in purity. And consequently he may drink wine and become impure from the dead only after four years.

וְתָנֵי עֲלַהּ: וּמְגַלֵּחַ אַרְבַּע תִּגְלָחִיּוֹת. תִּגְלַחַת רִאשׁוֹנָה — מֵבִיא צִפּוֹרִים,

And it is taught with regard to the halakha of the mishna (Tosefta 6:1): And he shaves with four separate acts of shaving, each time for its own reason. How so? For his first shaving, after the thirty days of an unspecified naziriteship or at the end of the period he vowed to observe naziriteship, he brings two birds of a leper: One is slaughtered over spring water and the other is sent away (Leviticus 14:4–7).

וְחַטַּאת הָעוֹף, וְעוֹלַת בְּהֵמָה. שְׁנִיָּה — מֵבִיא חַטַּאת הָעוֹף וְעוֹלַת בְּהֵמָה, שְׁלִישִׁית — מֵבִיא חַטַּאת הָעוֹף וְעוֹלַת בְּהֵמָה, רְבִיעִית — מֵבִיא קׇרְבַּן טׇהֳרָה.

And he also brings a bird sin-offering for his shaving of impure naziriteship, as he may have contracted impurity from a corpse, and an animal burnt-offering for his shaving of purity, as he may not have contracted impurity from a corpse. For his second shaving he brings a bird sin-offering and an animal burnt-offering. For his third shaving he again brings a bird sin-offering and an animal burnt-offering. And for the fourth shaving he brings an offering of purity.

אָמַרְתָּ: תִּגְלַחַת רִאשׁוֹן מֵבִיא וְכוּ׳. מִמָּה נַפְשָׁךְ שַׁפִּיר קָמַיְיתֵי, דְּאִי וַדַּאי מְצוֹרָע הוּא וְלָאו טָמֵא הוּא — צִיפּוֹרִין חוֹבָתוֹ, וְחַטַּאת הָעוֹף סָפֵק, אָזְלָא לִקְבוּרָה, וְעוֹלָה הָוְיָא נְדָבָה.

The Gemara analyzes the details and reasons for this halakha: You said in this baraita that for the first shaving he brings the two birds of a leper, as well as a bird sin-offering and an animal burnt-offering. The Gemara explains: In this manner he brings the proper offerings whichever way you look at it. As, if his status as a leper is definite and he is not impure, the birds he brings are for his obligation to purify himself from leprosy. And as the bird sin-offering in case he was impure was brought due to uncertainty, it goes for burial, like all bird sin-offerings sacrificed in a case of uncertainty, which cannot be eaten. And the bird burnt-offering that he brought in case he was an impure nazirite is a gift offering.

וּלְגַלְּחוֹ תּוֹךְ שִׁבְעָה אִי אֶפְשָׁר, דְּדִילְמָא לָאו מוּחְלָט הוּא, וְרַחֲמָנָא אָמַר ״תַּעַר לֹא יַעֲבֹר עַל רֹאשׁוֹ עַד מְלֹאת״.

The Gemara further explains: But it is not possible to shave him right after seven days, as one usually does when purified from leprosy, as perhaps he is not a confirmed leper and has no obligation to shave but is bound by the naziriteship vow, and the Merciful One says: “No razor shall come upon his head; until the days are fulfilled in which he consecrated himself to the Lord” (Numbers 6:5). This verse teaches that he cannot shave until the end of his naziriteship. Therefore, he shaves only after thirty days.

וְאִי לָאו מְצוֹרָע וַדַּאי הָוֵי, וְהוּא טָמֵא — חַטַּאת הָעוֹף חוֹבָתוֹ, וְצִיפּוֹרִין אַבָּרַאי קָא מִתְעַבְדִין, וְלָא הָוֵי חוּלִּין בַּעֲזָרָה. וְעוֹלַת בְּהֵמָה הָוְיָא נְדָבָה.

The Gemara continues to clarify the various uncertainties concerning the first shaving. And if he is not a definite leper but he is impure from a corpse, the bird sin-offering is for his obligation as an impure nazirite, and there is no problem with the unnecessary rituals of a leper’s birds, as they are performed outside the Temple, and are not subject to the prohibition against bringing non-sacred animals into the Temple courtyard. Therefore, the slaughter of one of the birds outside the Temple is not a transgression. And the animal burnt-offering is considered a gift offering.

וְאִי לָאו מְצוֹרָע הוּא וְלָאו טָמֵא הוּא — צִיפּוֹרִין אַבָּרַאי קָא מִתְעַבְדִין, חַטַּאת הָעוֹף לִקְבוּרָה, עוֹלַת בְּהֵמָה הָוְיָא חוֹבָתוֹ. וְהָא בָּעֵי אָשָׁם! רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן הִיא, דְּאָמַר: מַיְיתֵי וּמַתְנֵי.

