Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Skip to content

Today's Daf Yomi

January 3, 2020 | 讜壮 讘讟讘转 转砖状驻

  • This month's learning is sponsored by Terri Krivosha for the Refuah Shlemah of her husband Harav Hayim Yehuda Ben Faiga Rivah.聽

  • This month's learning is dedicated by Debbie and Yossi Gevir to Rabbanit Michelle and the Hadran Zoom group for their kindness, support, and care during a medically challenging year.

Niddah 73

Are the differences between nidda and zava something passed from by an old established tradition (halacha l’Moshe mi Sinai) or from verses? The braita raises all sorts of possibilities in order to understand how we know what the Torah meant the difference to be between nidda and zava and how to determine if blood is seen, which category does it fall into?


If the lesson doesn't play, click "Download"

转讜讻谉 讝讛 转讜专讙诐 讙诐 诇: 注讘专讬转

讘诇讗 注转 谞讚转讛 (注诇 谞讚转讛) 住诪讜讱 诇谞讚转讛

鈥淎nd if a woman has a discharge of her ziva blood for many days not in the time of her menstruation, or if she has a discharge beyond the time of her menstruation, all the days of the issue of her ziva she shall be as in the days of her menstruation: She is impure鈥 (Leviticus 15:25). This verse teaches that a woman becomes a zava only if she experiences bleeding close to her days of menstruation, i.e., on the day following her days of menstruation, but not during her days of menstruation.

讜讗讬谉 诇讬 讗诇讗 住诪讜讱 诇谞讚转讛 诪讜驻诇讙 诇谞讚转讛 讬讜诐 讗讞讚 诪谞讬谉 转诇诪讜讚 诇讜诪专 讗讜 讻讬 转讝讜讘

The baraita continues: And I have derived only that she is a zava in a case where she experiences bleeding close to her time of menstruation. From where do I derive that if she experiences bleeding one day separated from her days of menstruation she is also a zava? The verse states: 鈥淥r if she has a discharge beyond the time of her menstruation鈥 (Leviticus 15:25).

讗讬谉 诇讬 讗诇讗 讬讜诐 讗讞讚 诪谞讬谉 诇专讘讜转 诪讜驻诇讙 砖谞讬诐 砖诇砖讛 讗专讘注讛 讞诪砖讛 砖砖讛 讜砖讘注讛 砖诪讜谞讛 转砖注讛 注砖专讛 诪谞讬谉

The baraita further states: I have derived only that she is a zava in a case where she experiences bleeding one day away from her time of menstruation. From where is it derived to include a case when she experiences bleeding two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, or ten days separated from her days of menstruation that she is also a zava? From where is this derived?

讗诪专转 诪讛 诪爪讬谞讜 讘专讘讬注讬 砖专讗讜讬 诇住驻讬专讛 讜专讗讜讬 诇讝讬讘讛 讗祝 讗谞讬 讗讘讬讗 讛注砖讬专讬 砖专讗讜讬 诇住驻讬专讛 讜专讗讜讬 诇讝讬讘讛

You say as follows: Just as we find with regard to a woman who experiences bleeding on the fourth day of her days of ziva, that it is fit for counting, i.e., if she experiences bleeding for the first time on that day she must count one clean day for the one day that she experienced bleeding, and it is fit for ziva, i.e., if it is the last of three consecutive days of sightings that she becomes a greater zava, so too I will bring and include the tenth day, as it is fit for counting if she experiences bleeding for the first time on that day, and fit for ziva if she experiences bleeding for the third consecutive day on the tenth day.

讜诪谞讬谉 诇专讘讜转 讗讞讚 注砖专 转诇诪讜讚 诇讜诪专 讘诇讗 注转 谞讚转讛 讬讻讜诇 砖讗谞讬 诪专讘讛 讗祝 砖谞讬诐 注砖专 讗诪专转 诇讗讜

The baraita continues: And from where is it derived to include a case where she experiences bleeding on the eleventh day after her days of menstruation? The verse states: 鈥淣ot in the time of her menstruation鈥 (Leviticus 15:25). One might have thought that I include even the twelfth day after her period of menstruation. You must say: No, as that is no longer within her days of ziva.

