Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Skip to content

Today's Daf Yomi

January 30, 2020 | ื“ืณ ื‘ืฉื‘ื˜ ืชืฉืดืค

  • This month's learning is sponsored by Terri Krivosha for the Refuah Shlemah of her husband Harav Hayim Yehuda Ben Faiga Rivah.ย 

  • This month's learning is dedicated by Debbie and Yossi Gevir to Rabbanit Michelle and the Hadran Zoom group for their kindness, support, and care during a medically challenging year.

Berakhot 27

What does it mean “until four hours” – until and not including the fourth hour or until and including? Who do we hold like regarding times for the morning prayer and for the afternoon prayer? Can one pray arvit, the nighttime prayer, on Friday afternoon before sunset? And if one does this, is it considered Shabbat for them? If they accidentally accepted Shabbat early, thinking it was nighttime (i.e. gray rainy day), when they realize their mistake, is it Shabbat for them? Is arvit obligatory or optional? Rabban Gamliel and Rabbi Yehoshua disagree regarding this and Rabban Gamliel embarassed Rabbi Yehoshua in the biet midrash because of their disagreement. The people got angry at Rabban Gamliel and removed him from his position of being head of the beit midrash. There was a discussion about whether to replace him with Rabbi Yehoshua, Rabbi Akiva or Rabbi Elazar ben Azaria. The latter was chosen and he went to consult with his wife about whether to take the job.

ืชื•ื›ืŸ ื–ื” ืชื•ืจื’ื ื’ื ืœ: ืขื‘ืจื™ืช

ื”ื™ื™ื ื• ืจื‘ื ืŸ

is identical to the opinion of the Rabbis, as the end of the period that begins with the midpoint of the afternoon is sunset.

ืืœื ืžืื™ ืขื“ ื•ืœื ืขื“ ื‘ื›ืœืœ ืื™ืžื ืกื™ืคื ื•ืฉืœ ืžื•ืกืคื™ืŸ ื›ืœ ื”ื™ื•ื ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ืื•ืžืจ ืขื“ ืฉื‘ืข ืฉืขื•ืช ื•ืชื ื™ื ื”ื™ื• ืœืคื ื™ื• ืฉืชื™ ืชืคืœื•ืช ืื—ืช ืฉืœ ืžื•ืกืฃ ื•ืื—ืช ืฉืœ ืžื ื—ื” ืžืชืคืœืœ ืฉืœ ืžื ื—ื” ื•ืื—ืจ ื›ืš ืฉืœ ืžื•ืกืฃ ืฉื–ื• ืชื“ื™ืจื” ื•ื–ื• ืื™ื ื” ืชื“ื™ืจื” ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ืื•ืžืจ ืžืชืคืœืœ ืฉืœ ืžื•ืกืฃ ื•ืื—ืจ ื›ืš ืฉืœ ืžื ื—ื” ืฉื–ื• ืขื•ื‘ืจืช ื•ื–ื• ืื™ื ื” ืขื•ื‘ืจืช

The Gemara immediately rejects this proof: Rather, what is the alternative? That until means until and not including? It remains problematic. Say the latter clause of the mishna: The additional prayer may be recited all day. Rabbi Yehuda says: It may be recited until the seven hours. And it was taught in a baraita: If the obligation to recite two prayers was before him, one the additional prayer and one the afternoon prayer, he prays the afternoon prayer first and the additional prayer thereafter, because this, the afternoon prayer, is recited on a frequent basis, and that, the additional prayer, is recited on a relatively infrequent basis as it is only recited on Shabbat, the New Moon, and Festivals. The principle states: When a frequent practice and an infrequent practice clash, the frequent practice takes precedence over the infrequent practice. Rabbi Yehuda says: He recites the additional prayer first and the afternoon prayer thereafter, because the time to recite this, the additional prayer, will soon elapse, and this, the time to recite the afternoon prayer, will not soon elapse, as one may recite it until the midpoint of the afternoon.

ืื™ ืืžืจืช ื‘ืฉืœืžื ืขื“ ื•ืขื“ ื‘ื›ืœืœ ื”ื™ื™ื ื• ื“ืžืฉื›ื—ืช ืœื”ื• ืฉืชื™ ืชืคืœื•ืช ื‘ื”ื“ื™ ื”ื“ื“ื™ ืืœื ืื™ ืืžืจืช ืขื“ ื•ืœื ืขื“ ื‘ื›ืœืœ ื”ื™ื›ื™ ืžืฉื›ื—ืช ืœื”ื• ืฉืชื™ ืชืคืœื•ืช ื‘ื”ื“ื™ ื”ื“ื“ื™ ื›ื™ื•ืŸ ื“ืืชื™ื ืœื” ืฉืœ ืžื ื—ื” ืื–ืœื ืœื” ืฉืœ ืžื•ืกืคื™ืŸ

The relevant point is: Granted, if you say that until means until and including, that is how you can find a situation where the times to recite two prayers, the afternoon prayer and the additional prayer, overlap. But if you say that until means until and not including, and that until seven hours means until the beginning of the seventh hour, noon, then how can you find a situation where the times to recite two prayers overlap? Once the time to recite the afternoon prayer, a half hour past noon, has arrived, the time to recite the additional prayer is already gone?

ืืœื ืžืื™ ืขื“ ื•ืขื“ ื‘ื›ืœืœ ืงืฉื™ื ืจื™ืฉื ืžืื™ ืื™ื›ื ื‘ื™ืŸ ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ืœืจื‘ื ืŸ ืžื™ ืกื‘ืจืช ื“ื”ืื™ ืคืœื’ ืžื ื—ื” ืคืœื’ ืื—ืจื•ื ื” ืงืืžืจ ืคืœื’ ืจืืฉื•ื ื” ืงืืžืจ ื•ื”ื›ื™ ืงืืžืจ ืื™ืžืช ื ืคื™ืง ืคืœื’ ืจืืฉื•ื ื” ื•ืขื™ื™ืœ ืคืœื’ ืื—ืจื•ื ื” ืžื›ื™ ื ืคืงื™ ืื—ืช ืขืฉืจื” ืฉืขื•ืช ื—ืกืจ ืจื‘ื™ืข

Rather, what is the alternative? That until means until and including? Then the first clause of the mishna is difficult, as explained above with regard to the midpoint of the afternoon: What is the halakhic difference between the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda and the opinion of the Rabbis? The Gemara answers: Do you think that when this midpoint of the afternoon was mentioned it was speaking of the period following the midpoint, the last part of the afternoon, from an hour-and-a-quarter before sunset until sunset? This was not the intention. Rather, it was speaking of the period prior to the midpoint, the first part of the afternoon, which, as explained above, is from nine-and-a-half hours after sunrise until an hour-and-a-quarter before sunset. Consequently, until the midpoint of the afternoon means until the end of the first half of that afternoon period. And this is what he is saying: When does the first half leave and the second half enter? From when eleven hours minus a quarter have passed since sunrise. Rabbi Yehudaโ€™s use of the term until always means until and including.

ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ื ื—ืžืŸ ืืฃ ืื ืŸ ื ืžื™ ืชื ื™ื ื

Practically speaking, this means that, according to Rabbi Yehuda, it is permissible to recite the morning prayer until the end of the fourth hour. In support of this Rav Naแธฅman said: We, too, learned this in a mishna:

ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ื‘ืŸ ื‘ื‘ื ื”ืขื™ื“ ื—ืžืฉื” ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืฉืžืžืื ื™ืŸ ืืช ื”ืงื˜ื ื” ื•ืฉืžืฉื™ืื™ืŸ ืืช ื”ืืฉื” ืขืœ ืคื™ ืขื“ ืื—ื“ ื•ืขืœ ืชืจื ื’ื•ืœ ืฉื ืกืงืœ ื‘ื™ืจื•ืฉืœื™ื ืขืœ ืฉื”ืจื’ ืืช ื”ื ืคืฉ ื•ืขืœ ื™ื™ืŸ ื‘ืŸ ืืจื‘ืขื™ื ื™ื•ื ืฉื ืชื ืกืš ืขืœ ื’ื‘ื™ ื”ืžื–ื‘ื— ื•ืขืœ ืชืžื™ื“ ืฉืœ ืฉื—ืจ ืฉืงืจื‘ ื‘ืืจื‘ืข ืฉืขื•ืช

Rabbi Yehuda ben Bava testified about five matters of halakha:
When an orphan girl, who was married off by her mother or brother before reaching the age of majority, reaches the age of majority, she may refuse to continue living with her husband and thereby retroactively annul their marriage. Normally, marriage refusals are discouraged. However, in specific instances where it is clear that if the marriage were to remain in effect it would engender problems related to levirate marriage and แธฅalitza, Rabbi Yehuda ben Bava testified that one may persuade the minor girl to refuse to continue living with her husband, thereby resolving the complications involved in this case.
And he testified that one may allow a woman who, after hearing of her husbandโ€™s death, seeks to remarry, to marry based on the testimony of one witness, as opposed to the two witnesses required for other testimonies of the Torah.
And he testified about a rooster that was stoned to death in Jerusalem for killing a person, in order to teach that the Torah law (Exodus 21:28) which requires the stoning of an ox that killed a person, applies to other animals as well.
And he testified about forty-day-old wine that was used for libation on the altar.
And he testified about the daily morning offering that was sacrificed at four hours of the day.

ืฉืžืข ืžื™ื ื” ืขื“ ื•ืขื“ ื‘ื›ืœืœ ืฉืžืข ืžื™ื ื”

Learn from this final testimony, which is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda, that until means until and including. The Gemara concludes: Indeed, learn from this.

ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ื›ื”ื ื ื”ืœื›ื” ื›ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ื”ื•ืื™ืœ ื•ืชื ืŸ ื‘ื‘ื—ื™ืจืชื ื›ื•ื•ืชื™ื”:

Based on this mishna, Rav Kahana said: The halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda since we learned in a mishna in the preferred tractate, Eduyyot, in accordance with his opinion. Since the halakha is ruled in accordance with all of the mishnayot in Eduyyot, the opinion of a tanna who rules in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda in that mishna means that the halakha is in accordance with that opinion.

ื•ืขืœ ืชืžื™ื“ ืฉืœ ืฉื—ืจ ืฉืงืจื‘ ื‘ืืจื‘ืข ืฉืขื•ืช: ืžืืŸ ืชื ื ืœื”ื ื“ืชื ืŸ ื•ื—ื ื”ืฉืžืฉ ื•ื ืžืก ื‘ืืจื‘ืข ืฉืขื•ืช

And about the daily morning offering that was sacrificed at four hours. Based on this, the Gemara attempts to identify the tanna who taught that which we learned in the mishna about the manna that fell for the children of Israel in the desert: โ€œAnd they gathered it morning by morning, each according to what he eats, and when the sun grew hot it meltedโ€ (Exodus 16:21); that took place four hours into the day.

