From where was the oil brought for the menora and the meal offerings? Which olives could be used? How were they prepared? There is a difference between the oil that needed to be used for the menora and the one that could be used for meal offerings. From where were the grapes for the wine libations brought?
This week’s learning is sponsored for the merit and safety of Haymanut (Emuna) Kasau, who was 9 years old when she disappeared from her home in Tzfat two years ago, on the 16th of Adar, 5784 (February 25, 2024), and whose whereabouts remain unknown.
This week’s learning is dedicated of the safety of our nation, the soldiers and citizens of Israel, and for the liberation of the Iranian people. May we soon see the realization of “ליהודים היתה אורה ושמחה וששון ויקר”.
Want to dedicate learning? Get started here:
English
עברית
0:00
0:00
0:00
0:00
Today’s daily daf tools:
This week’s learning is sponsored for the merit and safety of Haymanut (Emuna) Kasau, who was 9 years old when she disappeared from her home in Tzfat two years ago, on the 16th of Adar, 5784 (February 25, 2024), and whose whereabouts remain unknown.
This week’s learning is dedicated of the safety of our nation, the soldiers and citizens of Israel, and for the liberation of the Iranian people. May we soon see the realization of “ליהודים היתה אורה ושמחה וששון ויקר”.
Menachot 86
וְאִם הֵבִיא – פָּסוּל (וְהָתַנְיָא: וְאִם הֵבִיא – כָּשֵׁר), מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהוּא שְׂרָף.
but if one did bring a meal offering made of such oil, it is not valid. But isn’t it taught in a baraita that if one did bring it, it is valid, because it is regarded merely as sap and not as oil? This contradicts this mishna, which assumes that it is regarded as oil.
אָמַר רַב יוֹסֵף: לָא קַשְׁיָא, הָא רַבִּי חִיָּיא, הָא רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בַּר רַבִּי, דְּרַבִּי חִיָּיא זָרֵיק לֵיהּ, וְרַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בַּר רַבִּי מְטַבֵּל [בֵּיהּ] (לֵיהּ), וְסִימָנָיךְ: עֲשִׁירִים מְקַמְּצִין.
Rav Yosef said: It is not difficult to resolve this contradiction. This baraita expresses the opinion of Rabbi Ḥiyya, and that mishna expresses the opinion of Rabbi Shimon, son of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi. As Rabbi Ḥiyya would toss such oil away, as he did not consider it to be oil, and Rabbi Shimon, son of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi, would dip his food into it, as he considered it to be oil. The Gemara concludes: And your mnemonic by which to remember their respective opinions is: The wealthy are parsimonious, i.e., Rabbi Shimon, son of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi, was wealthy, and he did not toss the oil away.
״שִׁשָּׁה חֳדָשִׁים בְּשֶׁמֶן הַמּוֹר״ – מַאי ״שֶׁמֶן הַמּוֹר״? רַב הוּנָא בַּר חִיָּיא אָמַר: סְטָכְתָּא. רַבִּי יִרְמְיָה בַּר אַבָּא אָמַר: שֶׁמֶן זַיִת שֶׁלֹּא הֵבִיא שְׁלִישׁ.
§ The Gemara digresses to discuss oil of myrrh: In describing the treatments provided to the women in preparation for their meeting with King Ahasuerus, the verse states: “For so were the days of their anointing accomplished: Six months with oil of myrrh, and six months with sweet odors and with other ointments of the women” (Esther 2:12). The Gemara asks: What is “oil of myrrh”? Rav Huna bar Ḥiyya says: It is the aromatic oil called setakhta. Rav Yirmeya bar Abba says: It is an oil derived from olives that have not yet reached one-third of their growth; the acidic oil is effective as a depilatory.
תַּנְיָא נָמֵי הָכִי: רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: אַנְפִּקִנוֹן – שֶׁמֶן זַיִת שֶׁלֹּא הֵבִיא שְׁלִישׁ, לָמָּה סָכִין אוֹתוֹ? שֶׁמַּשִּׁיר אֶת הַשֵּׂיעָר וּמְעַדֵּן אֶת הַבָּשָׂר.
The Gemara notes: This explanation of Rav Yirmeya bar Abba is also taught in a baraita: Rabbi Yehuda says: The term anpikanon is referring to olive oil produced from olives that have not yet reached one-third of their growth. And why do women spread it on their bodies? They do so because it removes the hair and pampers the skin.
אֵין מְבִיאִין מִן הַגַּרְגְּרִין שֶׁנִּשְׁרוּ בְּמַיִם. תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: שֶׁמֶן זַיִת כָּבוּשׁ, שָׁלוּק, שָׁרוּי, וְשֶׁל שְׁמָרִים, וְשֶׁל רֵיחַ רָע – לֹא יָבִיא, וְאִם הֵבִיא – פָּסוּל.
§ The mishna teaches: One may not bring meal offerings containing oil from olives that were soaked in water, nor from pickled olives, nor from boiled olives, and even if one did bring it, it is not valid. The Sages taught in a baraita: Olive oil produced from pickled olives, boiled olives, or olives soaked in water, and oil made from olive sediment, and oil with a foul odor may not be brought as part of a meal offering, and even if one did bring it, it is not valid.
בָּעֵי רַבָּה: הִקְדִּישׁוֹ, מַהוּ שֶׁיִּלְקֶה עָלָיו מִשּׁוּם בַּעַל מוּם? כֵּיוָן דְּפָסוּל – כְּבַעַל מוּם דָּמֵי, אוֹ דִלְמָא אֵין בַּעַל מוּם אֶלָּא בִּבְהֵמָה? תֵּיקוּ.
Rava asks: If one consecrated one of these unfit oils for use in meal offerings, what is the halakha with regard to whether he should be flogged for consecrating it due to the prohibition against consecrating a flawed item as an offering? Does one say that since it is unfit, it is comparable to a blemished animal? Or perhaps the prohibition against consecrating a flawed item applies only to an animal. The Gemara concludes: The dilemma shall stand unresolved.
מַתְנִי׳ שְׁלֹשָׁה זֵיתִים הֵן, וּבָהֶן שְׁלֹשָׁה שְׁלֹשָׁה שְׁמָנִים.
MISHNA: There are three harvests of olives each year, and in each of them, three different grades of oils are produced.
הַזַּיִת הָרִאשׁוֹן מְגַרְגְּרוֹ בְּרֹאשׁ הַזַּיִת, וְכוֹתֵשׁ וְנוֹתֵן לְתוֹךְ הַסַּל, רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: סְבִיבוֹת הַסַּל – זֶה רִאשׁוֹן.
How is the first olive harvest processed? One picks the ripe olives at the top of the olive tree, as those are the first to ripen, and crushes them in a mortar and places them inside the bottom of a wicker basket that has many small holes in it. The oil will then drip from the olives through those holes into a vessel placed underneath the basket. Rabbi Yehuda says: One positions the olives on the walls, surrounding the basket. This produces more refined oil, as the dregs stick to the walls of the basket. This is the first grade of oil produced from the first harvest.
חָזַר וְטוֹעֵן בְּקוֹרָה, רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: בַּאֲבָנִים – זֶה שֵׁנִי.
After the oil ceases to seep from the crushed olives, one then presses down with a wooden beam upon them, causing additional oil to flow from the basket into the vessel. Rabbi Yehuda says: The excessive pressure produced by pressing down with a beam would cause some of the flesh of the olives to get mixed in with the oil, compromising its quality. Rather, one applies pressure by placing stones upon the olives. This is the second grade of oil.
חָזַר וְטָחַן, וְטָעַן – זֶה שְׁלִישִׁי.
One then ground the olives with a millstone and pressed down with a beam on those olives to extract any remaining oil; this is the third grade of oil.
הָרִאשׁוֹן – לַמְּנוֹרָה, וְהַשְּׁאָר – לִמְנָחוֹת.
The first grade is fit for kindling the Candelabrum, which requires: “Refined olive oil” (Leviticus 24:2), and the rest are fit for use in meal offerings.
הַשֵּׁנִי – מְגַרְגְּרוֹ בְּרֹאשׁ הַגָּג, וְכוֹתֵשׁ, וְנוֹתֵן לְתוֹךְ הַסַּל, רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: סְבִיבוֹת הַסַּל – זֶה רִאשׁוֹן.
How is the second olive harvest processed? One picks the crop of olives that is accessible while one is standing on the rooftop. This was the second lot of olives to ripen. And one crushes it in a mortar and places those olives into a wicker basket, allowing the oil to drip through the holes into a vessel underneath. Rabbi Yehuda says: One positions the olives on the walls, surrounding the basket. This is the first grade of oil from the second harvest.