讜诪讛 专讗讬转 诇专讘讜转 讗讞讚 注砖专 讜诇讛讜爪讬讗 砖谞讬诐 注砖专 诪专讘讛 讗谞讬 讗讞讚 注砖专 砖专讗讜讬 诇住驻讬专转 讗讜 讻讬 转讝讜讘 讜诪讜爪讬讗 讗谞讬 砖谞讬诐 注砖专 砖讗讬谉 专讗讜讬 诇住驻讬专转 讗讜 讻讬 转讝讜讘

The baraita further states: And what did you see to include the eleventh day and to exclude the twelfth day? I include the eleventh day as it is fit for counting the seven clean days that follow sightings on three consecutive days which ended on the fourth day, as derived from the verse: 鈥淥r if she has a discharge beyond the time of her menstruation鈥 (Leviticus 15:25), as explained; and I exclude the twelfth day as it is not fit for counting the seven clean days after the fourth day, a requirement derived from the same verse: 鈥淥r if she has a discharge beyond the time of her menstruation.鈥

讜讗讬谉 诇讬 讗诇讗 砖诇砖讛 讬诪讬诐 砖谞讬 讬诪讬诐 诪谞讬谉 转诇诪讜讚 诇讜诪专 讬诪讬 讬讜诐 讗讞讚 诪谞讬谉 转诇诪讜讚 诇讜诪专 讻诇 讬诪讬

The baraita continues: And I have derived only that a woman is impure as a zava if she experiences bleeding for three consecutive days. From where do I derive that she is impure if she experiences bleeding for two consecutive days? The continuation of the verse states: 鈥淎ll the days of the issue of her ziva she shall be as in the days of her menstruation: She is impure鈥 (Leviticus 15:25). The plural 鈥渄ays鈥 indicates two days. From where is it derived that she is impure if she experiences bleeding on only one day? The verse states: 鈥淎ll the days of the issue of her ziva she shall be as in the days of her menstruation: She is impure.鈥

讟诪讗讛 诪诇诪讚 砖诪讟诪讗讛 讗转 讘讜注诇讛 讻谞讚讛 讛讬讗 讛讬讗 诪讟诪讗讛 讗转 讘讜注诇讛 讜讗讬谉 讛讝讘 诪讟诪讗 诪讛 砖讛讜讗 讘讜注诇

The baraita further explains that the word 鈥渋mpure鈥 in that verse teaches that a zava renders one who engages in intercourse with her impure, just like a menstruating woman does. The term: 鈥淪he is impure,鈥 indicates that she, a zava, renders a man who engages in intercourse with her impure, but a zav does not render a woman whom he engages in intercourse with ritually impure.

讜讛诇讗 讚讬谉 讛讜讗 讜诪讛 讛讬讗 砖讗讬谞讛 诪讟诪讗讛 讘专讗讬讜转 讻讘讬诪讬诐 诪讟诪讗讛 讗转 讘讜注诇讛 讛讜讗 砖诪讟诪讗 讘专讗讬讜转 讻讘讬诪讬诐 讗讬谞讜 讚讬谉 砖诪讟诪讗 诪讛 砖讛讜讗 讘讜注诇 转诇诪讜讚 诇讜诪专 讛讬讗 讛讬讗 诪讟诪讗讛 讗转 讘讜注诇讛 讜讗讬谉 讛讝讘 诪讟诪讗 诪讛 砖讛讜讗 讘讜注诇

One might have thought that one who engages in intercourse with a zav has the same status as one who engages in intercourse with a zava. Could this not be derived through an a fortiori inference? And if a zava, who does not become impure through three sightings like she becomes impure if she experiences bleeding for three consecutive days, and yet she renders a man who engages in intercourse with her impure, then with regard to a zav, who becomes impure through three sightings even on a single day like he becomes impure by seeing a discharge for three consecutive days, isn鈥檛 it logical that he should render a women whom he engages in intercourse with ritually impure? Therefore, the verse states: 鈥淪he shall be impure.鈥 This teaches that a zava renders a man who engages in intercourse with her impure, but a zav does not render a woman whom he engages in intercourse with ritually impure.