ืืชื” ืื•ืžืจ ื‘ืืจื‘ืข ืฉืขื•ืช ืื• ืื™ื ื• ืืœื ื‘ืฉืฉ ืฉืขื•ืช ื›ืฉื”ื•ื ืื•ืžืจ ื›ื—ื ื”ื™ื•ื ื”ืจื™ ืฉืฉ ืฉืขื•ืช ืืžื•ืจ ื”ื ืžื” ืื ื™ ืžืงื™ื™ื ื•ื—ื ื”ืฉืžืฉ ื•ื ืžืก ื‘ืืจื‘ืข ืฉืขื•ืช ืžื ื™ ืœื ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ื•ืœื ืจื‘ื ืŸ ืื™ ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ืขื“ ืืจื‘ืข ืฉืขื•ืช ื ืžื™ ืฆืคืจื ื”ื•ื ืื™ ืจื‘ื ืŸ ืขื“ ื—ืฆื•ืช ื ืžื™ ืฆืคืจื ื”ื•ื

The baraita continues: Do you say that the time when the sun grew hot was at four hours, or perhaps it was only at six hours of the day? When the verse says: โ€œIn the heat of the dayโ€ (Genesis 18:1), six hours is already mentioned in the Torah as the heat of the day. How, then, do I establish the verse: โ€œAnd when the sun grew hot it meltedโ€? This must refer to an earlier time, at four hours. The Gemara asks: Who is the tanna of this mishna? It is neither Rabbi Yehuda nor the Sages. If it was in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda, until four hours is also considered morning, as he holds that the daily morning offering may still be sacrificed then, while here it says that in the morning the manna was gathered and it melted after the morning. If it was in accordance with the opinion of the Rabbis, until noon is also considered morning, since, according to the Sages, the daily morning offering could be sacrificed until noon. Apparently, this is an entirely new position.

ืื™ ื‘ืขื™ืช ืื™ืžื ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ืื™ ื‘ืขื™ืช ืื™ืžื ืจื‘ื ืŸ ืื™ ื‘ืขื™ืช ืื™ืžื ืจื‘ื ืŸ ืืžืจ ืงืจื ื‘ื‘ืงืจ ื‘ื‘ืงืจ ื—ืœืงื”ื• ืœืฉื ื™ ื‘ืงืจื™ื ื•ืื™ ื‘ืขื™ืช ืื™ืžื ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ื”ืื™ ื‘ืงืจ ื™ืชื™ืจื ืœื”ืงื“ื™ื ืœื• ืฉืขื” ืื—ืช ื“ื›ื•ืœื ืขืœืžื ืžื™ื”ื ื•ื—ื ื”ืฉืžืฉ ื•ื ืžืก ื‘ืืจื‘ืข ืฉืขื•ืช

The Gemara responds: If you wish, say that the mishna is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda, and if you wish, say instead that the mishna is in accordance with the opinion of the Rabbis. The Gemara explains: If you wish, say in accordance with the opinion of the Rabbis. The verse states: Morning by morning, divide it into two mornings. Morning, according to the Rabbis, lasts until noon. The repetition of the term morning in the Torah indicates that the period when the manna was gathered ended at the conclusion of the first half of the morning, i.e., the end of the third hour. And if you wish, say instead in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda, who would say that: This extra morning in the phrase morning by morning comes to make the end of the period when the manna was gathered an hour earlier. In any event, everyone agrees that the verse, And when the sun grew hot it melted, refers to four hours of the day.

ืžืื™ ืžืฉืžืข ืืžืจ ืจื‘ื™ ืื—ื ื‘ืจ ื™ืขืงื‘ ืืžืจ ืงืจื ื•ื—ื ื”ืฉืžืฉ ื•ื ืžืก ืื™ื–ื• ื”ื™ื ืฉืขื” ืฉื”ืฉืžืฉ ื—ื ื•ื”ืฆืœ ืฆื•ื ืŸ ื”ื•ื™ ืื•ืžืจ ื‘ืืจื‘ืข ืฉืขื•ืช:

The Gemara asks: From where is the inference drawn that this is the meaning of the verse? Rabbi Aแธฅa bar Yaโ€™akov said: The verse states: โ€œWhen the sun grew hot it melted.โ€ Which is the hour that the sun is hot but the shade remains cool, before the heat of the day, when even the shade is hot? You must say at four hours.

ืชืคืœืช ื”ืžื ื—ื” ืขื“ ื”ืขืจื‘ ื•ื›ื•ืณ: ืืžืจ ืœื™ื” ืจื‘ ื—ืกื“ื ืœืจื‘ ื™ืฆื—ืง ื”ืชื ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ื›ื”ื ื ื”ืœื›ื” ื›ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ื”ื•ืื™ืœ ื•ืชื ืŸ ื‘ื‘ื—ื™ืจืชื ื›ื•ื•ืชื™ื” ื”ื›ื ืžืื™ ืื™ืฉืชื™ืง ื•ืœื ืืžืจ ืœื™ื” ื•ืœื ืžื™ื“ื™ ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ื—ืกื“ื ื ื—ื–ื™ ืื ืŸ ืžื“ืจื‘ ืžืฆืœื™ ืฉืœ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืขืจื‘ ืฉื‘ืช ืžื‘ืขื•ื“ ื™ื•ื ืฉืžืข ืžื™ื ื” ื”ืœื›ื” ื›ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื”

We learned in the mishna: The Rabbis hold that the afternoon prayer may be recited until the evening. Rabbi Yehuda says: It may be recited only until the midpoint of the afternoon. Rav แธคisda said to Rav Yitzแธฅak: There, with regard to the morning prayer, Rav Kahana said: The halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda, since we learned in a mishna in the preferred tractate, Eduyyot, in accordance with his opinion. Here, what is the ruling? He was silent and said nothing to him, as he was familiar with no established ruling in this matter. Rav แธคisda said: Let us see and try to resolve this ourselves from the fact that Rav prayed the Shabbat prayers on the eve of Shabbat while it was still day. Learn from this that the halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda, and the time for the afternoon prayer ends at the midpoint of the afternoon, after which time one may recite the evening prayer.

ืื“ืจื‘ื” ืžื“ืจื‘ ื”ื•ื ื ื•ืจื‘ื ืŸ ืœื ื”ื•ื• ืžืฆืœื• ืขื“ ืื•ืจืชื ืฉืžืข ืžื™ื ื” ืื™ืŸ ื”ืœื›ื” ื›ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ื”ืฉืชื ื“ืœื ืืชืžืจ ื”ืœื›ืชื ืœื ื›ืžืจ ื•ืœื ื›ืžืจ ื“ืขื‘ื“ ื›ืžืจ ืขื‘ื“ ื•ื“ืขื‘ื“ ื›ืžืจ ืขื‘ื“

The Gemara immediately rejects the proof based on Ravโ€™s practice: On the contrary, from the fact that Rav Huna and the Sages, students of Rav, would not pray until evening, learn from that that the halakha is not in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda. The Gemara concludes: Now that the halakha was stated neither in accordance with the opinion of this Sage nor in accordance with the opinion of that Sage, one who acted in accordance with the opinion of this Sage has acted legitimately, and one who acted in accordance with the opinion of that Sage has acted legitimately, as this halakha is left to the decision of each individual.

ืจื‘ ืื™ืงืœืข ืœื‘ื™ ื’ื ื™ื‘ื ื•ืฆืœื™ ืฉืœ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืขืจื‘ ืฉื‘ืช ื•ื”ื•ื” ืžืฆืœื™ ืจื‘ื™ ื™ืจืžื™ื” ื‘ืจ ืื‘ื ืœืื—ื•ืจื™ ื“ืจื‘ ื•ืกื™ื™ื ืจื‘ ื•ืœื ืคืกืงื™ื” ืœืฆืœื•ืชื™ื” ื“ืจื‘ื™ ื™ืจืžื™ื” ืฉืžืข ืžื™ื ื” ืชืœืช ืฉืžืข ืžื™ื ื” ืžืชืคืœืœ ืื“ื ืฉืœ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืขืจื‘ ืฉื‘ืช ื•ืฉืžืข ืžื™ื ื” ืžืชืคืœืœ ืชืœืžื™ื“ ืื—ื•ืจื™ ืจื‘ื• ื•ืฉืžืข ืžื™ื ื” ืืกื•ืจ ืœืขื‘ื•ืจ ื›ื ื’ื“ ื”ืžืชืคืœืœื™ืŸ

The Gemara relates: Rav happened by the house of the Sage, Geniva, and he prayed the Shabbat prayer on the eve of Shabbat before nightfall. Rabbi Yirmeya bar Abba was praying behind Rav, and Rav finished his prayer but did not take three steps back and interrupt the prayer of Rabbi Yirmeya. Derive from this incident three halakhot: Derive from this that one may pray the Shabbat prayer on the eve of Shabbat before nightfall. And derive from this that a student may pray behind his rabbi. And derive from this that it is prohibited to pass before those who are praying.

ืžืกื™ื™ืข ืœื™ื” ืœืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ืฉืข ื‘ืŸ ืœื•ื™ ื“ืืžืจ ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ืฉืข ื‘ืŸ ืœื•ื™ ืืกื•ืจ ืœืขื‘ื•ืจ ื›ื ื’ื“ ื”ืžืชืคืœืœื™ืŸ ืื™ื ื™ ื•ื”ื ืจื‘ื™ ืืžื™ ื•ืจื‘ื™ ืืกื™ ื—ืœืคื™ ืจื‘ื™ ืืžื™ ื•ืจื‘ื™ ืืกื™ ื—ื•ืฅ ืœืืจื‘ืข ืืžื•ืช ื”ื•ื ื“ื—ืœืคื™

The Gemara responds: This supports the opinion of Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi, as Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: It is prohibited to pass before those who are praying. The Gemara asks: Is that so? Didnโ€™t Rabbi Ami and Rabbi Asi pass before those who were praying? The Gemara responds: Rabbi Ami and Rabbi Asi were beyond four cubits from those who were praying when they passed.

ื•ืจื‘ื™ ื™ืจืžื™ื” ื”ื™ื›ื™ ืขื‘ื™ื“ ื”ื›ื™ ื•ื”ื ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ืœืขื•ืœื ืืœ ื™ืชืคืœืœ ืื“ื

One particular detail was surprising: How did Rabbi Yirmeya act that way and pray behind Rav? Didnโ€™t Rav Yehuda say that Rav said: A person should never pray

ืœื ื›ื ื’ื“ ืจื‘ื• ื•ืœื ืื—ื•ืจื™ ืจื‘ื•

directly next to his rabbi, presumptuously indicating that he is his rabbiโ€™s equal, and behind his rabbi as it creates the impression that he is bowing to him (Tosafot)?

ื•ืชื ื™ื ืจื‘ื™ ืืœื™ืขื–ืจ ืื•ืžืจ ื”ืžืชืคืœืœ ืื—ื•ืจื™ ืจื‘ื• ื•ื”ื ื•ืชืŸ ืฉืœื•ื ืœืจื‘ื• ื•ื”ืžื—ื–ื™ืจ ืฉืœื•ื ืœืจื‘ื• ื•ื”ื—ื•ืœืง ืขืœ ื™ืฉื™ื‘ืชื• ืฉืœ ืจื‘ื• ื•ื”ืื•ืžืจ ื“ื‘ืจ ืฉืœื ืฉืžืข ืžืคื™ ืจื‘ื• ื’ื•ืจื ืœืฉื›ื™ื ื” ืฉืชืกืชืœืง ืžื™ืฉืจืืœ

And it was taught in a baraita, in a more extreme manner, as Rabbi Eliezer says: One who prays behind his rabbi and one who greets his rabbi without waiting for his rabbi to greet him first, one who returns his rabbiโ€™s greeting without saying: Greetings to you, rabbi, one who rivals his rabbiโ€™s yeshiva, i.e., establishes a yeshiva of his own and teaches during his rabbiโ€™s lifetime without his consent (Rambam), and one who says something in the name of his rabbi which he did not hear directly from his rabbi, causes the Divine Presence to withdraw from Israel.