טוֹעֵן בְּקוֹרָה, וְרַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: בַּאֲבָנִים – זֶה שֵׁנִי.
One then presses down upon those olives with a wooden beam, thereby producing more oil. And Rabbi Yehuda says: One applies pressure only by placing stones upon them. This is the second grade of oil.
חָזַר וְטָחַן, וְטָעַן – זֶה שְׁלִישִׁי.
One then ground the olives with a millstone and pressed down upon them with a beam, thereby extracting any remaining oil; this is the third grade of oil.
הָרִאשׁוֹן – לַמְּנוֹרָה, וְהַשְּׁאָר – לִמְנָחוֹת.
The first grade is fit for kindling the Candelabrum, and the rest are fit for use in meal offerings.
שְׁלִישִׁי: עוֹטְנוֹ בְּבֵית הַבַּד, עַד שֶׁיִּלְקֶה, וּמַעֲלֵהוּ וּמְנַגְּבוֹ בְּרֹאשׁ הַגָּג, כּוֹתֵשׁ וְנוֹתֵן לְתוֹךְ הַסַּל. רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: סְבִיבוֹת הַסַּל – זֶה רִאשׁוֹן.
How is the third olive harvest processed? This harvest consists of all the olives that still remain on trees. One packs it into a vat [oteno] in the building that houses the olive press [beit habbad] where it remains until it softens, and then one raises it up to the roof and dries it on the rooftop to remove the foul-smelling liquid secreted from the olives while in the vat. Then, one crushes the olives in a mortar and places them into a wicker basket, allowing the oil to drip through the holes into a vessel underneath. Rabbi Yehuda says: One positions them on the walls, surrounding the basket. This is the first grade of oil.
טוֹעֵן בְּקוֹרָה, רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: בַּאֲבָנִים – זֶה שֵׁנִי.
One then presses down on those olives with a wooden beam, thereby producing more oil. And Rabbi Yehuda says: One applies pressure only by placing stones upon them. This is the second grade of oil.
חָזַר וְטָחַן וְטָעַן – זֶה שְׁלִישִׁי.
One would then grind the olives with a millstone and press down upon them with a beam, thereby extracting any remaining oil; this is the third grade of oil.
הָרִאשׁוֹן – לַמְּנוֹרָה, וְהַשְּׁאָר – לִמְנָחוֹת.
The first grade is fit for kindling the Candelabrum, and the rest are fit for use in meal offerings.
גְּמָ׳ אִיבַּעְיָא לְהוּ: מְגַרְגְּרוֹ תְּנַן, אוֹ מְגַלְגְּלוֹ תְּנַן?
GEMARA: A dilemma was raised before the Sages: What is the correct text of the mishna? Do we learn that one picks the olives at the top [megargero], i.e., one selects those that are ripe, or do we learn that one allows all the olives to ripen [megalgelo], and then picks them all?
תָּא שְׁמַע, דְּתַנְיָא: ״שֶׁמֶן זַיִת מִזֵּיתוֹ״ – מִכָּאן אָמְרוּ: זַיִת רִאשׁוֹן מְגַלְגְּלוֹ בְּרֹאשׁ הַזַּיִת, וְכוֹנְסוֹ לְבֵית הַבַּד, וְטוֹחֲנוֹ בְּרֵיחַיִם, וְנוֹתְנוֹ בְּסַלִּין. שֶׁמֶן הַיּוֹצֵא מִמֶּנּוּ, זֶה הָיָה רִאשׁוֹן.
The Gemara answers: Come and hear the resolution to this dilemma from that which is taught in a baraita. The verse states that the olive oil used for the kindling of the Candelabrum is to be: “Refined oil of an olive” (Exodus 27:20), which is interpreted to mean that the olives should be so ripe that the oil drips from them while they are still hanging on their olive tree, without them needing to be pressed. From here the Sages said that for the first olive harvest, one allows all the olives to ripen [megalgelo], picks the entire crop and brings it into the olive press, and he grinds it with a millstone and places it in wicker baskets, and this oil that would flow from it would be the first grade of oil.
טָעַן בְּקוֹרָה, שֶׁמֶן הַיּוֹצֵא מִמֶּנּוּ – זֶה הָיָה שֵׁנִי, וְחָזַר וּפָרַק, טָחַן וְטָעַן – זֶה הָיָה שְׁלִישִׁי. הָרִאשׁוֹן לַמְּנוֹרָה, וְהַשְּׁאָר לִמְנָחוֹת. וְכֵן זַיִת שֵׁנִי.
The baraita continues: Then one presses down upon the olives with a wooden beam. As for the oil that flows from it, this would be the second grade of oil. And then one would remove the crushed olives from the baskets and grind them, and press down upon them with a beam or stones, thereby extracting any remaining oil; this would be the third grade of oil. The first grade is fit for kindling the Candelabrum, and the rest are fit for use in meal offerings. And the same process was similarly used for the second olive harvest.
וְזַיִת שְׁלִישִׁי, עוֹטְנוֹ בְּבֵית הַבַּד עַד שֶׁיִּלְקֶה, וּמַעֲלֶה לְרֹאשׁ הַגָּג, וְעוֹשֶׂה אוֹתוֹ כְּמִין תְּמָרָה עַד שֶׁיָּזוּבוּ מֵימָיו, וְכוֹנְסוֹ לְבֵית הַבַּד, וְטוֹחֲנוֹ בָּרֵיחַיִם, וְנוֹתְנוֹ בְּסַלִּין, וָשֶׁמֶן הַיּוֹצֵא מִמֶּנּוּ – זֶה הָיָה רִאשׁוֹן.
The baraita continues: And for the third olive harvest, the entire crop is packed into a vat in the building that houses the olive press, where it remains until it softens, and then one raises it up to the roof and makes it into a sort of heap, wide at the bottom and narrow at the top, and leaves it there until the fluid it produced while in the vat flows away. And then one brings it to the olive press and grinds it with a millstone and places it into wicker baskets. As for the oil that would then flow from it, this would be the first grade of oil.
טָעַן בְּקוֹרָה, שֶׁמֶן הַיּוֹצֵא מִמֶּנּוּ – זֶה הָיָה שֵׁנִי. פָּרַק חָזַר וְטָחַן וְטָעַן – זֶה הָיָה שְׁלִישִׁי. הָרִאשׁוֹן לַמְּנוֹרָה, וְהַשְּׁאָר לִמְנָחוֹת.
Then one presses down upon it with a wooden beam. As for the oil that would then flow from it, this would be the second grade of oil. And then one would remove the crushed olives from the baskets and grind them, and press down upon them with a beam or stones, thereby extracting any remaining oil; this would be the third grade of oil. The first grade is fit for kindling the Candelabrum, and the rest are fit for use in meal offerings.
רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: לֹא הָיָה טוֹחֲנוֹ בָּרֵיחַיִם, אֶלָּא כּוֹתְשׁוֹ בְּמַכְתֶּשֶׁת, וְלֹא הָיָה טוֹעֵן בְּקוֹרָה אֶלָּא בַּאֲבָנִים, וְלֹא הָיָה נוֹתְנוֹ בְּסַלִּין אֶלָּא לְתוֹךְ סְבִיבוֹת הַסַּל.
The baraita concludes: Rabbi Yehuda disagrees with the Rabbis and says: One does not grind the crop of olives with a millstone; rather, one crushes it in a mortar. And one does not press down upon the olives with a wooden beam; rather, one presses on them with stones. And one does not place the olives into the bottom of the wicker baskets; rather, one positions them on the inner walls of the basket, all around the basket. In this baraita, the term: One allows all the olives to ripen [megalgelo], is used.
הָא גוּפָא קַשְׁיָא: כּוֹתֵשׁ – מַנִּי? רַבִּי יְהוּדָה הִיא, תּוֹךְ הַסַּל – אֲתָאן לְרַבָּנַן!
Having resolved the dilemma based on the baraita, the Gemara now clarifies the ruling of the mishna in light of it. The Gemara asks: This mishna itself is difficult, as the first tanna teaches that the olives should be crushed. From the baraita it is evident that whose opinion is it that the olives are crushed? It is the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda. Yet, when the first tanna states that the olives are placed inside the bottom of the basket, and not on its walls, we arrive at the opinion of the Rabbis who disagree with Rabbi Yehuda in the baraita.