讜诪谞讬谉 砖讛讜讗 注讜砖讛 诪砖讻讘 讜诪讜砖讘 转诇诪讜讚 诇讜诪专 讻诪砖讻讘 谞讚转讛

And from where is it derived that a zava transmits impurity to items designated for lying or sitting? The verse states: 鈥淓very bed which she lies on all the days of her discharge shall be for her like the bed of her menstruation; and everything that she sits on shall be impure, as the impurity of her menstruation鈥 (Leviticus 15:26).

讜讗讬谉 诇讬 讗诇讗 砖诇砖讛 讬诪讬诐 砖谞讬 讬诪讬诐 诪谞讬谉 转诇诪讜讚 诇讜诪专 讬诪讬 讬讜诐 讗讞讚 诪谞讬谉 转诇诪讜讚 诇讜诪专 讻诇 讬诪讬

And I have derived only that she transmits impurity to items designated for lying or sitting if she experiences bleeding for three consecutive days and is a greater zava. From where do I derive that she transmits impurity to items designated for lying or sitting if she experiences bleeding for two consecutive days and is only a lesser zava? The verse states 鈥渄ays.鈥 And from where do I derive that she transmits impurity to items designated for lying or sitting even if she experiences bleeding on only one day? The verse states: 鈥淎ll the days of her discharge.鈥

讜诪谞讬谉 砖住讜驻专转 讗讞讚 诇讗讞讚 转诇诪讜讚 诇讜诪专 讬讛讬讛 诇讛 讬讻讜诇 转住驻讜专 砖讘注讛 诇砖谞讬诐 讜讚讬谉 讛讜讗 讜诪讛 讛讜讗 砖讗讬谉 住讜驻专 讗讞讚 诇讗讞讚 住讜驻专 砖讘注讛 诇砖谞讬诐 讛讬讗 砖住讜驻专转 讗讞讚 诇讗讞讚 讗讬谞讜 讚讬谉 砖转住驻讜专 砖讘注讛 诇砖谞讬诐 转诇诪讜讚 诇讜诪专 讬讛讬讛 诇讛 讗讬谞讛 住讜驻专转 讗诇讗 讬讜诪讛

The baraita continues: And from where is it derived that she counts one clean day for experiencing bleeding on one day? The verse states: 鈥淎ll the days of her discharge shall be for her.鈥 One might have thought that she must count seven clean days for experiencing bleeding on two consecutive days. And this is a logical inference: Just as a zav, who does not count one clean day if he sees a discharge on one day, nevertheless must count seven clean days if he sees a discharge on two days, then with regard to a zava, who counts one clean day if she experiences bleeding on one day, isn鈥檛 it logical that she should count seven clean days if she experiences bleeding on two consecutive days? The verse states: 鈥淎ll the days of her discharge shall be for her,鈥 which teaches that she counts only her one day even if she experiences bleeding for two consecutive days.

讗诇诪讗 拽专讗讬 谞讬谞讛讜 诇专讘讬 注拽讬讘讗 拽专讗讬 诇专讘讬 讗诇注讝专 讘谉 注讝专讬讛 讛诇讻转讗

The Gemara explains the difficulty from this baraita: Evidently, the halakhot of the eleven days of ziva are derived from verses and are not a halakha transmitted to Moses from Sinai. The Gemara answers: According to the opinion of Rabbi Akiva these halakhot are derived from verses. According to the opinion of Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya they are a halakha transmitted to Moses from Sinai.