ืฉืื ื™ ืจื‘ื™ ื™ืจืžื™ื” ื‘ืจ ืื‘ื ื“ืชืœืžื™ื“ ื—ื‘ืจ ื”ื•ื” ื•ื”ื™ื™ื ื• ื“ืงืืžืจ ืœื™ื” ืจื‘ื™ ื™ืจืžื™ื” ื‘ืจ ืื‘ื ืœืจื‘ ืžื™ ื‘ื“ืœืช ืืžืจ ืœื™ื” ืื™ืŸ ื‘ื“ื™ืœื ื ื•ืœื ืืžืจ ืžื™ ื‘ื“ื™ืœ ืžืจ

With regard to Rabbi Yirmeyaโ€™s conduct, the Gemara explains that Rabbi Yirmeya bar Abba is different, as he was not a mere student of Rav. Rather, he was a disciple-colleague and was, therefore, permitted to act that way. And that is why on one occasion, when Rav prayed the Shabbat prayer early, Rabbi Yirmeya bar Abba asked him: Did you distance yourself from labor and accept the sanctity of Shabbat? Rav said to him: Yes, I distanced myself. And Rabbi Yirmeya did not say to him: Did the Master distance himself, as would have been appropriate had he merely been Ravโ€™s student.

ื•ืžื™ ื‘ื“ื™ืœ ื•ื”ืืžืจ ืจื‘ื™ ืื‘ื™ืŸ ืคืขื ืื—ืช ื”ืชืคืœืœ ืจื‘ื™ ืฉืœ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืขืจื‘ ืฉื‘ืช ื•ื ื›ื ืก ืœืžืจื—ืฅ ื•ื™ืฆื ื•ืฉื ื” ืœืŸ ืคืจืงื™ืŸ ื•ืขื“ื™ื™ืŸ ืœื ื—ืฉื›ื” ืืžืจ ืจื‘ื ื”ื”ื•ื ื“ื ื›ื ืก ืœื”ื–ื™ืข ื•ืงื•ื“ื ื’ื–ื™ืจื” ื”ื•ื”

Although Rav replied that he distanced himself from labor, did he indeed need to distance himself from labor? Didnโ€™t Rabbi Avin say: Once Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi prayed the Shabbat prayer on the eve of Shabbat before nightfall. He then entered the bathhouse and emerged and taught us our chapters that we had learned, and it was not yet dark. Rava said: That is a case where he had entered the bathhouse to perspire, and it was before the Sages issued a decree prohibiting perspiring in a bathhouse on Shabbat.

ืื™ื ื™ ื•ื”ื ืื‘ื™ื™ ืฉืจื ืœื™ื” ืœืจื‘ ื“ื™ืžื™ ื‘ืจ ืœื™ื•ืื™ ืœื›ื‘ืจื•ื™ื™ ืกืœื™

The Gemara asks: Is that so, that he was required to refrain from labor? Didnโ€™t Abaye permit Rav Dimi bar Livaโ€™ei to fumigate baskets with sulfur even though he had already recited the Shabbat prayer, indicating that it is permitted to perform labor even after the Shabbat prayer?

ื”ื”ื•ื ื˜ืขื•ืชื ื”ื•ืื™

The Gemara responds: That was an error, as Rav Dimi did not intend to begin Shabbat early. It was a cloudy day and he mistakenly thought that the sun had set and that was why he prayed. Consequently, even though he prayed, the Shabbat prayer did not obligate him to conduct himself in accordance with the sanctity of Shabbat and he was allowed to perform labor even after his prayer.

ื•ื˜ืขื•ืชื ืžื™ ื”ื“ืจื ื•ื”ื ืืžืจ ืื‘ื™ื“ืŸ ืคืขื ืื—ืช ื ืชืงืฉืจื• ืฉืžื™ื ื‘ืขื‘ื™ื ื›ืกื‘ื•ืจื™ื ื”ืขื ืœื•ืžืจ ื—ืฉื›ื” ื”ื•ื ื ื›ื ืกื• ืœื‘ื™ืช ื”ื›ื ืกืช ื•ื”ืชืคืœืœื• ืฉืœ ืžื•ืฆืื™ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืฉื‘ืช ื•ื ืชืคื–ืจื• ื”ืขื‘ื™ื ื•ื–ืจื—ื” ื”ื—ืžื”

The Gemara goes on to ask: Can a mistake be reversed, enabling one to conduct himself as if he had not prayed? Didnโ€™t Avidan, a student of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi, say: Once the sky became overcast, leading the people to think that it was the dark of night; they entered the synagogue and recited the evening prayer of the conclusion of Shabbat on Shabbat. And later, the clouds cleared and the sun shone, indicating that it was still day.

ื•ื‘ืื• ื•ืฉืืœื• ืืช ืจื‘ื™ ื•ืืžืจ ื”ื•ืื™ืœ ื•ื”ืชืคืœืœื• ื”ืชืคืœืœื• ืฉืื ื™ ืฆื‘ื•ืจ ื“ืœื ืžื˜ืจื—ื™ื ืŸ ืœื”ื•:

And they came and asked Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi what they should do, and he said: Since they have prayed, they have prayed, and they need not pray again. Although they prayed erroneously, their mistake is not reversible and what was done remains. The Gemara responds: A community is different in that we do not burden them to pray again.

ืืžืจ ืจื‘ื™ ื—ื™ื™ื ื‘ืจ ืื‘ื™ืŸ ืจื‘ ืฆืœื™ ืฉืœ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืขืจื‘ ืฉื‘ืช ืจื‘ื™ ื™ืืฉื™ื” ืžืฆืœื™ ืฉืœ ืžื•ืฆืื™ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืฉื‘ืช ืจื‘ ืฆืœื™ ืฉืœ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืขืจื‘ ืฉื‘ืช ืื•ืžืจ ืงื“ื•ืฉื” ืขืœ ื”ื›ื•ืก ืื• ืื™ื ื• ืื•ืžืจ ืงื“ื•ืฉื” ืขืœ ื”ื›ื•ืก ืชื ืฉืžืข ื“ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ื ื—ืžืŸ ืืžืจ ืฉืžื•ืืœ ืžืชืคืœืœ ืื“ื ืฉืœ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืขืจื‘ ืฉื‘ืช ื•ืื•ืžืจ ืงื“ื•ืฉื” ืขืœ ื”ื›ื•ืก ื•ื”ืœื›ืชื ื›ื•ื•ืชื™ื”

The Gemara continues to discuss the possibility of reciting the evening prayer early, even on Shabbat. Rabbi แธคiyya bar Avin said: Rav prayed the Shabbat prayer on the eve of Shabbat before nightfall. Rabbi Yoshiya would pray the evening prayer of the conclusion of Shabbat on Shabbat. With regard to the fact that Rav prayed the Shabbat prayer on the eve of Shabbat before nightfall, the dilemma is raised: In those cases, did he recite kiddush over the cup of wine, or did he not recite kiddush over the cup of wine before the stars emerged? Come and hear a resolution to this, as Rav Naแธฅman said that Shmuel said: One prays the Shabbat prayer on the eve of Shabbat before nightfall and recites kiddush over the cup of wine. And the halakha is in accordance with his ruling.

ืจื‘ื™ ื™ืืฉื™ื” ืžืฆืœื™ ืฉืœ ืžื•ืฆืื™ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืฉื‘ืช ืื•ืžืจ ื”ื‘ื“ืœื” ืขืœ ื”ื›ื•ืก ืื• ืื™ื ื• ืื•ืžืจ ื”ื‘ื“ืœื” ืขืœ ื”ื›ื•ืก ืชื ืฉืžืข ื“ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ืืžืจ ืฉืžื•ืืœ ืžืชืคืœืœ ืื“ื ืฉืœ ืžื•ืฆืื™ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืฉื‘ืช ื•ืื•ืžืจ ื”ื‘ื“ืœื” ืขืœ ื”ื›ื•ืก

A similar dilemma was raised concerning the fact that Rabbi Yoshiya would pray the evening prayer of the conclusion of Shabbat on Shabbat: After praying, while it is still Shabbat, does he recite havdala over the cup of wine or does one not recite havdala over the cup of wine? Come and hear a resolution to this, as Rav Yehuda said that Shmuel said: One prays the evening prayer of the conclusion of Shabbat on Shabbat and recites havdala over the cup of wine.

ืืžืจ ืจื‘ื™ ื–ื™ืจื ืืžืจ ืจื‘ื™ ืืกื™ ืืžืจ ืจื‘ื™ ืืœืขื–ืจ ืืžืจ ืจื‘ื™ ื—ื ื™ื ื ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ื‘ืฆื“ ืขืžื•ื“ ื–ื” ื”ืชืคืœืœ ืจื‘ื™ ื™ืฉืžืขืืœ ื‘ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื•ืกื™ ืฉืœ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืขืจื‘ ืฉื‘ืช

Rabbi Zeira said that Rabbi Asi said that Rabbi Elazar said that Rabbi แธคanina said that Rav said: Alongside this specific pillar before me, Rabbi Yishmael, son of Rabbi Yosei, prayed the Shabbat prayer on the eve of Shabbat before nightfall.

ื›ื™ ืืชื ืขื•ืœื ืืžืจ ื‘ืฆื“ ืชืžืจื” ื”ื•ื” ื•ืœื ื‘ืฆื“ ืขืžื•ื“ ื”ื•ื” ื•ืœื ืจื‘ื™ ื™ืฉืžืขืืœ ื‘ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื•ืกื™ ื”ื•ื” ืืœื ืจื‘ื™ ืืœืขื–ืจ ื‘ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื•ืกื™ ื”ื•ื” ื•ืœื ืฉืœ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืขืจื‘ ืฉื‘ืช ื”ื•ื” ืืœื ืฉืœ ืžื•ืฆืื™ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืฉื‘ืช ื”ื•ื”:

But when Ulla came from the Eretz Yisrael to Babylonia, he related a different version of this story. He said that he had heard: This transpired beside a palm tree, not beside a pillar, and it was not Rabbi Yishmael, son of Rabbi Yosei, but it was Rabbi Elazar, son of Rabbi Yosei, and it was not the Shabbat prayer on Shabbat eve before nightfall, rather it was the prayer of the conclusion of Shabbat on Shabbat.

ืชืคืœืช ื”ืขืจื‘ ืื™ืŸ ืœื” ืงื‘ืข: ืžืื™ ืื™ืŸ ืœื” ืงื‘ืข ืื™ืœื™ืžื ื“ืื™ ื‘ืขื™ ืžืฆืœื™ ื›ื•ืœื™ื” ืœื™ืœื™ื ืœื™ืชื ื™ ืชืคืœืช ื”ืขืจื‘ ื›ืœ ื”ืœื™ืœื” ืืœื ืžืื™ ืื™ืŸ ืœื” ืงื‘ืข

We learned in the mishna: The evening prayer may be recited throughout the night and is not fixed to a specific hour. The Gemara asks: What is the meaning of is not fixed? If you say that if one wishes, he may pray throughout the night, then let the mishna teach: The evening prayer may be recited throughout the night. Rather, what is the meaning of not fixed?