And if he is neither a leper nor impure he has also acted correctly, as the birds are performed outside the Temple, which means no transgression is committed, while the bird sin-offering of uncertain necessity goes to burial, and the animal burnt-offering is for his obligation, like any nazirite who completes his naziriteship. The Gemara asks: But isn’t a leper required to bring a guilt-offering to complete his atonement and permit him to partake of sacrificial food? The Gemara answers: This ruling is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Shimon, who said that one may bring a guilt-offering and stipulate as follows: If I am obligated to bring this offering then it is for my obligation; and if not, it shall be a voluntary peace-offering.

תִּגְלַחַת שְׁנִיָּה וּשְׁלִישִׁית צִיפּוֹרִין לָא צְרִיךְ, דְּהָא עֲבַיד, מַאי אִיכָּא: דִּילְמָא וַדַּאי מוּחְלָט הוּא, חֲדָא — לִסְפֵק סְפָרוֹ,

For the second and third shavings he does not need to bring birds again, as he has already performed this ritual. What is the potential concern? That perhaps he was previously a confirmed leper of definite status. For this reason, one of the bird sin-offerings he brings at the second shaving is for the days of his counting when his status was uncertain. After the first purification of a confirmed leper he counts seven days, or thirty days in this case due to the uncertainty, and brings a sin-offering.

וַחֲדָא, לִסְפֵק טוּמְאָתוֹ. תִּגְלַחַת רְבִיעִית — מֵבִיא קׇרְבַּן טׇהֳרָה וּמַתְנֵי,

And the one sin-offering he brings at his third shaving is for his uncertain impurity. If he was a leper, the offerings he brought on the previous occasion were for purification of his leprosy, not his naziriteship. This means that, if he was impure, he is still required to bring a sin-offering for his impurity as a nazirite. Furthermore, the animal burnt-offerings he brings for his second and third shavings are for his naziriteship of purity. For his fourth shaving he brings an offering of purity and stipulates as follows:

וְאִי וַדַּאי נָזִיר הוּא — עוֹלָה הָרִאשׁוֹנָה חוֹבָה, וְזוֹ נְדָבָה. וְאִם טָמֵא וּמוּחְלָט הוּא — עוֹלָה הָרִאשׁוֹנָה נְדָבָה, וְזוֹ חוֹבָה, וְזֶה שְׁאָר קׇרְבָּנוֹ.

And if he was a definite nazirite from the start and was neither impure from a corpse nor a leper, the first burnt-offering he brought after his initial shaving was for his obligation of pure naziriteship, and this one he is bringing now is a gift offering. And if he was impure from a corpse and a confirmed leper, the first burnt-offering he brought was a gift offering and this one he is bringing now is for his obligation. And these, the guilt-offering and peace-offering he is currently bringing, are for the rest of his obligatory offerings. This concludes the Gemara’s analysis of the case of the baraita.

טָמֵא סָפֵק וּמוּחְלָט וַדַּאי — אוֹכֵל בְּקָדָשִׁים לְאַחַר שְׁמוֹנָה יָמִים, וְשׁוֹתֶה יַיִן וּמִיטַּמֵּא לְמֵתִים לְאַחַר שִׁשִּׁים וְשִׁבְעָה יָמִים.

§ The Gemara addresses similar situations: A nazirite about whom it was uncertain if he was impure from a corpse, and he was a confirmed leper whose status was definite, partakes of sacrificial food after eight days. He counts seven days, after which he is purified from his leprosy. On the following day he brings his offerings and may partake of sacrificial food. And he may drink wine and become impure from the dead after sixty-seven days. He is required to count another thirty days for his naziriteship and shave, at which point he must observe another thirty days, in case his first shaving was for his impurity, and his second shaving is for his purity.

מוּחְלָט סָפֵק וְטָמֵא וַדַּאי — אוֹכֵל בְּקָדָשִׁים לְאַחַר שְׁלֹשִׁים וְשִׁבְעָה יָמִים, וְשׁוֹתֶה יַיִן וּמִיטַּמֵּא לְמֵתִים לְאַחַר שִׁבְעִים וְאַרְבָּעָה יָמִים.

The Gemara discusses another case: A nazirite whose status as a confirmed leper was uncertain and who was definitely impure from a corpse partakes of sacrificial food after thirty-seven days. He shaves after seven days for his definite impurity and starts counting thirty days of naziriteship afresh. At the conclusion of this period he shaves again, which renders him pure from any uncertain leprosy, and may partake of sacrificial food. However, he may drink wine and become impure from the dead only after seventy-four days. Since he might have been a confirmed leper, his first two shavings, after seven and thirty-seven days, count only toward the two stages of his purification from leprosy, for his first shaving and after the days of his counting. He must therefore observe a further thirty days for his naziriteship of purity.

טָמֵא וַדַּאי וּמוּחְלָט וַדַּאי — אוֹכֵל בְּקָדָשִׁים לְאַחַר שְׁמוֹנָה יָמִים, וְשׁוֹתֶה יַיִן וּמִיטַּמֵּא לְמֵתִים לְאַחַר אַרְבָּעִים וְאַרְבָּעָה יָמִים.