讗诪专 诇讬讛 专讘 砖诪注讬讛 诇专讘讬 讗讘讗 讗讬诪讗 讘讬诪诪讗 转讛讜讬 讝讘讛 讘诇讬诇讬讗 转讛讜讬 谞讚讛 讗诪专 诇讬讛 注诇讱 讗诪专 拽专讗 注诇 谞讚转讛 住诪讜讱 诇谞讚转讛 住诪讜讱 诇谞讚转讛 讗讬诪转 讛讜讬 讘诇讬诇讬讗 讜拽讗 拽专讬 诇讛 讝讘讛

With regard to the verse discussing the days of ziva, Rav Shemaya said to Rabbi Abba: But one can say that if she experiences bleeding during the daytime she shall be a zava, but if she experiences bleeding at night she shall be a menstruating woman, as the verse specifies 鈥渄ays.鈥 Rabbi Abba said to him: With regard to your claim, the verse states: 鈥淏eyond the time of her menstruation鈥 (Leviticus 15:25), which teaches that she becomes a zava if she experiences bleeding close to her days of menstruation. When is the time close to her days of menstruation? At night. And with regard to an emission during this time the verse calls her a zava.

转谞讗 讚讘讬 讗诇讬讛讜 讻诇 讛砖讜谞讛 讛诇讻讜转 讘讻诇 讬讜诐 诪讜讘讟讞 诇讜 砖讛讜讗 讘谉 讛注讜诇诐 讛讘讗 砖谞讗诪专 讛诇讬讻讜转 注讜诇诐 诇讜 讗诇 转拽专讬 讛诇讬讻讜转 讗诇讗 讛诇讻讜转

The Gemara concludes the tractate with a general statement with regard to Torah study. The school of Elijah taught: Anyone who studies halakhot every day is guaranteed that he is destined for the World-to-Come, as it is stated: 鈥淗is ways [halikhot] are eternal鈥 (Habakkuk 3:6). Do not read the verse as halikhot; rather, read it as halakhot. The verse indicates that the study of halakhot brings one to eternal life in the future world.

讛讚专谉 注诇讱 转讬谞讜拽转 讜住诇讬拽讗 诇讛 诪住讻转 谞讚讛

 

  • This month's learning is sponsored by Terri Krivosha for the Refuah Shlemah of her husband Harav Hayim Yehuda Ben Faiga Rivah.聽

  • This month's learning is dedicated by Debbie and Yossi Gevir to Rabbanit Michelle and the Hadran Zoom group for their kindness, support, and care during a medically challenging year.

Want to explore more about the Daf?

See insights from our partners, contributors and community of women learners

Sorry, there aren't any posts in this category yet. We're adding more soon!

Niddah 73

The William Davidson Talmud | Powered by Sefaria

Niddah 73

讘诇讗 注转 谞讚转讛 (注诇 谞讚转讛) 住诪讜讱 诇谞讚转讛

鈥淎nd if a woman has a discharge of her ziva blood for many days not in the time of her menstruation, or if she has a discharge beyond the time of her menstruation, all the days of the issue of her ziva she shall be as in the days of her menstruation: She is impure鈥 (Leviticus 15:25). This verse teaches that a woman becomes a zava only if she experiences bleeding close to her days of menstruation, i.e., on the day following her days of menstruation, but not during her days of menstruation.

讜讗讬谉 诇讬 讗诇讗 住诪讜讱 诇谞讚转讛 诪讜驻诇讙 诇谞讚转讛 讬讜诐 讗讞讚 诪谞讬谉 转诇诪讜讚 诇讜诪专 讗讜 讻讬 转讝讜讘

The baraita continues: And I have derived only that she is a zava in a case where she experiences bleeding close to her time of menstruation. From where do I derive that if she experiences bleeding one day separated from her days of menstruation she is also a zava? The verse states: 鈥淥r if she has a discharge beyond the time of her menstruation鈥 (Leviticus 15:25).