ื›ืžืืŸ ื“ืืžืจ ืชืคืœืช ืขืจื‘ื™ืช ืจืฉื•ืช ื“ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ืืžืจ ืฉืžื•ืืœ ืชืคืœืช ืขืจื‘ื™ืช ืจื‘ืŸ ื’ืžืœื™ืืœ ืื•ืžืจ ื—ื•ื‘ื” ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ืฉืข ืื•ืžืจ ืจืฉื•ืช ืืžืจ ืื‘ื™ื™ ื”ืœื›ื” ื›ื“ื‘ืจื™ ื”ืื•ืžืจ ื—ื•ื‘ื” ื•ืจื‘ื ืืžืจ ื”ืœื›ื” ื›ื“ื‘ืจื™ ื”ืื•ืžืจ ืจืฉื•ืช

It is in accordance with the opinion of the one who said: The evening prayer is optional. As Rav Yehuda said that Shmuel said with regard to the evening prayer. Rabban Gamliel says: It is obligatory. Rabbi Yehoshua says: It is optional. Abaye said: The halakha is in accordance with the statement of the one who said: The evening prayer is obligatory. Rava said: The halakha is in accordance with the statement of the one who said: The evening prayer is optional.

ืชื ื• ืจื‘ื ืŸ ืžืขืฉื” ื‘ืชืœืžื™ื“ ืื—ื“ ืฉื‘ื ืœืคื ื™ ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ืฉืข ืืžืจ ืœื• ืชืคืœืช ืขืจื‘ื™ืช ืจืฉื•ืช ืื• ื—ื•ื‘ื” ืืžืจ ืœื™ื” ืจืฉื•ืช

The Sages taught: There was an incident involving a student, who came before Rabbi Yehoshua. The student said to him: Is the evening prayer optional or obligatory? Rabbi Yehoshua said to him: Optional.

ื‘ื ืœืคื ื™ ืจื‘ืŸ ื’ืžืœื™ืืœ ืืžืจ ืœื• ืชืคืœืช ืขืจื‘ื™ืช ืจืฉื•ืช ืื• ื—ื•ื‘ื” ืืžืจ ืœื• ื—ื•ื‘ื” ืืžืจ ืœื• ื•ื”ืœื ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ืฉืข ืืžืจ ืœื™ ืจืฉื•ืช ืืžืจ ืœื• ื”ืžืชืŸ ืขื“ ืฉื™ื›ื ืกื• ื‘ืขืœื™ ืชืจื™ืกื™ืŸ ืœื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžื“ืจืฉ

The same student came before Rabban Gamliel and said to him: Is the evening prayer optional or obligatory? Rabban Gamliel said to him: Obligatory. The student said to Rabban Gamliel: But didnโ€™t Rabbi Yehoshua tell me that the evening prayer is optional? Rabban Gamliel said to the student: Wait until the โ€œmasters of the shields,โ€ a reference to the Torah scholars who battle in the war of Torah, enter the study hall, at which point we will discuss this issue.

ื›ืฉื ื›ื ืกื• ื‘ืขืœื™ ืชืจื™ืกื™ืŸ ืขืžื“ ื”ืฉื•ืืœ ื•ืฉืืœ ืชืคืœืช ืขืจื‘ื™ืช ืจืฉื•ืช ืื• ื—ื•ื‘ื” ืืžืจ ืœื• ืจื‘ืŸ ื’ืžืœื™ืืœ ื—ื•ื‘ื” ืืžืจ ืœื”ื ืจื‘ืŸ ื’ืžืœื™ืืœ ืœื—ื›ืžื™ื ื›ืœื•ื ื™ืฉ ืื“ื ืฉื—ื•ืœืง ื‘ื“ื‘ืจ ื–ื” ืืžืจ ืœื™ื” ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ืฉืข ืœืื• ืืžืจ ืœื• ื•ื”ืœื ืžืฉืžืš ืืžืจื• ืœื™ ืจืฉื•ืช

When the masters of the shields entered, the questioner stood before everyone present and asked: Is the evening prayer optional or obligatory? Rabban Gamliel said to him: Obligatory. In order to ascertain whether or not Rabbi Yehoshua still maintained his opinion, Rabban Gamliel said to the Sages: Is there any person who disputes this matter? Rabbi Yehoshua said to him: No, no one disagrees. In deference to the Nasi, he did not wish to argue with him publicly (Tziyyun LeNefesh แธคayya). Rabban Gamliel said to Rabbi Yehoshua: But was it not in your name that they told me that the evening prayer is optional?

ืืžืจ ืœื™ื” ื™ื”ื•ืฉืข ืขืžื•ื“ ืขืœ ืจื’ืœื™ืš ื•ื™ืขื™ื“ื• ื‘ืš ืขืžื“ ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ืฉืข ืขืœ ืจื’ืœื™ื• ื•ืืžืจ ืืœืžืœื ืื ื™ ื—ื™ ื•ื”ื•ื ืžืช ื™ื›ื•ืœ ื”ื—ื™ ืœื”ื›ื—ื™ืฉ ืืช ื”ืžืช ื•ืขื›ืฉื™ื• ืฉืื ื™ ื—ื™ ื•ื”ื•ื ื—ื™ ื”ื™ืืš ื™ื›ื•ืœ ื”ื—ื™ ืœื”ื›ื—ื™ืฉ ืืช ื”ื—ื™

Rabban Gamliel said to Rabbi Yehoshua: Yehoshua, stand on your feet and they will testify against you. Rabbi Yehoshua stood on his feet and said: If I were alive and the student were dead, the living can contradict the dead, and I could deny issuing that ruling. Now that I am alive and he is alive, how can the living contradict the living? I have no choice but to admit that I said it.

ื”ื™ื” ืจื‘ืŸ ื’ืžืœื™ืืœ ื™ื•ืฉื‘ ื•ื“ื•ืจืฉ ื•ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ืฉืข ืขื•ืžื“ ืขืœ ืจื’ืœื™ื• ืขื“ ืฉืจื ื ื• ื›ืœ ื”ืขื ื•ืืžืจื• ืœื—ื•ืฆืคื™ืช ื”ืชื•ืจื’ืžืŸ ืขืžื•ื“ ื•ืขืžื“

In the meantime, Rabban Gamliel, as the Nasi, was sitting and lecturing, and Rabbi Yehoshua all the while was standing on his feet, because Rabban Gamliel did not instruct him to sit. He remained standing in deference to the Nasi. This continued for some time, until it aroused great resentment against Rabban Gamliel, and all of the people assembled began murmuring and said to แธคutzpit the disseminator: Stop conveying Rabban Gamlielโ€™s lecture. And he stopped.

ืืžืจื™ ืขื“ ื›ืžื” ื ืฆืขืจื™ื” ื•ื ื™ื–ื™ืœ ื‘ืจืืฉ ื”ืฉื ื” ืืฉืชืงื“ ืฆืขืจื™ื” ื‘ื‘ื›ื•ืจื•ืช ื‘ืžืขืฉื” ื“ืจื‘ื™ ืฆื“ื•ืง ืฆืขืจื™ื” ื”ื›ื ื ืžื™ ืฆืขืจื™ื” ืชื ื•ื ืขื‘ืจื™ื”

The Gemara relates that in their murmuring they said: How long will Rabban Gamliel continue afflicting him? Last year on Rosh HaShana, he afflicted him; Rabban Gamliel ordered Rabbi Yehoshua to come to him carrying his staff and bag, on the day on which Yom Kippur occurred, according to Rabbi Yehoshuaโ€™s calculations. Regarding the firstborn, in the incident involving the question of Rabbi Tzadok, he afflicted him just as he did now, and forced him to remain standing as punishment for his failure to defend his differing opinion. Here too, he is afflicting him. Let us remove him from his position as Nasi.

ืžืืŸ ื ื•ืงื™ื ืœื™ื” ื ื•ืงืžื™ื” ืœืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ืฉืข ื‘ืขืœ ืžืขืฉื” ื”ื•ื ื ื•ืงืžื™ื” ืœืจื‘ื™ ืขืงื™ื‘ื ื“ื™ืœืžื ืขื ื™ืฉ ืœื™ื” ื“ืœื™ืช ืœื™ื” ื–ื›ื•ืช ืื‘ื•ืช

It was so agreed, but the question arose: Who shall we establish in his place? Shall we establish Rabbi Yehoshua in his place? The Sages rejected that option because Rabbi Yehoshua was party to the incident for which Rabban Gamliel was deposed. Appointing him would be extremely upsetting for Rabban Gamliel. Shall we establish Rabbi Akiva in his place? The Sages rejected that option because Rabbi Akiva, who descended from a family of converts, would be vulnerable. Perhaps due to Rabban Gamlielโ€™s resentment he would cause him to be divinely punished as he lacks the merit of his ancestors to protect him.

ืืœื ื ื•ืงืžื™ื” ืœืจื‘ื™ ืืœืขื–ืจ ื‘ืŸ ืขื–ืจื™ื” ื“ื”ื•ื ื—ื›ื ื•ื”ื•ื ืขืฉื™ืจ ื•ื”ื•ื ืขืฉื™ืจื™ ืœืขื–ืจื ื”ื•ื ื—ื›ื ื“ืื™ ืžืงืฉื™ ืœื™ื” ืžืคืจืง ืœื™ื” ื•ื”ื•ื ืขืฉื™ืจ ื“ืื™ ืื™ืช ืœื™ื” ืœืคืœื•ื—ื™ ืœื‘ื™ ืงื™ืกืจ ืืฃ ื”ื•ื ืื™ื–ื™ืœ ื•ืคืœื— ื•ื”ื•ื ืขืฉื™ืจื™ ืœืขื–ืจื ื“ืื™ืช ืœื™ื” ื–ื›ื•ืช ืื‘ื•ืช ื•ืœื ืžืฆื™ ืขื ื™ืฉ ืœื™ื” ืืชื• ื•ืืžืจื• ืœื™ื” ื ื™ื—ื ืœื™ื” ืœืžืจ ื“ืœื™ื”ื•ื™ ืจื™ืฉ ืžืชื™ื‘ืชื ืืžืจ ืœื”ื• ืื™ื–ื™ืœ ื•ืื™ืžืœื™ืš ื‘ืื™ื ืฉื™ ื‘ื™ืชื™ ืื–ืœ ื•ืืžืœื™ืš ื‘ื“ื‘ื™ืชื”ื• ืืžืจื” ืœื™ื”

Rather, suggested the Sages, let us establish Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya in his place, his outstanding characteristics set him apart from the other candidates. He is wise, rich, and a tenth generation descendant of Ezra. The Gemara explains: He is wise, so if Rabban Gamliel raises a challenge in matters of Torah, he will answer it and not be embarrassed. And he is rich, so if the need arises to pay homage to the Caesarโ€™s court and serve as a representative of Israel to lobby and negotiate, he has sufficient wealth to cover the costs of the long journeys, taxes, and gifts, so he too is able to go and pay homage. And he is a tenth generation descendant of Ezra, so he has the merit of his ancestors, and Rabban Gamliel will be unable to cause him to be punished. They came and said to him: Would the Master consent to being the Head of the Yeshiva? He said to them: I will go and consult with my household. He went and consulted with his wife. She said to him:

  • This month's learning is sponsored by Terri Krivosha for the Refuah Shlemah of her husband Harav Hayim Yehuda Ben Faiga Rivah.ย 

  • This month's learning is dedicated by Debbie and Yossi Gevir to Rabbanit Michelle and the Hadran Zoom group for their kindness, support, and care during a medically challenging year.