הַאי תַּנָּא סָבַר לַהּ כְּוָתֵיהּ בַּחֲדָא, וּפָלֵיג עֲלֵיהּ בַּחֲדָא.
The Gemara explains: This tanna of the mishna holds in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda with regard to one issue, i.e., the need to crush the olives, but disagrees with him with regard to another issue, i.e., he holds that the olives should be placed inside the basket, not on its walls.
מַתְנִי׳ הָרִאשׁוֹן שֶׁבָּרִאשׁוֹן – אֵין לְמַעְלָה הֵימֶנּוּ. הַשֵּׁנִי שֶׁבָּרִאשׁוֹן וְהָרִאשׁוֹן שֶׁבַּשֵּׁנִי – שָׁוִין. הַשְּׁלִישִׁי שֶׁבָּרִאשׁוֹן וְהַשֵּׁנִי שֶׁבַּשֵּׁנִי וְהָרִאשׁוֹן שֶׁבַּשְּׁלִישִׁי – שָׁוִין. הַשְּׁלִישִׁי שֶׁבַּשֵּׁנִי וְהַשֵּׁנִי שֶׁבַּשְּׁלִישִׁי – שָׁוִין. הַשְּׁלִישִׁי שֶׁבַּשְּׁלִישִׁי – אֵין לְמַטָּה הֵימֶנּוּ.
MISHNA: Having enumerated the nine grades of oils in the previous mishna, this mishna proceeds to rank them by their quality: As for the first grade of oil that is produced from the first harvest, there is none superior to it. The second grade of oil that is produced from the first harvest and the first grade of oil that is produced from the second harvest are of equal quality; there is no reason to choose one over the other. The third grade of oil that is produced from the first harvest and the second grade of oil that is produced from the second harvest and the first grade of oil that is produced from the third harvest are of equal quality. The third grade of oil that is produced from the second harvest and the second grade of oil that is produced from the third harvest are of equal quality. As for the third grade of oil that is produced from the third harvest, there is none inferior to it.
אַף כׇּל הַמְּנָחוֹת הָיוּ בַּדִּין שֶׁיִּטְעֲנוּ שֶׁמֶן זַיִת זָךְ, מָה מְנוֹרָה שֶׁאֵינָהּ לַאֲכִילָה טְעוּנָה שֶׁמֶן זַיִת זָךְ, מְנָחוֹת שֶׁהֵן לַאֲכִילָה אֵינוֹ דִּין שֶׁיִּטְעֲנוּ שֶׁמֶן זַיִת זָךְ! תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר ״זָךְ כָּתִית לְמָאוֹר״, וְאֵין זָךְ כָּתִית לִמְנָחוֹת.
Also, with regard to all the meal offerings, it was logical that they should require the highest quality of refined olive oil, just like the Candelabrum. Because if the Candelabrum, whose oil is not to be consumed on the altar, requires refined olive oil, then meal offerings, which are to be consumed on the altar, is it not logical that they should require refined olive oil? To dispel this notion, the verse states: “Refined pounded olive oil for illumination” (Leviticus 24:2), which indicates that the high-quality, refined, pounded oil is required for the Candelabrum, but there is no need for refined pounded olive oil for meal offerings.
גְּמָ׳ שָׁוִין? וְהָא אָמְרַתְּ רִאשׁוֹן לַמְּנוֹרָה וְהַשְּׁאָר לִמְנָחוֹת! אָמַר רַב נַחְמָן בַּר יִצְחָק: מַאי שָׁוִין – שָׁוִין לִמְנָחוֹת.
GEMARA: The Gemara asks: How can the mishna state that the second grade of the first harvest and the first grade of the second harvest are of equal quality? But didn’t you say that the first grade of each harvest is fit for kindling the Candelabrum and the rest are fit only for use in meal offerings? It would appear then that the first grade in any harvest is actually superior to the second grade of other harvests. To resolve this, Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak said: What does the mishna mean when it states that they are of equal quality? It means that they are equal with regard to meal offerings, and there is no reason to choose one over the other.
אַף [כׇּל] הַמְּנָחוֹת הָיוּ בַּדִּין [וְכוּ׳]. תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: ״זָךְ״ – אֵין ״זָךְ״ אֶלָּא נָקִי, רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: ״כָּתִית״ – אֵין ״כָּתִית״ אֶלָּא כָּתוּשׁ.
§ The mishna teaches: Also with regard to all the meal offerings, it was logical that they should require refined olive oil. To dispel this notion, the verse states: “Refined pounded olive oil for illumination” (Leviticus 24:2). The Sages taught in a baraita with regard to the verse cited in the mishna: The word “refined” means nothing other than clean oil, which flows by itself from the olives without applying any pressure. Rabbi Yehuda says that the word “pounded” means nothing other than olives crushed with a mortar, but not with a millstone.
יָכוֹל יְהֵא זָךְ כָּתִית פָּסוּל לִמְנָחוֹת? תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר ״וְעִשָּׂרוֹן סֹלֶת בָּלוּל בְּשֶׁמֶן כָּתִית״, אִם כֵּן מָה תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר ״לַמָּאוֹר״? אֶלָּא מִפְּנֵי הַחִיסָּכוֹן.
One might have thought that refined, pounded oil is unfit for meal offerings, since the verse specifies that this oil is to be used for illumination. To dispel this notion, the verse states with regard to the meal offering brought with the daily offering: “And a tenth of fine flour, thoroughly mixed with a quarter of a hin of pounded oil” (Exodus 29:40). This indicates that pounded oil is fit to be used in meal offerings. If so, what is the meaning when the verse states that the refined pounded oil is “for illumination”? Rather, the Torah requires the use of refined pounded oil only for the Candelabrum, due to the sparing [haḥisakhon] of money, as the highest-quality oil is very expensive.
מַאי ״חִיסָּכוֹן״? אָמַר רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר: הַתּוֹרָה חָסָה עַל מָמוֹנָן שֶׁל יִשְׂרָאֵל.
The Gemara asks: What is the reason for being sparing? Rabbi Elazar says: The intention is that the Torah spared the money of the Jewish people and did not require that the highest-quality oil be used for the meal offerings.
״צַו אֶת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וְיִקְחוּ אֵלֶיךָ שֶׁמֶן זַיִת זָךְ״, אָמַר רַבִּי שְׁמוּאֵל בַּר נַחְמָנִי: ״אֵלֶיךָ״ – וְלֹא לִי, לֹא לְאוֹרָה אֲנִי צָרִיךְ.
§ The Gemara discusses the Candelabrum and other aspects of the Temple. The verse states: “Command the children of Israel, and they shall take for yourself refined pounded olive oil for illumination, to kindle the lamps continually” (Leviticus 24:2). Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥmani says: God tells the Jewish people that the oil should be taken “for yourself,” to indicate that it is for their benefit and not for My benefit, as I do not need its light.
שֻׁלְחָן בַּצָּפוֹן, וּמְנוֹרָה בַּדָּרוֹם – אָמַר רַבִּי זְרִיקָא, אָמַר רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר: לֹא לַאֲכִילָה אֲנִי צָרִיךְ, וְלֹא לְאוֹרָה אֲנִי צָרִיךְ.
Similarly, with regard to the Table of the shewbread, located in the north of the Sanctuary, and the Candelabrum, located in the south of the Sanctuary, Rabbi Zerika says that Rabbi Elazar says: God said to the Jewish people: I do not require the Table for eating, nor do I require the Candelabrum for its illumination. In evidence of this, the Candelabrum was not positioned close to the Table, as is done by one who sets a table with food in order to eat there.
וַיַּעַשׂ לַבָּיִת חַלּוֹנֵי שְׁקֻפִים אֲטֻמִים״ – תָּנָא: שְׁקוּפִין מִבִּפְנִים, וַאֲטוּמִים מִבַּחוּץ, לֹא לְאוֹרָה אֲנִי צָרִיךְ.
With regard the Temple built by King Solomon, the verse states: “And he made for the House, windows narrow and broad” (I Kings 6:4). The Sages taught in a baraita: Typically, windows are constructed to widen toward the inside in order that the light from the outside would be dispersed throughout the room. For the Temple, God said: Make the windows narrow within and broad without, as I do not require its illumination. On the contrary, the light of the Temple is to be radiated outward.
״מִחוּץ לְפָרֹכֶת הָעֵדוּת בְּאֹהֶל מוֹעֵד״ – עֵדוּת הוּא לְכׇל בָּאֵי עוֹלָם שֶׁהַשְּׁכִינָה שׁוֹרָה בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל.