The Gemara mentions yet another case: A nazirite who was definitely impure from a corpse and he was a confirmed leper whose status was definite partakes of sacrificial food after eight days. He immediately shaves his first shaving for his leprosy, then counts seven days and shaves again for his leprosy and partakes of sacrificial food on the following day. And he may drink wine and become impure from the dead after forty-four days. He counts a further seven days of hair growth for his shaving of impurity, shaves, and finally observes thirty more days for his naziriteship of purity.

שָׁאֲלוּ תַּלְמִידָיו אֶת רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן יוֹחַי: נָזִיר טָהוֹר וּמְצוֹרָע, מַהוּ שֶׁיְּגַלֵּחַ תִּגְלַחַת אַחַת וְעוֹלָה לוֹ לְכָאן וּלְכָאן? אָמַר לָהֶן: אֵינוֹ מְגַלֵּחַ.

§ The students of Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai asked Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai: With regard to one who was a pure nazirite and a leper, what is the halakha concerning the possibility that he may shave one shaving and it will count for him both for this and for that? In other words, can it serve for his shaving of leprosy as well as for his naziriteship? He said to them: He may not shave once for both requirements.

אָמְרוּ לוֹ: לָמָּה? אָמַר לָהֶן: אִילּוּ זֶה לְגַדֵּל וְזֶה לְגַדֵּל, וְזֶה לְהַעֲבִיר וְזֶה לְהַעֲבִיר — יָפֶה אַתֶּם אוֹמְרִים. עַכְשָׁיו, נָזִיר — לְהַעֲבִיר, וּמְצוֹרָע — לְגַדֵּל.

They said to him: Why not? He said to them: If the aim of both shavings were the same, this one to grow hair and that one to grow hair, or this one to remove hair and that one to remove hair, you would have spoken well. Now in actual fact the two shavings have different functions: A nazirite shaves to remove his hair, and a leper shaves to grow hair, so that he can shave again after the days of his counting.

וְלֹא תַּעֲלֶה לוֹ לִימֵי חִלּוּטוֹ, וְתַעֲלֶה לוֹ לִימֵי סְפָרוֹ! וְאָמַר לָהֶן: אִילּוּ זֶה לִפְנֵי זְרִיקַת דָּמִים וְזֶה לִפְנֵי זְרִיקַת דָּמִים — יָפֶה אַתֶּם אוֹמְרִים, אֶלָּא מְצוֹרָע לִפְנֵי זְרִיקַת דָּמִים, וְנָזִיר לְאַחַר זְרִיקַת דָּמִים.

His students posed another question: But even if his shaving of naziriteship does not count for him as the shaving of the completion of his days of confirmed leprosy, let it at least count for him as the shaving at the end of the days of his counting, which is not followed by another act of shaving, and therefore is performed only for the purpose of removing his hair. And Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai said to them: If this one were performed before the sprinkling of blood and that one before the sprinkling of blood, you would have spoken well. However, a leper shaves before the sprinkling of his offering’s blood, and a nazirite does so after the sprinkling of the blood. Therefore, the two shavings are not equivalent.

וְלֹא תַּעֲלֶה לוֹ לִימֵי צָרַעְתּוֹ וּנְזִירוּתוֹ, וְתַעֲלֶה לוֹ לִימֵי צָרַעְתּוֹ וְטוּמְאָתוֹ! אָמַר לָהֶן: אִילּוּ זֶה לִפְנֵי בִּיאַת מַיִם וְזֶה לִפְנֵי בִּיאַת מַיִם — יָפֶה אַתֶּם אוֹמְרִים. אֶלָּא טָמֵא לְאַחַר בִּיאַת מַיִם, מְצוֹרָע לִפְנֵי בִּיאַת מַיִם.

Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai’s students asked him yet another question: And granted that his shaving does not count for his days of leprosy and his naziriteship, let it at least count for his days of leprosy and his shaving of naziriteship of impurity, both of which are performed before the sprinkling of the blood. He said to them: If this one shaved before his immersion in water, and that one before immersion in water, you would have spoken well. However, an impure nazirite shaves after immersion in water, whereas a leper shaves before immersion in water.

אָמְרוּ לוֹ: יָפֶה אָמַרְתָּ שֶׁלֹּא תַּעֲלֶה לוֹ לִימֵי סְפָרוֹ וְלִנְזִירוּתוֹ, וְתַעֲלֶה לוֹ לִימֵי חִלּוּטוֹ וְטוּמְאָתוֹ, דְּזֶה לְגַדֵּל וְזֶה לְגַדֵּל הוּא!

They said to Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai: You have spoken well, and convinced us that one shaving should not count for the days of his counting and for his naziriteship. But why not say that it should at least count for his days of confirmed leprosy and his naziriteship of impurity, as the purpose of this shaving is to grow hair and the purpose of that one is to grow hair.

אָמַר לָהֶן: נָזִיר טָהוֹר וְהוּא מְצוֹרָע — זֶה לְגַדֵּל וְזֶה לְהַעֲבִיר, וְאִם נָזִיר טָמֵא וְהוּא מְצוֹרָע — זֶה לִפְנֵי בִּיאַת מַיִם וְזֶה לְאַחַר בִּיאַת מַיִם.

