Does a woman who doesn’t deal with pure items need to check herself before and after relations with her husband? What are the differences regarding checking before/after relations between women who have regular cycles and those who don’t. There is a tannatic debate regarding whether or not a woman who does not have a regular cycle can remain married to her husband as there is a concern that having sex will bring on her period.
This month’s learning is sponsored by Beth Balkany in honor of their granddaughter, Devorah Chana Serach Eichel. “May she grow up to be a lifelong learner.”
Want to dedicate learning? Get started here:
English
עברית
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
This month’s learning is sponsored by Beth Balkany in honor of their granddaughter, Devorah Chana Serach Eichel. “May she grow up to be a lifelong learner.”
Niddah 12
בְּעָא מִינֵּיהּ רַבִּי זֵירָא מֵרַב יְהוּדָה: אִשָּׁה מַהוּ שֶׁתִּבְדּוֹק עַצְמָהּ לְבַעְלָהּ? אֲמַר לֵיהּ: לֹא תִּבְדּוֹק. וְתִבְדּוֹק — וּמָה בְּכָךְ? אִם כֵּן — לִבּוֹ נוֹקְפוֹ וּפוֹרֵשׁ.
§ Rabbi Zeira raised a dilemma before Rav Yehuda: What is the halakha as to whether a woman should examine herself before engaging in intercourse with her husband? Rav Yehuda said to him: She should not examine herself. Rabbi Zeira asked: And let her examine herself; what would be the problem with that? Rav Yehuda answered: If so, the heart of a scrupulous husband might strike him with pangs of conscience over sins that he could transgress, and he will separate from his wife out of fear that she is impure.
בְּעָא מִינֵּיהּ רַבִּי אַבָּא מֵרַב הוּנָא: אִשָּׁה מַהוּ שֶׁתִּבְדּוֹק עַצְמָהּ כְּשִׁיעוּר וֶסֶת, כְּדֵי לְחַיֵּיב בַּעְלָהּ חַטָּאת?
Rabbi Abba raised a similar dilemma before Rav Huna: What is the halakha as to whether a woman should examine herself immediately after engaging in intercourse, within the minimum period of time needed for the onset of menstruation, in order to render her husband liable to bring a sin offering for engaging in intercourse with a menstruating woman?
אֲמַר לֵיהּ: מִי מַשְׁכַּחַתְּ לַהּ לִבְדִיקָה כְּשִׁיעוּר וֶסֶת? וְהָתַנְיָא: אֵיזֶהוּ שִׁיעוּר וֶסֶת? מָשָׁל לְשַׁמָּשׁ וָעֵד שֶׁעוֹמְדִים בְּצַד הַמַּשְׁקוֹף, בִּיצִיאַת הַשַּׁמָּשׁ נִכְנַס עֵד.
Rav Huna said to him: Can you find a case where it is physically possible to perform a full examination after intercourse within the period of time needed for the onset of menstruation? But isn’t it taught in a baraita: What is the period of time needed for the onset of menstruation? This is comparable to a male organ and an examination cloth that are standing alongside the doorpost, i.e., at the entrance to the vagina; upon the exit of the organ the examination cloth immediately enters.
הֱוֵי: וֶסֶת שֶׁאָמְרוּ — לְקִנּוּחַ, וְלֹא לִבְדִיקָה. אֶלָּא מַהוּ שֶׁתְּקַנֵּחַ?
The Gemara explains: It is apparent that the period of time that they stated is the time required for an external wipe, and not for a full internal examination. Therefore, if she did an internal examination and found blood, one cannot be certain that she was already menstruating during intercourse and thereby render the husband liable to bring a sin offering. Rather, this is Rabbi Abba’s dilemma: What is the halakha as to whether a woman should wipe herself immediately after engaging in intercourse? Since this action can be performed quickly, if she were to find blood her husband would be liable to bring a sin offering.
אִיכָּא דְאָמְרִי, הָכִי בְּעָא מִינֵּיהּ: אִשָּׁה מַהוּ שֶׁתִּבְדּוֹק עַצְמָהּ כְּדֵי לְחַיֵּיב בַּעְלָהּ אָשָׁם תָּלוּי? אָמַר לוֹ: לֹא תִּבְדּוֹק. וְתִבְדּוֹק, וּמָה בְּכָךְ? אִם כֵּן, לִבּוֹ נוֹקְפוֹ וּפוֹרֵשׁ.
Some say that this is the dilemma that Rabbi Abba raised before Rav Huna: What is the halakha as to whether a woman should examine herself immediately after engaging in intercourse, in order to render her husband liable to bring a provisional guilt offering brought by one who is uncertain as to whether he committed a sin that requires a sin offering? Rav Huna said to him: She should not examine herself. Rabbi Abba asked: And let her examine herself; what would be the problem with that? Rav Huna answered: If so, the heart of a scrupulous husband might strike him with pangs of conscience over sins that he could transgress, and he will separate from his wife out of fear that she is impure.
וּבְשָׁעָה שֶׁהִיא עוֹבֶרֶת וְכוּ׳. אָמַר רַבִּי אַמֵּי אָמַר רַבִּי יַנַּאי: וְזֶהוּ עִדָּן שֶׁל צְנוּעוֹת. אֲמַר לֵיהּ רַבִּי אַבָּא בַּר מֶמֶל לְרַבִּי אַמֵּי: תַּנָּא תָּנֵי ״צְרִיכוֹת״, וְאַתְּ תָּנֵי ״צְנוּעוֹת״! אֲמַר לֵיהּ: שֶׁאֲנִי אוֹמֵר כׇּל הַמְקַיֵּים דִּבְרֵי חֲכָמִים נִקְרָא ״צָנוּעַ״.
§ The mishna teaches: And she is also required to examine herself at a time that she is about to engage in intercourse with her husband. Rabbi Ami says that Rabbi Yannai says: And this examination performed before intercourse is known as: The examination cloth of virtuous women, as this examination is not strictly required. Rabbi Abba bar Memel said to Rabbi Ami: The tanna teaches that women are required to perform this examination, and yet you teach that only virtuous women perform it. Rabbi Ami said to him: Yes, as I say that anyone who fulfills the statements of the Sages is called virtuous. Rabbi Ami did not mean that this examination is beyond the letter of the law. He was simply praising those who abide by the established halakha.
אָמַר רָבָא: וְשֶׁאֵינוֹ מְקַיֵּים דִּבְרֵי חֲכָמִים — ״צָנוּעַ״ הוּא דְּלָא מִקְּרֵי, הָא ״רָשָׁע״ לָא מִקְּרֵי? אֶלָּא אָמַר רָבָא: צְנוּעוֹת — עַד שֶׁבָּדְקוּ בּוֹ עַצְמָן לִפְנֵי תַּשְׁמִישׁ זֶה, אֵין בּוֹדְקוֹת בּוֹ לִפְנֵי תַּשְׁמִישׁ אַחֵר, וְשֶׁאֵינָן צְנוּעוֹת — בּוֹדְקוֹת וְלֹא אִיכְפַּת לָהֶן.
With regard to Rabbi Ami’s claim, Rava says: And according to your opinion, with regard to one who does not fulfill the statements of the Sages, he is not called virtuous. But this indicates that he is not called wicked either. This cannot be correct, as one who does not heed the instructions of the Sages is certainly wicked. Rather, Rava said: Virtuous women are those who do not reuse the examination cloth that they used to examine themselves before this intercourse. Even if no blood was found on it, they do not examine themselves with it prior to another act of intercourse, as once it was used once, it is not as clean as before. And those who are not virtuous women reuse the same examination cloths and examine themselves with them and they are not particular about this matter.
גּוּפָא, אָמַר רַבִּי זֵירָא, אָמַר רַבִּי אַבָּא בַּר יִרְמְיָה, אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: אִשָּׁה שֶׁאֵין לָהּ וֶסֶת אֲסוּרָה לְשַׁמֵּשׁ עַד שֶׁתִּבְדּוֹק. אֲמַר לֵיהּ רַבִּי זֵירָא לְרַבִּי אַבָּא בַּר יִרְמְיָה: אֵין לָהּ וֶסֶת — בָּעֲיָא בְּדִיקָה, יֵשׁ לָהּ וֶסֶת — לָא בָּעֲיָא בְּדִיקָה?
§ The Gemara returns to the matter itself: Rabbi Zeira says that Rabbi Abba bar Yirmeya says that Shmuel says: With regard to a woman who does not have a fixed menstrual cycle, it is forbidden for her to engage in intercourse until she examines herself. Rabbi Zeira said to Rabbi Abba bar Yirmeya: Does Shmuel mean that if she does not have a fixed menstrual cycle she is required to perform an examination, but if she has a fixed menstrual cycle she is not required to perform an examination? This is difficult, as the mishna teaches that even a woman with a fixed menstrual cycle is required to perform an examination before she engages in intercourse.
אֲמַר לֵיהּ: יֵשׁ לָהּ וֶסֶת — עֵרָה בָּעֲיָא בְּדִיקָה, יְשֵׁנָה לָא בָּעֲיָא בְּדִיקָה; אֵין לָהּ וֶסֶת — בֵּין עֵרָה בֵּין יְשֵׁנָה בָּעֲיָא בְּדִיקָה.
Rabbi Abba bar Yirmeya said to him: The mishna means that if she has a fixed menstrual cycle and she is awake, she is required to perform an examination; if she is sleeping she is not required to perform an examination before intercourse, as this would involve much effort. If she does not have a fixed menstrual cycle, then whether she is awake or sleeping, she is required to perform an examination.
