Rosh Hashanah 23

למיטעי אמרי האי חסר הוא והאי דלא עביד מאתמול משום דלא אפשר או דלמא מלא הוא ובזמנו עבדו

to err. They will be unsure how to interpret the lighting of the torches, as they will say: Perhaps this month is deficient, i.e., of twenty-nine days, and the reason that the torch sequence was not performed yesterday, on Shabbat eve, is due to the fact that it was impossible to do so on Shabbat. Or perhaps it is a full, thirty-day month, and they are performing the sequence at its proper time. Therefore, the Sages instituted that the torches should be lit only after deficient months, and the absence of this signal means that the month was a full one.

וליעביד בין אמלא בין אחסר וכי מקלע ראש חדש בערב שבת לא ליעביד כלל וכיון דלא עבדינן מוצאי שבת ועבדינן אמלא מידע ידעי דחסר הוא

The Gemara suggests: And let them perform the ceremony both for a full, thirty-day month and for a deficient one, and when the New Moon occurs on Shabbat eve, in which case they would have to light the torches after Shabbat, let them not perform it at all. And since the torches are not lit this month at the conclusion of Shabbat, and one normally performs the sequence for a full month, people will know that the month is deficient. In this manner, it should be possible to light the torches for all the months, with this one exception.

אפילו הכי אתו למיטעי אמרי האי מלא הוא והאי דלא עבדי איתנוסי הוא דאיתנוסי

The Gemara answers: Even so, people might come to err, as they will say: This month is indeed full, and the reason that they are not performing the ceremony is that they were subject to circumstances beyond their control. Therefore, there might still be confusion as to the date of the New Moon that month.

וליעביד אמלא ולא ליעביד אחסר כלל אמר אביי משום ביטול מלאכה לעם שני ימים

The Gemara asks: And let them perform the ceremony of torches only for a full, thirty-day month, and not perform it for a deficient month at all, in which case there will never be room for error. Abaye said: This cannot be done, because this would lead to a two-day suspension of work for the people, as it was customary to refrain from certain types of work on the New Moon. After a full month there will always be a suspension of work for two days, as the people must abstain from work on the thirtieth of the month in case it is declared the New Moon. However, if the torches are lit for a deficient month, then at least in that case people could return to work the following day. Therefore, the Sages instituted that the torches are lit only for a deficient month.

כיצד היו משיאין משואות מביאין כלונסות כו׳ אמר רב יהודה ארבעה מיני ארזים הן ארז קתרום עץ שמן וברוש קתרום אמר רב אדרא דבי רבי שילא אמרי מבליגא ואמרי לה זו גולמיש

§ The mishna taught: How would they light the torches? They would bring long poles [kelonsot] of cedar and other materials that burn well, tie them all together, and set them on fire. Rav Yehuda said that there are four types of cedar: Cedar, katrom, pinewood, and cypress. With regard to the identification of the tree called katrom, Rav said: This is the addera tree. In the school of Rabbi Sheila, they say: This is the mavliga tree. And some say it is the gulmish tree.

ופליגא דרבה בר רב הונא דאמר רבה בר רב הונא אמרי בי רב עשרה מיני ארזים הם שנאמר אתן במדבר ארז שטה והדס ועץ שמן אשים בערבה ברוש תדהר ותאשור יחדו ארז ארזא שטה תורניתא הדס אסא עץ שמן אפרסמא ברוש ברתא תדהר שאגא תאשור שוריבנא

The Gemara comments: And this opinion of Rav Yehuda disagrees with that of Rabba bar Rav Huna. As Rabba bar Rav Huna said that they say in the school of Rav: There are ten species of cedar, as it is stated: “I will plant in the wilderness the cedar, the acacia tree and myrtle and the pine tree; I will set in the desert cypress, the plane tree, and the larch together” (Isaiah 41:19). The seven species mentioned in this verse are all types of cedars. The Gemara proceeds to identify these trees by their Aramaic names: Cedar is arza, acacia is tornita, myrtle is asa, pine tree is afarsema, cypress is berata, maple is shaga, and box tree is shorivna.

הני שבעה הוו כי אתא רב דימי אמר הוסיפו עליהם אלונים אלמונים אלמוגין אלונים בוטמי אלמונים בלוטי אלמוגין כסיתא איכא דאמרי ארונים ערמונים אלמוגין ארונים ערי ערמונים דולבי אלמוגין כסיתא

The Gemara asks: Even if we count all the names in the verse, these are only seven, not ten. When Rav Dimi came from Eretz Israel to Babylonia, he said: They added to them three more types of cedar: Terebinth, oak, and coral wood. The Gemara identifies them: Terebinth is the tree called butmei, oak is balutei, and coral wood is kasita. There are those who say that the additional three types are: Bay tree, plane tree, and coral wood. And their Aramaic names are as follows: Bay tree is arei, plane is dulvei, and coral wood is kasita.

