More on the baraita, with a shift in explanation – when there’s a claimant against movable property, there’s no real concern of bias on the part of the creditor. Note the explicit difference – most of the time – between land a movable property. Also: the “apotiki” lien, which complicates the given that movable property won’t be getting a lien on it, as indeed it can (when attached to property).
Click here for the Talking Talmud podcast on Bava Batra 44/71a>.’”
To listen: Click the link above. Or subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Or join the Talking Talmud WhatsApp group, and receive the link as soon as it goes up.