אָמַר רָבָא: וְלֵימָא לֵיהּ — יֵשׁ לָהּ וֶסֶת, לִטְהָרוֹת בָּעֲיָא בְּדִיקָה, לְבַעְלָהּ לָא בָּעֲיָא בְּדִיקָה; אֵין לָהּ וֶסֶת, אֲפִילּוּ לְבַעְלָהּ נָמֵי בָּעֲיָא בְּדִיקָה. וּמִדְּלָא אֲמַר לֵיהּ הָכִי, שְׁמַע מִינַּהּ קָסָבַר שְׁמוּאֵל: כֹּל לְבַעְלַהּ לָא בָּעֲיָא בְּדִיקָה.
Rava says: And let Rabbi Abba bar Yirmeya say a different answer to Rabbi Zeira: Shmuel means that if she has a fixed menstrual cycle, then in the case of a woman who handles pure items, she is required to perform an examination for the sake of intercourse as well. If she does not handle pure items, then for the sake of intercourse with her husband alone she is not required to perform an examination. By contrast, if she does not have a fixed menstrual cycle, then she is required to perform an examination even for the sake of intercourse with her husband. Rava concludes: And from the fact that Rabbi Abba bar Yirmeya did not say this answer, one can learn from it that Shmuel holds that in any case where an examination is only for the purpose of intercourse with her husband, she is not required to perform an examination.
תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: חַמָּרִין וּפוֹעֲלִין, וְהַבָּאִין מִבֵּית הָאֵבֶל וּמִבֵּית הַמִּשְׁתֶּה — נְשֵׁיהֶם לָהֶם בְּחֶזְקַת טׇהֳרָה, וּבָאִין וְשׁוֹהִין עִמָּהֶם, בֵּין יְשֵׁנוֹת בֵּין עֵרוֹת. בַּמֶּה דְבָרִים אֲמוּרִים? שֶׁהִנִּיחָן בְּחֶזְקַת טׇהֳרָה, אֲבָל הִנִּיחָן בְּחֶזְקַת טוּמְאָה — לְעוֹלָם הִיא טְמֵאָה, עַד שֶׁתֹּאמַר לוֹ ״טְהוֹרָה אָנִי״.
§ The Sages taught in a baraita: With regard to donkey drivers and laborers who return home, and those who come home from the house of mourning or from the house of feasting for a wedding, their wives remain in a presumptive status of purity. And therefore they may come and remain with them, i.e., engage in intercourse with them, whether they are sleeping or awake. The baraita clarifies: In what case is this statement said? When the husbands left their wives in a presumptive state of purity. But if the husbands left them in a presumptive state of impurity, she remains forever in a status of impurity, until she says to him: I am ritually pure.
וְהָא שְׁמוּאֵל בְּמַאי מוֹקֵי לַהּ? אִי בְּשֶׁיֵּשׁ לָהּ וֶסֶת — קַשְׁיָא עֵרָה, וְאִי בְּשֶׁאֵין לָהּ וֶסֶת — קַשְׁיָא בֵּין עֵרָה בֵּין יְשֵׁנָה!
The Gemara asks: But according to Rabbi Abba bar Yirmeya, with regard to what case does Shmuel interpret this baraita? If the baraita is dealing with a woman who has a fixed menstrual cycle, it is difficult, as Shmuel holds that such a woman who is awake is required to perform an examination, whereas the baraita indicates that no examination is necessary. And if the baraita is referring to a woman who does not have a fixed menstrual cycle, it is also difficult, as Shmuel holds that she always is required to perform an examination, whether she is awake or sleeping.
לְעוֹלָם בְּשֶׁיֵּשׁ לָהּ וֶסֶת, וְכֵיוָן שֶׁתְּבָעָהּ — אֵין לְךָ בְּדִיקָה גְּדוֹלָה מִזּוֹ. אֲמַר לֵיהּ רַב פָּפָּא לְרָבָא: מַהוּ לְמֶעְבַּד כִּי הָא מַתְנִיתָא?
The Gemara answers: Actually, the baraita is referring to a case where she has a fixed menstrual cycle, and since her husband came home from his travels and requested of her that they engage in intercourse, there is no greater examination than this. Since she had time to consider the matter while he was asking her, she would have remembered had she sensed the onset of her menstrual cycle, whereas under regular circumstances she might not have time to recall. Based upon this explanation, Rav Pappa said to Rava: What is the halakha with regard to acting in accordance with this baraita? Perhaps it is necessary to wake her and ask her whether she is ritually pure.
אֲמַר לֵיהּ: סוּדָנִי, לָא, דְּמִגַּנְיָא בְּאַפֵּיהּ. אָמַר רַב כָּהֲנָא: שְׁאֵלְתִּינְהוּ לְאִינָשֵׁי בֵּיתֵיהּ דְּרַב פָּפָּא וּדְרַב הוּנָא בְּרֵיהּ דְּרַב יְהוֹשֻׁעַ, כִּי אֲתוֹ רַבָּנַן מִבֵּי רַב מַצְרְכִי לְכוּ בְּדִיקָה? וַאֲמַרוּ לִי: לָא. וְלִישַׁיְּילִינְהוּ לְדִידְהוּ! דִּילְמָא אִינְהוּ קָא מַחְמְירִי אַנַּפְשַׁיְיהוּ.
Rava said to Rav Pappa: Wise one [sudani]! No, won’t she be demeaned before him? It is embarrassing for her if she is awoken and has to think about whether or not she is pure. Rav Kahana says: I asked the members of the households, i.e., the wives, of Rav Pappa and of Rav Huna, son of Rav Yehoshua: When the Sages, your husbands, came home from the study hall, did they require you to perform an examination prior to intercourse? And they said to me: No. The Gemara asks: But why ask their wives? Why not ask those Sages themselves? The Gemara answers: Perhaps they might rule leniently for others, while acting stringently with themselves. Therefore, their wives were asked, to determine how the Sages conducted themselves in their personal lives.
תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: אִשָּׁה שֶׁאֵין לָהּ וֶסֶת — אֲסוּרָה לְשַׁמֵּשׁ, וְאֵין לָהּ לֹא כְּתוּבָּה, וְלֹא פֵּירוֹת, וְלֹא מְזוֹנוֹת, וְלֹא בְּלָאוֹת, וּמוֹצִיא וְלֹא מַחְזִיר עוֹלָמִית, דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי מֵאִיר.
§ The Sages taught in a baraita: With regard to a woman who does not have a fixed menstrual cycle, she is forbidden to engage in intercourse, and she does not have the right to receive payment of her marriage contract if divorced or widowed, nor is she entitled to payment from her husband for the produce of her property that he consumed, nor is she entitled to provisions for her sustenance from his estate, nor does she get back her worn clothes or other items she brought with her to her marriage as part of her dowry. And furthermore, her husband must divorce her and he may never remarry her. This is the statement of Rabbi Meir.
רַבִּי חֲנִינָא בֶּן אַנְטִיגְנוֹס אוֹמֵר: מְשַׁמֶּשֶׁת בִּשְׁנֵי עִדִּים, הֵן עִוְּתוּהָ, הֵן תִּקְּנוּהָ. מִשּׁוּם אַבָּא חָנָן אָמְרוּ: אוֹי לוֹ לְבַעְלָהּ.
Rabbi Ḥanina ben Antigonus says: She is permitted to engage in intercourse with her husband, but she must examine herself with two examination cloths, one prior to intercourse and one afterward. They may be to her detriment if she finds blood on the cloths, or they may lead to her betterment, since if she finds no blood she is permitted to her husband. They said in the name of Abba Ḥanan: Woe to her husband!
אֲסוּרָה לְשַׁמֵּשׁ — דִּילְמָא מְקַלְקְלָה לֵיהּ. וְאֵין לָהּ כְּתוּבָּה — כֵּיוָן דְּלָא חַזְיָא לְבִיאָה, לֵית לַהּ כְּתוּבָּה.
The Gemara explains each clause of the baraita: She is forbidden to engage in intercourse, as perhaps she will ruin her husband if she emits blood during intercourse. And with regard to the halakha that she does not have the right to receive payment of her marriage contract, the reason is that since she is not fit for intercourse, she is not entitled to payment of her marriage contract.
וְלֹא פֵּירוֹת, וְלֹא מְזוֹנוֹת, וְלֹא בְּלָאוֹת — תְּנָאֵי כְּתוּבָּה כִּכְתוּבָּה דָּמוּ.
The Gemara continues its explanation: And she is not entitled to payment for the produce of her property, nor is she entitled to provisions for her sustenance from his estate, nor does she get back her worn clothes. The reason for all these is because stipulations in the marriage contract are considered like the marriage contract itself. Since she is not entitled to a marriage contract, she is likewise not entitled to these additional provisions that are stipulated in the marriage contract.
וְיוֹצִיא, וְלֹא יַחְזִיר עוֹלָמִית. פְּשִׁיטָא! לָא צְרִיכָא — דַּהֲדַרָה וְאִתַּקַּנָה. מַהוּ דְּתֵימָא לַיהְדְּרַהּ? קָא מַשְׁמַע לַן, דְּזִימְנִין דְּאָזְלָא וּמִנַּסְבָא וּמִתַּקְנָא.
The Gemara analyzes the next clause in the baraita: Her husband must divorce her and he may never remarry her. The Gemara asks: Isn’t that obvious? The Gemara answers: No, it is necessary to teach this in a case where her situation was subsequently amended, i.e., she established a fixed menstrual cycle. Lest you say that he may remarry her, the baraita teaches us that this is not permitted, as sometimes such a woman might go and marry someone else and her status is subsequently amended.
וְאָמַר: ״אִילּוּ הָיִיתִי יוֹדֵעַ שֶׁכָּךְ הָיָה, אֲפִילּוּ הֱיִיתֶם נוֹתְנִין לִי מֵאָה מָנֶה — לֹא הָיִיתִי מְגָרְשָׁהּ!״, וְנִמְצָא גֵּט בָּטֵל, וּבָנֶיהָ מַמְזֵרִין.