讗讬谉 诇讬 讗诇讗 讬讜诐 讗讞讚 诪谞讬谉 诇专讘讜转 诪讜驻诇讙 砖谞讬诐 砖诇砖讛 讗专讘注讛 讞诪砖讛 砖砖讛 讜砖讘注讛 砖诪讜谞讛 转砖注讛 注砖专讛 诪谞讬谉

The baraita further states: I have derived only that she is a zava in a case where she experiences bleeding one day away from her time of menstruation. From where is it derived to include a case when she experiences bleeding two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, or ten days separated from her days of menstruation that she is also a zava? From where is this derived?

讗诪专转 诪讛 诪爪讬谞讜 讘专讘讬注讬 砖专讗讜讬 诇住驻讬专讛 讜专讗讜讬 诇讝讬讘讛 讗祝 讗谞讬 讗讘讬讗 讛注砖讬专讬 砖专讗讜讬 诇住驻讬专讛 讜专讗讜讬 诇讝讬讘讛

You say as follows: Just as we find with regard to a woman who experiences bleeding on the fourth day of her days of ziva, that it is fit for counting, i.e., if she experiences bleeding for the first time on that day she must count one clean day for the one day that she experienced bleeding, and it is fit for ziva, i.e., if it is the last of three consecutive days of sightings that she becomes a greater zava, so too I will bring and include the tenth day, as it is fit for counting if she experiences bleeding for the first time on that day, and fit for ziva if she experiences bleeding for the third consecutive day on the tenth day.

讜诪谞讬谉 诇专讘讜转 讗讞讚 注砖专 转诇诪讜讚 诇讜诪专 讘诇讗 注转 谞讚转讛 讬讻讜诇 砖讗谞讬 诪专讘讛 讗祝 砖谞讬诐 注砖专 讗诪专转 诇讗讜

The baraita continues: And from where is it derived to include a case where she experiences bleeding on the eleventh day after her days of menstruation? The verse states: 鈥淣ot in the time of her menstruation鈥 (Leviticus 15:25). One might have thought that I include even the twelfth day after her period of menstruation. You must say: No, as that is no longer within her days of ziva.

讜诪讛 专讗讬转 诇专讘讜转 讗讞讚 注砖专 讜诇讛讜爪讬讗 砖谞讬诐 注砖专 诪专讘讛 讗谞讬 讗讞讚 注砖专 砖专讗讜讬 诇住驻讬专转 讗讜 讻讬 转讝讜讘 讜诪讜爪讬讗 讗谞讬 砖谞讬诐 注砖专 砖讗讬谉 专讗讜讬 诇住驻讬专转 讗讜 讻讬 转讝讜讘

The baraita further states: And what did you see to include the eleventh day and to exclude the twelfth day? I include the eleventh day as it is fit for counting the seven clean days that follow sightings on three consecutive days which ended on the fourth day, as derived from the verse: 鈥淥r if she has a discharge beyond the time of her menstruation鈥 (Leviticus 15:25), as explained; and I exclude the twelfth day as it is not fit for counting the seven clean days after the fourth day, a requirement derived from the same verse: 鈥淥r if she has a discharge beyond the time of her menstruation.鈥

讜讗讬谉 诇讬 讗诇讗 砖诇砖讛 讬诪讬诐 砖谞讬 讬诪讬诐 诪谞讬谉 转诇诪讜讚 诇讜诪专 讬诪讬 讬讜诐 讗讞讚 诪谞讬谉 转诇诪讜讚 诇讜诪专 讻诇 讬诪讬

The baraita continues: And I have derived only that a woman is impure as a zava if she experiences bleeding for three consecutive days. From where do I derive that she is impure if she experiences bleeding for two consecutive days? The continuation of the verse states: 鈥淎ll the days of the issue of her ziva she shall be as in the days of her menstruation: She is impure鈥 (Leviticus 15:25). The plural 鈥渄ays鈥 indicates two days. From where is it derived that she is impure if she experiences bleeding on only one day? The verse states: 鈥淎ll the days of the issue of her ziva she shall be as in the days of her menstruation: She is impure.鈥