He said to them: Here too the acts of shaving for naziriteship and leprosy are not exactly the same: If he is a pure nazirite and he is also a leper, the difference is that the aim of this one, the shaving of a leper, is to grow hair, and the aim of that one, the shaving of the pure nazirite, is to remove his hair. And if he is an impure nazirite and he is also a leper, the difference is that this shaving, of a leper, occurs before immersion in water, and that one, the shaving of an impure nazirite, is performed after immersion in water.

Today’s daily daf tools:

Delve Deeper

Broaden your understanding of the topics on this daf with classes and podcasts from top women Talmud scholars.

For the Beyond the Daf shiurim offered in Hebrew, see here.

New to Talmud?

Check out our resources designed to help you navigate a page of Talmud – and study at the pace, level and style that fits you. 

The Hadran Women’s Tapestry

Meet the diverse women learning Gemara at Hadran and hear their stories. 

I started learning Daf Yomi because my sister, Ruth Leah Kahan, attended Michelle’s class in person and suggested I listen remotely. She always sat near Michelle and spoke up during class so that I could hear her voice. Our mom had just died unexpectedly and it made me feel connected to hear Ruth Leah’s voice, and now to know we are both listening to the same thing daily, continents apart.
Jessica Shklar
Jessica Shklar

Philadelphia, United States

I started Daf during the pandemic. I listened to a number of podcasts by various Rebbeim until one day, I discovered Rabbanit Farbers podcast. Subsequently I joined the Hadran family in Eruvin. Not the easiest place to begin, Rabbanit Farber made it all understandable and fun. The online live group has bonded together and have really become a supportive, encouraging family.

Leah Goldford
Leah Goldford

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

I was inspired to start learning after attending the 2020 siyum in Binyanei Hauma. It has been a great experience for me. It’s amazing to see the origins of stories I’ve heard and rituals I’ve participated in my whole life. Even when I don’t understand the daf itself, I believe that the commitment to learning every day is valuable and has multiple benefits. And there will be another daf tomorrow!

Khaya Eisenberg
Khaya Eisenberg

Jerusalem, Israel

In January 2020 on a Shabbaton to Baltimore I heard about the new cycle of Daf Yomi after the siyum celebration in NYC stadium. I started to read “ a daily dose of Talmud “ and really enjoyed it . It led me to google “ do Orthodox women study Talmud? “ and found HADRAN! Since then I listen to the podcast every morning, participate in classes and siyum. I love to learn, this is amazing! Thank you

Sandrine Simons
Sandrine Simons

Atlanta, United States

I started learning daf yomi at the beginning of this cycle. As the pandemic evolved, it’s been so helpful to me to have this discipline every morning to listen to the daf podcast after I’ve read the daf; learning about the relationships between the rabbis and the ways they were constructing our Jewish religion after the destruction of the Temple. I’m grateful to be on this journey!

Mona Fishbane
Mona Fishbane

Teaneck NJ, United States

I was exposed to Talmud in high school, but I was truly inspired after my daughter and I decided to attend the Women’s Siyum Shas in 2020. We knew that this was a historic moment. We were blown away, overcome with emotion at the euphoria of the revolution. Right then, I knew I would continue. My commitment deepened with the every-morning Virtual Beit Midrash on Zoom with R. Michelle.

Adina Hagege
Adina Hagege

Zichron Yaakov, Israel

I started learning on January 5, 2020. When I complete the 7+ year cycle I will be 70 years old. I had been intimidated by those who said that I needed to study Talmud in a traditional way with a chevruta, but I decided the learning was more important to me than the method. Thankful for Daf Yomi for Women helping me catch up when I fall behind, and also being able to celebrate with each Siyum!

Pamela Elisheva
Pamela Elisheva

Bakersfield, United States

I started learning with rabbis. I needed to know more than the stories. My first teacher to show me “the way of the Talmud” as well as the stories was Samara Schwartz.
Michelle Farber started the new cycle 2 yrs ago and I jumped on for the ride.
I do not look back.

Jenifer Nech
Jenifer Nech

Houston, United States

See video

Susan Fisher
Susan Fisher

Raanana, Israel

I heard the new Daf Yomi cycle was starting and I was curious, so I searched online for a women’s class and was pleasently surprised to find Rabanit Michelle’s great class reviews in many online articles. It has been a splendid journey. It is a way to fill my days with Torah, learning so many amazing things I have never heard before during my Tanach learning at High School. Thanks so much .

Martha Tarazi
Martha Tarazi

Panama, Panama

I had dreamed of doing daf yomi since I had my first serious Talmud class 18 years ago at Pardes with Rahel Berkovitz, and then a couple of summers with Leah Rosenthal. There is no way I would be able to do it without another wonderful teacher, Michelle, and the Hadran organization. I wake up and am excited to start each day with the next daf.

Beth Elster
Beth Elster

Irvine, United States

I started learning at the beginning of this cycle more than 2 years ago, and I have not missed a day or a daf. It’s been challenging and enlightening and even mind-numbing at times, but the learning and the shared experience have all been worth it. If you are open to it, there’s no telling what might come into your life.