God instructed Aaron to kindle the Candelabrum: “Outside the Curtain of the testimony in the Tent of Meeting” (Leviticus 24:3). The dividing curtain is referred to here as: The Curtain of the testimony, to indicate that the illumination of the Candelabrum is testimony to all of humanity that the Divine Presence rests among the Jewish people.
וְאִם תֹּאמַר: לְאוֹרָה אֲנִי צָרִיךְ? וַהֲלֹא כׇּל אַרְבָּעִים שָׁנָה שֶׁהָלְכוּ יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּמִדְבָּר לֹא הָלְכוּ אֶלָּא לְאוֹרוֹ! אֶלָּא עֵדוּת הוּא לְכׇל בָּאֵי עוֹלָם שֶׁהַשְּׁכִינָה שׁוֹרָה בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל.
And if you question this and say: How is this testimony; perhaps the Candelabrum is lit for illumination? To this God would respond: Do I need its light? But isn’t it so that for all forty years that the Jewish people walked in the wilderness of Sinai until they entered Eretz Yisrael, they walked exclusively by His light, i.e., from the pillar of fire that guided them at night. If God provides light for others, he certainly does not need it Himself. Rather, evidently, the illumination of the Candelabrum is testimony to all of humanity that the Divine Presence rests among the Jewish people.
מַאי עֵדוּתָהּ? אָמַר רָבָא: זֶה נֵר מַעֲרָבִי, שֶׁנּוֹתְנִין בָּהּ שֶׁמֶן כְּנֶגֶד חַבְרוֹתֶיהָ, וּמִמֶּנָּה הָיָה מַדְלִיק, וּבָהּ הָיָה מְסַיֵּים.
What provides its testimony? Rava says: The testimony is provided by the westernmost lamp of the Candelabrum, in which they place a quantity of oil equivalent to that placed in the other lamps, and nevertheless it continues to burn longer than any of the other lamps. It burns so long that every evening, from it the priest would kindle the Candelabrum, i.e., he lit that westernmost lamp first, and the following morning, with it he would conclude the preparation of the lamps for the following evening’s lighting, because it remained alight longer than any of the other lamps. This perpetual miracle was testimony to God’s continuous presence among His people.
מַתְנִי׳ מֵאַיִן הָיוּ מְבִיאִין אֶת הַיַּיִן? קְדוֹחַיִם וַעֲטוּלַיִן – אַלְפָּא לַיַּיִן, שְׁנִיָּה לָהֶן – בֵּית רִימָּה וּבֵית לָבָן בָּהָר, וּכְפַר סִיגְנָא בַּבִּקְעָה. כׇּל אֲרָצוֹת הָיוּ כְּשֵׁרוֹת, אֶלָּא מִיכָּן הָיוּ מְבִיאִין.
MISHNA: From where would they bring the wine for libations? Keduḥim and Attulin are the primary sources for wine. Secondary to them is Beit Rima and Beit Lavan, located in the mountain, and the village of Signa, located in the valley. All the regions were valid sources for wine; but it was from here, i.e., the aforementioned locations, that they would bring the wine.
אֵין מְבִיאִין לֹא מִבֵּית הַזְּבָלִים, וְלֹא מִבֵּית הַשְּׁלָחִים, וְלֹא מִמַּה שֶּׁנִּזְרַע בֵּינֵיהֶן, וְאִם הֵבִיא – כָּשֵׁר. אֵין מְבִיאִין הַלִּיסְטְיוֹן, וְאִם הֵבִיא – כָּשֵׁר. אֵין מְבִיאִין יָשָׁן – דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי, וַחֲכָמִים מַכְשִׁירִין. אֵין מְבִיאִין לֹא מָתוֹק, וְלֹא מְעוּשָּׁן, וְלֹא מְבוּשָּׁל, וְאִם הֵבִיא – פָּסוּל. וְאֵין מְבִיאִין מִן הַדָּלִיּוֹת, אֶלָּא מִן הָרַגְלִיּוֹת, וּמִן הַכְּרָמִים הָעֲבוּדִין.
One may not bring libations of wine that come from a fertilized vineyard, or from an irrigated vineyard, or from a vineyard in which grain was sown between the vines. But if one did bring a libation from such wine, it is valid. One may not bring libations from sweet wine made from sun-dried grapes [hilyasteyon], but if one did bring a libation from such wine, it is valid. One may not bring wine aged for one year; this is the statement of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi, but the Rabbis deem it valid. One may not bring libations from sweet wine, nor from wine produced from smoked grapes, nor libations from boiled wine, and if one did bring a libation from such wine, it is not valid. And one may not bring wine produced from grapes suspended on stakes or trees; rather, one brings it from grapes at foot height, i.e., that rest on the ground, which are superior-quality grapes, and from vineyards that are cultivated, i.e., where one hoes beneath the vines twice a year.
וְלֹא כּוֹנְסִין אוֹתוֹ בַּחֲצָבִין גְּדוֹלִים, אֶלָּא בְּחָבִיּוֹת קְטַנּוֹת, וְאֵינוֹ מְמַלֵּא אֶת הֶחָבִית עַד פִּיהָ, כְּדֵי שֶׁיְּהֵא רֵיחוֹ נוֹדֵף.
And when producing wine for libations, one should not collect the wine into large barrels, as it causes the wine to spoil; rather, it should be placed in small casks. And one does not fill up the cask until its mouth; rather, one leaves some empty space so that its fragrance will collect there and diffuse when the lid is opened.
אֵינוֹ מֵבִיא מִפִּיהָ – מִפְּנֵי
One should not bring libations from wine that rests at the mouth of the cask due to
Follow 
Today’s daily daf tools:
Delve Deeper
Broaden your understanding of the topics on this daf with classes and podcasts from top women Talmud scholars.
The Innovation of אינו מעכב – What does this category teach us about the halakhic system?
02.26.2026 | ט׳ באדר תשפ״ו
New to Talmud?
Check out our resources designed to help you navigate a page of Talmud – and study at the pace, level and style that fits you.
The Hadran Women’s Tapestry
Meet the diverse women learning Gemara at Hadran and hear their stories.
A beautiful world of Talmudic sages now fill my daily life with discussion and debate.
bringing alive our traditions and texts that has brought new meaning to my life.
I am a מגילת אסתר reader for women . the words in the Mishna of מסכת megillah 17a
הקורא את המגילה למפרע לא יצא were powerful to me.
I hope to have the zchut to complete the cycle for my 70th birthday.
Sheila Hauser
Jerusalem, Israel
I started learning daf yomi at the beginning of this cycle. As the pandemic evolved, it’s been so helpful to me to have this discipline every morning to listen to the daf podcast after I’ve read the daf; learning about the relationships between the rabbis and the ways they were constructing our Jewish religion after the destruction of the Temple. I’m grateful to be on this journey!
Mona Fishbane
Teaneck NJ, United States
I started learning Daf in Jan 2020 with Brachot b/c I had never seen the Jewish people united around something so positive, and I wanted to be a part of it. Also, I wanted to broaden my background in Torah Shebal Peh- Maayanot gave me a great gemara education, but I knew that I could hold a conversation in most parts of tanach but almost no TSB. I’m so thankful for Daf and have gained immensely.
Meira Shapiro
NJ, United States
When I began the previous cycle, I promised myself that if I stuck with it, I would reward myself with a trip to Israel. Little did I know that the trip would involve attending the first ever women’s siyum and being inspired by so many learners. I am now over 2 years into my second cycle and being part of this large, diverse, fascinating learning family has enhanced my learning exponentially.
Shira Krebs
Minnesota, United States
Last cycle, I listened to parts of various מסכתות. When the הדרן סיום was advertised, I listened to Michelle on נידה. I knew that בע”ה with the next cycle I was in (ב”נ). As I entered the סיום (early), I saw the signs and was overcome with emotion. I was randomly seated in the front row, and I cried many times that night. My choice to learn דף יומי was affirmed. It is one of the best I have made!
Miriam Tannenbaum
אפרת, Israel
I’ve been wanting to do Daf Yomi for years, but always wanted to start at the beginning and not in the middle of things. When the opportunity came in 2020, I decided: “this is now the time!” I’ve been posting my journey daily on social media, tracking my progress (#DafYomi); now it’s fully integrated into my daily routines. I’ve also inspired my partner to join, too!
Joséphine Altzman
Teaneck, United States
I learned daf more off than on 40 years ago. At the beginning of the current cycle, I decided to commit to learning daf regularly. Having Rabanit Michelle available as a learning partner has been amazing. Sometimes I learn with Hadran, sometimes with my husband, and sometimes on my own. It’s been fun to be part of an extended learning community.