Want to explore more about the Daf?

See insights from our partners, contributors and community of women learners

Sorry, there aren't any posts in this category yet. We're adding more soon!

Berakhot 27

The William Davidson Talmud | Powered by Sefaria

Berakhot 27

ื”ื™ื™ื ื• ืจื‘ื ืŸ

is identical to the opinion of the Rabbis, as the end of the period that begins with the midpoint of the afternoon is sunset.

ืืœื ืžืื™ ืขื“ ื•ืœื ืขื“ ื‘ื›ืœืœ ืื™ืžื ืกื™ืคื ื•ืฉืœ ืžื•ืกืคื™ืŸ ื›ืœ ื”ื™ื•ื ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ืื•ืžืจ ืขื“ ืฉื‘ืข ืฉืขื•ืช ื•ืชื ื™ื ื”ื™ื• ืœืคื ื™ื• ืฉืชื™ ืชืคืœื•ืช ืื—ืช ืฉืœ ืžื•ืกืฃ ื•ืื—ืช ืฉืœ ืžื ื—ื” ืžืชืคืœืœ ืฉืœ ืžื ื—ื” ื•ืื—ืจ ื›ืš ืฉืœ ืžื•ืกืฃ ืฉื–ื• ืชื“ื™ืจื” ื•ื–ื• ืื™ื ื” ืชื“ื™ืจื” ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ืื•ืžืจ ืžืชืคืœืœ ืฉืœ ืžื•ืกืฃ ื•ืื—ืจ ื›ืš ืฉืœ ืžื ื—ื” ืฉื–ื• ืขื•ื‘ืจืช ื•ื–ื• ืื™ื ื” ืขื•ื‘ืจืช

The Gemara immediately rejects this proof: Rather, what is the alternative? That until means until and not including? It remains problematic. Say the latter clause of the mishna: The additional prayer may be recited all day. Rabbi Yehuda says: It may be recited until the seven hours. And it was taught in a baraita: If the obligation to recite two prayers was before him, one the additional prayer and one the afternoon prayer, he prays the afternoon prayer first and the additional prayer thereafter, because this, the afternoon prayer, is recited on a frequent basis, and that, the additional prayer, is recited on a relatively infrequent basis as it is only recited on Shabbat, the New Moon, and Festivals. The principle states: When a frequent practice and an infrequent practice clash, the frequent practice takes precedence over the infrequent practice. Rabbi Yehuda says: He recites the additional prayer first and the afternoon prayer thereafter, because the time to recite this, the additional prayer, will soon elapse, and this, the time to recite the afternoon prayer, will not soon elapse, as one may recite it until the midpoint of the afternoon.

ืื™ ืืžืจืช ื‘ืฉืœืžื ืขื“ ื•ืขื“ ื‘ื›ืœืœ ื”ื™ื™ื ื• ื“ืžืฉื›ื—ืช ืœื”ื• ืฉืชื™ ืชืคืœื•ืช ื‘ื”ื“ื™ ื”ื“ื“ื™ ืืœื ืื™ ืืžืจืช ืขื“ ื•ืœื ืขื“ ื‘ื›ืœืœ ื”ื™ื›ื™ ืžืฉื›ื—ืช ืœื”ื• ืฉืชื™ ืชืคืœื•ืช ื‘ื”ื“ื™ ื”ื“ื“ื™ ื›ื™ื•ืŸ ื“ืืชื™ื ืœื” ืฉืœ ืžื ื—ื” ืื–ืœื ืœื” ืฉืœ ืžื•ืกืคื™ืŸ

The relevant point is: Granted, if you say that until means until and including, that is how you can find a situation where the times to recite two prayers, the afternoon prayer and the additional prayer, overlap. But if you say that until means until and not including, and that until seven hours means until the beginning of the seventh hour, noon, then how can you find a situation where the times to recite two prayers overlap? Once the time to recite the afternoon prayer, a half hour past noon, has arrived, the time to recite the additional prayer is already gone?

ืืœื ืžืื™ ืขื“ ื•ืขื“ ื‘ื›ืœืœ ืงืฉื™ื ืจื™ืฉื ืžืื™ ืื™ื›ื ื‘ื™ืŸ ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ืœืจื‘ื ืŸ ืžื™ ืกื‘ืจืช ื“ื”ืื™ ืคืœื’ ืžื ื—ื” ืคืœื’ ืื—ืจื•ื ื” ืงืืžืจ ืคืœื’ ืจืืฉื•ื ื” ืงืืžืจ ื•ื”ื›ื™ ืงืืžืจ ืื™ืžืช ื ืคื™ืง ืคืœื’ ืจืืฉื•ื ื” ื•ืขื™ื™ืœ ืคืœื’ ืื—ืจื•ื ื” ืžื›ื™ ื ืคืงื™ ืื—ืช ืขืฉืจื” ืฉืขื•ืช ื—ืกืจ ืจื‘ื™ืข

Rather, what is the alternative? That until means until and including? Then the first clause of the mishna is difficult, as explained above with regard to the midpoint of the afternoon: What is the halakhic difference between the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda and the opinion of the Rabbis? The Gemara answers: Do you think that when this midpoint of the afternoon was mentioned it was speaking of the period following the midpoint, the last part of the afternoon, from an hour-and-a-quarter before sunset until sunset? This was not the intention. Rather, it was speaking of the period prior to the midpoint, the first part of the afternoon, which, as explained above, is from nine-and-a-half hours after sunrise until an hour-and-a-quarter before sunset. Consequently, until the midpoint of the afternoon means until the end of the first half of that afternoon period. And this is what he is saying: When does the first half leave and the second half enter? From when eleven hours minus a quarter have passed since sunrise. Rabbi Yehudaโ€™s use of the term until always means until and including.

ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ื ื—ืžืŸ ืืฃ ืื ืŸ ื ืžื™ ืชื ื™ื ื

Practically speaking, this means that, according to Rabbi Yehuda, it is permissible to recite the morning prayer until the end of the fourth hour. In support of this Rav Naแธฅman said: We, too, learned this in a mishna:

ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ื‘ืŸ ื‘ื‘ื ื”ืขื™ื“ ื—ืžืฉื” ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืฉืžืžืื ื™ืŸ ืืช ื”ืงื˜ื ื” ื•ืฉืžืฉื™ืื™ืŸ ืืช ื”ืืฉื” ืขืœ ืคื™ ืขื“ ืื—ื“ ื•ืขืœ ืชืจื ื’ื•ืœ ืฉื ืกืงืœ ื‘ื™ืจื•ืฉืœื™ื ืขืœ ืฉื”ืจื’ ืืช ื”ื ืคืฉ ื•ืขืœ ื™ื™ืŸ ื‘ืŸ ืืจื‘ืขื™ื ื™ื•ื ืฉื ืชื ืกืš ืขืœ ื’ื‘ื™ ื”ืžื–ื‘ื— ื•ืขืœ ืชืžื™ื“ ืฉืœ ืฉื—ืจ ืฉืงืจื‘ ื‘ืืจื‘ืข ืฉืขื•ืช

Rabbi Yehuda ben Bava testified about five matters of halakha:
When an orphan girl, who was married off by her mother or brother before reaching the age of majority, reaches the age of majority, she may refuse to continue living with her husband and thereby retroactively annul their marriage. Normally, marriage refusals are discouraged. However, in specific instances where it is clear that if the marriage were to remain in effect it would engender problems related to levirate marriage and แธฅalitza, Rabbi Yehuda ben Bava testified that one may persuade the minor girl to refuse to continue living with her husband, thereby resolving the complications involved in this case.
And he testified that one may allow a woman who, after hearing of her husbandโ€™s death, seeks to remarry, to marry based on the testimony of one witness, as opposed to the two witnesses required for other testimonies of the Torah.
And he testified about a rooster that was stoned to death in Jerusalem for killing a person, in order to teach that the Torah law (Exodus 21:28) which requires the stoning of an ox that killed a person, applies to other animals as well.
And he testified about forty-day-old wine that was used for libation on the altar.
And he testified about the daily morning offering that was sacrificed at four hours of the day.

ืฉืžืข ืžื™ื ื” ืขื“ ื•ืขื“ ื‘ื›ืœืœ ืฉืžืข ืžื™ื ื”

Learn from this final testimony, which is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda, that until means until and including. The Gemara concludes: Indeed, learn from this.

ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ื›ื”ื ื ื”ืœื›ื” ื›ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ื”ื•ืื™ืœ ื•ืชื ืŸ ื‘ื‘ื—ื™ืจืชื ื›ื•ื•ืชื™ื”:

Based on this mishna, Rav Kahana said: The halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda since we learned in a mishna in the preferred tractate, Eduyyot, in accordance with his opinion. Since the halakha is ruled in accordance with all of the mishnayot in Eduyyot, the opinion of a tanna who rules in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda in that mishna means that the halakha is in accordance with that opinion.

ื•ืขืœ ืชืžื™ื“ ืฉืœ ืฉื—ืจ ืฉืงืจื‘ ื‘ืืจื‘ืข ืฉืขื•ืช: ืžืืŸ ืชื ื ืœื”ื ื“ืชื ืŸ ื•ื—ื ื”ืฉืžืฉ ื•ื ืžืก ื‘ืืจื‘ืข ืฉืขื•ืช

And about the daily morning offering that was sacrificed at four hours. Based on this, the Gemara attempts to identify the tanna who taught that which we learned in the mishna about the manna that fell for the children of Israel in the desert: โ€œAnd they gathered it morning by morning, each according to what he eats, and when the sun grew hot it meltedโ€ (Exodus 16:21); that took place four hours into the day.