וצי אדיר לא יעברנו אמר רב זו בורני גדולה

§ Apropos coral, the Gemara cites a relevant verse: “Neither shall a tzi adir be able to cross it” (Isaiah 33:21), i.e., it will not be able to traverse the river that will issue forth from the Temple in the future. What is this tzi adir? Rav said: This is a great ship [burnei] used to collect coral from the sea.

היכי עבדו מייתו שית אלפי גברי בתריסר ירחי שתא ואמרי לה תריסר אלפי גברי בשיתא ירחי שתא וטעני לה חלא עד דשכנא ונחית בר אמוראי וקטר אטוני דכיתנא בכסיתא וקטר להו בספינתא ונטלי חלא ושדו לבראי וכמה דמדליא עקרא ומתיא

The Gemara explains: How do they perform this collection of coral? They bring six thousand men to work for twelve months of the year, and some say they bring twelve thousand men for six months of the year. And they load the ship with sand until it sinks to the bottom of the sea. A diver descends and ties flax ropes around the coral and ties the other ends of the ropes to the boat. And then they take the sand and cast it overboard, and the boat rises once again to the surface. And as it rises, it uproots and brings the coral with it.

ומחליף על חד תרין בכספא תלת פרוותא הויין תרתי בי ארמאי וחדא דבי פרסאי דבי ארמאי מסקן כסיתא דבי פרסאי מסקן מרגנייתא ומקרייא פרוותא דמשמהיג

The Gemara comments: And this coral is so precious that it is exchanged for twice its weight in silver. The Gemara further notes: There are three ports in those places. Two belong to the Romans [Armai], and one belongs to the Persians. In the one belonging to the Romans, they raise up coral, whereas in the one belonging to the Persians, they raise up pearls. And the Persian ports are called royal ports.

אמר רבי יוחנן כל שיטה ושיטה שנטלו גוים מירושלים עתיד הקדוש ברוך הוא להחזירן לה שנאמר אתן במדבר ארז שטה ואין מדבר אלא ירושלים שנאמר ציון מדבר היתה וגו׳

With regard to the aforementioned verse, Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Each and every acacia tree that the gentiles took from Jerusalem will be returned to the city by the Holy One, Blessed be He, as it is stated: “I will plant in the wilderness the cedar, the acacia tree and myrtle and the oil tree; I will set in the desert cypress, the plane tree and the larch together” (Isaiah 41:19). And the term wilderness is referring to nothing other than Jerusalem, as it is stated: “Zion is become a wilderness, Jerusalem a desolation” (Isaiah 64:9).

ואמר רבי יוחנן כל הלומד תורה ואינו מלמדה דומה להדס במדבר איכא דאמרי כל הלומד תורה ומלמדה במקום שאין תלמידי חכמים דומה להדס במדבר דחביב

And Rabbi Yoḥanan also said: Anyone who studies Torah but does not teach it to others is likened to a myrtle in the wilderness. The myrtle has a pleasant fragrance, but there is nobody to enjoy it in the wilderness. There are those who say a different version of this statement: Anyone who studies Torah and teaches it to others in a place where there are no other Torah scholars is likened to a myrtle in the wilderness, which is especially precious and thoroughly enjoyed by those who find it.

ואמר רבי יוחנן אוי להם לגוים שאין להם תקנה שנאמר תחת הנחשת אביא זהב ותחת הברזל אביא כסף ותחת העצים נחשת ותחת האבנים ברזל תחת רבי עקיבא וחביריו מאי מביאין ועליהם הוא אומר ונקיתי דמם לא נקיתי

And Rabbi Yoḥanan further said: Woe to the nations of the world, as they have no remedy for the sins they committed against the Jewish people, as it is stated: “For brass I will bring gold, and for iron I will bring silver, and for wood brass, and for stones iron” (Isaiah 60:17). For all things there is a remedy, as one can always exchange them for an item of equivalent or greater value. However, for Rabbi Akiva and his colleagues, whom the nations put to death, what can one bring to atone for their sin? And with regard to them it is stated: And I will hold them as innocent, but for their blood I will not hold them innocent (see Joel 4:21).