Miriam Pollack
Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
In my Shana bet at Migdal Oz I attended the Hadran siyum hash”as. Witnessing so many women so passionate about their Torah learning and connection to God, I knew I had to begin with the coming cycle. My wedding (June 24) was two weeks before the siyum of mesechet yoma so I went a little ahead and was able to make a speech and siyum at my kiseh kallah on my wedding day!
Sharona Guggenheim Plumb
Givat Shmuel, Israel
See video
Susan Fisher
Raanana, Israel
I graduated college in December 2019 and received a set of shas as a present from my husband. With my long time dream of learning daf yomi, I had no idea that a new cycle was beginning just one month later, in January 2020. I have been learning the daf ever since with Michelle Farber… Through grad school, my first job, my first baby, and all the other incredible journeys over the past few years!
Sigal Spitzer Flamholz
Bronx, United States
When we heard that R. Michelle was starting daf yomi, my 11-year-old suggested that I go. Little did she know that she would lose me every morning from then on. I remember standing at the Farbers’ door, almost too shy to enter. After that first class, I said that I would come the next day but couldn’t commit to more. A decade later, I still look forward to learning from R. Michelle every morning.
Ruth Leah Kahan
Ra’anana, Israel
When I was working and taking care of my children, learning was never on the list. Now that I have more time I have two different Gemora classes and the nach yomi as well as the mishna yomi daily.
Shoshana Shinnar
Jerusalem, Israel
Hearing and reading about the siyumim at the completion of the 13 th cycle Daf Yomi asked our shul rabbi about starting the Daf – he directed me to another shiur in town he thought would allow a woman to join, and so I did! Love seeing the sources for the Divrei Torah I’ve been hearing for the past decades of living an observant life and raising 5 children .
Jill Felder
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
I started learning at the beginning of this cycle more than 2 years ago, and I have not missed a day or a daf. It’s been challenging and enlightening and even mind-numbing at times, but the learning and the shared experience have all been worth it. If you are open to it, there’s no telling what might come into your life.
Patti Evans
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
It’s hard to believe it has been over two years. Daf yomi has changed my life in so many ways and has been sustaining during this global sea change. Each day means learning something new, digging a little deeper, adding another lens, seeing worlds with new eyes. Daf has also fostered new friendships and deepened childhood connections, as long time friends have unexpectedly become havruta.
Joanna Rom
Northwest Washington, United States
I started learning when my brother sent me the news clip of the celebration of the last Daf Yomi cycle. I was so floored to see so many women celebrating that I wanted to be a part of it. It has been an enriching experience studying a text in a language I don’t speak, using background knowledge that I don’t have. It is stretching my learning in unexpected ways, bringing me joy and satisfaction.
Jodi Gladstone
Warwick, Rhode Island, United States
When I began the previous cycle, I promised myself that if I stuck with it, I would reward myself with a trip to Israel. Little did I know that the trip would involve attending the first ever women’s siyum and being inspired by so many learners. I am now over 2 years into my second cycle and being part of this large, diverse, fascinating learning family has enhanced my learning exponentially.
Shira Krebs
Minnesota, United States
The first month I learned Daf Yomi by myself in secret, because I wasn’t sure how my husband would react, but after the siyyum on Masechet Brachot I discovered Hadran and now sometimes my husband listens to the daf with me. He and I also learn mishnayot together and are constantly finding connections between the different masechtot.
Laura Warshawsky
Silver Spring, Maryland, United States
I attended the Siyum so that I could tell my granddaughter that I had been there. Then I decided to listen on Spotify and after the siyum of Brachot, Covid and zoom began. It gave structure to my day. I learn with people from all over the world who are now my friends – yet most of us have never met. I can’t imagine life without it. Thank you Rabbanit Michelle.
Emma Rinberg
Raanana, Israel
I learned Mishnayot more than twenty years ago and started with Gemara much later in life. Although I never managed to learn Daf Yomi consistently, I am learning since some years Gemara in depth and with much joy. Since last year I am studying at the International Halakha Scholars Program at the WIHL. I often listen to Rabbanit Farbers Gemara shiurim to understand better a specific sugyiah. I am grateful for the help and inspiration!
Shoshana Ruerup
Berlin, Germany
Menachot 86
וְאִם הֵבִיא – פָּסוּל (וְהָתַנְיָא: וְאִם הֵבִיא – כָּשֵׁר), מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהוּא שְׂרָף.
but if one did bring a meal offering made of such oil, it is not valid. But isn’t it taught in a baraita that if one did bring it, it is valid, because it is regarded merely as sap and not as oil? This contradicts this mishna, which assumes that it is regarded as oil.
אָמַר רַב יוֹסֵף: לָא קַשְׁיָא, הָא רַבִּי חִיָּיא, הָא רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בַּר רַבִּי, דְּרַבִּי חִיָּיא זָרֵיק לֵיהּ, וְרַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בַּר רַבִּי מְטַבֵּל [בֵּיהּ] (לֵיהּ), וְסִימָנָיךְ: עֲשִׁירִים מְקַמְּצִין.
Rav Yosef said: It is not difficult to resolve this contradiction. This baraita expresses the opinion of Rabbi Ḥiyya, and that mishna expresses the opinion of Rabbi Shimon, son of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi. As Rabbi Ḥiyya would toss such oil away, as he did not consider it to be oil, and Rabbi Shimon, son of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi, would dip his food into it, as he considered it to be oil. The Gemara concludes: And your mnemonic by which to remember their respective opinions is: The wealthy are parsimonious, i.e., Rabbi Shimon, son of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi, was wealthy, and he did not toss the oil away.
״שִׁשָּׁה חֳדָשִׁים בְּשֶׁמֶן הַמּוֹר״ – מַאי ״שֶׁמֶן הַמּוֹר״? רַב הוּנָא בַּר חִיָּיא אָמַר: סְטָכְתָּא. רַבִּי יִרְמְיָה בַּר אַבָּא אָמַר: שֶׁמֶן זַיִת שֶׁלֹּא הֵבִיא שְׁלִישׁ.
§ The Gemara digresses to discuss oil of myrrh: In describing the treatments provided to the women in preparation for their meeting with King Ahasuerus, the verse states: “For so were the days of their anointing accomplished: Six months with oil of myrrh, and six months with sweet odors and with other ointments of the women” (Esther 2:12). The Gemara asks: What is “oil of myrrh”? Rav Huna bar Ḥiyya says: It is the aromatic oil called setakhta. Rav Yirmeya bar Abba says: It is an oil derived from olives that have not yet reached one-third of their growth; the acidic oil is effective as a depilatory.
תַּנְיָא נָמֵי הָכִי: רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: אַנְפִּקִנוֹן – שֶׁמֶן זַיִת שֶׁלֹּא הֵבִיא שְׁלִישׁ, לָמָּה סָכִין אוֹתוֹ? שֶׁמַּשִּׁיר אֶת הַשֵּׂיעָר וּמְעַדֵּן אֶת הַבָּשָׂר.
The Gemara notes: This explanation of Rav Yirmeya bar Abba is also taught in a baraita: Rabbi Yehuda says: The term anpikanon is referring to olive oil produced from olives that have not yet reached one-third of their growth. And why do women spread it on their bodies? They do so because it removes the hair and pampers the skin.
אֵין מְבִיאִין מִן הַגַּרְגְּרִין שֶׁנִּשְׁרוּ בְּמַיִם. תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: שֶׁמֶן זַיִת כָּבוּשׁ, שָׁלוּק, שָׁרוּי, וְשֶׁל שְׁמָרִים, וְשֶׁל רֵיחַ רָע – לֹא יָבִיא, וְאִם הֵבִיא – פָּסוּל.
§ The mishna teaches: One may not bring meal offerings containing oil from olives that were soaked in water, nor from pickled olives, nor from boiled olives, and even if one did bring it, it is not valid. The Sages taught in a baraita: Olive oil produced from pickled olives, boiled olives, or olives soaked in water, and oil made from olive sediment, and oil with a foul odor may not be brought as part of a meal offering, and even if one did bring it, it is not valid.
בָּעֵי רַבָּה: הִקְדִּישׁוֹ, מַהוּ שֶׁיִּלְקֶה עָלָיו מִשּׁוּם בַּעַל מוּם? כֵּיוָן דְּפָסוּל – כְּבַעַל מוּם דָּמֵי, אוֹ דִלְמָא אֵין בַּעַל מוּם אֶלָּא בִּבְהֵמָה? תֵּיקוּ.