And the problem in this scenario is that her first husband might say: If I would have known that it is like this, that she would be cured, even if you would have given me one hundred times one hundred dinars to divorce her I would not have divorced her. And if so, the bill of divorce will be found to be void, and her children from her second husband will be considered mamzerim. Therefore it must be made clear to him from the outset that this divorce is final.
מִשּׁוּם אַבָּא חָנָן אָמְרוּ: ״אוֹי לוֹ לְבַעְלָהּ״. אִיכָּא דְאָמְרִי לְרַבִּי מֵאִיר אֲמַר לֵיהּ, דְּבָעֵי לְאַגְבּוֹיַהּ כְּתוּבְּתַהּ. אִיכָּא דְאָמְרִי לְרַבִּי חֲנִינָא בֶּן אַנְטִיגְנוֹס קָאָמַר לֵיהּ, דִּמְקַלְקְלָה לֵיהּ.
The Gemara analyzes the final clause of the baraita: They said in the name of Abba Ḥanan: Woe to her husband! Some say that he said this to Rabbi Meir, as Abba Ḥanan maintains that the husband is required to settle her payment of her marriage contract upon their divorce. And some say that he said this to Rabbi Ḥanina ben Antigonus, since Abba Ḥanan disagrees with his opinion and holds that it is forbidden to engage in intercourse with her, as perhaps she will ruin him if they engage in intercourse when she is menstruating.
אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: הֲלָכָה כְּרַבִּי חֲנִינָא בֶּן אַנְטִיגְנוֹס. וּבְמַאי? אִי בַּעֲסוּקָה בִּטְהָרוֹת, הָא אַמְרַהּ שְׁמוּאֵל חֲדָא זִימְנָא!
Rav Yehuda says that Shmuel says: The halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Ḥanina ben Antigonus. The Gemara asks: And with regard to what case did Shmuel issue this ruling of halakha? The Gemara elaborates: If it is referring to a woman who is engaged in handling ritually pure items, didn’t Shmuel already say on another occasion that a woman without a fixed menstrual cycle must examine herself prior to intercourse?
וְאִי בְּשֶׁאֵינָהּ עֲסוּקָה בִּטְהָרוֹת, הָא אָמַר כֹּל לְבַעְלַהּ לָא בָּעֲיָא בְּדִיקָה, דְּאָמַר רַבִּי זֵירָא אָמַר רַבִּי אַבָּא בַּר יִרְמְיָה אָמַר שְׁמוּאֵל: ״אִשָּׁה שֶׁאֵין לָהּ וֶסֶת אֲסוּרָה לְשַׁמֵּשׁ עַד שֶׁתִּבְדּוֹק״, וְאוֹקִימְנָא לָהּ בַּעֲסוּקָה בִּטְהָרוֹת! מַאן דְּמַתְנֵי הָא לָא מַתְנֵי הָא.
And if it is referring to a woman who is not engaged in handling ritually pure items, doesn’t Shmuel say that in any case where an examination is only for the purpose of intercourse with her husband, not for handling pure items, she is not required to perform an examination? As Rabbi Zeira said that Rabbi Abba bar Yirmeya says that Shmuel says: A woman who does not have a fixed menstrual cycle is forbidden to engage in intercourse until she examines herself, and we interpreted this statement as referring to cases where she is engaged in handling ritually pure items. The Gemara answers: He who teaches this does not teach that, i.e., Shmuel’s ruling is in fact referring to a woman engaged in handling pure items, and the two rulings were cited in his name by different Sages.
הֲדַרַן עֲלָךְ שַׁמַּאי אוֹמֵר.
Follow
Delve Deeper
Broaden your understanding of the topics on this daf with classes and podcasts from top women Talmud scholars.
פיגול- דף משלהן
Rabbanit Shira Marili Mirvis and Rabbanit Hamutal Shoval
10.18.2025 | כ״ו בתשרי תשפ״ו
Zevahim 33: The Heavy Laying on of Hands
Anne Gordon and Yardaena Osband
10.17.2025 | כ״ה בתשרי תשפ״ו
Zevahim 31: It’s a Measure of Time: Half a Loaf of Bread
Anne Gordon and Yardaena Osband
10.16.2025 | כ״ד בתשרי תשפ״ו
Zevahim 32: The Surprising Leniencies and Leeway of Sacrifices
Anne Gordon and Yardaena Osband
10.16.2025 | כ״ד בתשרי תשפ״ו
May a Woman Schecht Sacred Animals? – Gefet
Rabbanit Yael Shimoni
10.16.2025 | כ״ד בתשרי תשפ״ו
Zevahim 30: An Olive’s Measure of Intent
Anne Gordon and Yardaena Osband
10.15.2025 | כ״ג בתשרי תשפ״ו
Zevahim 29: More Ways to Offer Offerings Right
Anne Gordon and Yardaena Osband
10.13.2025 | כ״א בתשרי תשפ״ו
Zevahim 28: Beyond Place, Beyond Time
Anne Gordon and Yardaena Osband
10.12.2025 | כ׳ בתשרי תשפ״ו
Zevahim 27: Hindrances to Atonement
Anne Gordon and Yardaena Osband
10.12.2025 | כ׳ בתשרי תשפ״ו
A Daf Of Their Own –Schita By a Woman
Rabbanit Shira Marili Mirvis and Rabbanit Hamutal Shoval
10.12.2025 | כ׳ בתשרי תשפ״ו
נשים שוחטות- דף משלהן
Rabbanit Shira Marili Mirvis and Rabbanit Hamutal Shoval
10.11.2025 | י״ט בתשרי תשפ״ו
Zevahim 26: When a Father Corrects His Rabbi-Son
Anne Gordon and Yardaena Osband
10.10.2025 | י״ח בתשרי תשפ״ו
Zevahim 25: Knife Technique and Troubleshooting
Anne Gordon and Yardaena Osband
10.09.2025 | י״ז בתשרי תשפ״ו
Zevahim 24: Between the Floor and the Foot
Anne Gordon and Yardaena Osband
10.08.2025 | ט״ז בתשרי תשפ״ו
New to Talmud?
Check out our resources designed to help you navigate a page of Talmud – and study at the pace, level and style that fits you.
The Hadran Women’s Tapestry
Meet the diverse women learning Gemara at Hadran and hear their stories.
In early January of 2020, I learned about Siyyum HaShas and Daf Yomi via Tablet Magazine’s brief daily podcast about the Daf. I found it compelling and fascinating. Soon I discovered Hadran; since then I have learned the Daf daily with Rabbanit Michelle Cohen Farber. The Daf has permeated my every hour, and has transformed and magnified my place within the Jewish Universe.
Lisa Berkelhammer
San Francisco, CA , United States
I went to day school in Toronto but really began to learn when I attended Brovenders back in the early 1980’s. Last year after talking to my sister who was learning Daf Yomi, inspired, I looked on the computer and the Hadran site came up. I have been listening to each days shiur in the morning as I work. I emphasis listening since I am not sitting with a Gamara. I listen while I work in my studio.
Rachel Rotenberg
Tekoa, Israel
It happened without intent (so am I yotzei?!) – I watched the women’s siyum live and was so moved by it that the next morning, I tuned in to Rabbanit Michelle’s shiur, and here I am, still learning every day, over 2 years later. Some days it all goes over my head, but others I grasp onto an idea or a story, and I ‘get it’ and that’s the best feeling in the world. So proud to be a Hadran learner.
Jeanne Yael Klempner
Zichron Yaakov, Israel
A beautiful world of Talmudic sages now fill my daily life with discussion and debate.
bringing alive our traditions and texts that has brought new meaning to my life.
I am a מגילת אסתר reader for women . the words in the Mishna of מסכת megillah 17a
הקורא את המגילה למפרע לא יצא were powerful to me.
I hope to have the zchut to complete the cycle for my 70th birthday.
Sheila Hauser
Jerusalem, Israel
I decided to give daf yomi a try when I heard about the siyum hashas in 2020. Once the pandemic hit, the daily commitment gave my days some much-needed structure. There have been times when I’ve felt like quitting- especially when encountering very technical details in the text. But then I tell myself, “Look how much you’ve done. You can’t stop now!” So I keep going & my Koren bookshelf grows…
Miriam Eckstein-Koas
Huntington, United States
While vacationing in San Diego, Rabbi Leah Herz asked if I’d be interested in being in hevruta with her to learn Daf Yomi through Hadran. Why not? I had loved learning Gemara in college in 1971 but hadn’t returned. With the onset of covid, Daf Yomi and Rabbanit Michelle centered me each day. Thank-you for helping me grow and enter this amazing world of learning.
Meryll Page
Minneapolis, MN, United States
I had dreamed of doing daf yomi since I had my first serious Talmud class 18 years ago at Pardes with Rahel Berkovitz, and then a couple of summers with Leah Rosenthal. There is no way I would be able to do it without another wonderful teacher, Michelle, and the Hadran organization. I wake up and am excited to start each day with the next daf.
Beth Elster
Irvine, United States
I graduated college in December 2019 and received a set of shas as a present from my husband. With my long time dream of learning daf yomi, I had no idea that a new cycle was beginning just one month later, in January 2020. I have been learning the daf ever since with Michelle Farber… Through grad school, my first job, my first baby, and all the other incredible journeys over the past few years!
Sigal Spitzer Flamholz
Bronx, United States
Attending the Siyyum in Jerusalem 26 months ago inspired me to become part of this community of learners. So many aspects of Jewish life have been illuminated by what we have learned in Seder Moed. My day is not complete without daf Yomi. I am so grateful to Rabbanit Michelle and the Hadran Community.