ืืชื” ืื•ืžืจ ื‘ืืจื‘ืข ืฉืขื•ืช ืื• ืื™ื ื• ืืœื ื‘ืฉืฉ ืฉืขื•ืช ื›ืฉื”ื•ื ืื•ืžืจ ื›ื—ื ื”ื™ื•ื ื”ืจื™ ืฉืฉ ืฉืขื•ืช ืืžื•ืจ ื”ื ืžื” ืื ื™ ืžืงื™ื™ื ื•ื—ื ื”ืฉืžืฉ ื•ื ืžืก ื‘ืืจื‘ืข ืฉืขื•ืช ืžื ื™ ืœื ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ื•ืœื ืจื‘ื ืŸ ืื™ ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ืขื“ ืืจื‘ืข ืฉืขื•ืช ื ืžื™ ืฆืคืจื ื”ื•ื ืื™ ืจื‘ื ืŸ ืขื“ ื—ืฆื•ืช ื ืžื™ ืฆืคืจื ื”ื•ื

The baraita continues: Do you say that the time when the sun grew hot was at four hours, or perhaps it was only at six hours of the day? When the verse says: โ€œIn the heat of the dayโ€ (Genesis 18:1), six hours is already mentioned in the Torah as the heat of the day. How, then, do I establish the verse: โ€œAnd when the sun grew hot it meltedโ€? This must refer to an earlier time, at four hours. The Gemara asks: Who is the tanna of this mishna? It is neither Rabbi Yehuda nor the Sages. If it was in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda, until four hours is also considered morning, as he holds that the daily morning offering may still be sacrificed then, while here it says that in the morning the manna was gathered and it melted after the morning. If it was in accordance with the opinion of the Rabbis, until noon is also considered morning, since, according to the Sages, the daily morning offering could be sacrificed until noon. Apparently, this is an entirely new position.

ืื™ ื‘ืขื™ืช ืื™ืžื ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ืื™ ื‘ืขื™ืช ืื™ืžื ืจื‘ื ืŸ ืื™ ื‘ืขื™ืช ืื™ืžื ืจื‘ื ืŸ ืืžืจ ืงืจื ื‘ื‘ืงืจ ื‘ื‘ืงืจ ื—ืœืงื”ื• ืœืฉื ื™ ื‘ืงืจื™ื ื•ืื™ ื‘ืขื™ืช ืื™ืžื ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ื”ืื™ ื‘ืงืจ ื™ืชื™ืจื ืœื”ืงื“ื™ื ืœื• ืฉืขื” ืื—ืช ื“ื›ื•ืœื ืขืœืžื ืžื™ื”ื ื•ื—ื ื”ืฉืžืฉ ื•ื ืžืก ื‘ืืจื‘ืข ืฉืขื•ืช

The Gemara responds: If you wish, say that the mishna is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda, and if you wish, say instead that the mishna is in accordance with the opinion of the Rabbis. The Gemara explains: If you wish, say in accordance with the opinion of the Rabbis. The verse states: Morning by morning, divide it into two mornings. Morning, according to the Rabbis, lasts until noon. The repetition of the term morning in the Torah indicates that the period when the manna was gathered ended at the conclusion of the first half of the morning, i.e., the end of the third hour. And if you wish, say instead in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda, who would say that: This extra morning in the phrase morning by morning comes to make the end of the period when the manna was gathered an hour earlier. In any event, everyone agrees that the verse, And when the sun grew hot it melted, refers to four hours of the day.

ืžืื™ ืžืฉืžืข ืืžืจ ืจื‘ื™ ืื—ื ื‘ืจ ื™ืขืงื‘ ืืžืจ ืงืจื ื•ื—ื ื”ืฉืžืฉ ื•ื ืžืก ืื™ื–ื• ื”ื™ื ืฉืขื” ืฉื”ืฉืžืฉ ื—ื ื•ื”ืฆืœ ืฆื•ื ืŸ ื”ื•ื™ ืื•ืžืจ ื‘ืืจื‘ืข ืฉืขื•ืช:

The Gemara asks: From where is the inference drawn that this is the meaning of the verse? Rabbi Aแธฅa bar Yaโ€™akov said: The verse states: โ€œWhen the sun grew hot it melted.โ€ Which is the hour that the sun is hot but the shade remains cool, before the heat of the day, when even the shade is hot? You must say at four hours.

ืชืคืœืช ื”ืžื ื—ื” ืขื“ ื”ืขืจื‘ ื•ื›ื•ืณ: ืืžืจ ืœื™ื” ืจื‘ ื—ืกื“ื ืœืจื‘ ื™ืฆื—ืง ื”ืชื ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ื›ื”ื ื ื”ืœื›ื” ื›ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ื”ื•ืื™ืœ ื•ืชื ืŸ ื‘ื‘ื—ื™ืจืชื ื›ื•ื•ืชื™ื” ื”ื›ื ืžืื™ ืื™ืฉืชื™ืง ื•ืœื ืืžืจ ืœื™ื” ื•ืœื ืžื™ื“ื™ ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ื—ืกื“ื ื ื—ื–ื™ ืื ืŸ ืžื“ืจื‘ ืžืฆืœื™ ืฉืœ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืขืจื‘ ืฉื‘ืช ืžื‘ืขื•ื“ ื™ื•ื ืฉืžืข ืžื™ื ื” ื”ืœื›ื” ื›ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื”

We learned in the mishna: The Rabbis hold that the afternoon prayer may be recited until the evening. Rabbi Yehuda says: It may be recited only until the midpoint of the afternoon. Rav แธคisda said to Rav Yitzแธฅak: There, with regard to the morning prayer, Rav Kahana said: The halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda, since we learned in a mishna in the preferred tractate, Eduyyot, in accordance with his opinion. Here, what is the ruling? He was silent and said nothing to him, as he was familiar with no established ruling in this matter. Rav แธคisda said: Let us see and try to resolve this ourselves from the fact that Rav prayed the Shabbat prayers on the eve of Shabbat while it was still day. Learn from this that the halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda, and the time for the afternoon prayer ends at the midpoint of the afternoon, after which time one may recite the evening prayer.

ืื“ืจื‘ื” ืžื“ืจื‘ ื”ื•ื ื ื•ืจื‘ื ืŸ ืœื ื”ื•ื• ืžืฆืœื• ืขื“ ืื•ืจืชื ืฉืžืข ืžื™ื ื” ืื™ืŸ ื”ืœื›ื” ื›ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ื”ืฉืชื ื“ืœื ืืชืžืจ ื”ืœื›ืชื ืœื ื›ืžืจ ื•ืœื ื›ืžืจ ื“ืขื‘ื“ ื›ืžืจ ืขื‘ื“ ื•ื“ืขื‘ื“ ื›ืžืจ ืขื‘ื“

The Gemara immediately rejects the proof based on Ravโ€™s practice: On the contrary, from the fact that Rav Huna and the Sages, students of Rav, would not pray until evening, learn from that that the halakha is not in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda. The Gemara concludes: Now that the halakha was stated neither in accordance with the opinion of this Sage nor in accordance with the opinion of that Sage, one who acted in accordance with the opinion of this Sage has acted legitimately, and one who acted in accordance with the opinion of that Sage has acted legitimately, as this halakha is left to the decision of each individual.

ืจื‘ ืื™ืงืœืข ืœื‘ื™ ื’ื ื™ื‘ื ื•ืฆืœื™ ืฉืœ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืขืจื‘ ืฉื‘ืช ื•ื”ื•ื” ืžืฆืœื™ ืจื‘ื™ ื™ืจืžื™ื” ื‘ืจ ืื‘ื ืœืื—ื•ืจื™ ื“ืจื‘ ื•ืกื™ื™ื ืจื‘ ื•ืœื ืคืกืงื™ื” ืœืฆืœื•ืชื™ื” ื“ืจื‘ื™ ื™ืจืžื™ื” ืฉืžืข ืžื™ื ื” ืชืœืช ืฉืžืข ืžื™ื ื” ืžืชืคืœืœ ืื“ื ืฉืœ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืขืจื‘ ืฉื‘ืช ื•ืฉืžืข ืžื™ื ื” ืžืชืคืœืœ ืชืœืžื™ื“ ืื—ื•ืจื™ ืจื‘ื• ื•ืฉืžืข ืžื™ื ื” ืืกื•ืจ ืœืขื‘ื•ืจ ื›ื ื’ื“ ื”ืžืชืคืœืœื™ืŸ

The Gemara relates: Rav happened by the house of the Sage, Geniva, and he prayed the Shabbat prayer on the eve of Shabbat before nightfall. Rabbi Yirmeya bar Abba was praying behind Rav, and Rav finished his prayer but did not take three steps back and interrupt the prayer of Rabbi Yirmeya. Derive from this incident three halakhot: Derive from this that one may pray the Shabbat prayer on the eve of Shabbat before nightfall. And derive from this that a student may pray behind his rabbi. And derive from this that it is prohibited to pass before those who are praying.

ืžืกื™ื™ืข ืœื™ื” ืœืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ืฉืข ื‘ืŸ ืœื•ื™ ื“ืืžืจ ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ืฉืข ื‘ืŸ ืœื•ื™ ืืกื•ืจ ืœืขื‘ื•ืจ ื›ื ื’ื“ ื”ืžืชืคืœืœื™ืŸ ืื™ื ื™ ื•ื”ื ืจื‘ื™ ืืžื™ ื•ืจื‘ื™ ืืกื™ ื—ืœืคื™ ืจื‘ื™ ืืžื™ ื•ืจื‘ื™ ืืกื™ ื—ื•ืฅ ืœืืจื‘ืข ืืžื•ืช ื”ื•ื ื“ื—ืœืคื™

The Gemara responds: This supports the opinion of Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi, as Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: It is prohibited to pass before those who are praying. The Gemara asks: Is that so? Didnโ€™t Rabbi Ami and Rabbi Asi pass before those who were praying? The Gemara responds: Rabbi Ami and Rabbi Asi were beyond four cubits from those who were praying when they passed.

ื•ืจื‘ื™ ื™ืจืžื™ื” ื”ื™ื›ื™ ืขื‘ื™ื“ ื”ื›ื™ ื•ื”ื ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ืœืขื•ืœื ืืœ ื™ืชืคืœืœ ืื“ื

One particular detail was surprising: How did Rabbi Yirmeya act that way and pray behind Rav? Didnโ€™t Rav Yehuda say that Rav said: A person should never pray

ืœื ื›ื ื’ื“ ืจื‘ื• ื•ืœื ืื—ื•ืจื™ ืจื‘ื•

directly next to his rabbi, presumptuously indicating that he is his rabbiโ€™s equal, and behind his rabbi as it creates the impression that he is bowing to him (Tosafot)?

ื•ืชื ื™ื ืจื‘ื™ ืืœื™ืขื–ืจ ืื•ืžืจ ื”ืžืชืคืœืœ ืื—ื•ืจื™ ืจื‘ื• ื•ื”ื ื•ืชืŸ ืฉืœื•ื ืœืจื‘ื• ื•ื”ืžื—ื–ื™ืจ ืฉืœื•ื ืœืจื‘ื• ื•ื”ื—ื•ืœืง ืขืœ ื™ืฉื™ื‘ืชื• ืฉืœ ืจื‘ื• ื•ื”ืื•ืžืจ ื“ื‘ืจ ืฉืœื ืฉืžืข ืžืคื™ ืจื‘ื• ื’ื•ืจื ืœืฉื›ื™ื ื” ืฉืชืกืชืœืง ืžื™ืฉืจืืœ

And it was taught in a baraita, in a more extreme manner, as Rabbi Eliezer says: One who prays behind his rabbi and one who greets his rabbi without waiting for his rabbi to greet him first, one who returns his rabbiโ€™s greeting without saying: Greetings to you, rabbi, one who rivals his rabbiโ€™s yeshiva, i.e., establishes a yeshiva of his own and teaches during his rabbiโ€™s lifetime without his consent (Rambam), and one who says something in the name of his rabbi which he did not hear directly from his rabbi, causes the Divine Presence to withdraw from Israel.