Rava asks: If one consecrated one of these unfit oils for use in meal offerings, what is the halakha with regard to whether he should be flogged for consecrating it due to the prohibition against consecrating a flawed item as an offering? Does one say that since it is unfit, it is comparable to a blemished animal? Or perhaps the prohibition against consecrating a flawed item applies only to an animal. The Gemara concludes: The dilemma shall stand unresolved.
מַתְנִי׳ שְׁלֹשָׁה זֵיתִים הֵן, וּבָהֶן שְׁלֹשָׁה שְׁלֹשָׁה שְׁמָנִים.
MISHNA: There are three harvests of olives each year, and in each of them, three different grades of oils are produced.
הַזַּיִת הָרִאשׁוֹן מְגַרְגְּרוֹ בְּרֹאשׁ הַזַּיִת, וְכוֹתֵשׁ וְנוֹתֵן לְתוֹךְ הַסַּל, רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: סְבִיבוֹת הַסַּל – זֶה רִאשׁוֹן.
How is the first olive harvest processed? One picks the ripe olives at the top of the olive tree, as those are the first to ripen, and crushes them in a mortar and places them inside the bottom of a wicker basket that has many small holes in it. The oil will then drip from the olives through those holes into a vessel placed underneath the basket. Rabbi Yehuda says: One positions the olives on the walls, surrounding the basket. This produces more refined oil, as the dregs stick to the walls of the basket. This is the first grade of oil produced from the first harvest.
חָזַר וְטוֹעֵן בְּקוֹרָה, רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: בַּאֲבָנִים – זֶה שֵׁנִי.
After the oil ceases to seep from the crushed olives, one then presses down with a wooden beam upon them, causing additional oil to flow from the basket into the vessel. Rabbi Yehuda says: The excessive pressure produced by pressing down with a beam would cause some of the flesh of the olives to get mixed in with the oil, compromising its quality. Rather, one applies pressure by placing stones upon the olives. This is the second grade of oil.
חָזַר וְטָחַן, וְטָעַן – זֶה שְׁלִישִׁי.
One then ground the olives with a millstone and pressed down with a beam on those olives to extract any remaining oil; this is the third grade of oil.
הָרִאשׁוֹן – לַמְּנוֹרָה, וְהַשְּׁאָר – לִמְנָחוֹת.
The first grade is fit for kindling the Candelabrum, which requires: “Refined olive oil” (Leviticus 24:2), and the rest are fit for use in meal offerings.
הַשֵּׁנִי – מְגַרְגְּרוֹ בְּרֹאשׁ הַגָּג, וְכוֹתֵשׁ, וְנוֹתֵן לְתוֹךְ הַסַּל, רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: סְבִיבוֹת הַסַּל – זֶה רִאשׁוֹן.
How is the second olive harvest processed? One picks the crop of olives that is accessible while one is standing on the rooftop. This was the second lot of olives to ripen. And one crushes it in a mortar and places those olives into a wicker basket, allowing the oil to drip through the holes into a vessel underneath. Rabbi Yehuda says: One positions the olives on the walls, surrounding the basket. This is the first grade of oil from the second harvest.
טוֹעֵן בְּקוֹרָה, וְרַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: בַּאֲבָנִים – זֶה שֵׁנִי.
One then presses down upon those olives with a wooden beam, thereby producing more oil. And Rabbi Yehuda says: One applies pressure only by placing stones upon them. This is the second grade of oil.
חָזַר וְטָחַן, וְטָעַן – זֶה שְׁלִישִׁי.
One then ground the olives with a millstone and pressed down upon them with a beam, thereby extracting any remaining oil; this is the third grade of oil.
הָרִאשׁוֹן – לַמְּנוֹרָה, וְהַשְּׁאָר – לִמְנָחוֹת.
The first grade is fit for kindling the Candelabrum, and the rest are fit for use in meal offerings.
שְׁלִישִׁי: עוֹטְנוֹ בְּבֵית הַבַּד, עַד שֶׁיִּלְקֶה, וּמַעֲלֵהוּ וּמְנַגְּבוֹ בְּרֹאשׁ הַגָּג, כּוֹתֵשׁ וְנוֹתֵן לְתוֹךְ הַסַּל. רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: סְבִיבוֹת הַסַּל – זֶה רִאשׁוֹן.
How is the third olive harvest processed? This harvest consists of all the olives that still remain on trees. One packs it into a vat [oteno] in the building that houses the olive press [beit habbad] where it remains until it softens, and then one raises it up to the roof and dries it on the rooftop to remove the foul-smelling liquid secreted from the olives while in the vat. Then, one crushes the olives in a mortar and places them into a wicker basket, allowing the oil to drip through the holes into a vessel underneath. Rabbi Yehuda says: One positions them on the walls, surrounding the basket. This is the first grade of oil.
טוֹעֵן בְּקוֹרָה, רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: בַּאֲבָנִים – זֶה שֵׁנִי.
One then presses down on those olives with a wooden beam, thereby producing more oil. And Rabbi Yehuda says: One applies pressure only by placing stones upon them. This is the second grade of oil.
חָזַר וְטָחַן וְטָעַן – זֶה שְׁלִישִׁי.
One would then grind the olives with a millstone and press down upon them with a beam, thereby extracting any remaining oil; this is the third grade of oil.
הָרִאשׁוֹן – לַמְּנוֹרָה, וְהַשְּׁאָר – לִמְנָחוֹת.
The first grade is fit for kindling the Candelabrum, and the rest are fit for use in meal offerings.
גְּמָ׳ אִיבַּעְיָא לְהוּ: מְגַרְגְּרוֹ תְּנַן, אוֹ מְגַלְגְּלוֹ תְּנַן?
GEMARA: A dilemma was raised before the Sages: What is the correct text of the mishna? Do we learn that one picks the olives at the top [megargero], i.e., one selects those that are ripe, or do we learn that one allows all the olives to ripen [megalgelo], and then picks them all?
תָּא שְׁמַע, דְּתַנְיָא: ״שֶׁמֶן זַיִת מִזֵּיתוֹ״ – מִכָּאן אָמְרוּ: זַיִת רִאשׁוֹן מְגַלְגְּלוֹ בְּרֹאשׁ הַזַּיִת, וְכוֹנְסוֹ לְבֵית הַבַּד, וְטוֹחֲנוֹ בְּרֵיחַיִם, וְנוֹתְנוֹ בְּסַלִּין. שֶׁמֶן הַיּוֹצֵא מִמֶּנּוּ, זֶה הָיָה רִאשׁוֹן.
The Gemara answers: Come and hear the resolution to this dilemma from that which is taught in a baraita. The verse states that the olive oil used for the kindling of the Candelabrum is to be: “Refined oil of an olive” (Exodus 27:20), which is interpreted to mean that the olives should be so ripe that the oil drips from them while they are still hanging on their olive tree, without them needing to be pressed. From here the Sages said that for the first olive harvest, one allows all the olives to ripen [megalgelo], picks the entire crop and brings it into the olive press, and he grinds it with a millstone and places it in wicker baskets, and this oil that would flow from it would be the first grade of oil.
טָעַן בְּקוֹרָה, שֶׁמֶן הַיּוֹצֵא מִמֶּנּוּ – זֶה הָיָה שֵׁנִי, וְחָזַר וּפָרַק, טָחַן וְטָעַן – זֶה הָיָה שְׁלִישִׁי. הָרִאשׁוֹן לַמְּנוֹרָה, וְהַשְּׁאָר לִמְנָחוֹת. וְכֵן זַיִת שֵׁנִי.
The baraita continues: Then one presses down upon the olives with a wooden beam. As for the oil that flows from it, this would be the second grade of oil. And then one would remove the crushed olives from the baskets and grind them, and press down upon them with a beam or stones, thereby extracting any remaining oil; this would be the third grade of oil. The first grade is fit for kindling the Candelabrum, and the rest are fit for use in meal offerings. And the same process was similarly used for the second olive harvest.
וְזַיִת שְׁלִישִׁי, עוֹטְנוֹ בְּבֵית הַבַּד עַד שֶׁיִּלְקֶה, וּמַעֲלֶה לְרֹאשׁ הַגָּג, וְעוֹשֶׂה אוֹתוֹ כְּמִין תְּמָרָה עַד שֶׁיָּזוּבוּ מֵימָיו, וְכוֹנְסוֹ לְבֵית הַבַּד, וְטוֹחֲנוֹ בָּרֵיחַיִם, וְנוֹתְנוֹ בְּסַלִּין, וָשֶׁמֶן הַיּוֹצֵא מִמֶּנּוּ – זֶה הָיָה רִאשׁוֹן.