讟诪讗讛 诪诇诪讚 砖诪讟诪讗讛 讗转 讘讜注诇讛 讻谞讚讛 讛讬讗 讛讬讗 诪讟诪讗讛 讗转 讘讜注诇讛 讜讗讬谉 讛讝讘 诪讟诪讗 诪讛 砖讛讜讗 讘讜注诇

The baraita further explains that the word 鈥渋mpure鈥 in that verse teaches that a zava renders one who engages in intercourse with her impure, just like a menstruating woman does. The term: 鈥淪he is impure,鈥 indicates that she, a zava, renders a man who engages in intercourse with her impure, but a zav does not render a woman whom he engages in intercourse with ritually impure.

讜讛诇讗 讚讬谉 讛讜讗 讜诪讛 讛讬讗 砖讗讬谞讛 诪讟诪讗讛 讘专讗讬讜转 讻讘讬诪讬诐 诪讟诪讗讛 讗转 讘讜注诇讛 讛讜讗 砖诪讟诪讗 讘专讗讬讜转 讻讘讬诪讬诐 讗讬谞讜 讚讬谉 砖诪讟诪讗 诪讛 砖讛讜讗 讘讜注诇 转诇诪讜讚 诇讜诪专 讛讬讗 讛讬讗 诪讟诪讗讛 讗转 讘讜注诇讛 讜讗讬谉 讛讝讘 诪讟诪讗 诪讛 砖讛讜讗 讘讜注诇

One might have thought that one who engages in intercourse with a zav has the same status as one who engages in intercourse with a zava. Could this not be derived through an a fortiori inference? And if a zava, who does not become impure through three sightings like she becomes impure if she experiences bleeding for three consecutive days, and yet she renders a man who engages in intercourse with her impure, then with regard to a zav, who becomes impure through three sightings even on a single day like he becomes impure by seeing a discharge for three consecutive days, isn鈥檛 it logical that he should render a women whom he engages in intercourse with ritually impure? Therefore, the verse states: 鈥淪he shall be impure.鈥 This teaches that a zava renders a man who engages in intercourse with her impure, but a zav does not render a woman whom he engages in intercourse with ritually impure.

讜诪谞讬谉 砖讛讜讗 注讜砖讛 诪砖讻讘 讜诪讜砖讘 转诇诪讜讚 诇讜诪专 讻诪砖讻讘 谞讚转讛

And from where is it derived that a zava transmits impurity to items designated for lying or sitting? The verse states: 鈥淓very bed which she lies on all the days of her discharge shall be for her like the bed of her menstruation; and everything that she sits on shall be impure, as the impurity of her menstruation鈥 (Leviticus 15:26).

讜讗讬谉 诇讬 讗诇讗 砖诇砖讛 讬诪讬诐 砖谞讬 讬诪讬诐 诪谞讬谉 转诇诪讜讚 诇讜诪专 讬诪讬 讬讜诐 讗讞讚 诪谞讬谉 转诇诪讜讚 诇讜诪专 讻诇 讬诪讬

And I have derived only that she transmits impurity to items designated for lying or sitting if she experiences bleeding for three consecutive days and is a greater zava. From where do I derive that she transmits impurity to items designated for lying or sitting if she experiences bleeding for two consecutive days and is only a lesser zava? The verse states 鈥渄ays.鈥 And from where do I derive that she transmits impurity to items designated for lying or sitting even if she experiences bleeding on only one day? The verse states: 鈥淎ll the days of her discharge.鈥