ืฉืื ื™ ืจื‘ื™ ื™ืจืžื™ื” ื‘ืจ ืื‘ื ื“ืชืœืžื™ื“ ื—ื‘ืจ ื”ื•ื” ื•ื”ื™ื™ื ื• ื“ืงืืžืจ ืœื™ื” ืจื‘ื™ ื™ืจืžื™ื” ื‘ืจ ืื‘ื ืœืจื‘ ืžื™ ื‘ื“ืœืช ืืžืจ ืœื™ื” ืื™ืŸ ื‘ื“ื™ืœื ื ื•ืœื ืืžืจ ืžื™ ื‘ื“ื™ืœ ืžืจ

With regard to Rabbi Yirmeyaโ€™s conduct, the Gemara explains that Rabbi Yirmeya bar Abba is different, as he was not a mere student of Rav. Rather, he was a disciple-colleague and was, therefore, permitted to act that way. And that is why on one occasion, when Rav prayed the Shabbat prayer early, Rabbi Yirmeya bar Abba asked him: Did you distance yourself from labor and accept the sanctity of Shabbat? Rav said to him: Yes, I distanced myself. And Rabbi Yirmeya did not say to him: Did the Master distance himself, as would have been appropriate had he merely been Ravโ€™s student.

ื•ืžื™ ื‘ื“ื™ืœ ื•ื”ืืžืจ ืจื‘ื™ ืื‘ื™ืŸ ืคืขื ืื—ืช ื”ืชืคืœืœ ืจื‘ื™ ืฉืœ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืขืจื‘ ืฉื‘ืช ื•ื ื›ื ืก ืœืžืจื—ืฅ ื•ื™ืฆื ื•ืฉื ื” ืœืŸ ืคืจืงื™ืŸ ื•ืขื“ื™ื™ืŸ ืœื ื—ืฉื›ื” ืืžืจ ืจื‘ื ื”ื”ื•ื ื“ื ื›ื ืก ืœื”ื–ื™ืข ื•ืงื•ื“ื ื’ื–ื™ืจื” ื”ื•ื”

Although Rav replied that he distanced himself from labor, did he indeed need to distance himself from labor? Didnโ€™t Rabbi Avin say: Once Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi prayed the Shabbat prayer on the eve of Shabbat before nightfall. He then entered the bathhouse and emerged and taught us our chapters that we had learned, and it was not yet dark. Rava said: That is a case where he had entered the bathhouse to perspire, and it was before the Sages issued a decree prohibiting perspiring in a bathhouse on Shabbat.

ืื™ื ื™ ื•ื”ื ืื‘ื™ื™ ืฉืจื ืœื™ื” ืœืจื‘ ื“ื™ืžื™ ื‘ืจ ืœื™ื•ืื™ ืœื›ื‘ืจื•ื™ื™ ืกืœื™

The Gemara asks: Is that so, that he was required to refrain from labor? Didnโ€™t Abaye permit Rav Dimi bar Livaโ€™ei to fumigate baskets with sulfur even though he had already recited the Shabbat prayer, indicating that it is permitted to perform labor even after the Shabbat prayer?

ื”ื”ื•ื ื˜ืขื•ืชื ื”ื•ืื™

The Gemara responds: That was an error, as Rav Dimi did not intend to begin Shabbat early. It was a cloudy day and he mistakenly thought that the sun had set and that was why he prayed. Consequently, even though he prayed, the Shabbat prayer did not obligate him to conduct himself in accordance with the sanctity of Shabbat and he was allowed to perform labor even after his prayer.

ื•ื˜ืขื•ืชื ืžื™ ื”ื“ืจื ื•ื”ื ืืžืจ ืื‘ื™ื“ืŸ ืคืขื ืื—ืช ื ืชืงืฉืจื• ืฉืžื™ื ื‘ืขื‘ื™ื ื›ืกื‘ื•ืจื™ื ื”ืขื ืœื•ืžืจ ื—ืฉื›ื” ื”ื•ื ื ื›ื ืกื• ืœื‘ื™ืช ื”ื›ื ืกืช ื•ื”ืชืคืœืœื• ืฉืœ ืžื•ืฆืื™ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืฉื‘ืช ื•ื ืชืคื–ืจื• ื”ืขื‘ื™ื ื•ื–ืจื—ื” ื”ื—ืžื”

The Gemara goes on to ask: Can a mistake be reversed, enabling one to conduct himself as if he had not prayed? Didnโ€™t Avidan, a student of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi, say: Once the sky became overcast, leading the people to think that it was the dark of night; they entered the synagogue and recited the evening prayer of the conclusion of Shabbat on Shabbat. And later, the clouds cleared and the sun shone, indicating that it was still day.

ื•ื‘ืื• ื•ืฉืืœื• ืืช ืจื‘ื™ ื•ืืžืจ ื”ื•ืื™ืœ ื•ื”ืชืคืœืœื• ื”ืชืคืœืœื• ืฉืื ื™ ืฆื‘ื•ืจ ื“ืœื ืžื˜ืจื—ื™ื ืŸ ืœื”ื•:

And they came and asked Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi what they should do, and he said: Since they have prayed, they have prayed, and they need not pray again. Although they prayed erroneously, their mistake is not reversible and what was done remains. The Gemara responds: A community is different in that we do not burden them to pray again.

ืืžืจ ืจื‘ื™ ื—ื™ื™ื ื‘ืจ ืื‘ื™ืŸ ืจื‘ ืฆืœื™ ืฉืœ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืขืจื‘ ืฉื‘ืช ืจื‘ื™ ื™ืืฉื™ื” ืžืฆืœื™ ืฉืœ ืžื•ืฆืื™ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืฉื‘ืช ืจื‘ ืฆืœื™ ืฉืœ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืขืจื‘ ืฉื‘ืช ืื•ืžืจ ืงื“ื•ืฉื” ืขืœ ื”ื›ื•ืก ืื• ืื™ื ื• ืื•ืžืจ ืงื“ื•ืฉื” ืขืœ ื”ื›ื•ืก ืชื ืฉืžืข ื“ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ื ื—ืžืŸ ืืžืจ ืฉืžื•ืืœ ืžืชืคืœืœ ืื“ื ืฉืœ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืขืจื‘ ืฉื‘ืช ื•ืื•ืžืจ ืงื“ื•ืฉื” ืขืœ ื”ื›ื•ืก ื•ื”ืœื›ืชื ื›ื•ื•ืชื™ื”

The Gemara continues to discuss the possibility of reciting the evening prayer early, even on Shabbat. Rabbi แธคiyya bar Avin said: Rav prayed the Shabbat prayer on the eve of Shabbat before nightfall. Rabbi Yoshiya would pray the evening prayer of the conclusion of Shabbat on Shabbat. With regard to the fact that Rav prayed the Shabbat prayer on the eve of Shabbat before nightfall, the dilemma is raised: In those cases, did he recite kiddush over the cup of wine, or did he not recite kiddush over the cup of wine before the stars emerged? Come and hear a resolution to this, as Rav Naแธฅman said that Shmuel said: One prays the Shabbat prayer on the eve of Shabbat before nightfall and recites kiddush over the cup of wine. And the halakha is in accordance with his ruling.

ืจื‘ื™ ื™ืืฉื™ื” ืžืฆืœื™ ืฉืœ ืžื•ืฆืื™ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืฉื‘ืช ืื•ืžืจ ื”ื‘ื“ืœื” ืขืœ ื”ื›ื•ืก ืื• ืื™ื ื• ืื•ืžืจ ื”ื‘ื“ืœื” ืขืœ ื”ื›ื•ืก ืชื ืฉืžืข ื“ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ืืžืจ ืฉืžื•ืืœ ืžืชืคืœืœ ืื“ื ืฉืœ ืžื•ืฆืื™ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืฉื‘ืช ื•ืื•ืžืจ ื”ื‘ื“ืœื” ืขืœ ื”ื›ื•ืก

A similar dilemma was raised concerning the fact that Rabbi Yoshiya would pray the evening prayer of the conclusion of Shabbat on Shabbat: After praying, while it is still Shabbat, does he recite havdala over the cup of wine or does one not recite havdala over the cup of wine? Come and hear a resolution to this, as Rav Yehuda said that Shmuel said: One prays the evening prayer of the conclusion of Shabbat on Shabbat and recites havdala over the cup of wine.

ืืžืจ ืจื‘ื™ ื–ื™ืจื ืืžืจ ืจื‘ื™ ืืกื™ ืืžืจ ืจื‘ื™ ืืœืขื–ืจ ืืžืจ ืจื‘ื™ ื—ื ื™ื ื ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ื‘ืฆื“ ืขืžื•ื“ ื–ื” ื”ืชืคืœืœ ืจื‘ื™ ื™ืฉืžืขืืœ ื‘ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื•ืกื™ ืฉืœ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืขืจื‘ ืฉื‘ืช

Rabbi Zeira said that Rabbi Asi said that Rabbi Elazar said that Rabbi แธคanina said that Rav said: Alongside this specific pillar before me, Rabbi Yishmael, son of Rabbi Yosei, prayed the Shabbat prayer on the eve of Shabbat before nightfall.

ื›ื™ ืืชื ืขื•ืœื ืืžืจ ื‘ืฆื“ ืชืžืจื” ื”ื•ื” ื•ืœื ื‘ืฆื“ ืขืžื•ื“ ื”ื•ื” ื•ืœื ืจื‘ื™ ื™ืฉืžืขืืœ ื‘ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื•ืกื™ ื”ื•ื” ืืœื ืจื‘ื™ ืืœืขื–ืจ ื‘ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื•ืกื™ ื”ื•ื” ื•ืœื ืฉืœ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืขืจื‘ ืฉื‘ืช ื”ื•ื” ืืœื ืฉืœ ืžื•ืฆืื™ ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืฉื‘ืช ื”ื•ื”:

But when Ulla came from the Eretz Yisrael to Babylonia, he related a different version of this story. He said that he had heard: This transpired beside a palm tree, not beside a pillar, and it was not Rabbi Yishmael, son of Rabbi Yosei, but it was Rabbi Elazar, son of Rabbi Yosei, and it was not the Shabbat prayer on Shabbat eve before nightfall, rather it was the prayer of the conclusion of Shabbat on Shabbat.

ืชืคืœืช ื”ืขืจื‘ ืื™ืŸ ืœื” ืงื‘ืข: ืžืื™ ืื™ืŸ ืœื” ืงื‘ืข ืื™ืœื™ืžื ื“ืื™ ื‘ืขื™ ืžืฆืœื™ ื›ื•ืœื™ื” ืœื™ืœื™ื ืœื™ืชื ื™ ืชืคืœืช ื”ืขืจื‘ ื›ืœ ื”ืœื™ืœื” ืืœื ืžืื™ ืื™ืŸ ืœื” ืงื‘ืข

We learned in the mishna: The evening prayer may be recited throughout the night and is not fixed to a specific hour. The Gemara asks: What is the meaning of is not fixed? If you say that if one wishes, he may pray throughout the night, then let the mishna teach: The evening prayer may be recited throughout the night. Rather, what is the meaning of not fixed?