Nancy Kolodny
Newton, United States
I began to learn this cycle of Daf Yomi after my husband passed away 2 1/2 years ago. It seemed a good way to connect to him. Even though I don’t know whether he would have encouraged women learning Gemara, it would have opened wonderful conversations. It also gives me more depth for understanding my frum children and grandchildren. Thank you Hadran and Rabbanit Michelle Farber!!
Harriet Hartman
Tzur Hadassah, Israel
At almost 70 I am just beginning my journey with Talmud and Hadran. I began not late, but right when I was called to learn. It is never too late to begin! The understanding patience of staff and participants with more experience and knowledge has been fabulous. The joy of learning never stops and for me. It is a new life, a new light, a new depth of love of The Holy One, Blessed be He.
Deborah Hoffman-Wade
Richmond, CA, United States
I learned Talmud as a student in Yeshivat Ramaz and felt at the time that Talmud wasn’t for me.
After reading Ilana Kurshan’s book I was intrigued and after watching the great siyum in Yerushalayim it ignited the spark to begin this journey. It has been a transformative life experience for me as a wife, mother, Savta and member of Klal Yisrael.
Elana Storch
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
I began daf yomi in January 2020 with Brachot. I had made aliya 6 months before, and one of my post-aliya goals was to complete a full cycle. As a life-long Tanach teacher, I wanted to swim from one side of the Yam shel Torah to the other. Daf yomi was also my sanity through COVID. It was the way to marking the progression of time, and feel that I could grow and accomplish while time stopped.
Leah Herzog
Givat Zev, Israel
I started learning daf yomi at the beginning of this cycle. As the pandemic evolved, it’s been so helpful to me to have this discipline every morning to listen to the daf podcast after I’ve read the daf; learning about the relationships between the rabbis and the ways they were constructing our Jewish religion after the destruction of the Temple. I’m grateful to be on this journey!
Mona Fishbane
Teaneck NJ, United States
I started learning Daf in Jan 2020 with Brachot b/c I had never seen the Jewish people united around something so positive, and I wanted to be a part of it. Also, I wanted to broaden my background in Torah Shebal Peh- Maayanot gave me a great gemara education, but I knew that I could hold a conversation in most parts of tanach but almost no TSB. I’m so thankful for Daf and have gained immensely.
Meira Shapiro
NJ, United States
I began my journey two years ago at the beginning of this cycle of the daf yomi. It has been an incredible, challenging experience and has given me a new perspective of Torah Sh’baal Peh and the role it plays in our lives
linda kalish-marcus
Efrat, Israel
I started learning at the start of this cycle, and quickly fell in love. It has become such an important part of my day, enriching every part of my life.
Naomi Niederhoffer
Toronto, Canada
While vacationing in San Diego, Rabbi Leah Herz asked if I’d be interested in being in hevruta with her to learn Daf Yomi through Hadran. Why not? I had loved learning Gemara in college in 1971 but hadn’t returned. With the onset of covid, Daf Yomi and Rabbanit Michelle centered me each day. Thank-you for helping me grow and enter this amazing world of learning.
Meryll Page
Minneapolis, MN, United States
I was moved to tears by the Hadran Siyyum HaShas. I have learned Torah all my life, but never connected to learning Gemara on a regular basis until then. Seeing the sheer joy Talmud Torah at the siyyum, I felt compelled to be part of it, and I haven’t missed a day!
It’s not always easy, but it is so worthwhile, and it has strengthened my love of learning. It is part of my life now.
Michelle Lewis
Beit Shemesh, Israel
I began to learn this cycle of Daf Yomi after my husband passed away 2 1/2 years ago. It seemed a good way to connect to him. Even though I don’t know whether he would have encouraged women learning Gemara, it would have opened wonderful conversations. It also gives me more depth for understanding my frum children and grandchildren. Thank you Hadran and Rabbanit Michelle Farber!!
Harriet Hartman
Tzur Hadassah, Israel
Niddah 12
ΧΦ°ΦΌΧ’ΦΈΧ ΧΦ΄ΧΧ Φ΅ΦΌΧΧΦΌ Χ¨Φ·ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧ ΧΦ΅ΧΧ¨ΦΈΧ ΧΦ΅Χ¨Φ·Χ ΧΦ°ΧΧΦΌΧΦΈΧ: ΧΦ΄Χ©ΦΈΦΌΧΧ ΧΦ·ΧΧΦΌ Χ©ΦΆΧΧͺΦ΄ΦΌΧΦ°ΧΦΌΧΦΉΧ§ Χ’Φ·Χ¦Φ°ΧΦΈΧΦΌ ΧΦ°ΧΦ·Χ’Φ°ΧΦΈΧΦΌ? ΧΦ²ΧΦ·Χ¨ ΧΦ΅ΧΧΦΌ: ΧΦΉΧ ΧͺΦ΄ΦΌΧΦ°ΧΦΌΧΦΉΧ§. ΧΦ°ΧͺΦ΄ΧΦ°ΧΦΌΧΦΉΧ§ β ΧΦΌΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦΈΧΦ°? ΧΦ΄Χ ΧΦ΅ΦΌΧ β ΧΦ΄ΧΦΌΧΦΉ Χ ΧΦΉΧ§Φ°Χ€ΧΦΉ ΧΦΌΧ€ΧΦΉΧ¨Φ΅Χ©Χ.
Β§ Rabbi Zeira raised a dilemma before Rav Yehuda: What is the halakha as to whether a woman should examine herself before engaging in intercourse with her husband? Rav Yehuda said to him: She should not examine herself. Rabbi Zeira asked: And let her examine herself; what would be the problem with that? Rav Yehuda answered: If so, the heart of a scrupulous husband might strike him with pangs of conscience over sins that he could transgress, and he will separate from his wife out of fear that she is impure.
ΧΦ°ΦΌΧ’ΦΈΧ ΧΦ΄ΧΧ Φ΅ΦΌΧΧΦΌ Χ¨Φ·ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧ ΧΦ·ΧΦΈΦΌΧ ΧΦ΅Χ¨Φ·Χ ΧΧΦΌΧ ΦΈΧ: ΧΦ΄Χ©ΦΈΦΌΧΧ ΧΦ·ΧΧΦΌ Χ©ΦΆΧΧͺΦ΄ΦΌΧΦ°ΧΦΌΧΦΉΧ§ Χ’Φ·Χ¦Φ°ΧΦΈΧΦΌ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧ©Φ΄ΧΧΧ’ΧΦΌΧ¨ ΧΦΆΧ‘ΦΆΧͺ, ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦ΅Χ ΧΦ°ΧΦ·ΧΦ΅ΦΌΧΧ ΧΦ·ΦΌΧ’Φ°ΧΦΈΧΦΌ ΧΦ·ΧΦΈΦΌΧΧͺ?
Rabbi Abba raised a similar dilemma before Rav Huna: What is the halakha as to whether a woman should examine herself immediately after engaging in intercourse, within the minimum period of time needed for the onset of menstruation, in order to render her husband liable to bring a sin offering for engaging in intercourse with a menstruating woman?
ΧΦ²ΧΦ·Χ¨ ΧΦ΅ΧΧΦΌ: ΧΦ΄Χ ΧΦ·Χ©Φ°ΧΧΦ·ΦΌΧΦ·ΧͺΦ°ΦΌ ΧΦ·ΧΦΌ ΧΦ΄ΧΦ°ΧΦ΄ΧΧ§ΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧ©Φ΄ΧΧΧ’ΧΦΌΧ¨ ΧΦΆΧ‘ΦΆΧͺ? ΧΦ°ΧΦΈΧͺΦ·Χ Φ°ΧΦΈΧ: ΧΦ΅ΧΧΦΆΧΧΦΌ Χ©Φ΄ΧΧΧ’ΧΦΌΧ¨ ΧΦΆΧ‘ΦΆΧͺ? ΧΦΈΧ©ΦΈΧΧ ΧΦ°Χ©Φ·ΧΧΦΈΦΌΧ©Χ ΧΦΈΧ’Φ΅Χ Χ©ΦΆΧΧ’ΧΦΉΧΦ°ΧΦ΄ΧΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧ¦Φ·Χ ΧΦ·ΧΦ·ΦΌΧ©Φ°ΧΧ§ΧΦΉΧ£, ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧΧ¦Φ΄ΧΧΦ·Χͺ ΧΦ·Χ©Φ·ΦΌΧΧΦΈΦΌΧ©Χ Χ Φ΄ΧΦ°Χ Φ·Χ‘ Χ’Φ΅Χ.
Rav Huna said to him: Can you find a case where it is physically possible to perform a full examination after intercourse within the period of time needed for the onset of menstruation? But isnβt it taught in a baraita: What is the period of time needed for the onset of menstruation? This is comparable to a male organ and an examination cloth that are standing alongside the doorpost, i.e., at the entrance to the vagina; upon the exit of the organ the examination cloth immediately enters.
ΧΦ±ΧΦ΅Χ: ΧΦΆΧ‘ΦΆΧͺ Χ©ΦΆΧΧΦΈΧΦ°Χ¨ΧΦΌ β ΧΦ°Χ§Φ΄Χ ΦΌΧΦΌΧΦ·, ΧΦ°ΧΦΉΧ ΧΦ΄ΧΦ°ΧΦ΄ΧΧ§ΦΈΧ. ΧΦΆΧΦΈΦΌΧ ΧΦ·ΧΧΦΌ Χ©ΦΆΧΧͺΦ°ΦΌΧ§Φ·Χ Φ΅ΦΌΧΦ·?