Patti Evans
Patti Evans

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

I went to day school in Toronto but really began to learn when I attended Brovenders back in the early 1980’s. Last year after talking to my sister who was learning Daf Yomi, inspired, I looked on the computer and the Hadran site came up. I have been listening to each days shiur in the morning as I work. I emphasis listening since I am not sitting with a Gamara. I listen while I work in my studio.

Rachel Rotenberg
Rachel Rotenberg

Tekoa, Israel

I am grateful for the structure of the Daf Yomi. When I am freer to learn to my heart’s content, I learn other passages in addition. But even in times of difficulty, I always know that I can rely on the structure and social support of Daf Yomi learners all over the world.

I am also grateful for this forum. It is very helpful to learn with a group of enthusiastic and committed women.

Janice Block-2
Janice Block

Beit Shemesh, Israel

I started to listen to Michelle’s podcasts four years ago. The minute I started I was hooked. I’m so excited to learn the entire Talmud, and think I will continue always. I chose the quote “while a woman is engaged in conversation she also holds the spindle”. (Megillah 14b). It reminds me of all of the amazing women I learn with every day who multi-task, think ahead and accomplish so much.

Julie Mendelsohn
Julie Mendelsohn

Zichron Yakov, Israel

I started learning Gemara at the Yeshivah of Flatbush. And I resumed ‘ברוך ה decades later with Rabbanit Michele at Hadran. I started from Brachot and have had an exciting, rewarding experience throughout seder Moed!

Anne Mirsky (1)
Anne Mirsky

Maale Adumim, Israel

As Jewish educator and as a woman, I’m mindful that Talmud has been kept from women for many centuries. Now that we are privileged to learn, and learning is so accessible, it’s my intent to complete Daf Yomi. I am so excited to keep learning with my Hadran community.

Sue Parker Gerson
Sue Parker Gerson

Denver, United States

I have joined the community of daf yomi learners at the start of this cycle. I have studied in different ways – by reading the page, translating the page, attending a local shiur and listening to Rabbanit Farber’s podcasts, depending on circumstances and where I was at the time. The reactions have been positive throughout – with no exception!

Silke Goldberg
Silke Goldberg

Guildford, United Kingdom

I started learning Daf Yomi because my sister, Ruth Leah Kahan, attended Michelle’s class in person and suggested I listen remotely. She always sat near Michelle and spoke up during class so that I could hear her voice. Our mom had just died unexpectedly and it made me feel connected to hear Ruth Leah’s voice, and now to know we are both listening to the same thing daily, continents apart.
Jessica Shklar
Jessica Shklar

Philadelphia, United States

I started learning with rabbis. I needed to know more than the stories. My first teacher to show me “the way of the Talmud” as well as the stories was Samara Schwartz.
Michelle Farber started the new cycle 2 yrs ago and I jumped on for the ride.
I do not look back.

Jenifer Nech
Jenifer Nech

Houston, United States

Nazir 60

גְּמָ׳ תָּנָא: בַּמֶּה דְּבָרִים אֲמוּרִים — בִּנְזִירוּת מוּעֶטֶת, אֲבָל בִּנְזִירוּת בַּת שָׁנָה — אוֹכֵל בְּקָדָשִׁים לְאַחַר שְׁתֵּי שָׁנִים,

GEMARA: The Sage taught: In what case is this statement of the mishna said? With regard to a short naziriteship of thirty days. However, with regard to a naziriteship of a year, he partakes of sacrificial food only after two years. He cannot shave until a year has passed, in case he is not a leper; he may shave the second time only a year later, in case he was impure during the first year and this second year was his naziriteship observed in purity. At this stage he may partake of sacrificial meat, for if he was a full-fledged leper he has shaved twice.

וְשׁוֹתֶה יַיִן וּמִיטַּמֵּא לְמֵתִים לְאַחַר אַרְבַּע שָׁנִים.

Yet if the first two shavings were for his leprosy, he has not shaved for his naziriteship at all, and therefore he must observe a third year of naziriteship and shave. He then must observe another year of naziriteship and shave again, as perhaps his third shaving was for impurity and the fourth will be for his naziriteship in purity. And consequently he may drink wine and become impure from the dead only after four years.

וְתָנֵי עֲלַהּ: וּמְגַלֵּחַ אַרְבַּע תִּגְלָחִיּוֹת. תִּגְלַחַת רִאשׁוֹנָה — מֵבִיא צִפּוֹרִים,

And it is taught with regard to the halakha of the mishna (Tosefta 6:1): And he shaves with four separate acts of shaving, each time for its own reason. How so? For his first shaving, after the thirty days of an unspecified naziriteship or at the end of the period he vowed to observe naziriteship, he brings two birds of a leper: One is slaughtered over spring water and the other is sent away (Leviticus 14:4–7).