The baraita continues: And for the third olive harvest, the entire crop is packed into a vat in the building that houses the olive press, where it remains until it softens, and then one raises it up to the roof and makes it into a sort of heap, wide at the bottom and narrow at the top, and leaves it there until the fluid it produced while in the vat flows away. And then one brings it to the olive press and grinds it with a millstone and places it into wicker baskets. As for the oil that would then flow from it, this would be the first grade of oil.
טָעַן בְּקוֹרָה, שֶׁמֶן הַיּוֹצֵא מִמֶּנּוּ – זֶה הָיָה שֵׁנִי. פָּרַק חָזַר וְטָחַן וְטָעַן – זֶה הָיָה שְׁלִישִׁי. הָרִאשׁוֹן לַמְּנוֹרָה, וְהַשְּׁאָר לִמְנָחוֹת.
Then one presses down upon it with a wooden beam. As for the oil that would then flow from it, this would be the second grade of oil. And then one would remove the crushed olives from the baskets and grind them, and press down upon them with a beam or stones, thereby extracting any remaining oil; this would be the third grade of oil. The first grade is fit for kindling the Candelabrum, and the rest are fit for use in meal offerings.
רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: לֹא הָיָה טוֹחֲנוֹ בָּרֵיחַיִם, אֶלָּא כּוֹתְשׁוֹ בְּמַכְתֶּשֶׁת, וְלֹא הָיָה טוֹעֵן בְּקוֹרָה אֶלָּא בַּאֲבָנִים, וְלֹא הָיָה נוֹתְנוֹ בְּסַלִּין אֶלָּא לְתוֹךְ סְבִיבוֹת הַסַּל.
The baraita concludes: Rabbi Yehuda disagrees with the Rabbis and says: One does not grind the crop of olives with a millstone; rather, one crushes it in a mortar. And one does not press down upon the olives with a wooden beam; rather, one presses on them with stones. And one does not place the olives into the bottom of the wicker baskets; rather, one positions them on the inner walls of the basket, all around the basket. In this baraita, the term: One allows all the olives to ripen [megalgelo], is used.
הָא גוּפָא קַשְׁיָא: כּוֹתֵשׁ – מַנִּי? רַבִּי יְהוּדָה הִיא, תּוֹךְ הַסַּל – אֲתָאן לְרַבָּנַן!
Having resolved the dilemma based on the baraita, the Gemara now clarifies the ruling of the mishna in light of it. The Gemara asks: This mishna itself is difficult, as the first tanna teaches that the olives should be crushed. From the baraita it is evident that whose opinion is it that the olives are crushed? It is the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda. Yet, when the first tanna states that the olives are placed inside the bottom of the basket, and not on its walls, we arrive at the opinion of the Rabbis who disagree with Rabbi Yehuda in the baraita.
הַאי תַּנָּא סָבַר לַהּ כְּוָתֵיהּ בַּחֲדָא, וּפָלֵיג עֲלֵיהּ בַּחֲדָא.
The Gemara explains: This tanna of the mishna holds in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda with regard to one issue, i.e., the need to crush the olives, but disagrees with him with regard to another issue, i.e., he holds that the olives should be placed inside the basket, not on its walls.
מַתְנִי׳ הָרִאשׁוֹן שֶׁבָּרִאשׁוֹן – אֵין לְמַעְלָה הֵימֶנּוּ. הַשֵּׁנִי שֶׁבָּרִאשׁוֹן וְהָרִאשׁוֹן שֶׁבַּשֵּׁנִי – שָׁוִין. הַשְּׁלִישִׁי שֶׁבָּרִאשׁוֹן וְהַשֵּׁנִי שֶׁבַּשֵּׁנִי וְהָרִאשׁוֹן שֶׁבַּשְּׁלִישִׁי – שָׁוִין. הַשְּׁלִישִׁי שֶׁבַּשֵּׁנִי וְהַשֵּׁנִי שֶׁבַּשְּׁלִישִׁי – שָׁוִין. הַשְּׁלִישִׁי שֶׁבַּשְּׁלִישִׁי – אֵין לְמַטָּה הֵימֶנּוּ.
MISHNA: Having enumerated the nine grades of oils in the previous mishna, this mishna proceeds to rank them by their quality: As for the first grade of oil that is produced from the first harvest, there is none superior to it. The second grade of oil that is produced from the first harvest and the first grade of oil that is produced from the second harvest are of equal quality; there is no reason to choose one over the other. The third grade of oil that is produced from the first harvest and the second grade of oil that is produced from the second harvest and the first grade of oil that is produced from the third harvest are of equal quality. The third grade of oil that is produced from the second harvest and the second grade of oil that is produced from the third harvest are of equal quality. As for the third grade of oil that is produced from the third harvest, there is none inferior to it.
אַף כׇּל הַמְּנָחוֹת הָיוּ בַּדִּין שֶׁיִּטְעֲנוּ שֶׁמֶן זַיִת זָךְ, מָה מְנוֹרָה שֶׁאֵינָהּ לַאֲכִילָה טְעוּנָה שֶׁמֶן זַיִת זָךְ, מְנָחוֹת שֶׁהֵן לַאֲכִילָה אֵינוֹ דִּין שֶׁיִּטְעֲנוּ שֶׁמֶן זַיִת זָךְ! תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר ״זָךְ כָּתִית לְמָאוֹר״, וְאֵין זָךְ כָּתִית לִמְנָחוֹת.
Also, with regard to all the meal offerings, it was logical that they should require the highest quality of refined olive oil, just like the Candelabrum. Because if the Candelabrum, whose oil is not to be consumed on the altar, requires refined olive oil, then meal offerings, which are to be consumed on the altar, is it not logical that they should require refined olive oil? To dispel this notion, the verse states: “Refined pounded olive oil for illumination” (Leviticus 24:2), which indicates that the high-quality, refined, pounded oil is required for the Candelabrum, but there is no need for refined pounded olive oil for meal offerings.
גְּמָ׳ שָׁוִין? וְהָא אָמְרַתְּ רִאשׁוֹן לַמְּנוֹרָה וְהַשְּׁאָר לִמְנָחוֹת! אָמַר רַב נַחְמָן בַּר יִצְחָק: מַאי שָׁוִין – שָׁוִין לִמְנָחוֹת.
GEMARA: The Gemara asks: How can the mishna state that the second grade of the first harvest and the first grade of the second harvest are of equal quality? But didn’t you say that the first grade of each harvest is fit for kindling the Candelabrum and the rest are fit only for use in meal offerings? It would appear then that the first grade in any harvest is actually superior to the second grade of other harvests. To resolve this, Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak said: What does the mishna mean when it states that they are of equal quality? It means that they are equal with regard to meal offerings, and there is no reason to choose one over the other.
אַף [כׇּל] הַמְּנָחוֹת הָיוּ בַּדִּין [וְכוּ׳]. תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: ״זָךְ״ – אֵין ״זָךְ״ אֶלָּא נָקִי, רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר: ״כָּתִית״ – אֵין ״כָּתִית״ אֶלָּא כָּתוּשׁ.
§ The mishna teaches: Also with regard to all the meal offerings, it was logical that they should require refined olive oil. To dispel this notion, the verse states: “Refined pounded olive oil for illumination” (Leviticus 24:2). The Sages taught in a baraita with regard to the verse cited in the mishna: The word “refined” means nothing other than clean oil, which flows by itself from the olives without applying any pressure. Rabbi Yehuda says that the word “pounded” means nothing other than olives crushed with a mortar, but not with a millstone.
יָכוֹל יְהֵא זָךְ כָּתִית פָּסוּל לִמְנָחוֹת? תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר ״וְעִשָּׂרוֹן סֹלֶת בָּלוּל בְּשֶׁמֶן כָּתִית״, אִם כֵּן מָה תַּלְמוּד לוֹמַר ״לַמָּאוֹר״? אֶלָּא מִפְּנֵי הַחִיסָּכוֹן.
One might have thought that refined, pounded oil is unfit for meal offerings, since the verse specifies that this oil is to be used for illumination. To dispel this notion, the verse states with regard to the meal offering brought with the daily offering: “And a tenth of fine flour, thoroughly mixed with a quarter of a hin of pounded oil” (Exodus 29:40). This indicates that pounded oil is fit to be used in meal offerings. If so, what is the meaning when the verse states that the refined pounded oil is “for illumination”? Rather, the Torah requires the use of refined pounded oil only for the Candelabrum, due to the sparing [haḥisakhon] of money, as the highest-quality oil is very expensive.