The Gemara explains: It is apparent that the period of time that they stated is the time required for an external wipe, and not for a full internal examination. Therefore, if she did an internal examination and found blood, one cannot be certain that she was already menstruating during intercourse and thereby render the husband liable to bring a sin offering. Rather, this is Rabbi Abbaβs dilemma: What is the halakha as to whether a woman should wipe herself immediately after engaging in intercourse? Since this action can be performed quickly, if she were to find blood her husband would be liable to bring a sin offering.
ΧΦ΄ΧΧΦΈΦΌΧ ΧΦ°ΧΦΈΧΦ°Χ¨Φ΄Χ, ΧΦΈΧΦ΄Χ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧ’ΦΈΧ ΧΦ΄ΧΧ Φ΅ΦΌΧΧΦΌ: ΧΦ΄Χ©ΦΈΦΌΧΧ ΧΦ·ΧΧΦΌ Χ©ΦΆΧΧͺΦ΄ΦΌΧΦ°ΧΦΌΧΦΉΧ§ Χ’Φ·Χ¦Φ°ΧΦΈΧΦΌ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦ΅Χ ΧΦ°ΧΦ·ΧΦ΅ΦΌΧΧ ΧΦ·ΦΌΧ’Φ°ΧΦΈΧΦΌ ΧΦΈΧ©ΦΈΧΧ ΧͺΦΈΦΌΧΧΦΌΧ? ΧΦΈΧΦ·Χ¨ ΧΧΦΉ: ΧΦΉΧ ΧͺΦ΄ΦΌΧΦ°ΧΦΌΧΦΉΧ§. ΧΦ°ΧͺΦ΄ΧΦ°ΧΦΌΧΦΉΧ§, ΧΦΌΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦΈΧΦ°? ΧΦ΄Χ ΧΦ΅ΦΌΧ, ΧΦ΄ΧΦΌΧΦΉ Χ ΧΦΉΧ§Φ°Χ€ΧΦΉ ΧΦΌΧ€ΧΦΉΧ¨Φ΅Χ©Χ.
Some say that this is the dilemma that Rabbi Abba raised before Rav Huna: What is the halakha as to whether a woman should examine herself immediately after engaging in intercourse, in order to render her husband liable to bring a provisional guilt offering brought by one who is uncertain as to whether he committed a sin that requires a sin offering? Rav Huna said to him: She should not examine herself. Rabbi Abba asked: And let her examine herself; what would be the problem with that? Rav Huna answered: If so, the heart of a scrupulous husband might strike him with pangs of conscience over sins that he could transgress, and he will separate from his wife out of fear that she is impure.
ΧΦΌΧΦ°Χ©ΦΈΧΧ’ΦΈΧ Χ©ΦΆΧΧΦ΄ΧΧ Χ’ΧΦΉΧΦΆΧ¨ΦΆΧͺ ΧΦ°ΧΧΦΌΧ³. ΧΦΈΧΦ·Χ¨ Χ¨Φ·ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧ ΧΦ·ΧΦ΅ΦΌΧ ΧΦΈΧΦ·Χ¨ Χ¨Φ·ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧ ΧΦ·Χ Φ·ΦΌΧΧ: ΧΦ°ΧΦΆΧΧΦΌ Χ’Φ΄ΧΦΈΦΌΧ Χ©ΦΆΧΧ Χ¦Φ°Χ ΧΦΌΧ’ΧΦΉΧͺ. ΧΦ²ΧΦ·Χ¨ ΧΦ΅ΧΧΦΌ Χ¨Φ·ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧ ΧΦ·ΧΦΈΦΌΧ ΧΦ·ΦΌΧ¨ ΧΦΆΧΦΆΧ ΧΦ°Χ¨Φ·ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧ ΧΦ·ΧΦ΅ΦΌΧ: ΧͺΦ·ΦΌΧ ΦΈΦΌΧ ΧͺΦΈΦΌΧ Φ΅Χ Χ΄Χ¦Φ°Χ¨Φ΄ΧΧΧΦΉΧͺΧ΄, ΧΦ°ΧΦ·ΧͺΦ°ΦΌ ΧͺΦΈΦΌΧ Φ΅Χ Χ΄Χ¦Φ°Χ ΧΦΌΧ’ΧΦΉΧͺΧ΄! ΧΦ²ΧΦ·Χ¨ ΧΦ΅ΧΧΦΌ: Χ©ΦΆΧΧΦ²Χ Φ΄Χ ΧΧΦΉΧΦ΅Χ¨ ΧΧΦΌΧ ΧΦ·ΧΦ°Χ§Φ·ΧΦ΅ΦΌΧΧ ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧΦ°Χ¨Φ΅Χ ΧΦ²ΧΦΈΧΦ΄ΧΧ Χ Φ΄Χ§Φ°Χ¨ΦΈΧ Χ΄Χ¦ΦΈΧ ΧΦΌΧ’Φ·Χ΄.
Β§ The mishna teaches: And she is also required to examine herself at a time that she is about to engage in intercourse with her husband. Rabbi Ami says that Rabbi Yannai says: And this examination performed before intercourse is known as: The examination cloth of virtuous women, as this examination is not strictly required. Rabbi Abba bar Memel said to Rabbi Ami: The tanna teaches that women are required to perform this examination, and yet you teach that only virtuous women perform it. Rabbi Ami said to him: Yes, as I say that anyone who fulfills the statements of the Sages is called virtuous. Rabbi Ami did not mean that this examination is beyond the letter of the law. He was simply praising those who abide by the established halakha.
ΧΦΈΧΦ·Χ¨ Χ¨ΦΈΧΦΈΧ: ΧΦ°Χ©ΦΆΧΧΦ΅ΧΧ ΧΦΉ ΧΦ°Χ§Φ·ΧΦ΅ΦΌΧΧ ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧΦ°Χ¨Φ΅Χ ΧΦ²ΧΦΈΧΦ΄ΧΧ β Χ΄Χ¦ΦΈΧ ΧΦΌΧ’Φ·Χ΄ ΧΧΦΌΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ΄Χ§Φ°ΦΌΧ¨Φ΅Χ, ΧΦΈΧ Χ΄Χ¨ΦΈΧ©ΦΈΧΧ’Χ΄ ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ΄Χ§Φ°ΦΌΧ¨Φ΅Χ? ΧΦΆΧΦΈΦΌΧ ΧΦΈΧΦ·Χ¨ Χ¨ΦΈΧΦΈΧ: Χ¦Φ°Χ ΧΦΌΧ’ΧΦΉΧͺ β Χ’Φ·Χ Χ©ΦΆΧΧΦΈΦΌΧΦ°Χ§ΧΦΌ ΧΦΌΧΦΉ Χ’Φ·Χ¦Φ°ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ΄Χ€Φ°Χ Φ΅Χ ΧͺΦ·ΦΌΧ©Φ°ΧΧΦ΄ΧΧ©Χ ΧΦΆΧ, ΧΦ΅ΧΧ ΧΦΌΧΦΉΧΦ°Χ§ΧΦΉΧͺ ΧΦΌΧΦΉ ΧΦ΄Χ€Φ°Χ Φ΅Χ ΧͺΦ·ΦΌΧ©Φ°ΧΧΦ΄ΧΧ©Χ ΧΦ·ΧΦ΅Χ¨, ΧΦ°Χ©ΦΆΧΧΦ΅ΧΧ ΦΈΧ Χ¦Φ°Χ ΧΦΌΧ’ΧΦΉΧͺ β ΧΦΌΧΦΉΧΦ°Χ§ΧΦΉΧͺ ΧΦ°ΧΦΉΧ ΧΦ΄ΧΧΦ°Χ€Φ·ΦΌΧͺ ΧΦΈΧΦΆΧ.
With regard to Rabbi Amiβs claim, Rava says: And according to your opinion, with regard to one who does not fulfill the statements of the Sages, he is not called virtuous. But this indicates that he is not called wicked either. This cannot be correct, as one who does not heed the instructions of the Sages is certainly wicked. Rather, Rava said: Virtuous women are those who do not reuse the examination cloth that they used to examine themselves before this intercourse. Even if no blood was found on it, they do not examine themselves with it prior to another act of intercourse, as once it was used once, it is not as clean as before. And those who are not virtuous women reuse the same examination cloths and examine themselves with them and they are not particular about this matter.
ΧΦΌΧΦΌΧ€ΦΈΧ, ΧΦΈΧΦ·Χ¨ Χ¨Φ·ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧ ΧΦ΅ΧΧ¨ΦΈΧ, ΧΦΈΧΦ·Χ¨ Χ¨Φ·ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧ ΧΦ·ΧΦΈΦΌΧ ΧΦ·ΦΌΧ¨ ΧΦ΄Χ¨Φ°ΧΦ°ΧΦΈΧ, ΧΦΈΧΦ·Χ¨ Χ©Φ°ΧΧΧΦΌΧΦ΅Χ: ΧΦ΄Χ©ΦΈΦΌΧΧ Χ©ΦΆΧΧΦ΅ΧΧ ΧΦΈΧΦΌ ΧΦΆΧ‘ΦΆΧͺ ΧΦ²Χ‘ΧΦΌΧ¨ΦΈΧ ΧΦ°Χ©Φ·ΧΧΦ΅ΦΌΧ©Χ Χ’Φ·Χ Χ©ΦΆΧΧͺΦ΄ΦΌΧΦ°ΧΦΌΧΦΉΧ§. ΧΦ²ΧΦ·Χ¨ ΧΦ΅ΧΧΦΌ Χ¨Φ·ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧ ΧΦ΅ΧΧ¨ΦΈΧ ΧΦ°Χ¨Φ·ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧ ΧΦ·ΧΦΈΦΌΧ ΧΦ·ΦΌΧ¨ ΧΦ΄Χ¨Φ°ΧΦ°ΧΦΈΧ: ΧΦ΅ΧΧ ΧΦΈΧΦΌ ΧΦΆΧ‘ΦΆΧͺ β ΧΦΈΦΌΧ’Φ²ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦ΄ΧΧ§ΦΈΧ, ΧΦ΅Χ©Χ ΧΦΈΧΦΌ ΧΦΆΧ‘ΦΆΧͺ β ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦΈΦΌΧ’Φ²ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦ΄ΧΧ§ΦΈΧ?