讜诪谞讬谉 砖住讜驻专转 讗讞讚 诇讗讞讚 转诇诪讜讚 诇讜诪专 讬讛讬讛 诇讛 讬讻讜诇 转住驻讜专 砖讘注讛 诇砖谞讬诐 讜讚讬谉 讛讜讗 讜诪讛 讛讜讗 砖讗讬谉 住讜驻专 讗讞讚 诇讗讞讚 住讜驻专 砖讘注讛 诇砖谞讬诐 讛讬讗 砖住讜驻专转 讗讞讚 诇讗讞讚 讗讬谞讜 讚讬谉 砖转住驻讜专 砖讘注讛 诇砖谞讬诐 转诇诪讜讚 诇讜诪专 讬讛讬讛 诇讛 讗讬谞讛 住讜驻专转 讗诇讗 讬讜诪讛

The baraita continues: And from where is it derived that she counts one clean day for experiencing bleeding on one day? The verse states: 鈥淎ll the days of her discharge shall be for her.鈥 One might have thought that she must count seven clean days for experiencing bleeding on two consecutive days. And this is a logical inference: Just as a zav, who does not count one clean day if he sees a discharge on one day, nevertheless must count seven clean days if he sees a discharge on two days, then with regard to a zava, who counts one clean day if she experiences bleeding on one day, isn鈥檛 it logical that she should count seven clean days if she experiences bleeding on two consecutive days? The verse states: 鈥淎ll the days of her discharge shall be for her,鈥 which teaches that she counts only her one day even if she experiences bleeding for two consecutive days.

讗诇诪讗 拽专讗讬 谞讬谞讛讜 诇专讘讬 注拽讬讘讗 拽专讗讬 诇专讘讬 讗诇注讝专 讘谉 注讝专讬讛 讛诇讻转讗

The Gemara explains the difficulty from this baraita: Evidently, the halakhot of the eleven days of ziva are derived from verses and are not a halakha transmitted to Moses from Sinai. The Gemara answers: According to the opinion of Rabbi Akiva these halakhot are derived from verses. According to the opinion of Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya they are a halakha transmitted to Moses from Sinai.

讗诪专 诇讬讛 专讘 砖诪注讬讛 诇专讘讬 讗讘讗 讗讬诪讗 讘讬诪诪讗 转讛讜讬 讝讘讛 讘诇讬诇讬讗 转讛讜讬 谞讚讛 讗诪专 诇讬讛 注诇讱 讗诪专 拽专讗 注诇 谞讚转讛 住诪讜讱 诇谞讚转讛 住诪讜讱 诇谞讚转讛 讗讬诪转 讛讜讬 讘诇讬诇讬讗 讜拽讗 拽专讬 诇讛 讝讘讛

With regard to the verse discussing the days of ziva, Rav Shemaya said to Rabbi Abba: But one can say that if she experiences bleeding during the daytime she shall be a zava, but if she experiences bleeding at night she shall be a menstruating woman, as the verse specifies 鈥渄ays.鈥 Rabbi Abba said to him: With regard to your claim, the verse states: 鈥淏eyond the time of her menstruation鈥 (Leviticus 15:25), which teaches that she becomes a zava if she experiences bleeding close to her days of menstruation. When is the time close to her days of menstruation? At night. And with regard to an emission during this time the verse calls her a zava.

转谞讗 讚讘讬 讗诇讬讛讜 讻诇 讛砖讜谞讛 讛诇讻讜转 讘讻诇 讬讜诐 诪讜讘讟讞 诇讜 砖讛讜讗 讘谉 讛注讜诇诐 讛讘讗 砖谞讗诪专 讛诇讬讻讜转 注讜诇诐 诇讜 讗诇 转拽专讬 讛诇讬讻讜转 讗诇讗 讛诇讻讜转

The Gemara concludes the tractate with a general statement with regard to Torah study. The school of Elijah taught: Anyone who studies halakhot every day is guaranteed that he is destined for the World-to-Come, as it is stated: 鈥淗is ways [halikhot] are eternal鈥 (Habakkuk 3:6). Do not read the verse as halikhot; rather, read it as halakhot. The verse indicates that the study of halakhot brings one to eternal life in the future world.

讛讚专谉 注诇讱 转讬谞讜拽转 讜住诇讬拽讗 诇讛 诪住讻转 谞讚讛

 

Scroll To Top