וְחַטַּאת הָעוֹף, וְעוֹלַת בְּהֵמָה. שְׁנִיָּה — מֵבִיא חַטַּאת הָעוֹף וְעוֹלַת בְּהֵמָה, שְׁלִישִׁית — מֵבִיא חַטַּאת הָעוֹף וְעוֹלַת בְּהֵמָה, רְבִיעִית — מֵבִיא קׇרְבַּן טׇהֳרָה.

And he also brings a bird sin-offering for his shaving of impure naziriteship, as he may have contracted impurity from a corpse, and an animal burnt-offering for his shaving of purity, as he may not have contracted impurity from a corpse. For his second shaving he brings a bird sin-offering and an animal burnt-offering. For his third shaving he again brings a bird sin-offering and an animal burnt-offering. And for the fourth shaving he brings an offering of purity.

אָמַרְתָּ: תִּגְלַחַת רִאשׁוֹן מֵבִיא וְכוּ׳. מִמָּה נַפְשָׁךְ שַׁפִּיר קָמַיְיתֵי, דְּאִי וַדַּאי מְצוֹרָע הוּא וְלָאו טָמֵא הוּא — צִיפּוֹרִין חוֹבָתוֹ, וְחַטַּאת הָעוֹף סָפֵק, אָזְלָא לִקְבוּרָה, וְעוֹלָה הָוְיָא נְדָבָה.

The Gemara analyzes the details and reasons for this halakha: You said in this baraita that for the first shaving he brings the two birds of a leper, as well as a bird sin-offering and an animal burnt-offering. The Gemara explains: In this manner he brings the proper offerings whichever way you look at it. As, if his status as a leper is definite and he is not impure, the birds he brings are for his obligation to purify himself from leprosy. And as the bird sin-offering in case he was impure was brought due to uncertainty, it goes for burial, like all bird sin-offerings sacrificed in a case of uncertainty, which cannot be eaten. And the bird burnt-offering that he brought in case he was an impure nazirite is a gift offering.

וּלְגַלְּחוֹ תּוֹךְ שִׁבְעָה אִי אֶפְשָׁר, דְּדִילְמָא לָאו מוּחְלָט הוּא, וְרַחֲמָנָא אָמַר ״תַּעַר לֹא יַעֲבֹר עַל רֹאשׁוֹ עַד מְלֹאת״.

The Gemara further explains: But it is not possible to shave him right after seven days, as one usually does when purified from leprosy, as perhaps he is not a confirmed leper and has no obligation to shave but is bound by the naziriteship vow, and the Merciful One says: “No razor shall come upon his head; until the days are fulfilled in which he consecrated himself to the Lord” (Numbers 6:5). This verse teaches that he cannot shave until the end of his naziriteship. Therefore, he shaves only after thirty days.

וְאִי לָאו מְצוֹרָע וַדַּאי הָוֵי, וְהוּא טָמֵא — חַטַּאת הָעוֹף חוֹבָתוֹ, וְצִיפּוֹרִין אַבָּרַאי קָא מִתְעַבְדִין, וְלָא הָוֵי חוּלִּין בַּעֲזָרָה. וְעוֹלַת בְּהֵמָה הָוְיָא נְדָבָה.

The Gemara continues to clarify the various uncertainties concerning the first shaving. And if he is not a definite leper but he is impure from a corpse, the bird sin-offering is for his obligation as an impure nazirite, and there is no problem with the unnecessary rituals of a leper’s birds, as they are performed outside the Temple, and are not subject to the prohibition against bringing non-sacred animals into the Temple courtyard. Therefore, the slaughter of one of the birds outside the Temple is not a transgression. And the animal burnt-offering is considered a gift offering.

וְאִי לָאו מְצוֹרָע הוּא וְלָאו טָמֵא הוּא — צִיפּוֹרִין אַבָּרַאי קָא מִתְעַבְדִין, חַטַּאת הָעוֹף לִקְבוּרָה, עוֹלַת בְּהֵמָה הָוְיָא חוֹבָתוֹ. וְהָא בָּעֵי אָשָׁם! רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן הִיא, דְּאָמַר: מַיְיתֵי וּמַתְנֵי.

And if he is neither a leper nor impure he has also acted correctly, as the birds are performed outside the Temple, which means no transgression is committed, while the bird sin-offering of uncertain necessity goes to burial, and the animal burnt-offering is for his obligation, like any nazirite who completes his naziriteship. The Gemara asks: But isn’t a leper required to bring a guilt-offering to complete his atonement and permit him to partake of sacrificial food? The Gemara answers: This ruling is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Shimon, who said that one may bring a guilt-offering and stipulate as follows: If I am obligated to bring this offering then it is for my obligation; and if not, it shall be a voluntary peace-offering.

תִּגְלַחַת שְׁנִיָּה וּשְׁלִישִׁית צִיפּוֹרִין לָא צְרִיךְ, דְּהָא עֲבַיד, מַאי אִיכָּא: דִּילְמָא וַדַּאי מוּחְלָט הוּא, חֲדָא — לִסְפֵק סְפָרוֹ,

For the second and third shavings he does not need to bring birds again, as he has already performed this ritual. What is the potential concern? That perhaps he was previously a confirmed leper of definite status. For this reason, one of the bird sin-offerings he brings at the second shaving is for the days of his counting when his status was uncertain. After the first purification of a confirmed leper he counts seven days, or thirty days in this case due to the uncertainty, and brings a sin-offering.