ื›ืžืืŸ ื“ืืžืจ ืชืคืœืช ืขืจื‘ื™ืช ืจืฉื•ืช ื“ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ืืžืจ ืฉืžื•ืืœ ืชืคืœืช ืขืจื‘ื™ืช ืจื‘ืŸ ื’ืžืœื™ืืœ ืื•ืžืจ ื—ื•ื‘ื” ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ืฉืข ืื•ืžืจ ืจืฉื•ืช ืืžืจ ืื‘ื™ื™ ื”ืœื›ื” ื›ื“ื‘ืจื™ ื”ืื•ืžืจ ื—ื•ื‘ื” ื•ืจื‘ื ืืžืจ ื”ืœื›ื” ื›ื“ื‘ืจื™ ื”ืื•ืžืจ ืจืฉื•ืช

It is in accordance with the opinion of the one who said: The evening prayer is optional. As Rav Yehuda said that Shmuel said with regard to the evening prayer. Rabban Gamliel says: It is obligatory. Rabbi Yehoshua says: It is optional. Abaye said: The halakha is in accordance with the statement of the one who said: The evening prayer is obligatory. Rava said: The halakha is in accordance with the statement of the one who said: The evening prayer is optional.

ืชื ื• ืจื‘ื ืŸ ืžืขืฉื” ื‘ืชืœืžื™ื“ ืื—ื“ ืฉื‘ื ืœืคื ื™ ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ืฉืข ืืžืจ ืœื• ืชืคืœืช ืขืจื‘ื™ืช ืจืฉื•ืช ืื• ื—ื•ื‘ื” ืืžืจ ืœื™ื” ืจืฉื•ืช

The Sages taught: There was an incident involving a student, who came before Rabbi Yehoshua. The student said to him: Is the evening prayer optional or obligatory? Rabbi Yehoshua said to him: Optional.

ื‘ื ืœืคื ื™ ืจื‘ืŸ ื’ืžืœื™ืืœ ืืžืจ ืœื• ืชืคืœืช ืขืจื‘ื™ืช ืจืฉื•ืช ืื• ื—ื•ื‘ื” ืืžืจ ืœื• ื—ื•ื‘ื” ืืžืจ ืœื• ื•ื”ืœื ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ืฉืข ืืžืจ ืœื™ ืจืฉื•ืช ืืžืจ ืœื• ื”ืžืชืŸ ืขื“ ืฉื™ื›ื ืกื• ื‘ืขืœื™ ืชืจื™ืกื™ืŸ ืœื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžื“ืจืฉ

The same student came before Rabban Gamliel and said to him: Is the evening prayer optional or obligatory? Rabban Gamliel said to him: Obligatory. The student said to Rabban Gamliel: But didnโ€™t Rabbi Yehoshua tell me that the evening prayer is optional? Rabban Gamliel said to the student: Wait until the โ€œmasters of the shields,โ€ a reference to the Torah scholars who battle in the war of Torah, enter the study hall, at which point we will discuss this issue.

ื›ืฉื ื›ื ืกื• ื‘ืขืœื™ ืชืจื™ืกื™ืŸ ืขืžื“ ื”ืฉื•ืืœ ื•ืฉืืœ ืชืคืœืช ืขืจื‘ื™ืช ืจืฉื•ืช ืื• ื—ื•ื‘ื” ืืžืจ ืœื• ืจื‘ืŸ ื’ืžืœื™ืืœ ื—ื•ื‘ื” ืืžืจ ืœื”ื ืจื‘ืŸ ื’ืžืœื™ืืœ ืœื—ื›ืžื™ื ื›ืœื•ื ื™ืฉ ืื“ื ืฉื—ื•ืœืง ื‘ื“ื‘ืจ ื–ื” ืืžืจ ืœื™ื” ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ืฉืข ืœืื• ืืžืจ ืœื• ื•ื”ืœื ืžืฉืžืš ืืžืจื• ืœื™ ืจืฉื•ืช

When the masters of the shields entered, the questioner stood before everyone present and asked: Is the evening prayer optional or obligatory? Rabban Gamliel said to him: Obligatory. In order to ascertain whether or not Rabbi Yehoshua still maintained his opinion, Rabban Gamliel said to the Sages: Is there any person who disputes this matter? Rabbi Yehoshua said to him: No, no one disagrees. In deference to the Nasi, he did not wish to argue with him publicly (Tziyyun LeNefesh แธคayya). Rabban Gamliel said to Rabbi Yehoshua: But was it not in your name that they told me that the evening prayer is optional?

ืืžืจ ืœื™ื” ื™ื”ื•ืฉืข ืขืžื•ื“ ืขืœ ืจื’ืœื™ืš ื•ื™ืขื™ื“ื• ื‘ืš ืขืžื“ ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ืฉืข ืขืœ ืจื’ืœื™ื• ื•ืืžืจ ืืœืžืœื ืื ื™ ื—ื™ ื•ื”ื•ื ืžืช ื™ื›ื•ืœ ื”ื—ื™ ืœื”ื›ื—ื™ืฉ ืืช ื”ืžืช ื•ืขื›ืฉื™ื• ืฉืื ื™ ื—ื™ ื•ื”ื•ื ื—ื™ ื”ื™ืืš ื™ื›ื•ืœ ื”ื—ื™ ืœื”ื›ื—ื™ืฉ ืืช ื”ื—ื™

Rabban Gamliel said to Rabbi Yehoshua: Yehoshua, stand on your feet and they will testify against you. Rabbi Yehoshua stood on his feet and said: If I were alive and the student were dead, the living can contradict the dead, and I could deny issuing that ruling. Now that I am alive and he is alive, how can the living contradict the living? I have no choice but to admit that I said it.

ื”ื™ื” ืจื‘ืŸ ื’ืžืœื™ืืœ ื™ื•ืฉื‘ ื•ื“ื•ืจืฉ ื•ืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ืฉืข ืขื•ืžื“ ืขืœ ืจื’ืœื™ื• ืขื“ ืฉืจื ื ื• ื›ืœ ื”ืขื ื•ืืžืจื• ืœื—ื•ืฆืคื™ืช ื”ืชื•ืจื’ืžืŸ ืขืžื•ื“ ื•ืขืžื“

In the meantime, Rabban Gamliel, as the Nasi, was sitting and lecturing, and Rabbi Yehoshua all the while was standing on his feet, because Rabban Gamliel did not instruct him to sit. He remained standing in deference to the Nasi. This continued for some time, until it aroused great resentment against Rabban Gamliel, and all of the people assembled began murmuring and said to แธคutzpit the disseminator: Stop conveying Rabban Gamlielโ€™s lecture. And he stopped.

ืืžืจื™ ืขื“ ื›ืžื” ื ืฆืขืจื™ื” ื•ื ื™ื–ื™ืœ ื‘ืจืืฉ ื”ืฉื ื” ืืฉืชืงื“ ืฆืขืจื™ื” ื‘ื‘ื›ื•ืจื•ืช ื‘ืžืขืฉื” ื“ืจื‘ื™ ืฆื“ื•ืง ืฆืขืจื™ื” ื”ื›ื ื ืžื™ ืฆืขืจื™ื” ืชื ื•ื ืขื‘ืจื™ื”

The Gemara relates that in their murmuring they said: How long will Rabban Gamliel continue afflicting him? Last year on Rosh HaShana, he afflicted him; Rabban Gamliel ordered Rabbi Yehoshua to come to him carrying his staff and bag, on the day on which Yom Kippur occurred, according to Rabbi Yehoshuaโ€™s calculations. Regarding the firstborn, in the incident involving the question of Rabbi Tzadok, he afflicted him just as he did now, and forced him to remain standing as punishment for his failure to defend his differing opinion. Here too, he is afflicting him. Let us remove him from his position as Nasi.

ืžืืŸ ื ื•ืงื™ื ืœื™ื” ื ื•ืงืžื™ื” ืœืจื‘ื™ ื™ื”ื•ืฉืข ื‘ืขืœ ืžืขืฉื” ื”ื•ื ื ื•ืงืžื™ื” ืœืจื‘ื™ ืขืงื™ื‘ื ื“ื™ืœืžื ืขื ื™ืฉ ืœื™ื” ื“ืœื™ืช ืœื™ื” ื–ื›ื•ืช ืื‘ื•ืช

It was so agreed, but the question arose: Who shall we establish in his place? Shall we establish Rabbi Yehoshua in his place? The Sages rejected that option because Rabbi Yehoshua was party to the incident for which Rabban Gamliel was deposed. Appointing him would be extremely upsetting for Rabban Gamliel. Shall we establish Rabbi Akiva in his place? The Sages rejected that option because Rabbi Akiva, who descended from a family of converts, would be vulnerable. Perhaps due to Rabban Gamlielโ€™s resentment he would cause him to be divinely punished as he lacks the merit of his ancestors to protect him.

ืืœื ื ื•ืงืžื™ื” ืœืจื‘ื™ ืืœืขื–ืจ ื‘ืŸ ืขื–ืจื™ื” ื“ื”ื•ื ื—ื›ื ื•ื”ื•ื ืขืฉื™ืจ ื•ื”ื•ื ืขืฉื™ืจื™ ืœืขื–ืจื ื”ื•ื ื—ื›ื ื“ืื™ ืžืงืฉื™ ืœื™ื” ืžืคืจืง ืœื™ื” ื•ื”ื•ื ืขืฉื™ืจ ื“ืื™ ืื™ืช ืœื™ื” ืœืคืœื•ื—ื™ ืœื‘ื™ ืงื™ืกืจ ืืฃ ื”ื•ื ืื™ื–ื™ืœ ื•ืคืœื— ื•ื”ื•ื ืขืฉื™ืจื™ ืœืขื–ืจื ื“ืื™ืช ืœื™ื” ื–ื›ื•ืช ืื‘ื•ืช ื•ืœื ืžืฆื™ ืขื ื™ืฉ ืœื™ื” ืืชื• ื•ืืžืจื• ืœื™ื” ื ื™ื—ื ืœื™ื” ืœืžืจ ื“ืœื™ื”ื•ื™ ืจื™ืฉ ืžืชื™ื‘ืชื ืืžืจ ืœื”ื• ืื™ื–ื™ืœ ื•ืื™ืžืœื™ืš ื‘ืื™ื ืฉื™ ื‘ื™ืชื™ ืื–ืœ ื•ืืžืœื™ืš ื‘ื“ื‘ื™ืชื”ื• ืืžืจื” ืœื™ื”

Rather, suggested the Sages, let us establish Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya in his place, his outstanding characteristics set him apart from the other candidates. He is wise, rich, and a tenth generation descendant of Ezra. The Gemara explains: He is wise, so if Rabban Gamliel raises a challenge in matters of Torah, he will answer it and not be embarrassed. And he is rich, so if the need arises to pay homage to the Caesarโ€™s court and serve as a representative of Israel to lobby and negotiate, he has sufficient wealth to cover the costs of the long journeys, taxes, and gifts, so he too is able to go and pay homage. And he is a tenth generation descendant of Ezra, so he has the merit of his ancestors, and Rabban Gamliel will be unable to cause him to be punished. They came and said to him: Would the Master consent to being the Head of the Yeshiva? He said to them: I will go and consult with my household. He went and consulted with his wife. She said to him:

Scroll To Top