Β§ The Gemara returns to the matter itself: Rabbi Zeira says that Rabbi Abba bar Yirmeya says that Shmuel says: With regard to a woman who does not have a fixed menstrual cycle, it is forbidden for her to engage in intercourse until she examines herself. Rabbi Zeira said to Rabbi Abba bar Yirmeya: Does Shmuel mean that if she does not have a fixed menstrual cycle she is required to perform an examination, but if she has a fixed menstrual cycle she is not required to perform an examination? This is difficult, as the mishna teaches that even a woman with a fixed menstrual cycle is required to perform an examination before she engages in intercourse.
ΧΦ²ΧΦ·Χ¨ ΧΦ΅ΧΧΦΌ: ΧΦ΅Χ©Χ ΧΦΈΧΦΌ ΧΦΆΧ‘ΦΆΧͺ β Χ’Φ΅Χ¨ΦΈΧ ΧΦΈΦΌΧ’Φ²ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦ΄ΧΧ§ΦΈΧ, ΧΦ°Χ©Φ΅ΧΧ ΦΈΧ ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦΈΦΌΧ’Φ²ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦ΄ΧΧ§ΦΈΧ; ΧΦ΅ΧΧ ΧΦΈΧΦΌ ΧΦΆΧ‘ΦΆΧͺ β ΧΦ΅ΦΌΧΧ Χ’Φ΅Χ¨ΦΈΧ ΧΦ΅ΦΌΧΧ ΧΦ°Χ©Φ΅ΧΧ ΦΈΧ ΧΦΈΦΌΧ’Φ²ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦ΄ΧΧ§ΦΈΧ.
Rabbi Abba bar Yirmeya said to him: The mishna means that if she has a fixed menstrual cycle and she is awake, she is required to perform an examination; if she is sleeping she is not required to perform an examination before intercourse, as this would involve much effort. If she does not have a fixed menstrual cycle, then whether she is awake or sleeping, she is required to perform an examination.
ΧΦΈΧΦ·Χ¨ Χ¨ΦΈΧΦΈΧ: ΧΦ°ΧΦ΅ΧΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ΅ΧΧΦΌ β ΧΦ΅Χ©Χ ΧΦΈΧΦΌ ΧΦΆΧ‘ΦΆΧͺ, ΧΦ΄ΧΦ°ΧΦΈΧ¨ΧΦΉΧͺ ΧΦΈΦΌΧ’Φ²ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦ΄ΧΧ§ΦΈΧ, ΧΦ°ΧΦ·Χ’Φ°ΧΦΈΧΦΌ ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦΈΦΌΧ’Φ²ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦ΄ΧΧ§ΦΈΧ; ΧΦ΅ΧΧ ΧΦΈΧΦΌ ΧΦΆΧ‘ΦΆΧͺ, ΧΦ²Χ€Φ΄ΧΧΦΌΧΦΌ ΧΦ°ΧΦ·Χ’Φ°ΧΦΈΧΦΌ Χ ΦΈΧΦ΅Χ ΧΦΈΦΌΧ’Φ²ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦ΄ΧΧ§ΦΈΧ. ΧΦΌΧΦ΄ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ²ΧΦ·Χ¨ ΧΦ΅ΧΧΦΌ ΧΦΈΧΦ΄Χ, Χ©Φ°ΧΧΦ·Χ’ ΧΦ΄ΧΧ Φ·ΦΌΧΦΌ Χ§ΦΈΧ‘ΦΈΧΦ·Χ¨ Χ©Φ°ΧΧΧΦΌΧΦ΅Χ: ΧΦΉΦΌΧ ΧΦ°ΧΦ·Χ’Φ°ΧΦ·ΧΦΌ ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦΈΦΌΧ’Φ²ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦ΄ΧΧ§ΦΈΧ.
Rava says: And let Rabbi Abba bar Yirmeya say a different answer to Rabbi Zeira: Shmuel means that if she has a fixed menstrual cycle, then in the case of a woman who handles pure items, she is required to perform an examination for the sake of intercourse as well. If she does not handle pure items, then for the sake of intercourse with her husband alone she is not required to perform an examination. By contrast, if she does not have a fixed menstrual cycle, then she is required to perform an examination even for the sake of intercourse with her husband. Rava concludes: And from the fact that Rabbi Abba bar Yirmeya did not say this answer, one can learn from it that Shmuel holds that in any case where an examination is only for the purpose of intercourse with her husband, she is not required to perform an examination.
ΧͺΦΈΦΌΧ ΧΦΌ Χ¨Φ·ΧΦΈΦΌΧ Φ·Χ: ΧΦ·ΧΦΈΦΌΧ¨Φ΄ΧΧ ΧΦΌΧ€ΧΦΉΧ’Φ²ΧΦ΄ΧΧ, ΧΦ°ΧΦ·ΧΦΈΦΌΧΦ΄ΧΧ ΧΦ΄ΧΦ΅ΦΌΧΧͺ ΧΦΈΧΦ΅ΧΦΆΧ ΧΦΌΧΦ΄ΧΦ΅ΦΌΧΧͺ ΧΦ·ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧ©Φ°ΧΧͺΦΆΦΌΧ β Χ Φ°Χ©Φ΅ΧΧΧΦΆΧ ΧΦΈΧΦΆΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦΆΧΦ°Χ§Φ·Χͺ ΧΧΧΦ³Χ¨ΦΈΧ, ΧΦΌΧΦΈΧΦ΄ΧΧ ΧΦ°Χ©ΧΧΦΉΧΦ΄ΧΧ Χ’Φ΄ΧΦΈΦΌΧΦΆΧ, ΧΦ΅ΦΌΧΧ ΧΦ°Χ©Φ΅ΧΧ ΧΦΉΧͺ ΧΦ΅ΦΌΧΧ Χ’Φ΅Χ¨ΧΦΉΧͺ. ΧΦ·ΦΌΧΦΆΦΌΧ ΧΦ°ΧΦΈΧ¨Φ΄ΧΧ ΧΦ²ΧΧΦΌΧ¨Φ΄ΧΧ? Χ©ΦΆΧΧΦ΄Χ Φ΄ΦΌΧΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦΆΧΦ°Χ§Φ·Χͺ ΧΧΧΦ³Χ¨ΦΈΧ, ΧΦ²ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ΄Χ Φ΄ΦΌΧΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦΆΧΦ°Χ§Φ·Χͺ ΧΧΦΌΧΦ°ΧΦΈΧ β ΧΦ°Χ’ΧΦΉΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ΄ΧΧ ΧΦ°ΧΦ΅ΧΦΈΧ, Χ’Φ·Χ Χ©ΦΆΧΧͺΦΉΦΌΧΧΦ·Χ¨ ΧΧΦΉ Χ΄ΧΦ°ΧΧΦΉΧ¨ΦΈΧ ΧΦΈΧ Φ΄ΧΧ΄.
Β§ The Sages taught in a baraita: With regard to donkey drivers and laborers who return home, and those who come home from the house of mourning or from the house of feasting for a wedding, their wives remain in a presumptive status of purity. And therefore they may come and remain with them, i.e., engage in intercourse with them, whether they are sleeping or awake. The baraita clarifies: In what case is this statement said? When the husbands left their wives in a presumptive state of purity. But if the husbands left them in a presumptive state of impurity, she remains forever in a status of impurity, until she says to him: I am ritually pure.
ΧΦ°ΧΦΈΧ Χ©Φ°ΧΧΧΦΌΧΦ΅Χ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦ·ΧΧ ΧΧΦΉΧ§Φ΅Χ ΧΦ·ΧΦΌ? ΧΦ΄Χ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧ©ΦΆΧΧΦ΅ΦΌΧ©Χ ΧΦΈΧΦΌ ΧΦΆΧ‘ΦΆΧͺ β Χ§Φ·Χ©Φ°ΧΧΦΈΧ Χ’Φ΅Χ¨ΦΈΧ, ΧΦ°ΧΦ΄Χ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧ©ΦΆΧΧΦ΅ΧΧ ΧΦΈΧΦΌ ΧΦΆΧ‘ΦΆΧͺ β Χ§Φ·Χ©Φ°ΧΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ΅ΦΌΧΧ Χ’Φ΅Χ¨ΦΈΧ ΧΦ΅ΦΌΧΧ ΧΦ°Χ©Φ΅ΧΧ ΦΈΧ!
The Gemara asks: But according to Rabbi Abba bar Yirmeya, with regard to what case does Shmuel interpret this baraita? If the baraita is dealing with a woman who has a fixed menstrual cycle, it is difficult, as Shmuel holds that such a woman who is awake is required to perform an examination, whereas the baraita indicates that no examination is necessary. And if the baraita is referring to a woman who does not have a fixed menstrual cycle, it is also difficult, as Shmuel holds that she always is required to perform an examination, whether she is awake or sleeping.