וַחֲדָא, לִסְפֵק טוּמְאָתוֹ. תִּגְלַחַת רְבִיעִית — מֵבִיא קׇרְבַּן טׇהֳרָה וּמַתְנֵי,

And the one sin-offering he brings at his third shaving is for his uncertain impurity. If he was a leper, the offerings he brought on the previous occasion were for purification of his leprosy, not his naziriteship. This means that, if he was impure, he is still required to bring a sin-offering for his impurity as a nazirite. Furthermore, the animal burnt-offerings he brings for his second and third shavings are for his naziriteship of purity. For his fourth shaving he brings an offering of purity and stipulates as follows:

וְאִי וַדַּאי נָזִיר הוּא — עוֹלָה הָרִאשׁוֹנָה חוֹבָה, וְזוֹ נְדָבָה. וְאִם טָמֵא וּמוּחְלָט הוּא — עוֹלָה הָרִאשׁוֹנָה נְדָבָה, וְזוֹ חוֹבָה, וְזֶה שְׁאָר קׇרְבָּנוֹ.

And if he was a definite nazirite from the start and was neither impure from a corpse nor a leper, the first burnt-offering he brought after his initial shaving was for his obligation of pure naziriteship, and this one he is bringing now is a gift offering. And if he was impure from a corpse and a confirmed leper, the first burnt-offering he brought was a gift offering and this one he is bringing now is for his obligation. And these, the guilt-offering and peace-offering he is currently bringing, are for the rest of his obligatory offerings. This concludes the Gemara’s analysis of the case of the baraita.

טָמֵא סָפֵק וּמוּחְלָט וַדַּאי — אוֹכֵל בְּקָדָשִׁים לְאַחַר שְׁמוֹנָה יָמִים, וְשׁוֹתֶה יַיִן וּמִיטַּמֵּא לְמֵתִים לְאַחַר שִׁשִּׁים וְשִׁבְעָה יָמִים.

§ The Gemara addresses similar situations: A nazirite about whom it was uncertain if he was impure from a corpse, and he was a confirmed leper whose status was definite, partakes of sacrificial food after eight days. He counts seven days, after which he is purified from his leprosy. On the following day he brings his offerings and may partake of sacrificial food. And he may drink wine and become impure from the dead after sixty-seven days. He is required to count another thirty days for his naziriteship and shave, at which point he must observe another thirty days, in case his first shaving was for his impurity, and his second shaving is for his purity.

מוּחְלָט סָפֵק וְטָמֵא וַדַּאי — אוֹכֵל בְּקָדָשִׁים לְאַחַר שְׁלֹשִׁים וְשִׁבְעָה יָמִים, וְשׁוֹתֶה יַיִן וּמִיטַּמֵּא לְמֵתִים לְאַחַר שִׁבְעִים וְאַרְבָּעָה יָמִים.

The Gemara discusses another case: A nazirite whose status as a confirmed leper was uncertain and who was definitely impure from a corpse partakes of sacrificial food after thirty-seven days. He shaves after seven days for his definite impurity and starts counting thirty days of naziriteship afresh. At the conclusion of this period he shaves again, which renders him pure from any uncertain leprosy, and may partake of sacrificial food. However, he may drink wine and become impure from the dead only after seventy-four days. Since he might have been a confirmed leper, his first two shavings, after seven and thirty-seven days, count only toward the two stages of his purification from leprosy, for his first shaving and after the days of his counting. He must therefore observe a further thirty days for his naziriteship of purity.

טָמֵא וַדַּאי וּמוּחְלָט וַדַּאי — אוֹכֵל בְּקָדָשִׁים לְאַחַר שְׁמוֹנָה יָמִים, וְשׁוֹתֶה יַיִן וּמִיטַּמֵּא לְמֵתִים לְאַחַר אַרְבָּעִים וְאַרְבָּעָה יָמִים.

The Gemara mentions yet another case: A nazirite who was definitely impure from a corpse and he was a confirmed leper whose status was definite partakes of sacrificial food after eight days. He immediately shaves his first shaving for his leprosy, then counts seven days and shaves again for his leprosy and partakes of sacrificial food on the following day. And he may drink wine and become impure from the dead after forty-four days. He counts a further seven days of hair growth for his shaving of impurity, shaves, and finally observes thirty more days for his naziriteship of purity.

שָׁאֲלוּ תַּלְמִידָיו אֶת רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן יוֹחַי: נָזִיר טָהוֹר וּמְצוֹרָע, מַהוּ שֶׁיְּגַלֵּחַ תִּגְלַחַת אַחַת וְעוֹלָה לוֹ לְכָאן וּלְכָאן? אָמַר לָהֶן: אֵינוֹ מְגַלֵּחַ.