ומאין היו משיאין משואות כו׳ ומבית בלתין מאי בית בלתין אמר רב

§ The mishna states: And from which mountains would they light the torches? From the Mount of Olives to Sartava, and from Sartava to Gerofina, and from Gerofina to Ḥavran, and from Ḥavran to Beit Baltin. And from Beit Baltin they would not light torches in any other pre-established places. The Gemara asks: What is this place called Beit Baltin? Rav said:

זו בירם

This is the town called Biram.

מאי גולה אמר רב יוסף זו פומבדיתא מאי כמדורת האש תנא כל אחד ואחד נוטל אבוקה בידו ועולה לראש גגו

§ The mishna taught: He would wave the torch back and forth and up and down, until he would see the entire Diaspora before him alight like one large bonfire. The Gemara asks: What is the meaning in this context of the term Diaspora, which certainly cannot be referring to the entire Diaspora across the world? Rav Yosef said: This is referring to the city of Pumbedita in Babylonia. The Gemara further asks. What is the meaning of the phrase: Like one large bonfire? It is taught in a baraita: Each and every individual would take a torch in his hand and ascend to the top of his roof and light it. In this manner, the entire city would present the appearance of a large bonfire.

תניא רבי שמעון בן אלעזר אומר אף חרים וכייר וגדר וחברותיה איכא דאמרי ביני וביני הוו קיימי איכא דאמרי להך גיסא דארץ ישראל הוו קיימי מר חשיב דהאי גיסא ומר חשיב דהאי גיסא

It is taught in a baraita that Rabbi Shimon ben Elazar says: Torches were also lit at Ḥarim, and Kayar and Geder, and its neighboring places. There are those who say that the places added by Rabbi Shimon ben Elazar are located between the places mentioned in the mishna, whereas there are those who say that they are located on the other side of Eretz Yisrael, on the side nearer Babylonia. The Sage in the mishna enumerates the places found on one side of Eretz Yisrael, whereas the Sage in the baraita enumerates the places found on the other side.

אמר רבי יוחנן בין כל אחת ואחת שמונה פרסאות כמה הוו להו תלתין ותרתין והא האידנא טובא הוו אמר אביי אסתתומי אסתתום להו דרכי

Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Between each and every one of the stations there was a distance of eight parasangs. The Gemara asks: How many parasangs are these in total? Thirty-two parasangs. The Gemara further asks: Isn’t the distance from the Mount of Olives to Beit Baltin now much greater than thirty-two parasangs? Abaye said: The direct routes have become blocked, and therefore people nowadays must use indirect routes, making the journey much longer.

דכתיב לכן הנני שך את דרכך בסירים רב נחמן בר יצחק אמר מהכא דכתיב נתיבותי עוה

The Gemara provides a source for this claim. As it is written: “Therefore, behold, I will hedge up your way with thorns, and make a wall against her, that she shall not find her paths” (Hosea 2:8). Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak said: It is derived from here, as it is written: “He has made my paths crooked” (Lamentations 3:9), which indicates that over the course of the exile the routes have become longer.

מתני׳ חצר גדולה היתה בירושלים ובית יעזק היתה נקראת ולשם כל העדים מתכנסין ובית דין בודקין אותם שם וסעודות גדולות עושין להם בשביל שיהו רגילין לבא

MISHNA: There was a large courtyard in Jerusalem, which was called Beit Ya’zek. And there all the witnesses coming to testify about the new moon would gather, and the court of seventy-one judges would examine them there. And they would prepare great feasts for them, so that they would be willing and accustomed to coming and submitting their testimony.

בראשונה לא היו זזין משם כל היום התקין רבן גמליאל הזקן שיהו מהלכין אלפים אמה לכל רוח

Initially, when witnesses would arrive on Shabbat from a distant place, they would not move from there all day, as they had left their Shabbat limit, and it was consequently prohibited for them to walk more than four cubits in any direction once they had completed their mission. Concerned that this limitation would discourage witnesses from coming, Rabban Gamliel the Elder instituted that the witnesses be permitted to walk two thousand cubits in each direction.

ולא אלו בלבד אלא אף חכמה הבאה ליילד והבא להציל מן הדליקה ומן הגייס ומן הנהר ומן המפולת הרי אלו כאנשי העיר ויש להם אלפים לכל רוח

The mishna continues: And not only these witnesses are granted two thousand cubits from their new place, but this applies also to a midwife who comes to deliver a child, and one who comes to rescue Jews from a fire, from an invasion of gentile troops, from a flooding river, or from the collapse of a building. All these are considered like the inhabitants of the city where they arrive, and therefore they have two thousand cubits in each direction.