מַאי ״חִיסָּכוֹן״? אָמַר רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר: הַתּוֹרָה חָסָה עַל מָמוֹנָן שֶׁל יִשְׂרָאֵל.
The Gemara asks: What is the reason for being sparing? Rabbi Elazar says: The intention is that the Torah spared the money of the Jewish people and did not require that the highest-quality oil be used for the meal offerings.
״צַו אֶת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וְיִקְחוּ אֵלֶיךָ שֶׁמֶן זַיִת זָךְ״, אָמַר רַבִּי שְׁמוּאֵל בַּר נַחְמָנִי: ״אֵלֶיךָ״ – וְלֹא לִי, לֹא לְאוֹרָה אֲנִי צָרִיךְ.
§ The Gemara discusses the Candelabrum and other aspects of the Temple. The verse states: “Command the children of Israel, and they shall take for yourself refined pounded olive oil for illumination, to kindle the lamps continually” (Leviticus 24:2). Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥmani says: God tells the Jewish people that the oil should be taken “for yourself,” to indicate that it is for their benefit and not for My benefit, as I do not need its light.
שֻׁלְחָן בַּצָּפוֹן, וּמְנוֹרָה בַּדָּרוֹם – אָמַר רַבִּי זְרִיקָא, אָמַר רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר: לֹא לַאֲכִילָה אֲנִי צָרִיךְ, וְלֹא לְאוֹרָה אֲנִי צָרִיךְ.
Similarly, with regard to the Table of the shewbread, located in the north of the Sanctuary, and the Candelabrum, located in the south of the Sanctuary, Rabbi Zerika says that Rabbi Elazar says: God said to the Jewish people: I do not require the Table for eating, nor do I require the Candelabrum for its illumination. In evidence of this, the Candelabrum was not positioned close to the Table, as is done by one who sets a table with food in order to eat there.
וַיַּעַשׂ לַבָּיִת חַלּוֹנֵי שְׁקֻפִים אֲטֻמִים״ – תָּנָא: שְׁקוּפִין מִבִּפְנִים, וַאֲטוּמִים מִבַּחוּץ, לֹא לְאוֹרָה אֲנִי צָרִיךְ.
With regard the Temple built by King Solomon, the verse states: “And he made for the House, windows narrow and broad” (I Kings 6:4). The Sages taught in a baraita: Typically, windows are constructed to widen toward the inside in order that the light from the outside would be dispersed throughout the room. For the Temple, God said: Make the windows narrow within and broad without, as I do not require its illumination. On the contrary, the light of the Temple is to be radiated outward.
״מִחוּץ לְפָרֹכֶת הָעֵדוּת בְּאֹהֶל מוֹעֵד״ – עֵדוּת הוּא לְכׇל בָּאֵי עוֹלָם שֶׁהַשְּׁכִינָה שׁוֹרָה בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל.
God instructed Aaron to kindle the Candelabrum: “Outside the Curtain of the testimony in the Tent of Meeting” (Leviticus 24:3). The dividing curtain is referred to here as: The Curtain of the testimony, to indicate that the illumination of the Candelabrum is testimony to all of humanity that the Divine Presence rests among the Jewish people.
וְאִם תֹּאמַר: לְאוֹרָה אֲנִי צָרִיךְ? וַהֲלֹא כׇּל אַרְבָּעִים שָׁנָה שֶׁהָלְכוּ יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּמִדְבָּר לֹא הָלְכוּ אֶלָּא לְאוֹרוֹ! אֶלָּא עֵדוּת הוּא לְכׇל בָּאֵי עוֹלָם שֶׁהַשְּׁכִינָה שׁוֹרָה בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל.
And if you question this and say: How is this testimony; perhaps the Candelabrum is lit for illumination? To this God would respond: Do I need its light? But isn’t it so that for all forty years that the Jewish people walked in the wilderness of Sinai until they entered Eretz Yisrael, they walked exclusively by His light, i.e., from the pillar of fire that guided them at night. If God provides light for others, he certainly does not need it Himself. Rather, evidently, the illumination of the Candelabrum is testimony to all of humanity that the Divine Presence rests among the Jewish people.
מַאי עֵדוּתָהּ? אָמַר רָבָא: זֶה נֵר מַעֲרָבִי, שֶׁנּוֹתְנִין בָּהּ שֶׁמֶן כְּנֶגֶד חַבְרוֹתֶיהָ, וּמִמֶּנָּה הָיָה מַדְלִיק, וּבָהּ הָיָה מְסַיֵּים.
What provides its testimony? Rava says: The testimony is provided by the westernmost lamp of the Candelabrum, in which they place a quantity of oil equivalent to that placed in the other lamps, and nevertheless it continues to burn longer than any of the other lamps. It burns so long that every evening, from it the priest would kindle the Candelabrum, i.e., he lit that westernmost lamp first, and the following morning, with it he would conclude the preparation of the lamps for the following evening’s lighting, because it remained alight longer than any of the other lamps. This perpetual miracle was testimony to God’s continuous presence among His people.
מַתְנִי׳ מֵאַיִן הָיוּ מְבִיאִין אֶת הַיַּיִן? קְדוֹחַיִם וַעֲטוּלַיִן – אַלְפָּא לַיַּיִן, שְׁנִיָּה לָהֶן – בֵּית רִימָּה וּבֵית לָבָן בָּהָר, וּכְפַר סִיגְנָא בַּבִּקְעָה. כׇּל אֲרָצוֹת הָיוּ כְּשֵׁרוֹת, אֶלָּא מִיכָּן הָיוּ מְבִיאִין.
MISHNA: From where would they bring the wine for libations? Keduḥim and Attulin are the primary sources for wine. Secondary to them is Beit Rima and Beit Lavan, located in the mountain, and the village of Signa, located in the valley. All the regions were valid sources for wine; but it was from here, i.e., the aforementioned locations, that they would bring the wine.
אֵין מְבִיאִין לֹא מִבֵּית הַזְּבָלִים, וְלֹא מִבֵּית הַשְּׁלָחִים, וְלֹא מִמַּה שֶּׁנִּזְרַע בֵּינֵיהֶן, וְאִם הֵבִיא – כָּשֵׁר. אֵין מְבִיאִין הַלִּיסְטְיוֹן, וְאִם הֵבִיא – כָּשֵׁר. אֵין מְבִיאִין יָשָׁן – דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי, וַחֲכָמִים מַכְשִׁירִין. אֵין מְבִיאִין לֹא מָתוֹק, וְלֹא מְעוּשָּׁן, וְלֹא מְבוּשָּׁל, וְאִם הֵבִיא – פָּסוּל. וְאֵין מְבִיאִין מִן הַדָּלִיּוֹת, אֶלָּא מִן הָרַגְלִיּוֹת, וּמִן הַכְּרָמִים הָעֲבוּדִין.
One may not bring libations of wine that come from a fertilized vineyard, or from an irrigated vineyard, or from a vineyard in which grain was sown between the vines. But if one did bring a libation from such wine, it is valid. One may not bring libations from sweet wine made from sun-dried grapes [hilyasteyon], but if one did bring a libation from such wine, it is valid. One may not bring wine aged for one year; this is the statement of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi, but the Rabbis deem it valid. One may not bring libations from sweet wine, nor from wine produced from smoked grapes, nor libations from boiled wine, and if one did bring a libation from such wine, it is not valid. And one may not bring wine produced from grapes suspended on stakes or trees; rather, one brings it from grapes at foot height, i.e., that rest on the ground, which are superior-quality grapes, and from vineyards that are cultivated, i.e., where one hoes beneath the vines twice a year.
וְלֹא כּוֹנְסִין אוֹתוֹ בַּחֲצָבִין גְּדוֹלִים, אֶלָּא בְּחָבִיּוֹת קְטַנּוֹת, וְאֵינוֹ מְמַלֵּא אֶת הֶחָבִית עַד פִּיהָ, כְּדֵי שֶׁיְּהֵא רֵיחוֹ נוֹדֵף.
And when producing wine for libations, one should not collect the wine into large barrels, as it causes the wine to spoil; rather, it should be placed in small casks. And one does not fill up the cask until its mouth; rather, one leaves some empty space so that its fragrance will collect there and diffuse when the lid is opened.
אֵינוֹ מֵבִיא מִפִּיהָ – מִפְּנֵי
One should not bring libations from wine that rests at the mouth of the cask due to
Follow