§ The students of Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai asked Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai: With regard to one who was a pure nazirite and a leper, what is the halakha concerning the possibility that he may shave one shaving and it will count for him both for this and for that? In other words, can it serve for his shaving of leprosy as well as for his naziriteship? He said to them: He may not shave once for both requirements.

אָמְרוּ לוֹ: לָמָּה? אָמַר לָהֶן: אִילּוּ זֶה לְגַדֵּל וְזֶה לְגַדֵּל, וְזֶה לְהַעֲבִיר וְזֶה לְהַעֲבִיר — יָפֶה אַתֶּם אוֹמְרִים. עַכְשָׁיו, נָזִיר — לְהַעֲבִיר, וּמְצוֹרָע — לְגַדֵּל.

They said to him: Why not? He said to them: If the aim of both shavings were the same, this one to grow hair and that one to grow hair, or this one to remove hair and that one to remove hair, you would have spoken well. Now in actual fact the two shavings have different functions: A nazirite shaves to remove his hair, and a leper shaves to grow hair, so that he can shave again after the days of his counting.

וְלֹא תַּעֲלֶה לוֹ לִימֵי חִלּוּטוֹ, וְתַעֲלֶה לוֹ לִימֵי סְפָרוֹ! וְאָמַר לָהֶן: אִילּוּ זֶה לִפְנֵי זְרִיקַת דָּמִים וְזֶה לִפְנֵי זְרִיקַת דָּמִים — יָפֶה אַתֶּם אוֹמְרִים, אֶלָּא מְצוֹרָע לִפְנֵי זְרִיקַת דָּמִים, וְנָזִיר לְאַחַר זְרִיקַת דָּמִים.

His students posed another question: But even if his shaving of naziriteship does not count for him as the shaving of the completion of his days of confirmed leprosy, let it at least count for him as the shaving at the end of the days of his counting, which is not followed by another act of shaving, and therefore is performed only for the purpose of removing his hair. And Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai said to them: If this one were performed before the sprinkling of blood and that one before the sprinkling of blood, you would have spoken well. However, a leper shaves before the sprinkling of his offering’s blood, and a nazirite does so after the sprinkling of the blood. Therefore, the two shavings are not equivalent.

וְלֹא תַּעֲלֶה לוֹ לִימֵי צָרַעְתּוֹ וּנְזִירוּתוֹ, וְתַעֲלֶה לוֹ לִימֵי צָרַעְתּוֹ וְטוּמְאָתוֹ! אָמַר לָהֶן: אִילּוּ זֶה לִפְנֵי בִּיאַת מַיִם וְזֶה לִפְנֵי בִּיאַת מַיִם — יָפֶה אַתֶּם אוֹמְרִים. אֶלָּא טָמֵא לְאַחַר בִּיאַת מַיִם, מְצוֹרָע לִפְנֵי בִּיאַת מַיִם.

Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai’s students asked him yet another question: And granted that his shaving does not count for his days of leprosy and his naziriteship, let it at least count for his days of leprosy and his shaving of naziriteship of impurity, both of which are performed before the sprinkling of the blood. He said to them: If this one shaved before his immersion in water, and that one before immersion in water, you would have spoken well. However, an impure nazirite shaves after immersion in water, whereas a leper shaves before immersion in water.

אָמְרוּ לוֹ: יָפֶה אָמַרְתָּ שֶׁלֹּא תַּעֲלֶה לוֹ לִימֵי סְפָרוֹ וְלִנְזִירוּתוֹ, וְתַעֲלֶה לוֹ לִימֵי חִלּוּטוֹ וְטוּמְאָתוֹ, דְּזֶה לְגַדֵּל וְזֶה לְגַדֵּל הוּא!

They said to Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai: You have spoken well, and convinced us that one shaving should not count for the days of his counting and for his naziriteship. But why not say that it should at least count for his days of confirmed leprosy and his naziriteship of impurity, as the purpose of this shaving is to grow hair and the purpose of that one is to grow hair.

אָמַר לָהֶן: נָזִיר טָהוֹר וְהוּא מְצוֹרָע — זֶה לְגַדֵּל וְזֶה לְהַעֲבִיר, וְאִם נָזִיר טָמֵא וְהוּא מְצוֹרָע — זֶה לִפְנֵי בִּיאַת מַיִם וְזֶה לְאַחַר בִּיאַת מַיִם.

He said to them: Here too the acts of shaving for naziriteship and leprosy are not exactly the same: If he is a pure nazirite and he is also a leper, the difference is that the aim of this one, the shaving of a leper, is to grow hair, and the aim of that one, the shaving of the pure nazirite, is to remove his hair. And if he is an impure nazirite and he is also a leper, the difference is that this shaving, of a leper, occurs before immersion in water, and that one, the shaving of an impure nazirite, is performed after immersion in water.

Want to follow content and continue where you left off?

Create an account today to track your progress, mark what you’ve learned, and follow the shiurim that speak to you.

Clear all items from this list?

This will remove ALL the items in this section. You will lose any progress or history connected to them. This is irreversible.

Cancel
Yes, clear all

Are you sure you want to delete this item?

You will lose any progress or history connected to this item.

Cancel
Yes, delete