גמ׳ איבעיא להו בית יעזק תנן או בית יזק תנן בית יעזק תנן לישנא מעליא הוא דכתיב ויעזקהו ויסקלהו או דלמא בית יזק תנן לישנא דצערא הוא כדכתיב והוא אסור באזיקים

GEMARA: A dilemma was raised before the Sages: What is the correct reading of the mishna? Did we learn: Beit Ya’zek, or did we learn: Beit Yazek? The Gemara explains the difference between these two versions. Did we learn: Beit Ya’zek, which is an lofty term, indicating that it was a fine place where the witnesses had a pleasant experience, as it is written: “And he dug it [vaye’azzekehu] and cleared it of stones” (Isaiah 5:2), which shows that the root a-z-k denotes improvement? Or perhaps we learned: Beit Yazek, which is a term of distress, reflecting the fact that the witnesses who arrived there on Shabbat were not permitted to move from there all day, as it is written: “And he was bound with chains [bazikim]” (Jeremiah 40:1).

אמר אביי תא שמע סעודות גדולות היו עושין להם שם כדי שיהו רגילים לבוא דלמא תרתי הוו עבדי בהו

Abaye said: Come and hear the mishna: They would prepare great feasts for them there, so that they would be accustomed to come and submit their testimony. This indicates that the witnesses were made welcome, in accordance with the name Beit Ya’zek. The Gemara rejects this argument: Perhaps they performed two practices for them, i.e., they provided feasts but they also restricted their movement. Therefore, there is no proof from the mishna for this version of the name.

מתני׳ כיצד בודקין את העדים זוג שבא ראשון בודקין אותו ראשון ומכניסין את הגדול שבהן ואומרין לו אמור כיצד ראית את הלבנה לפני החמה או לאחר החמה לצפונה או לדרומה כמה היה גבוה ולאין היה נוטה וכמה היה רחב אם אמר לפני החמה לא אמר כלום

MISHNA: How do they examine the witnesses who come to testify about the new moon? They deal with them in order, as the pair of witnesses that arrives first they examine first. They bring in the greater of the two witnesses, and they say to him: Say how you saw the moon. Was it in front of the sun or behind the sun? To its north or to its south? How high was the moon over the horizon, and in which direction did it tilt? And how wide was it? If, for example, he said that he saw the moon in front of the sun, he has not said anything of substance, as this is impossible and therefore he is either mistaken or lying.

ואחר כך היו מכניסין את השני ובודקין אותו אם נמצאו דבריהם מכוונים עדותן קיימת ושאר כל הזוגות שואלין אותן ראשי דברים לא שהיו צריכים להם אלא כדי שלא יצאו בפחי נפש בשביל שיהו רגילים לבוא

And after they finish hearing the first witness’s testimony, they would bring in the second witness and examine him in a similar manner. If their statements match, their testimony is accepted and the court sanctifies the New Moon. And the court then asks all the other pairs of witnesses certain general matters, without probing into all the details. They do this not because they require the additional testimony, but so that the witnesses should not leave disappointed, and so that the witnesses should be accustomed to coming to testify, and will not hesitate to come the next time, when they might be needed.

גמ׳ היינו לפני החמה היינו לצפונה היינו לאחר החמה היינו לדרומה אמר אביי פגימתה לפני החמה או לאחר החמה אם אמר לפני החמה לא אמר כלום

GEMARA: The Gemara asks: In front of the sun is the same as to its north, and behind the sun is the same as to its south. Why would the court ask the witnesses both sets of questions? Abaye said: The first question does not refer to the moon’s position relative to the sun, but to the concave side of the moon, whether it was before the sun, pointing toward it, or behind the sun, pointing away from it. If he said that it was before the sun, he has said nothing.

דאמר רבי יוחנן מאי דכתיב המשל ופחד עמו עושה שלום במרומיו מעולם לא ראתה חמה פגימתה של לבנה ולא פגימתה של קשת פגימתה של לבנה דחלשה דעתה פגימתה של קשת דלא לימרו עובדי החמה

As Rabbi Yoḥanan said: What is the meaning of that which is written: “Dominion and fear are with Him, He makes peace in His high places” (Job 25:2)? It means that the sun has never seen the concave side of the new moon, nor has it ever seen the concave side of a rainbow, both of which always face away from the sun. It has never seen the concave side of the moon, as the moon would be distressed by a sense of inadequacy if its concave side faced the sun. Therefore the sun sees only the full roundness of its convex side. In this way He makes peace in His high places between the sun and the moon. Furthermore, the sun has never seen the concave side of a rainbow, so that the worshippers of the sun not say, as though the sun is a god,