ΧΦ°Χ’ΧΦΉΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧ©ΦΆΧΧΦ΅ΦΌΧ©Χ ΧΦΈΧΦΌ ΧΦΆΧ‘ΦΆΧͺ, ΧΦ°ΧΦ΅ΧΧΦΈΧ Χ©ΦΆΧΧͺΦΌΦ°ΧΦΈΧ’ΦΈΧΦΌ β ΧΦ΅ΧΧ ΧΦ°ΧΦΈ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦ΄ΧΧ§ΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΧΦΉΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ΄ΧΦΌΧΦΉ. ΧΦ²ΧΦ·Χ¨ ΧΦ΅ΧΧΦΌ Χ¨Φ·Χ Χ€ΦΈΦΌΧ€ΦΈΦΌΧ ΧΦ°Χ¨ΦΈΧΦΈΧ: ΧΦ·ΧΧΦΌ ΧΦ°ΧΦΆΧ’Φ°ΧΦ·ΦΌΧ ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧ ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ·ΧͺΦ°Χ Φ΄ΧΧͺΦΈΧ?
The Gemara answers: Actually, the baraita is referring to a case where she has a fixed menstrual cycle, and since her husband came home from his travels and requested of her that they engage in intercourse, there is no greater examination than this. Since she had time to consider the matter while he was asking her, she would have remembered had she sensed the onset of her menstrual cycle, whereas under regular circumstances she might not have time to recall. Based upon this explanation, Rav Pappa said to Rava: What is the halakha with regard to acting in accordance with this baraita? Perhaps it is necessary to wake her and ask her whether she is ritually pure.
ΧΦ²ΧΦ·Χ¨ ΧΦ΅ΧΧΦΌ: Χ‘ΧΦΌΧΦΈΧ Φ΄Χ, ΧΦΈΧ, ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦ΄ΧΦ·ΦΌΧ Φ°ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦ·Χ€Φ΅ΦΌΧΧΦΌ. ΧΦΈΧΦ·Χ¨ Χ¨Φ·Χ ΧΦΈΦΌΧΦ²Χ ΦΈΧ: Χ©Φ°ΧΧΦ΅ΧΦ°ΧͺΦ΄ΦΌΧΧ Φ°ΧΧΦΌ ΧΦ°ΧΦ΄ΧΧ ΦΈΧ©Φ΅ΧΧ ΧΦ΅ΦΌΧΧͺΦ΅ΧΧΦΌ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧ¨Φ·Χ Χ€ΦΈΦΌΧ€ΦΈΦΌΧ ΧΦΌΧΦ°Χ¨Φ·Χ ΧΧΦΌΧ ΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧ¨Φ΅ΧΧΦΌ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧ¨Φ·Χ ΧΦ°ΧΧΦΉΧ©Φ»ΧΧ’Φ·, ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧ ΧΦ²ΧͺΧΦΉ Χ¨Φ·ΧΦΈΦΌΧ Φ·Χ ΧΦ΄ΧΦ΅ΦΌΧ Χ¨Φ·Χ ΧΦ·Χ¦Φ°Χ¨Φ°ΧΦ΄Χ ΧΦ°ΧΧΦΌ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦ΄ΧΧ§ΦΈΧ? ΧΦ·ΧΦ²ΧΦ·Χ¨ΧΦΌ ΧΦ΄Χ: ΧΦΈΧ. ΧΦ°ΧΦ΄ΧΧ©Φ·ΧΧΦ°ΦΌΧΧΦ΄ΧΧ Φ°ΧΧΦΌ ΧΦ°ΧΦ΄ΧΧΦ°ΧΧΦΌ! ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧΧΦ°ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ΄ΧΧ Φ°ΧΧΦΌ Χ§ΦΈΧ ΧΦ·ΧΦ°ΧΦ°ΧΧ¨Φ΄Χ ΧΦ·Χ Φ·ΦΌΧ€Φ°Χ©Φ·ΧΧΦ°ΧΧΧΦΌ.
Rava said to Rav Pappa: Wise one [sudani]! No, wonβt she be demeaned before him? It is embarrassing for her if she is awoken and has to think about whether or not she is pure. Rav Kahana says: I asked the members of the households, i.e., the wives, of Rav Pappa and of Rav Huna, son of Rav Yehoshua: When the Sages, your husbands, came home from the study hall, did they require you to perform an examination prior to intercourse? And they said to me: No. The Gemara asks: But why ask their wives? Why not ask those Sages themselves? The Gemara answers: Perhaps they might rule leniently for others, while acting stringently with themselves. Therefore, their wives were asked, to determine how the Sages conducted themselves in their personal lives.
ΧͺΦΈΦΌΧ ΧΦΌ Χ¨Φ·ΧΦΈΦΌΧ Φ·Χ: ΧΦ΄Χ©ΦΈΦΌΧΧ Χ©ΦΆΧΧΦ΅ΧΧ ΧΦΈΧΦΌ ΧΦΆΧ‘ΦΆΧͺ β ΧΦ²Χ‘ΧΦΌΧ¨ΦΈΧ ΧΦ°Χ©Φ·ΧΧΦ΅ΦΌΧ©Χ, ΧΦ°ΧΦ΅ΧΧ ΧΦΈΧΦΌ ΧΦΉΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧͺΧΦΌΧΦΈΦΌΧ, ΧΦ°ΧΦΉΧ Χ€Φ΅ΦΌΧΧ¨ΧΦΉΧͺ, ΧΦ°ΧΦΉΧ ΧΦ°ΧΧΦΉΧ ΧΦΉΧͺ, ΧΦ°ΧΦΉΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦΈΧΧΦΉΧͺ, ΧΦΌΧΧΦΉΧ¦Φ΄ΧΧ ΧΦ°ΧΦΉΧ ΧΦ·ΧΦ°ΧΦ΄ΧΧ¨ Χ’ΧΦΉΧΦΈΧΦ΄ΧΧͺ, ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧΦ°Χ¨Φ΅Χ Χ¨Φ·ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧ ΧΦ΅ΧΦ΄ΧΧ¨.
Β§ The Sages taught in a baraita: With regard to a woman who does not have a fixed menstrual cycle, she is forbidden to engage in intercourse, and she does not have the right to receive payment of her marriage contract if divorced or widowed, nor is she entitled to payment from her husband for the produce of her property that he consumed, nor is she entitled to provisions for her sustenance from his estate, nor does she get back her worn clothes or other items she brought with her to her marriage as part of her dowry. And furthermore, her husband must divorce her and he may never remarry her. This is the statement of Rabbi Meir.
Χ¨Φ·ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧ ΧΦ²Χ Φ΄ΧΧ ΦΈΧ ΧΦΆΦΌΧ ΧΦ·Χ Φ°ΧΦ΄ΧΧΦ°Χ ΧΦΉΧ‘ ΧΧΦΉΧΦ΅Χ¨: ΧΦ°Χ©Φ·ΧΧΦΆΦΌΧ©ΦΆΧΧͺ ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧ©Φ°ΧΧ Φ΅Χ Χ’Φ΄ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧΧ, ΧΦ΅Χ Χ’Φ΄ΧΦ°ΦΌΧͺΧΦΌΧΦΈ, ΧΦ΅Χ ΧͺΦ΄ΦΌΧ§Φ°ΦΌΧ ΧΦΌΧΦΈ. ΧΦ΄Χ©ΦΌΧΧΦΌΧ ΧΦ·ΧΦΈΦΌΧ ΧΦΈΧ ΦΈΧ ΧΦΈΧΦ°Χ¨ΧΦΌ: ΧΧΦΉΧ ΧΧΦΉ ΧΦ°ΧΦ·Χ’Φ°ΧΦΈΧΦΌ.
Rabbi αΈ€anina ben Antigonus says: She is permitted to engage in intercourse with her husband, but she must examine herself with two examination cloths, one prior to intercourse and one afterward. They may be to her detriment if she finds blood on the cloths, or they may lead to her betterment, since if she finds no blood she is permitted to her husband. They said in the name of Abba αΈ€anan: Woe to her husband!
ΧΦ²Χ‘ΧΦΌΧ¨ΦΈΧ ΧΦ°Χ©Φ·ΧΧΦ΅ΦΌΧ©Χ β ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧΧΦ°ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ°Χ§Φ·ΧΦ°Χ§Φ°ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ΅ΧΧΦΌ. ΧΦ°ΧΦ΅ΧΧ ΧΦΈΧΦΌ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧͺΧΦΌΧΦΈΦΌΧ β ΧΦ΅ΦΌΧΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ·ΧΦ°ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΧΦ΄ΧΧΦΈΧ, ΧΦ΅ΧΧͺ ΧΦ·ΧΦΌ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧͺΧΦΌΧΦΈΦΌΧ.
The Gemara explains each clause of the baraita: She is forbidden to engage in intercourse, as perhaps she will ruin her husband if she emits blood during intercourse. And with regard to the halakha that she does not have the right to receive payment of her marriage contract, the reason is that since she is not fit for intercourse, she is not entitled to payment of her marriage contract.
ΧΦ°ΧΦΉΧ Χ€Φ΅ΦΌΧΧ¨ΧΦΉΧͺ, ΧΦ°ΧΦΉΧ ΧΦ°ΧΧΦΉΧ ΧΦΉΧͺ, ΧΦ°ΧΦΉΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦΈΧΧΦΉΧͺ β ΧͺΦ°ΦΌΧ ΦΈΧΦ΅Χ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧͺΧΦΌΧΦΈΦΌΧ ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧΦ°ΧͺΧΦΌΧΦΈΦΌΧ ΧΦΈΦΌΧΧΦΌ.
The Gemara continues its explanation: And she is not entitled to payment for the produce of her property, nor is she entitled to provisions for her sustenance from his estate, nor does she get back her worn clothes. The reason for all these is because stipulations in the marriage contract are considered like the marriage contract itself. Since she is not entitled to a marriage contract, she is likewise not entitled to these additional provisions that are stipulated in the marriage contract.
