More on how an ox shifts from being “tam” to “mu’ad” – is the ox or the person whose somewhat negligence has given it room to gore? Also, the case of a person who uses a second party’s dog to cause harm to a third party – who’s responsible from a financial perspective? The Gemara attempts to resolve the dog case with the ox case.
Click here for the Talking Talmud podcast on Bava Kamma 24/a>.
To listen: Click the link above. Or subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Or join the Talking Talmud WhatsApp group, and receive the link as soon as it goes up.