ΧΦ°ΧΧΦΉΧ¦Φ΄ΧΧ, ΧΦ°ΧΦΉΧ ΧΦ·ΧΦ°ΧΦ΄ΧΧ¨ Χ’ΧΦΉΧΦΈΧΦ΄ΧΧͺ. Χ€Φ°ΦΌΧ©Φ΄ΧΧΧΦΈΧ! ΧΦΈΧ Χ¦Φ°Χ¨Φ΄ΧΧΦΈΧ β ΧΦ·ΦΌΧΦ²ΧΦ·Χ¨ΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΧΦ΄ΧͺΦ·ΦΌΧ§Φ·ΦΌΧ ΦΈΧ. ΧΦ·ΧΧΦΌ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧͺΦ΅ΧΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ·ΧΧΦ°ΧΦ°ΦΌΧ¨Φ·ΧΦΌ? Χ§ΦΈΧ ΧΦ·Χ©Φ°ΧΧΦ·Χ’ ΧΦ·Χ, ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦ΄ΧΧΦ°Χ Φ΄ΧΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦΈΧΦ°ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦΌΧΦ΄Χ Φ·ΦΌΧ‘Φ°ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦΌΧΦ΄ΧͺΦ·ΦΌΧ§Φ°Χ ΦΈΧ.
The Gemara analyzes the next clause in the baraita: Her husband must divorce her and he may never remarry her. The Gemara asks: Isnβt that obvious? The Gemara answers: No, it is necessary to teach this in a case where her situation was subsequently amended, i.e., she established a fixed menstrual cycle. Lest you say that he may remarry her, the baraita teaches us that this is not permitted, as sometimes such a woman might go and marry someone else and her status is subsequently amended.
ΧΦ°ΧΦΈΧΦ·Χ¨: Χ΄ΧΦ΄ΧΧΦΌΧΦΌ ΧΦΈΧΦ΄ΧΧͺΦ΄Χ ΧΧΦΉΧΦ΅Χ’Φ· Χ©ΦΆΧΧΦΈΦΌΧΦ° ΧΦΈΧΦΈΧ, ΧΦ²Χ€Φ΄ΧΧΦΌΧΦΌ ΧΦ±ΧΦ΄ΧΧͺΦΆΧ Χ ΧΦΉΧͺΦ°Χ Φ΄ΧΧ ΧΦ΄Χ ΧΦ΅ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦΈΧ ΦΆΧ β ΧΦΉΧ ΧΦΈΧΦ΄ΧΧͺΦ΄Χ ΧΦ°ΧΦΈΧ¨Φ°Χ©ΦΈΧΧΦΌ!Χ΄, ΧΦ°Χ Φ΄ΧΦ°Χ¦ΦΈΧ ΧΦ΅ΦΌΧ ΧΦΈΦΌΧΦ΅Χ, ΧΦΌΧΦΈΧ ΦΆΧΧΦΈ ΧΦ·ΧΦ°ΧΦ΅Χ¨Φ΄ΧΧ.
And the problem in this scenario is that her first husband might say: If I would have known that it is like this, that she would be cured, even if you would have given me one hundred times one hundred dinars to divorce her I would not have divorced her. And if so, the bill of divorce will be found to be void, and her children from her second husband will be considered mamzerim. Therefore it must be made clear to him from the outset that this divorce is final.
ΧΦ΄Χ©ΦΌΧΧΦΌΧ ΧΦ·ΧΦΈΦΌΧ ΧΦΈΧ ΦΈΧ ΧΦΈΧΦ°Χ¨ΧΦΌ: Χ΄ΧΧΦΉΧ ΧΧΦΉ ΧΦ°ΧΦ·Χ’Φ°ΧΦΈΧΦΌΧ΄. ΧΦ΄ΧΧΦΈΦΌΧ ΧΦ°ΧΦΈΧΦ°Χ¨Φ΄Χ ΧΦ°Χ¨Φ·ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧ ΧΦ΅ΧΦ΄ΧΧ¨ ΧΦ²ΧΦ·Χ¨ ΧΦ΅ΧΧΦΌ, ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦΈΧ’Φ΅Χ ΧΦ°ΧΦ·ΧΦ°ΧΦΌΧΦΉΧΦ·ΧΦΌ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧͺΧΦΌΧΦ°ΦΌΧͺΦ·ΧΦΌ. ΧΦ΄ΧΧΦΈΦΌΧ ΧΦ°ΧΦΈΧΦ°Χ¨Φ΄Χ ΧΦ°Χ¨Φ·ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧ ΧΦ²Χ Φ΄ΧΧ ΦΈΧ ΧΦΆΦΌΧ ΧΦ·Χ Φ°ΧΦ΄ΧΧΦ°Χ ΧΦΉΧ‘ Χ§ΦΈΧΦΈΧΦ·Χ¨ ΧΦ΅ΧΧΦΌ, ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧΦ°Χ§Φ·ΧΦ°Χ§Φ°ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ΅ΧΧΦΌ.
The Gemara analyzes the final clause of the baraita: They said in the name of Abba αΈ€anan: Woe to her husband! Some say that he said this to Rabbi Meir, as Abba αΈ€anan maintains that the husband is required to settle her payment of her marriage contract upon their divorce. And some say that he said this to Rabbi αΈ€anina ben Antigonus, since Abba αΈ€anan disagrees with his opinion and holds that it is forbidden to engage in intercourse with her, as perhaps she will ruin him if they engage in intercourse when she is menstruating.
ΧΦΈΧΦ·Χ¨ Χ¨Φ·Χ ΧΦ°ΧΧΦΌΧΦΈΧ ΧΦΈΧΦ·Χ¨ Χ©Φ°ΧΧΧΦΌΧΦ΅Χ: ΧΦ²ΧΦΈΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧ¨Φ·ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧ ΧΦ²Χ Φ΄ΧΧ ΦΈΧ ΧΦΆΦΌΧ ΧΦ·Χ Φ°ΧΦ΄ΧΧΦ°Χ ΧΦΉΧ‘. ΧΦΌΧΦ°ΧΦ·ΧΧ? ΧΦ΄Χ ΧΦ·ΦΌΧ’Φ²Χ‘ΧΦΌΧ§ΦΈΧ ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧΦ°ΧΦΈΧ¨ΧΦΉΧͺ, ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ·ΧΦ°Χ¨Φ·ΧΦΌ Χ©Φ°ΧΧΧΦΌΧΦ΅Χ ΧΦ²ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ΄ΧΧΦ°Χ ΦΈΧ!
Rav Yehuda says that Shmuel says: The halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi αΈ€anina ben Antigonus. The Gemara asks: And with regard to what case did Shmuel issue this ruling of halakha? The Gemara elaborates: If it is referring to a woman who is engaged in handling ritually pure items, didnβt Shmuel already say on another occasion that a woman without a fixed menstrual cycle must examine herself prior to intercourse?
ΧΦ°ΧΦ΄Χ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧ©ΦΆΧΧΦ΅ΧΧ ΦΈΧΦΌ Χ’Φ²Χ‘ΧΦΌΧ§ΦΈΧ ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧΦ°ΧΦΈΧ¨ΧΦΉΧͺ, ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦΈΧΦ·Χ¨ ΧΦΉΦΌΧ ΧΦ°ΧΦ·Χ’Φ°ΧΦ·ΧΦΌ ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦΈΦΌΧ’Φ²ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦ΄ΧΧ§ΦΈΧ, ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦΈΧΦ·Χ¨ Χ¨Φ·ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧ ΧΦ΅ΧΧ¨ΦΈΧ ΧΦΈΧΦ·Χ¨ Χ¨Φ·ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧ ΧΦ·ΧΦΈΦΌΧ ΧΦ·ΦΌΧ¨ ΧΦ΄Χ¨Φ°ΧΦ°ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦΈΧΦ·Χ¨ Χ©Φ°ΧΧΧΦΌΧΦ΅Χ: Χ΄ΧΦ΄Χ©ΦΈΦΌΧΧ Χ©ΦΆΧΧΦ΅ΧΧ ΧΦΈΧΦΌ ΧΦΆΧ‘ΦΆΧͺ ΧΦ²Χ‘ΧΦΌΧ¨ΦΈΧ ΧΦ°Χ©Φ·ΧΧΦ΅ΦΌΧ©Χ Χ’Φ·Χ Χ©ΦΆΧΧͺΦ΄ΦΌΧΦ°ΧΦΌΧΦΉΧ§Χ΄, ΧΦ°ΧΧΦΉΧ§Φ΄ΧΧΦ°Χ ΦΈΧ ΧΦΈΧΦΌ ΧΦ·ΦΌΧ’Φ²Χ‘ΧΦΌΧ§ΦΈΧ ΧΦ΄ΦΌΧΦ°ΧΦΈΧ¨ΧΦΉΧͺ! ΧΦ·ΧΧ ΧΦ°ΦΌΧΦ·ΧͺΦ°Χ Φ΅Χ ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦΈΧ ΧΦ·ΧͺΦ°Χ Φ΅Χ ΧΦΈΧ.
And if it is referring to a woman who is not engaged in handling ritually pure items, doesnβt Shmuel say that in any case where an examination is only for the purpose of intercourse with her husband, not for handling pure items, she is not required to perform an examination? As Rabbi Zeira said that Rabbi Abba bar Yirmeya says that Shmuel says: A woman who does not have a fixed menstrual cycle is forbidden to engage in intercourse until she examines herself, and we interpreted this statement as referring to cases where she is engaged in handling ritually pure items. The Gemara answers: He who teaches this does not teach that, i.e., Shmuelβs ruling is in fact referring to a woman engaged in handling pure items, and the two rulings were cited in his name by different Sages.
ΧΦ²ΧΦ·Χ¨Φ·Χ Χ’Φ²ΧΦΈΧΦ° Χ©ΧΦ·ΧΦΌΦ·ΧΧ ΧΧΦΉΧΦ΅Χ¨.
Follow
